MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
When young Trayvon Martin was killed, people held candles and prayed to
“God.” And George Zimmerman walked away free. Then we heard of the young
brother in Missouri, unarmed yet gunned down by a pig – an amerikkkan
kolonial thug. The people held candles and quoted fables from the book
of “God.” The pig went free.
Cleveland, Ohio – Black child of twelve. Yes, Black not because of his
dark skin color, but Black because of the gaping wound to human dignity
because he was gunned down by another enforcer of white amerikkkan
privilege. The people wept and prayed while the assassin slithered away
quite free.
Then Wisconsin and another brother of African descent. Unarmed yet shot
and killed by scum who are sworn to “protect and serve.” The killer pig
was not even charged with a crime while the people sing and pray and
dance and wave candles to their “God.” But suddenly – Baltimore.
Freddy Gray killed by pigs. This time people overturn vehicles; break
into businesses; loot them; set fires; throw rocks and bottles at pigs.
And six pigs are indicted.
Perhaps “God” merely honors large candles of burning buildings and
burning cars? Or perhaps white amerikkkans only care about dead people
of color when the financial losses come to Whitey? Like when the
oppressed say, “Get your pigs under control or we will burn your fucking
city to the ground.”
Do we want social and economic justice that requires people held
accountable? Or do we want merely to whine and pray and bemoan the
injustice of the amerikkkan grand jury that failed to indict a pig who
killed a brother selling loose cigarettes? Facts reveal observable
actions leading to desired outcomes. Fables reveal actions of pointless
futility.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This writer is spot on about the failure of
prayer and kind requests to change systemic violence. It is only with
force that the imperialists will give up their guns. Yet we don’t mean
to say that we should just take up arms and act without planning and
organizing.
The righteous anger of the masses in Baltimore is a power that must be
harnessed by a revolutionary vanguard party. The oppressed can
coordinate their actions and ensure these actions are taken only when
victory is possible through strong and centralized leadership. We are
still at the stage of educating and building for revolution. Part of
this work involves spreading anti-imperialist theory to all who know
from personal oppression and experience that they must fight back,
helping them to see the bigger picture and take up leadership in the
struggle.
We must remember that in Oakland, California, cars were lit on fire and
businesses were looted in response to the murder of 22-year-old New
Afrikan Oscar Grant. Grant’s murderer, a transit cop, was indicted,
charged, and imprisoned. In the end, it was a slap on the wrist for this
blatant murder. For a period of time the state will respond to people
protesting in the streets. They may go through some motions or
formalities to appease people and quell their anger. But ultimately
there will just be more names to add to the list of oppressed nation
people killed – a list that has been growing for centuries. It should be
obvious that we need more fundamental changes to our daily life than
body cameras and reliance on our present injustice system.
Imperialism is the ravenous cancer eating away the body of humynkind.
Karnes Detention Center in Texas is owned and operated by slimy fungi in
the guise of humyns known as GEO group. And GEO group is Amerikkkan
kkkapitalists feeding at the table of suffering like worms eating the
insides of defenseless infants.
Karnes Detention Center (KDC) is one of the hundreds of torture chambers
housing lumpen who are labelled “Illegal Immigrants” by the Amerikkkan
elitists. Housed at KDC are mothers and their children. They have no
criminal backgrounds. All came to amerikkka because of persecution in
their native lands. Persecution often caused by amerikkkan kkkapitalist
intervention in the domestic affairs of those lands.
At KDC one lawyer reports seeing many children with persistent cough.
The children complained of no medical care and lack of edible food. A
three-year-old girl with asthma was told to “drink water” when her
mother sought treatment for her.
The food was pre-packaged and expired. Rotted and beyond use. The lawyer
brought cookies for them from a vending machine. One sad looking girl
held hers but did not eat. When the lawyer asked her, the tiny child
said, “I will share mine with mommy.” It was then noticed that none of
the children ate cookies until they could share with their mothers.
KDC exists because of an executive order signed by united snakes
president Obama. He reminds me of a “house nigger.” You know, the “smart
one” who looked after “Massa’s affairs,” and slept in “Massa’s house?”
The one who kept massa informed of dem dumb field niggas jes in case dey
was a plottin’ and schemin’. House nigger don’t care that his
“privilege” stands on the backs of bleeding filed workers. Chief Pig
Obama and GEO Group stock holders get tax money for crushing
undocumented children and their mothers.
Now we could discuss Obama’s overwhelming and extensive use of military
drones to kill innocent families in Third World nations. We could
discuss how house nigger plans to sell drones to other countries to
enable those countries to do “operations” that are illegal for the u.$
to perform. Or we could discuss Judge Gideon of Dewitt Town Court in New
York. He issued an Order of Protection for Colonel Earl Evans. Colonel
Evans is commander of Hancock Field where weaponized Reaper Drones are
remotely piloted to make lethal strikes in Afghanistan. These cowardly
amerikkkans fire missiles and kill innocent Afghani mothers and children
from a cozy office across half a continent and an ocean from the
victims. Slaughter without risk.
But Colonel Evans was granted an Order of Protection. He lives on a
military base surrounded by soldiers with massive weaponry who are
trained and ready to defend Colonel Evans. He needs an Order of
Protection because he wants “protection” from peace activists who stand
outside the base protesting drone warfare. And then Judge Gideon jails
those activists for violating that Order of Protection, circumventing
the First Amendment of the united snakes constipation.
Odd but I hear that old tune “London Bridge is Falling Down,” but the
word “Amerikkka” replaces “London Bridge.” May the piece of shit soon
implode. Maybe then the Afghanis can get an Order of Protection.
[Having a narrow understanding of the world makes it easier to be
manipulated into believing things that aren’t true or that are against
one’s own interests. When we say 80% of the world’s people have an
objective interest in communism, this is not just based on comparing
incomes or wealth. The imperialists try to hide the historical fact that
at one time a third of the world’s people lived in socialist systems,
and this was achieved by the valiant armed struggles of those peoples
fighting for liberation. Even beyond the borders of the socialist
countries the oppressed people of the world openly supported the
leadership of those countries, meaning the vast majority of the world’s
people supported communism as the way forward. We cannot say this today,
but the numbers are certainly higher than most are aware of. In South
Asia, in particular, Maoism has been alive and well among the masses for
decades, and consolidating its forces in recent years. Most of what is
considered South Asia is the state of India. South Asia has some of the
most densely populated regions of the world, with a population much
larger than all of North and South America combined.]
