What is Mental Health?
Starting with the basics: what is often referred to as the “mind” is a
complex collection of biochemical reactions that occur in the humyn
brain, a physical object. To take a materialist approach to mental
health, we must not talk about the “mind” as a separate entity from the
physical body. The belief that there is a mind or spirit separate from
the physical being is a concept called dualism and is at the
basis of most idealist philosophies in the world today.
Applying a basic concept of probability to genetics and biology we can
accept that there are going to be humyns that are born with brains that
have physical characteristics that lead them to function different than
normal, and in some cases that will mean these individuals are less
capable of basic humyn functions. That said, the complex biochemistry of
the brain is susceptible to all sorts of outside influences from even
before an animal is born. These include chemicals in the form of food,
medicine and environmental pollutants, as well as physical conditions
that induce biochemical responses within the body, such as stress,
isolation, and irregular daylight cycles. Therefore, most discussions of
inborn psychological disorders lack a scientific basis, as scientists
cannot control the myriad of outside factors that influence the brain
throughout an animal’s lifespan.
A sociological approach shows that mental health has strong connections
to gender oppression. In,
Getting
Clarity on what Gender Oppression is, MC5 defined gender as being
found in leisure-time, related to pleasure. Therefore depression, an
extreme lack of pleasure, and the alienation that leads to it is largely
shaped in the realm of gender. In MIM Theory 9, there is a
focus on the disproportionate mental health struggles of wimmin and
youth. As we laid out in more detail in
Gender
Oppression in U.$. Prisons (ULK 1), lumpen youth are gender
oppressed by Amerikan biowimmin, and are some of the most gender
oppressed within U.$. borders. We suspect prisoners suffer more from
mental health problems than wimmin and youth in the United $tates.
The Scientific Method
The bourgeois approach to conflict and problem solving is
individualistic. When problems are dealt with on the individual level,
only a few problems are solved and then held up as examples that
“anyone” can achieve, but most problems are either not solved in the
first place, or recur soon after they are solved. Communists, on the
other hand, work in the interests of the vast majority in the world
today who are oppressed by the powerful. Our strategy is to solve
problems at the group level, and mental health is no exception.
While dialectical materialists often refer to themselves as scientists,
this does not mean that all scientific work is for the benefit of the
people. A more pointed attack would be asking questions like, “what type
of science spends millions of dollars studying the effects of long-term
isolation on brain waves?” Maoists abolished isolation as a form of
psychological treatment in the 1950s. Prior to that time, psychological
work in socialist China was criticized by the people because it
consisted largely of scientists in labs doing studies isolated from the
real world. For a discipline that is supposedly about the mental state
of people, which is very dependent on society, this is a very backwards
approach. As a result of criticisms, the Chinese practice evolved to
focus on improving people’s understanding and engagement with the real
world. But today, under imperialism, we are still stuck in these archaic
forms of mental health research.(1)
As the 1st Crown of BORO describes in h
article
on psychology, scientific theories are often wrong and often guided
by the interests of the group to which the scientist belongs. The
theories that subspecies of humyns existed were developed by nations
that were in the process of expanding their domination over other
peoples. Prior to the development of genetic testing it was harder to
argue that theories about different races or subspecies of humyns were
incorrect as we can today. Criminology today is similarly tainted by the
interests of the oppressors.
Who is Mentally Ill?
In MIM Theory 9, MCB52’s review of psychological practice in
revolutionary China gives an excellent overview of the subject.(1) S/he
prefaces h article by pointing out that those who are diagnosed with
mental health problems are mostly “pissed off people rationally
resisting the hegemonic culture one way or another. This especially
affects youth and women, and rather than trying to ‘cure’ it – we
celebrate it!” However, many people struggle to function as a result.
And therefore, there is a great overlap of people struggling with mental
health and interested in communist politics, both inside and outside
prisons.
