I’m writing to report on the hunger strike from Calipatria State Prison.
Everyone here on the facility showed their support. Not all of us agreed
on the tactics that some chose to pursue but nonetheless we all
participated. Some people refused to go to work while others chose only
not to accept food. Everyone who chose not to go to work received write
ups (CDCR 115) for refusing to work and participation in security threat
group (STG) activity. So now those people have STG points against them.
Some guys were trying to force everyone not to work but calmer heads
prevailed and they allowed people to make the choice themselves.
Out of the 850 prisoners on this yard, at least 700 participated. It
only lasted for a week. The staff passed out a flyer on what can happen
medically to a person who goes without food for long periods of time.
They sent the nurse from door to door asking if people were alright but
it didn’t get to the point where they had to start weighing people.
A lot of questions are now being asked like what did that accomplish?
Although we had a high level of participation we had no one to actually
explain what the strike was for or what are the goals we are trying to
accomplish. Most guys just get involved because they were told to. The
people who are socially conscious and politically conscious didn’t want
to speak up for fear of being labeled as inciting the strike which will
land you in the SHU. A lot of guys who have been down for 30 years have
been broken and refuse to stand up to the administration.
All in all we here at Calipatria showed our support until next time.
MIM(Prisons) responds:First let us recognize what this comrade
said about prisoners receiving STG points against them for a peaceful
refusal to eat or go to work. This is what the CDCR is using to label
people a Security Threat Group member and put them in torture units for
years or even decades - the main thing that the strike is protesting in
the first place! Such outrageous injustice should fuel the struggle for
basic humyn rights in Calipatria.
Second, let’s acknowledge the amazing accomplishment of having 700 out
850 prisoners participate in a united action that was part of a planned
strategic approach towards change in the interests of all prisoners.
This is historic, and it is happening all over California!
That said, the masses are correct to ask, “What did this accomplish?”
This report exposes the importance of building political
consciousness and educating our comrades behind bars both before and
during protest actions. We must build leadership to ensure that the
political message of these protests is effectively conveyed, both to
those participating and to the target of our protests.
Of course, the application of leadership in such closely monitored
conditions should be done cautiously as the comrades in Calipatria did.
Materials like Under Lock & Key can be tools for spreading
education and providing leadership. But even then we face censorship,
and prisoners get written up just for possessing literature, which
presumably was given to them by prison mail staff in the first place.
The solutions to this are tactical questions that should be part of the
sum up of the experiences in California prisons this summer. As the
masses are struggling for answers, now is the time to step in and have
these discussions however you can in your locality. What is the opinion
of the actions? What do people think should have been done differently?
How did leadership fail, and how could you build differently in the
future? If you come up with universal conclusions send them to us to
share, however as conditions vary over time and place, most of these
conversations should be applied locally.
On the large scale we can make a few points. First, the strike was about
ending conditions of torture in California prisons, in particular in the
long-term isolation units (SHU, ASU, etc.). And the strike continues
with almost 300 people having not eaten for over 40 days according to
the CDCR, and an unknown number of others still participating who are
not being counted. So the struggle continues there.
If comrades in Calipatria are asking what their one-week actions
accomplished, we encourage them to look back at the agreement to end
hostilities and the United Front for Peace in Prisons statement on page
2 of Under Lock & Key that were used to form a basis for
the massive support seen this time around. The goals of these projects
are to unite prisoners around their mutual interests as prisoners and
prevent the state from pitting them against each other as a form of
social control. We hope that comrades in Calipatria were inspired by the
tremendous level of solidarity this author reports on. There are many
ways to build on this unity through things such as study groups, health
campaigns, literacy programs, and other forms of mutual support. In our
own work we model such programs after the Black Panthers and Chinese
Serve the People Programs, which had the purpose of providing for
survival needs pending revolution.