Half a century ago, India was in turmoil, with rebellions popping up in
the countryside. One such being the Marxist-led food movement of 1965
and another being a peasant revolt in 1976 in a village in West Bengal
called Naxalbari. This peasant revolt would later inspire a Maoist-led
people’s movement, which was named after the Naxalbari revolt, and
inspired by Mao Zedong’s model of agrarian reform. The rebels are today
known as “Naxalites” by the locals; we know them as the Communist Party
of India (Maoist) (CPI(Maoist)). Today they are leading the largest
Maoist struggle in the world, liberating vast areas in the jungles,
mountains, and the countryside from the neo-colonial regime of India.
The first Maoists to arrive in the jungles of Abujamarh in 1989 were
largely petty-bourgeois revolutionaries and college students from the
Indian state of Andhra Pradesh following a government crackdown on
communists in the cities. It is here that the Naxalite cadres have taken
up the people’s struggle. In the depth of the jungles the Naxalites have
found a new ally: the adivasi. Adivasi means “original people”
and they are the First Nations within India, who number 84 million, or
about 8.6% of the population. Today the Naxalite communist forces
include not only the petty bourgeoisie and college students, but also
very large numbers of revolutionaries from India’s socially
disadvantaged segment known as “the backward class.” As a matter of
fact, while the CPI(Maoist) was initially composed of various
intellectuals from the cities, it is the admixture of the intellectuals
with the peasants that has given the people’s struggle new life and
sustainability. As the struggle rages on it’s the adivasi who have taken
up leadership roles as CPI(Maoist) cadres, in particular the wimmin who,
according to reports, now make up 60% of the Maoist top hierarchy.
In India’s countryside, where 180 million exploited people survive on
less than two dollars a day; where in poor rural areas like Abujmarh the
farmers, peasants, and the poor can’t even feed themselves; where
children are malnourished and plagued by disease; the people have taken
a revolutionary stand against national oppression. They have taken up
Maoism. According to a recent National Geographic article, what
kicked up the insurrection was newly elected Prime Minister Narendra
Modi’s attraction to the country’s mineral wealth, which happens to be
in the Naxalite territories. The coal reserves being the most
attractive, the coal reserves (the fifth largest in the world) fuel the
power plants that light up India’s very distant metropolises. The
company Central Coalfields Limited (CCL), a local subsidiary of Coal
India Limited (CIL), has offered money to locals, jobs and other petty
bribes in return for the locals’ land. Some accepted the bribes, but I
wonder for how long will they last? To the peasant farmers whose
livelihood is linked to their land the state’s bribes hold little
attraction.
The bullshit money CCL offers will go as quick as it came and the petty
jobs will not last forever. What then? The people want to keep their
farmland to be able to feed their families. Many have resisted the
capitalist encroachment, but some have been unable to resist the
pressures from big business. Others have simply sold out. Since it
became law in 1894, the Land Acquisition Act (a colonial legislation
created to allow the bourgeoisie to seize land under the so-called
principal of “eminent domain”) has left millions without homes due to
the state’s mining activities. In response to this the Naxalites have
established people’s courts within both the disputed and liberated zones
so that the masses can not only put the predatory land agents on trial,
but the traitors as well. Such institutions of the oppressed are part of
the building of dual power in India, where an emerging socialist state
challenges the existing capitalist one. The people’s courts follow in
the traditions of the Bolshevik and Chinese revolutions. In particular
the latter, after Japanese imperialism’s defeat and liberation from both
British and Amerikan imperialism. With these courts the targets of the
masses were not only pro-Japanese landlords, but counter-revolutionaries
as well.
When discussing political affairs, chiefly the oppression and
exploitation of the Third World countries, people ask, what do you care?
You’re on the other side of the world. Well, as humyn beings we should
care. What the Naxalite/adivasi struggle teaches is that without
national liberation for self-determination of an oppressed nation, which
should be led by a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist vanguard, imperialist
oppression will never end. As anti-imperialists we are duty-bound to
support the struggles of the oppressed against imperialism. The adivasi
and other peasant masses are tired of foreign and domestic capital
exploiting their people and their land. The adivasi struggle is our
struggle! With unification of the masses, and with the correct
leadership of the Maoist unity, victory is on the people’s side.
excerpt from a March 2015 report from India:
“Overcoming innumerable obstacles and snatching initiative, PLGA
fighters and urban action team combatants led by the Western Ghats
Special Zonal Committee (WGSZC) of the CPI (Maoist) have opened up a new
warfront in the State of Keralam, situated along the South Western
coast of India… The necessity of taking up arms and advancing the
revolutionary war as the true means to seize and secure the rights of
the adivasis and other masses over the ‘Land, water and forests’ has
been widely propagated through these actions.
“…These actions were carried out as part of a Politico-Military
Campaign (PMC) carried out over a three month period, from November 2014
till January 2015. The aim of the campaign was to prepare the masses for
the revolutionary war, defeat the initiative and aggressiveness of the
enemy armed forces and advance the revolutionary movement…
“The successful completion of the PMC marks a qualitative turn in the
expansion of the people’s war led by the CPI (Maoist) in the country as
well as an overcoming of the stagnation faced in the armed struggle
initiated in the Western Ghats more than a decade ago in the Malnad
region of Karnataka. Facing heavy repression, the party lost 16 of its
valiant leaders and fighters, including comrades Saketh Rajan and
Rajamouli (Secretaries of Karnataka State Committee) during this period,
while striving to sink firm roots and advance the new democratic
revolution by rallying the masses. Meanwhile, efforts to initiate the
armed struggle in Tamil Nadu and Keralam too failed to get off,
suffering grievous losses of comrades who were martyred in enemy
attacks.
