[In January 2016, MIM(Prisons) received a report from a comrade in Kern
Valley State Prison stating that the Agreement to End Hostilities (AEH)
had been broken there. The incident included an attack by one group, and
retaliation by another group against others not necessarily involved in
the original attack. The original attackers reportedly ran to the state
for protection. The prospects for peaceful resolution were not great. In
response to this report, a comrade now working as part of the Free
Speech Society sent us this update on efforts to reconcile the conflict
in line with the AEH.]
All power to the people who do not fear
real freedom!!!
Mission Statement:
In the aftermath of two small-scale race-based “isolated” incidents that
occurred on B-facility in January of 2016 at Kern Valley State Prison,
the Free Speech Society was able to successfully initiate a conflict
resolution committee as a part of the inmate advisory council (IAC) that
has been established at this prison.
The conflict resolution committee ensures the de-escalation of potential
conflicts between various groups/formations on B-facility. As it
constitutes a body of like-minded individuals that is both
representative of the totality of the various groups/formations on
B-facility, but also capable of resolving potential or actual conflicts
in a responsible, positive, and expeditious fashion. In the past, Kern
Valley State Prison (KVSP) administrators, which is inclusive of
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations (CDCR)
headquarters in Sacramento, California have made errors in one form or
another, by failing to ensure the engagement of the primary stakeholders
that are representative of those groups/formations actually engaged in a
conflict, nor has there been a body of “like-minded” individuals
specifically tasked with resolving potential conflicts before they
mature into actual hostile-based conflicts, whereby unnecessary
disturbances become manifest, which jeopardize the safety and security
of both prisoners and staff.
Per Departmental Operations Manual (DOM) 53120.5.3 (viz. “Special
Concern Sub-Committee”) the KVSP B-facility
Men’s
Advisory Council will enact the Conflict Resolution Committee (CRC).
The CRC is convened for the sole purpose of resolving potential and
actual conflicts on B-facility whenever and wherever they occur, and
effectively articulating these resolutions to the entire prisoner
population, with special attention given to the groups/formations in
conjunction with the Agreement to End Hostilities (AEH).
Because appropriate representation is essential to the resolution of
conflicts in an effective and responsible manner, the composition of the
CRC will reflect prisoner representation from each specific
group/formation who will in turn be responsible for engaging and
positively resolving any subdivisions in these groups.
A basic outline of the CRC representative body will consist of a
representative from each of the following groups/formations:
-
BGF
-
Surenos
-
Whites
-
Others
-
Crips
-
Bloods
-
Mexican nationals
-
Bay area Blacks
-
Hoovers
-
Muslims
-
415
Because of the sensitive nature of this special concern sub-committee,
the CRC must have access to the units on B-facility, per approval of the
facility captain. The daily activities of the CRC are designed to
increase dialogue across cultural lines of every formation/group to
promote a stronger foundation upon which issues can be put forward and
resolved in a constructive manner. Communication and timing are
essential components to preventing conflicts before they mature into
hostile-based conflict. Therefore, CRC members must be able to talk to
who they need to, when they need to. Our objective is to be proactive in
resolving potential and/or actual conflicts within the general
population. All prisoners are encouraged to relay any and all potential
conflicts to the CRC so they can be resolved in an expeditious manner.
The function and activities of this committee shall be to ensure equal
and effective representation of the entire general population in the
resolution of potential and actual conflicts on B-facility. The entire
CRC body will abide by the by-laws of the Inmate Advisory Council (IAC).
Our Struggle Continues!!!
For more information about the Free
Speech Society go to:
www.freespeechsociety.org
MIM(Prisons) responds: What started as a report on the breaking
of the AEH at one of the largest California state prisons, has been
turned around to a testament of the practical work of the AEH. The
release of comrades from SHU is at play here in ensuring that the AEH is
upheld by the prison masses in a way that addresses the needs of the
masses.
In short order, comrades at KVSP have put to work the tools at hand to
address the contradictions among the people there in a practical way.
This is an example that should be followed and repeated throughout the
state and the country. All that said, in the long run we must caution
against depending on institutions of the state to meet the needs of the
oppressed. Conflict is not the natural state of the oppressed, it is
created. And the history of CDCR is one of utilizing, encouraging and
even creating divisions among the prison masses for its own interests.
When the Short Corridor Collective asked the CDCR to distribute the
statement calling for an Agreement to End Hostilities (AEH), that was a
correct tactical approach to working with the state. When the CDCR
refused, it still strengthened the cause of peace and unity among the
oppressed. In a recent essay a USW comrade lays out the history and
current reality of the MAC/IACs in California prisons.(1) While their
formation was based in the strength of the prison movement, they have
since been used to undermine the movement, as the comrade argues, as a
sort of neo-colonial force akin to U.$. foreign policy abroad.
Meanwhile, another comrade in
Pelican
Bay who has been struggling to build peace reports that attempts to
work within the MAC and within an approved Inmate Leisure Time Activity
Group have both resulted in increased harrassment by staff who see unity
as a threat.
Again, we commend the comrades at KVSP who have utilized the tools
available to them to address a very dangerous situation, and we offer
our support in those continued efforts. But we recommend that all those
attempting to build peace in prisons study the
5 principles
of the United Front for Peace in Prisons. Independence is one of
those principles, because without independence the masses do not have
the ability to make decisions for themselves and provide real solutions.