MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
On April 28, 2011 a complaint was made against two lieutenants and the
associate warden of operations (AWO) at Lovelock Correctional Center
(LCC) for threatening the entire Protective Segregation (PS) housing
unit population with group punishment if the gambling, homosexual
activity, tattooing, etc. continued, despite the fact that those who’d
been caught were known and identified and/or already facing disciplinary
procedures.
The same night, a number of individuals were caught gambling, and the
following morning both PS housing units 3A and 3B were locked down. The
lockdown was purportedly in response to the gambling incident.
On May 10, 2011 a minor altercation occurred between two prisoners in
the LCC dining hall. These two individuals were placed in more secure
housing where they received:
telephone access
law library access
library access (i.e. book cart)
cleaning supplies for cells
full food portions in two hot meals per day
yard access
due process prior to loss of privileges and punishment
The remaining PS prisoners in 3A and 3B, having nothing to do with
any of these incidents, received:
lockdown for 6 days with showers on first and fourth days
loss of cell visiting privileges (permanently)
loss of open access to cells and toilet accommodations (permanently)
no law library access
no religious access
no library access
no telephone access
no cell cleaning supplies
no tier time/yard time
refused grievances and “advised” not to “fly paperwork if we want off of
lockdown”
During the lockdown a shakedown (described as getting the unit into
compliance) was done resulting in the confiscation of appliances, which
was later returned because “it should not have been taken in the first
place.”
Upon being let off of lockdown some of the population united around
these and other issues long overdue for redress and formulated a
complaint alleging several violations of civil and human rights which
are embraced by the following acts and holdings among others: 22
USCA 6021 (9) 22 USCA 6401 (in toto) 42 USCA 1997a (CRIPA) 42
USCA 2000cl (RLUIPA) Bounds v Smith 37SCT1491 430US817 Heck v.
Humphrey 114SCT2364 512US477 Wolff v McDonnell 94 SCT 2963 418 US
539 Breenholtz v Nebraska 99 SCT 2100 442 US 1 Estelle v Gamble 97
SCT 285 429 US 97 Turner v Safley 102 CT 2754 482 US 78 All of
which are US Supreme Court holdings which are binding upon Nevada
(Nevada constitution article 1 Sec 2 Bargas v Warden NSP 482 P2d 317 87
Nev 30 91 SCT 1267 403 US 935 29 LED 715)
The complaint raises the following (and other) issues which are constant
and pervasive conditions at LCC among PS prisoners:
unsanitary/unsafe dining hall conditions
inadequate food and medical treatment
compulsory strip searches daily (to boxers) frequently done by
females
verbal abuse by staff in the form of derogatory racial, cultural and
gender charged epithets
abusive and retaliatory behavior toward adherents of non-traditional
religions
inadequate legal access and retaliation for accessing legal process
coercion/harassment in the form of cell searches and theft/destruction
of personal property as retaliation and for furtherance of personal
agendas
withholding/theft of mail, opening legal mail outside of prisoner’s
presence
use of prisoners in supervisory capacity and as facilitators/teachers of
rehabilitative and psych programs which impact earned sentence credits,
parole board decisions and sentence duration
fomenting hostility and animus between prisoners using confidential or
otherwise sensitive information
group punishment/threats of collective retaliation and punishments
The above is a summary of the mentioned complaint and does not
contain much in the way of detail and specificity. However, it serves to
articulate the overall conditions here (and elsewhere) and exemplifies
the need for solidarity and presenting a united front against
oppression. It should never be allowed to get this bad before action is
taken, but it apparently must get bad enough to inspire action.
It is easier to keep what one has than it is to regain what one has
already lost, but this is not a message which is widely understood by
the new prisoner class.
In any event, if information concerning our struggle becomes available,
it will be put “before the world.”
MIM(Prisons) adds: We applaud prisoners coming together to fight
repression in their housing units. In this case it is prisoners in
protective custody, a place our prison comrades are fond of reminding us
is rife with people who informed on other prisoners (often falsely) to
save their own hides. We cannot often know who, in PC or general
population, is a snitch, but we can judge prisoners by their actions and
uphold the correctness of struggles against prison brutality wherever
they arise.
Allow me to first salute and extend my comradely blessings to those who
have evolved in realization that unification and commonality is the one
and only true efficient vehicle for our struggle towards liberation.
However, being that this is my first entry this article will be
contributed to the topic of unity and peace.
As I reside in the Maryland prison system, I can only speak on the
assessment of this region, and a lack of unity and peace amongst the
prison class has established a stronghold throughout the many
institutions. We have an environment littered with opposing groups which
historically have common origins that share the same vision and cause.