“…[Decades earlier] Wayanad was one of the main areas of revolutionary
struggles in Keralam inspired by the armed peasant rebellion of
Naxalbari… Keralam has a long history of communist activity and valiant
armed struggles led by the communists. When the CPI leadership deviated
into revisionism, rank and file comrades in different parts of the State
started seeking a way forward. They were attracted to the fierce
ideological struggle being waged against Khrushchev revisionism under
the leadership of Mao Tsetung.
“Ever since then Maoist led revolutionary activities has been a regular
feature of the political scene. A number of heroic armed actions were
carried out successfully. Many militant mass struggles were organised.
At different periods, youth and students came forward in large numbers
to join the revolutionary movement and serve the people. Yet all these
efforts did not lead to building a sustained and developing Maoist
movement. All throughout these decades, the revolutionary movement was
repeatedly derailed by wrong tendencies and rightist deviations.
“This was ruptured with in the early 1990s. On the one hand, a section
of comrades rebelled against the revisionist line of K. Venu, rejected
the theses that conditions in Keralam are not conducive for people’s war
and went forward. This initiative would be one of the components forming
the Maoist Unity Centre, CPI (ML), along with comrades in Maharashtra,
and then later, the CPI (ML) NAXALBARI, uniting with revolutionaries
led by the late comrade SA Rawoof. A group of comrades, who had formed a
new centre, rebelling against CPI(ML) Jana Shakthi rightist leadership,
later merged with this. Meanwhile, sections who were disgusted with the
right opportunism of the various ML parties present in Keralam rebelled
and joined the CPI (ML) People’s War in the early 1990s, which later
merged with the Maoist Communist Centre, India in 2004 to form the CPI
(Maoist). They too set out to rubbish the revisionist theses of
Keralam’s exclusivity. Both of these initiatives had been working
independently towards initiating armed struggle.”(4)
30 March 2015 - As ordered by the Federal government, the U.$. Army must
reduce Amerika’s active-duty soldier ranks by more than 40,000 by 2017.
Recently, here in Alaska, a state which, since its colonization and
subsequent possession by the United $tates, has been very heavily
subsidized by government funding, large crowds of predominantly white
petty-bourgeoisie turned out to demonstrate and rally against the
military cuts. The reason? Some 10,000 troops and their families may
leave the state, causing 1 billion dollars in losses to the state
economy.(1) In other words, large groups of social parasites, living off
the largess of their imperial overlord in Washington and the Pentagon,
and the sub-parasites who feed off the primary parasites’ existence,
stand to lose their stable and guaranteed incomes and relatively high
standards of living (gained mainly from the oppression and exploitation
of the Third World and enforced by the same military) and may need to
find other ways to support themselves.
The “Rally For Our Troops,” attended by more than 400 people, was
organized by Anchorage, Alaska-based business, civic and municipal
organizations and was aimed at sparing cuts to Anchorage’s joint base
Elmendorf-Richardson and Fort Wainwright in Fairbanks. Alaska has more
veterans per capita than any other state, and in the so-called
“worst-case scenario,” as many as 10,800 troops and 19,000 dependents
could be forced to depart, amounting to a loss of about 4 percent of
Alaska’s population.(1) This is not surprising, as some estimates place
the amount of the working population associated with government
employment as high as 60%.
Of course, the event began with a resounding display of the
imperialists’ early indoctrination and brainwashing of the young through
a performance of a local middle school’s Drum Corps and Flag Team,
accompanied by hundreds of others waving little Amerikan flags and
cheering. After the initial show, the discussion began around convincing
the four-person army committee present of the “strategic importance” of
the main unit (4th brigade/25th infantry combat team).
The local community concern over losing Army Combat Brigades is
economic. It could cost the state 1 billion dollars in economic impact,
according to Bill Popp, Anchorage Economic Development corporation
President and one of the rally coordinators.(1) That, along with the
expected population decrease aforementioned, is the overriding concern
for businesses and many concerned participants. Hence, we are here
confronted with a major historic and pernicious problem with such
outlooks: that being the insipid and persistent factor of self-interest
and economic dependence of a large percentage of the Amerikan labor
aristocracy on the continuation and preservation of imperialism and its
most oppressive and pervading manifestation, the military industrial
complex.
The labor aristocracy’s support of imperialism coupled with the
strategic concerns of the ruling class in perpetuating global capitalist
domination via military and political power are two of the biggest foes
of the international proletariat in achieving socialist revolution and
change in the world today. The front-line defense of any existing,
regular administration and order of imperialist rule is its police and
regular army, and will be deployed against the will of the revolution
when it comes. It will undoubtedly obey its political and economic
masters. History is replete with examples of the U.$. military being
unleashed not only on the international proletariat to further the
interests of the imperialists in their unceasing quest for strategic
domination and natural resource/labor exploitation, but also on internal
colony repression and domestic discontent control. The U.$. military,
just as much as the prison system, is an inherent and vital mechanism
for social control and the protection of the established order.
Historical instances abound around the world where the military and U.$.
troops were used to break workers’ strikes, put down political and
social demonstrations, and help corporate power exploit and repress the
working class and quash popular discontent with governmental policy.
Often times they use quite brutal and violent means and tactics,
including blatant murder of citizens, armed or not. Troops have also
been used to entrench and enforce racial and economic inequality and
conserve the status quo.
To illustrate a few examples of domestic military oppression: from very
early on, continuing right through to almost the mid-20th century and
including sporadic examples even in the present day, the military was
very frequently called out to suppress and eliminate labor disputes and
strikes all over the United $tates at the bidding of their corporate
masters in Washington. This occurred primarily in the days when a true
economic and political proletariat existed within the U.$. borders. One
example of this type of domestic military oppression was the infamous
“Ludlow Massacre” of 1914, in which the Colorado Fuel and Iron
Corporation, owned by the Rockefeller family, used murder, beatings,
imprisonments and gun attacks to break the strike of thousands of
deplorably-exploited foreign-born miners, employing the Army National
Guard to do so. At one point, the National Guard opened fire with
machine guns on an encampment housing hundreds of women and children,
which resulted in the deaths of 11 children and 2 wimmin after the Guard
set fire to their tents with torches.(2) Less than 60 years later,
another Rockefeller was responsible for the brutal Attica prison
massacre, once against perpetrated by the Army National Guard.(3)
During the civil rights era, military attacks occurred against Black
demonstrators repeatedly, such as happened in Watts, Los Angeles,
Detroit and Chicago, with numerous accounts of brutality committed on
peaceable demonstrators and even mere bystanders. In Ohio, college
students demonstrating against the imperialist Vietnam War were mowed
down by Federal troops. The list of such barbaric and repressive actions
against U.$. citizens by military agencies is far too long to include
here, but just these few examples should show succinctly how willing and
ready U.$. military forces can and will be in violently confronting
anyone who poses any challenge to the Amerikan status quo and
imperialist agenda.