In imperialist prisons, the ambiguity of diagnosing people as mentally
ill becomes very pronounced. Part of the problem is that imprisonment
causes mental health problems, so people who may not have had symptoms
that would lead to a diagnosis often develop them. Yet it is not in the
oppressor’s interests to recognize this problem, so staff feel that they
must draw a line between the truly ill and the “fakers.” Rather than
seeing the prisons as causing mental illness, they see people acting out
for attention in contrast to those who were born with “real” mental
illness. Such silly exercises allow them to keep some prisoners sedated
while pushing others to suicide.(2)
Short-term Solutions
As with most problems we face, we can find answers to mental health
problems through dialectical materialism and in having the correct
political line. In the 1950s the Chinese eliminated the more backwards
psychological practices in their society and replaced them with ones
focused on getting individuals to connect with and help shape the
material world through applying dialectical materialism. Mental health
care, like much of Chinese society under Mao, emphasized the importance
of both self-reliance and collective help, with the understanding that
patients can fight their diseases and lead productive lives in the new
society. This required the participation of the patient’s family,
doctors, and revolutionary committee at their place of employment.(3)
Unfortunately, today we don’t have that kind of support in our society,
and prisoners as a group are even worse off. So keeping your political
line right to stay sane requires even more effort.
One article in this issue of ULK gives an example of sleep
deprivation being used as a means of social control. While some have
claimed to have trained themselves over time to require very little
sleep, such as George Jackson, medical research has demonstrated the
importance of regular sleep. Ultra-leftism leads one to take the weight
of the world on one’s shoulders, and push the purist and extreme line
without recognition of one’s conditions of struggle. While we encourage
comrades to strive to improve their efficiency, we should also take an
approach that promotes our health and longevity, as we have a long
struggle ahead of us.
We often get letters from comrades in isolation, who are clearly
well-read and want to change the system, but their articles are mostly
confused and hard to decipher. These comrades have been lost to the
system, and at this point there’s not much we can do to bring them back.
So we must work together with those who aren’t lost, to keep them sane
and on point. Ultra-leftism can feed into one’s isolation, which can be
a very bad combo for someone who is already in a prison cell. Develop
routines, set goals, and track your progress. All of these things can
help you stay sharp mentally when you are physically isolated. But do
not let the lack of control you have over your conditions lead you to
take up extreme behaviors that threaten your physical or mental health.
The topic that triggered the call for an issue focused on mental health
was suicide, which can be associated with a political line of defeatism.
We’ve been getting a number of responses and stories on the topic after
a mention in Ra’d’s obituary a few months back. One prison censored
Under Lock & Key for talking about suicide. While the
motivation was not clear, the numerous stories we receive show that
these institutions encourage people who are locked up to commit suicide.
Censoring open discussions on preventing suicide is just one more way to
do this. Yet, at another prison the psychological services staff are
giving out our address as a resource for people with suicidal
tendencies. This is good news, but probably not common across the
country where prisoners are twice as likely to commit suicide as the
general population.(4) Overall, suicide rates are higher in the United
$tates than many other countries, and comparisons to socialist China in
the 1970s showed suicide and schizophrenia to be hundreds of times more
common in the United $tates.(5)
If you or someone you know is dealing with suicidal thoughts, write to
MIM(Prisons) to get a copy of our
struggle
with a comrade printed in ULK 13, as well as the
self-criticism by a suicidal comrade printed in MIM Theory 9.
These are good starting points for re-evaluating your own life in
relation to the struggle.(6) In general, we prescribe study and
political work. Come up with ways to contribute more to the struggle,
while doing any little things you can to improve your immediate
situation such as exercise, eating better, meditating, writing people on
the outside, forming local discussion groups and staying away from
negative influences.
And remember, the purpose of these prisons is to control certain
populations. Getting you to end your own life is the ultimate form of
control. Therefore, suicide and mental health are closely linked to
other forms of control including beating people into submission,
drugging them, denying them due process and sexually assaulting them.
Exposing and struggling against these abuses is part of the struggle
against suicide in U.$. prisons.
Notes:
(1) MCB52. “Psychological Practice in the Chinese Revolution,”
MIM
Theory 9: Psychology and Imperialism, MIM Distributors: 1995.
p.34.
(2)
U.S. Prisons
Prove Maddening: review of Terry Kuper’s book Prison Madness by
MIM
(3) Sidel, Victor & Ruth. Serve the People: Observations on
Medicine in the People’s Republic of China, Beacon Press: 1973.
p. 156.
(4) Kupers, Terry. Prison Madness: the Mental Health Crisis
Behind Bars and What We Must Do About it, Jossey-Bass Publishers: 1999.
p.175.
(5)
HC116. The Imperialist-Patriarchy’s phony Anti-Stigma, 22 April
2005.
(6) For more testimonies and strategies from control unit
survivors see: Survivors Manual compiled by Bonnie Kerness Coordinator
AFSC Prison Watch Program 89 Market Street, 6th Floor Newark, NJ 07102