Even soldiers themselves can become victims of imperialist greed. In
both the Vietnam and Iraq wars thousands of veterans were for years
denied medical care or even recognition of numerous insidious maladies,
many life-threatening, resulting from munitions or chemicals used by the
military in those wars: Agent Orange in Vietnam, uranium=tipped shells
and inoculations for chemical warfare in Iraq, and other causes of “Gulf
War Syndrome” in Iraq. Of course, all this says nothing for the
countless thousands of indigenous victims of these brutal wars of
imperialist oppression, many civilians and children, who get no help at
all from the Amerikan government since such statistics aren’t kept by
the Pentagon.
The imperialists create new threats and dangers to justify ongoing
funding to the already enormous Amerikan military. The “Cold War” and
the “War on Terror” are just two examples of these excuses for
maintaining a hugely bloated military establishment. As leftist
political commentator Noam Chomsky wrote: “the appeal to security is
largely fraudulent, the Cold War framework having been employed as a
device to justify the suppression of independent nationalism - whether
in Europe, Japan or the Third World.” As Maoists, we recognize that it
includes the suppression of internal colonies within the United $tates
as well.
Of course, the biggest threat to any revolutionary movements is the
standing army, which reactionary and counter-revolutionary factions and
governments will not hesitate to use, unleashing military personnel and
arms against citizens who pose any threat or challenge to the
establishment. As was seen in the 1917 Russian Revolution, reactionary
generals such as Kornilov and Kaledin initiated counter-revolutionary
attacks against the newly-formed Soviets, and the Western imperialist
powers inserted military forces in an intervention aimed at undermining
the socialists and keeping Russia embroiled in the inter-imperialist
world war.(4)
Revolutionary activists need to confront rallies like the one held in
Anchorage with their own counter-rallies opposing military spending and
maintenance. Those under lock and key can write letters and send
petitions to representatives, suggesting more funds be spent for
educational, nutritional or medical programs for the dispossessed and
recently-imprisoned as opposed to military funding. Any opposition to
military expenditure and activity is desirable as first steps toward the
future of socialism in imperialist Amerika. Don’t let the official,
unceasing propaganda in the media (i.e., ISIS, Russia/Putin, etc) fool
anyone - the imperialist military establishment needs to be opposed at
all levels and through all possible endeavors by all committed
socialists, even if it conflicts with relations to family members who
may be enlisted. Every dollar spent on military funding should be seen
as one less morsel for food, one less book or pen, or one less dose of
life-saving medicine for the world’s proletariat. And now with
imperialist defenders and lap dogs like Representative John Boehner
asking for increased funding for military and “national security” in the
face of the continuing “ISIS” farce and propaganda, and U.$. Senator Dan
Sullivan proclaiming that “he who owns Alaska owns the entire world”
(statements from U.$. politicians don’t get more imperialist-minded than
that!), we can see that the Amerikan imperialists will continue to use
any excuse to perpetuate the money pit and pig sty that is the U.$.
military establishment and its presence both domestic and abroad.
Socialists everywhere must hold it as among the highest priorities to
organize and act against this greatest of threats to humynity and
equality.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This writer does a good job explaining the
importance of opposing the U.$. military and the reasons why so many
Amerikans support this imperialist army. S/he proposes that we take
action by demanding that the money currently funding the military be
instead used to help provide food, medicine and education for the
international proletariat. As a goal for improving the lives of the
world’s people we certainly agree. But we do not see this as a winnable
battle under imperialism. As the author explains, the Amerikan military
is a tool of U.$. imperialism: it’s purpose is to keep the people around
the world in line so that imperialist corporations can exploit the
workers and steal the natural resources. This colonialism is fundamental
to the economic model of imperialism. Calling on the Amerikan government
to voluntarily redirect military funds to the very people that military
is helping to oppress and exploit is not a battle we can win with words
alone.
It will take the forcible overthrow of the imperialist government before
they will lay down their weapons and give up their wealth. History has
shown this time and again: peaceful revolutions are not really
revolutions at all. By playing their game and asking kindly for the
government to redirect military funds to humanitarian needs we give the
imperialists the chance to pretend they are actually working in the
interests of the people. We should not mislead people into thinking this
is possible. Any so-called humanitarian work by the imperialists is just
a cover for their brutal militarism.
This author is correct: “Every dollar spent on military funding should
be seen as one less morsel for food, one less book or pen, or one less
dose of life-saving medicine for the world’s proletariat.” The urgency
of the situation can not be overstated, people around the world are
dying while Amerikans are rallying for expansion of the imperialist
military.
En realidad, la celebración de Agosto Negro debería ser todo el año.
Solo nosotros(as) podemos hacer que esto cambie. Carter G. Woodson es el
creador de la semana de historia Afro-Americana (Black history week), y
50 años después tenemos mes de historial Afro-Americana (Black history
month). Para los(as) que no tienen conocimiento de Agosto Negro, este
mes se celebran a los(as) “luchadores(as) de libertad.” El color de la
piel es irrelevante. Te amo hermana Marilyn Buck (descansa en poder),
Lolita Lebron (descansa en poder), y Silvia Berrideni, entre otras que
no eran de color negro. Pero ellas eran negras. Porque para el(a)
oprimido(a) de cualquier nacionalidad, negro no es un color.
Negro es un establecimiento creado para proteger los derechos civiles de
uno(a). Negro es valentía. Negro es motivación propia para ganar. Negro
es visión. Negro es respeto. Negro es amor. Negro es lealtad. Negro es
unidad. Negro es orgullo. Negro(a) eres tu! Además y más importante,
negra soy yo!
Colectivamente, estas expresiones de cariño negras somos nosotros(as)
(por ejemplo, soldados unidos y soldadas unidas). Por esto creo que
Agosto Negro, la celebración de luchadores(as) de libertad, debería ser
todo el año.
En preparación para esta celebración, estoy llamando a todos los(as)
camaradas que escojan a un(a) luchador(a) de libertad de su preferencia
y sometan una redacción de 250 palabras de su escogido(a) luchador(a) de
libertad, escribe porque lo(a) selecionaste y el impacto que éste(a)
luchador(a) de libertad tuvo en tí. En solidaridad con Bajo Llave y
Candado (BLC), (Under Lock & Key en inglés) estoy llamando a
todos(as) los(as) leyentes de BLC que participen. Aunque cada artículo
no sea publicado por limitaciones financieras y por espacio, su
participación no será ignorada. Fortalezcamos a la voz de BLC. Porque si
somos considerados la voz de BLC y no la fortalecemos, ¿quién lo hará?
La unidad es una herramienta poderosa cuando es aplicada adecuadamente.
Unámosnos en vez de destruirnos.
El MIM(Prisiones) añade: Decidimos aceptar la llamada de este
camarada para la presentación de redacciones de luchadores(as) de
libertad todo el año, anunciandola durante Agosto Negro y siguiendo con
la publicación de redacciones sometidas por leyentes de BLC en futuros
ejemplares. De importancia particular en esta llamada, es el
entendimiento que todos(as) los(as) prisioneros(as) son prisioneros(as)
políticos(as) y por eso no solo identificamos a luchadores(as) de
libertad como personas que fueron famosas por su activismo político
antes de que fueron puestos(as) bajo llave y candado. En cambio,
sugerimos que piensen de prisioneros(as) que te han influido en una
manera positiva, incluyendo esos(as) que no han escrito libros o
recibido atención por la prensa. Celebremos a todos(as) los(as)
luchadores(as) de libertad y esforcemosnos en ser luchadores(as) de
libertad nosotros(as) mismos(as).
It’s a beautiful thing when I read about the struggle for social justice
and liberation of the oppressed, especially when it is prisoners who are
developing politically or ex-prisoners who are released and get involved
in activism of various sorts. The lumpen have a hystory of rising up in
struggle against injustice. We see this when reading about Attica, the
San Quentin six, and the California hunger strikes, as well as in the
many revolutionary groups which developed within prisons. This is great,
of course, but our development, actions, and theory should be based in
science.
Science keeps us grounded in reality; it helps us proceed and understand
the way things are. The opposite of science would be faith, a hunch, or
metaphysical concepts in general. As revolutionaries we use the
scientific method to make decisions on how we interact with the world we
live in. The scientific method relies on observation and experimentation
with the world that we live in so that we fully understand it and thus
transform it.
Science, then, is a tool which helps us make the proper decisions and
enables scientific leadership, focused on truth and reality. Scientific
leadership allows for one to percieve truth because one studies
hystorical events which have been tested and experimented with. Learning
from all of this allows scientific leadership to make real power moves
which advance the people, as opposed to decisions based on idealism or
lofty visions.
What Does Scientific Leadership Look Like?
How much leadership can accomplish depends on whether it is scientific
leadership or not. For example, scientific leadership in a political
movement must study the world’s hystorical movements to see what in
hystory has worked, which social experiments have been successful and
which have not.
By studying movements and revolutions one would know better than to
invest time and programs on Trotskyism because one would quickly see
that it has yet to liberate a people anywhere in the world. Science
shows that Maoism was most successful because, among other things, it
teaches that even after a nation is liberated class struggle continues –
even after socialist revolution. Understanding this will reveal why
nations such as Vietnam flip-flopped back to capitalism after
liberation; it’s because the leadership were not Maoists and did not
accept that class struggle continues. In short they did not have
scientific leadership.
Within prisons it becomes easy to stray off the path of science because
in so many ways our methods for surviving in these dungeons and the ways
we cope with an unbearable existence may not be anchored in our best
interests. Because we are placed in survival mode by the state the
minute we are imprisoned it becomes easy to try to come up at another
prisoner’s expense, but this method is incorrect and parasitic.
When we study hystory we learn that people around the world did not
liberate themselves and their people by preying on other similarly
situated or oppressed people. They did so by struggling together for
their collective interests. One cannot at the same time exploit their
own people and free them. Attempting to advance one’s own people in
order to better exploit them amounts to bourgeois nationalism. This is
not scientific leadership because it means the leadership did not learn
from hystorical cases of bourgeois revolutions.
Studying revolutionary nationalism reveals what scientific leadership
looked like for oppressed nations. Mao’s China gave us the greatest
example of this so far. But Mao used science to continuously break
ground and lead the social forces out of the woods of ignorance and
dead-end politics. As he put it:
“Natural science is one of man’s weapons in his fight for freedom.
For the purpose of attaining freedom in society, man must use social
science to understand and change society and carry out social
revolution. For the purpose of attaining freedom in the world of nature
man must use natural science to understand, conquer and change nature
and thus attain freedom from nature.”(1)
As Mao explains above, people seeking to push a movement forward
must harness natural science and learn from our reality. Prisoners in
our microcosm must do the same. Our “freedom” within U.$. prisons does
not translate to seizing state power today, but the beauty of Maoism is
that we can apply these teachings to our own environment, even the
prison environment. Our freedom in U.$. prisons should be freedom from
torture, freedom from abuse and other forms of oppression. We should
seek freedom in the realm of ideas where we can read and write without
censorship. We should be free to socialize and form study groups and
politically educate our fellow prisoners without fear of being
brutalized by the state or stuffed in a control unit.
The scientific leadership within U.$. prisons is a minority and is
most reflective in the pages of Under Lock & Key. If Maoism
is the highest or most scientific ideology today, then Maoist prisoners
are the scientific leadership in U.$. prisons, even if we are not yet
currently “in power” within U.$. prisons.
A scientific leadership should ensure that its people are a politically
educated people. To monopolize on knowledge and hoard education within a
chosen few means that should these leaders get slammed down in the hole
or control unit the masses become lost. This is why educating the people
is something that should be constantly focused on. Building cadre is
investing in a movement’s future.
Can the People be Led Without Science?
Prison can be a brutal environment. In the old days it was the most
brutal who rose to the top of the heap and led, although it may have
been down a dead-end road. Without understanding who is oppressing you,
the oppressor will not only continue to oppress you, but you’ll end up
focusing on those who are not oppressing you. You consequently never dig
yourself out of the hole that you don’t even realize you are in.
Unfortunately the people can be, and in many cases are, led by
unscientific leadership. The prison rebellion in Santa Fe, New Mexico
was a concrete example of what happens when leadership is not based in
the scientific method. Violence and parasitism are promoted rather than
steering the people toward liberation. Lumpen organizations (LOs) that
are not scientific will more often than not be swayed to
lumpen-on-lumpen crime. They are not looking at their social reality
from political lenses and instead they will look more to immediate needs
and self-gratification. This is the breeding ground for escapism and
individualism. This does nothing to combat the oppressor and almost
always reinforces national oppression.
Unscientific leadership is not a revolutionary leadership. It is not for
the people’s real interest and will never get past making a little money
here and there and gaining some recognition from those in prisons and
other lumpen, while never rebuilding their nation or contributing to
freeing their nation.
This means that people will be led, but it will be down a path which
leads nowhere productive. If anything, it is a path which helps destroy
their own people. Their goals will remain in self-destructive behavior
which works alongside the state in many ways. The un-scientific approach
ends up being an enabler to the state and one’s very own national
oppression. One essentially ends up tying the knots for our oppressor
which binds us, helpless and vulnerable.
So What is Scientific Leadership For?
Ultimately people are led towards a goal. Scientific leadership is
communist and working toward liberating oppressed people. Prisoners
within U.$. borders are mostly from the internal semi-colonies, so for
us scientific leadership works toward independence from Amerikkka. All
of our decisions as a scientific leadership should be with the intent of
inching closer to our goal of liberating our nation(s) and obtaining
complete independence.
Emancipation will take work, but prisoners can contribute in many ways.
Scientific leaders within U.$. prisons should first identify their
political hystory and who they are as a nation. This means guiding one’s
flock to also understand who they are and to become politically
educated. Independent institutions need to be created, which includes
revolutionary publications. Those who are already politically conscious
need to be harnessed so that they can be political instructors for those
who do not yet grasp their political reality. Liberation schools need to
be created, and better relations with others who are similarly situated
and oppressed need to be coordinated.
Outside political institutions also need to be created which help link
people outside prison walls with our imprisoned struggles for justice in
these concentration camps. We can still hustle in prisons, but our
hustles should not oppress others and our hustles should not be for our
own come up, but for building our revolutionary movement.
At the end of the day the role of the imprisoned scientific leadership
is to transform prisons, to revolutionize the prisons. Our aim is
freedom. We cannot shy away from the very real contradictions that exist
within the lumpen population. There is a lot of work to do, but things
are changing and the imprisoned lumpen are becoming more and more
conscious. This is reflected in many things, from more frequent prison
uprisings, more imprisoned revolutionary organizations springing up,
more prison theoreticians developing ideology, and most importantly more
lumpen unity behind prison walls. All of this and more points to the
imprisoned lumpen acquiring more scientific leadership. Imprisoned
revolutionaries should help accelerate these developments because this
is what all LOs originated for in the beginning, for their people to be
free from oppression behind prison walls.
As early as October 2012, the administrators of California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) have relentlessly advocated to the
public how the step-down program (SDP) is an improvement upon the gang
validation policies/practices that previously existed. But history
informs us that any mantra of change being presented by the powers that
be means more of the same, literally.
On a day in March 2015, I was the sole prisoner transferred out of
Corcoran SHU via special transportation, as the warden issued some type
of “special order” for me to be housed at CCI Tehachapi SHU. I have yet
to see this “special order.” I’m not going to get into the litany of
horrendous living conditions that exist here at this point and time,
however, I’ve witnessed countless prisoners be issued bogus rule
violation reports (CDC 115 RVRs) and then coerced to start over and
repeat the step that they were just in. This subjects the prisoner to
being interned to indefinite solitary confinement status once again, as
there are no mechanisms in place that would prohibit and/or prevent this
process from reoccurring. It’s nothing more than the same old barbaric
and dehumanizing gang validation policies and practices.
For example, the most prominent reason for prisoners being issued CDC
115 RVRs is because their name has been found in a “kite” that was
written by another prisoner. Not only is this contrary to our primary 5
core demands from the mass hunger strikes, in relation to behavior-based
“individual accountability,” but it is also contrary to the new SDP
policy. In particular, CDCR memorandum dated 9 August 2013 states in
part on page 4:
“At times this information includes a list of names or other
personal information being found in another offender’s possession that
has some nexus to STG activity or behavior. During the DRB reviews, the
offender whose name is simply on the list (versus the individual being
in actual possession of the list) will not be held accountable for the
contents.”
But wait, it gets even better my people. While at Corcoran,
counter-intelligence officer S. Niehus searched my personal legal
property in February 2015 and stole (“confiscated”) my legal exhibits
for active legal cases under the false premise of it being gang-related
contraband. In my first level 602 appeal interview with Institutional
Gang Investigator Sergeant Pierce, he told me:
“Corcoran’s litigation office has confirmed [your] active legal
cases and that the confiscated materials were indeed legal exhibits for
said court cases, but he is going to retain possession of them, as CDCR
has deemed the materials to be gang-related contraband per CCR Title 15
Section 3378.”
It can’t be both ways! Either they’re legal exhibits or not. This type
of subjective rationale makes it fundamentally impossible to challenge
these bogus allegations of gang activity, because no sooner do we get
evidence that refutes these ridiculous allegations, it is then stolen
under the falsity of being gang-related. How is this not more of the
same old policies and practices? But more importantly, how can we win
under these circumstances? It is imperative that the people send letters
and emails to M.D. Stainer, Susan Hubbard, Scott Kernan and others in
CDCR’s headquarters in Sacramento, California to voice your outrage on
this contradiction.
MIM(Prisons) adds: In the meantime, we will also fight from the
angle of publicizing these abuses via our independent media resources
(Under Lock & Key and prisoncensorship.info). We also fight
injustice by offering educational materials and study groups to raise
the political understanding of anyone with an interest in putting a
permanent end to false imprisonment, torture via inhumane long-term
isolation, and an oppressive state and military which tries to bully the
entire world. The more we understand our oppression, the better equipped
we will be to fight against it effectively.
I am writing to add on to the article that you ran in the
January/February 2015
edition of Under Lock & Key, titled
“Texas
Hides Grievance Manual.” Frank Hoke also has it that once you sign
in to the law library, we are not allowed to leave and go to the
bathroom the entire session. If we do go, we have to put everything up,
leave our legal material in the law library, go to the restroom, and
when we come back we have to sit by the door doing nothing until count
clears. We have not been able to find this in any directive and since we
cannot find it or it is not listed in the new January 2015 edition of
the Offender Orientation Handbook (of which I have the only copy on this
unit, since my family printed it off the TDCJ website). We are going to
fight it since this policy is denying us our access to the courts. Also
in the new orientation handbook, it states that the law library is to be
open for one session on Saturdays, and this does not happen. I am going
to work on that since it denies us access to the courts.
In recent years we’ve seen the consolidation of the movement to end
long-term isolation in U.$. prisons. This has been an issue the Maoist
Internationalist Movement, and others, have focused on for decades
because they determined that it was an important contradiction between
the oppressors and the oppressed in the United $tates. It’s taken some
time, but that analysis seems to be proving true as the movement is
gaining traction.
Another issue that we have reported on over the years has been that of
police brutality, and in particular police killings. In recent years,
this too has emerged as a flashpoint issue. After many incidents that
provoked local and ongoing responses, Ferguson took it to another level,
and now Baltimore has further pushed the issue and begun to draw lines
in the sand.
Just as the state attacked the anti-SHU movement for being a bunch of
gangbangers just looking out for themselves, the question of oppressed
nation unity across lumpen organizations has come to the forefront in
Ferguson and Baltimore. In Baltimore, the Nation of Islam held a press
conference with members of Blood and Crip organizations that led to a
lot of press coverage. During the uprising, those organizations were on
the streets protecting New Afrikan-owned businesses and community
members. As they attempted to show their ability to do for their
community what the police claimed but failed to do, the state tried to
paint them as a bunch of cop killers in the media.
A controversial hypothesis that we have put forth is that we should look
to the oppressed nation lumpen and lumpen organizations to find a mass
base for revolutionary organizing in the United $tates. We see the
social forces involved in the struggles against long-term isolation and
police killing as providing evidence in support of this hypothesis. We
have looked at this question in depth and think there is enough evidence
to support this as a valid scientific theory. One source of confirmation
we get from this is the support we get from the oppressed nation lumpen.
One comrade from Baltimore wrote to us further illuminating the
connection between our prison work and the anti-police movement today:
“I am a former eminent member of the 5-Deuce Hoover Crips in the
Northeast region of Baltimore city. Currently, I am serving out a long
prison sentence in Maryland. I am writing to you in regards to the riots
and the looting and the unorganized protest that took place 27 April
2015. I can’t say that I’m surprised, nor can I say I seen it coming;
but you must know that if the melee on April 27 didn’t happen when it
did, it still would have taken place somewhere further down the line. Do
I condone the actions of misled, poorly-educated youth and mindless
adults during the date of Freddie Gray’s burial? No, I do not!
“I knew Freddie personally so know his death is agonizing and he’ll be
missed. It is such a crying shame it took the misplaced anger and rage
of Baltimore’s youth to get the governor, mayor, city’s councilpeople,
etc. off their hindparts to ‘work actively’ with the protestors and
conduct an investigation of Freddie Gray’s death. Every big shot wants
to say how good of a city Baltimore is, yet the justice system is
corrupt, and our ‘city leaders’ are corrupt…
“There is good in Balti but those ghettos around the realm of the city
are truculent. Not because there’s direct destruction, but because right
now it is the blind leading the blind. Those same misled youth who
rioted April 27 will soon grow to be adults who will be misleading the
next generation. Baltimore city needs help, in its ghettos and its
prisons. In short, legislation has to make some changes with its
shielding of police who break the law and violate the rights of the
civilians.”
Certainly there is much to be done in all areas where there is mass
opposition to police brutality. And we do not see any possible solution
from a state whose interests the police are serving. The struggle to
transform spontaneous uprisings into long-term organizing is one that
the movement has faced for decades. The increase in frequency and size
of such uprisings is the quantitative change in this contradiction
between the oppressed nations and the imperialist state. The
transformation from spontaneous to organized, concerted movements is the
qualitative change that must happen to keep the struggle advancing. And
the lumpen organizations themselves must transform in order to play an
effective leadership role in that process.
Some in the oppressed nations are frustrated with the slow pace of
change. No doubt there have been a lot of peace treaties and calls from
lumpen organizations to be forces for the community that have not always
panned out to be all that we had hoped for. But just as there were
countless uprisings to overthrow slavery before enough quantitative
change had occurred in society to be successful, we are now in a stage
where we see many efforts to form national unity in New Afrika and to
politicize lumpen organizations. These efforts are part of the
quantitative change that has not yet made a qualitative leap to a new
stage of struggle. This is a process that faces setbacks from state
interference, but also responds to state interference with further
radicalization and mobilization.
Another sign that the movement is advancing is that lines are being
drawn between enemies and friends. It is becoming clear that many who
claim to oppose racism and police brutality actually care more about
private property and business as usual. So the progressive facade of
these forces is being torn off as they come face-to-face with the
unrefined reality of mass uprisings. But just as those false friends
become alienated from the struggle against police killings, the masses
who have a real interest in change will become energized by a movement
as it becomes more real and relatable.
Becoming more real requires having an analysis of the situation that is
based in materialism; that is real. The more our analysis reflects
reality and is able to harness the forces of change that are present,
the more support we will gain from those forces of change. Many people
are still stuck in metaphysical ways of thinking. They think this is
just the way things are and they will never change. Such people conclude
that the best thing to do is to try to avoid conflict with the
oppressor, keep your head down and just try to get by.
The dominant Amerikan analysis is also metaphysical and misleads the
masses who might otherwise be supportive of dialectical materialist
analysis. Racism is a metaphysical view of sociology. Using an
individualist approach to sociological questions, or replacing
psychology for sociology, is also metaphysical. Sociology studies groups
of humyns and can be used to predict how they will behave; psychology
studies individual humyns and attempts to predict how they will behave.
The metaphysical line goes that there are bad cops and there are bad
people who go to the protests. These bad people must be rooted out and
punished. As sociologists, we disagree, as this does not address the
source of the conflict.
The racist version is that these looters are thugs who have nothing to
do with Gray. If we look at history, these types of occurrences in
similar communities in the United $tates are almost always in the
response to the killing of New Afrikans by the U.$. state. This would
lead the scientific mind to develop a hypothesis that there is some
connection between the two. To test this hypothesis we could search
history for incidents when large groups of people loot stores when there
wasn’t a New Afrikan killed. If we find few-to-no examples of this, and
find many examples of the first situation, we might raise our hypothesis
to a theory, that can be used as a predictive tool.
In contrast, Amerikans say the people in Baltimore who looted stores are
opportunists, using the protests as an excuse to act out their real
goals. Like getting some free Doritos is a higher priority for them than
getting justice for the countless New Afrikans who have faced abuse and
murder under Amerikan occupation. Such a nihilistic view is almost
laughable. But let’s entertain it a little further. If we are to oppose
this position, we should propose a better explanation for the behavior
of many of the youth in Baltimore recently. As our comrade wrote, it is
a blind leading the blind problem, but why is that? Are New Afrikans
just not smart enough to figure out how to respond effectively? He
further wrote:
“I am a 25 year old Black man who taught myself how to read while
incarcerated. After being sent to prison a third time I learned my true
calling. There’s so much more to life, I am trying my hardest to be an
activist behind the prison walls and when I make it out on the streets.
I know first hand how it feels to be those Black children who’ve been
mis-educated and unheard, so the only way to express your emotions is
through lashing out because you don’t know any other way. The police
used to beat and harass me every single day because of my position in
the Crips, because I wasn’t properly educated, and because they had the
power. I’m no saint, but a lot of things I went through and/or other
Black children endured with police brutality often times was uncalled
for.
“If the shoe was on the other foot and someone killed a police officer,
there wouldn’t be a waiting period or an investigation to lock the
person up. The police might even go as far as persecution (execution
style) of the person themselves. The video clips taken during the
occurrence of Freddie Gray’s death should render enough information for
all of those cops involved to be taken into custody (without bail) until
a trial date is arranged.”
Let’s analyze this a little further. We live in a capitalist society,
where the primary motivator that keeps things moving is profit. Our
country is an imperialist country, that has always used force to kill
and steal from people to increase its wealth. When New Afrikans walk
around with $ signs hanging from their necks, and big portraits of
Benjamin Franklin on the back of their jeans, is there any doubt that
they are reflecting the dominant ideology of capitalism? On the other
hand, whenever a New Afrikan movement has arisen that promotes
socialism, communism, cooperative economics or anything of the sort,
they have faced repression. People who led New Afrikan youth against
capitalism have been imprisoned and killed. Could these be explanations
of why New Afrikan youth today are often caught up in fetishizing money
and wealth? Because they’ve been terrorized into it? The individualist
will pretend these things don’t matter and that it’s up to the
individual to make the right decisions, even when the individual does
not have all the information or knowledge they would need to do so
because that information has been purposely and systematically kept from
them. It amounts to blaming the victim.
Of course, a real Amerikan patriot supports the First Amendment, so they
will say “I support the protesters, but I oppose the looters.” The petty
bourgeois class interest is not hard to see in this dominant narrative.
People are literally putting more weight on private property than a New
Afrikan’s life. They might respond, that to put it such a way is a false
dichotomy, because it was not a situation where we either break some
windows and save Gray’s life or let Gray die at the hands of police. But
this again is based on their individualist worldview. In their view,
each incident is unique and isolated between the individuals involved
and must be assessed as such. There is no consideration of the
possibility of the mass uprising in Baltimore leading to a surge in
organizing, that then contributes to a new revolutionary movement that
30 years from now has put an end to imperialism in this country so that
New Afrikans’ lives are no longer threatened by police.
The more we look at the big picture, the worse things are for the
defenders of capitalism. When we look at the big picture we see things
like 80% of the world’s people have a material interest opposed to
capitalism because their basic needs are not being met. And that
capitalism has only been around for a few hundred years, a blip on the
timeline of humyn history. And that all systems change, all empires
fall. This constant change is a part of the dialectical worldview.
This is why Mao talked about science being on the side of the
oppressed. Injustice is an objective fact. And the solutions to the
problems our society faces today are found in a thorough analysis of
that society.
We commend our comrade from Baltimore for taking the journey of teaching
himself to become an activist to serve the people. But how does one go
about learning in an effective way? There is so much information out
there, so many books and groups and so little time. Making effective use
of the collective knowledge of humynkind requires using the correct
scientific methods, and comparing different practices to see which ones
have worked. We hope this issue of ULK gives our readers some
guidance in this process of judging truth and knowledge. As always, we
have study materials that go more deeply into this than we can here in
ULK where we try to focus on news and agitation. Issue 45 of
ULK will focus on the practical side of how to organize study
groups in prison, and the question of how do we teach basic skills like
literacy. We hope those of you with experience will contribute to that
issue and help build the quantitative change that must come from the
oppressed masses themselves for any systematic change to take place.
My strive is to liberate So with my scribe I demonstrate Teaching
those education who seek to be free So with their own two eyes, the
truth they will see Oppressors abuse their authority with fallacious
tendencies To whom do officers rehabilitate, it ain’t you or me If
I could liberate just one, maybe two, or even three They will know
the cause of a revolutionary Realizing that one can make a
difference Look at Malcolm X or Nat Turner for instance Each with
their own position in the cause So this is why I strive to perfect my
flaws For their descendants is why my ancestors died So regardless
if I fail at least I tried