Somewhere along the timeline they have gotten away from a political
platform geared towards revamping the conditions of the lower and lumpen
classes of society. They have swayed away from the real opposition,
which as a result has plagued the prison community by creating these
mentalities and groups of mass destruction. That is why I support and
believe that the collective conscious minds need to manufacture a united
front to combat the fatuous and self-destructive mind-state which has
been a detriment for too long.
Nevertheless, from what I’ve evaluated, I believe before we can
consolidate to one unit we need to focus on peace. Without peace amongst
the many power structures there can’t be unity. In order to establish
peace there must be a certain height of maturity amongst the leadership
in these regimes to conceive the significance and dire need to unify and
stand for a common purpose. Personal growth and development must be
acquired for one to widen their lens to envision the benefits of this
objective. Only once this level of growth is reached between the
leadership can they exert their influence and pass down the educational
curriculum necessary to manifest/cultivate a paradigm shift emulating a
united mission. Only then can we extirpate (root out) the infantile
foolishness, the individualistic agendas, and breed a sound social
atmosphere. Of course I’ve given thought that there may be renegade
members within the groups who refuse to adhere to the cause, but I’m a
firm believer of operating with an iron fist, and we need to weed out
those who neglect to contribute and continue to destroy. Some may
associate this statement with radical theory. But I believe considering
the words can’t produce the same results as action.
Moreover, once we build on this foundation of peace we can then move in
the direction of unity. It is imperative that we have unification,
because without the strength of unity we dis-empower ourselves. Every
movement which has gained its liberation derived from uniting the people
for a common cause. We injure our purpose by our ignorance and
succumbing to the psychological tactics of divide and conquer. While our
ignorance continues to serve as strength and energy to this system which
governs us all, we will continue to wallow in this cycle of repression.
So, yes I do believe peace and unity are the essence of true liberation,
and probably the last remaining alternative for improvement. I admire
this attempt for international unity, this alarming call for a united
front, and as a member of The New Man Corp, you have my support.
This flyer can be used as a whole-sheet flyer, or print it double-sided,
cut it in half, and it becomes a half-sheet flyer. Use it to spread the
word about the
striking
prisoners in Pelican Bay State Prison.
On the flyer there is an example of a support letter to send to
administrators about this issue. It is reprinted below for your
convenience.
Dear Warden Lewis,
I am writing this letter to you to express my concern for the prisoners
held in Pelican Bay State Prison’s short-corridor Group D. It is my
understanding that these people have no disciplinary charges, but are
being held in extreme isolation, unable to send photographs to their
families or speak to them on the phone.
I am concerned that these prisoners, who are under your responsibility,
are being denied their Constitutional right to due process. Not only do
these prisoners not have any disciplinary charges, but IGI is
intimidating and harassing them into fabricating information to avoid
false gang validations. This is illegal and upsetting. As a citizen of
the state of California, I fund your paycheck, and I expect more from a
state employee than to allow these gross violations of the Constitution
to happen right under your nose.
Studies prove time and time again that prisoners who have contact with
their family are able to rehabilitate much better than those who are
isolated. They are better able to adjust to society when they are
released, and avoid being sent back to prison. It is completely
irresponsible that you would permit IGI to cause this potential damage
in a person’s life, when they are supposed to be allowed these
privileges.
Since you are the Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison, I am asking that
you intervene in these illegal and irresponsible practices going on in
short-corridor Group D. Please allow the prisoners held there their full
privileges according to CDCR policies, and end the harassment and
intimidation of prisoners, especially ones who have no information, and
no disciplinary actions.
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. I also thank you for
your future efforts to resolve this problem.
While reading the latest issue of ULK I noticed the topic on
Peace and Unity. As a member of the New Man Corp., it’s my obligation to
want to contribute to productive activity and liberation from what
ignorance has bound me to. This is why I encourage all my comrades to
work towards true freedom, and also to work against this diabolical
establishment. I believe we as men should study our heritage and culture
and protect each other from this open enemy. I understand the need to
study George, Malcolm, and Huey to become well versed with the people of
the struggle and develop a sense of camaraderie. It has come time for
all of us to stand together as one united front, so we can fight against
prison injustice.
I reside in Maryland Correctional Institution, where peace and unity is
imperative. It’s become increasingly clear that our continued genocidal
tendencies are at our peril. We complain about the injustice we are
forced to deal with inside this slave plantation known as prison, but it
pales in comparison to the pain and sorrow we have inflicted upon each
other.
Just think of the power that is in our writing against the elements that
thrive successfully because of our difficulties and divided strata. It
is time for all of the warriors of the prison tribes to realize that
together we are unstoppable. It is time for those of us with political
minds, influence, rank, and respect to start believing in and advocating
peace and unity. We must revolutionize ourselves, become new men, and
liberate ourselves mentally. This will redirect our energy towards the
interests of our people. This is why I stress education of the lumpen to
understand why we are where we are, while building strong ties to change
our reality. Those who benefit from the oppression and exploitation of
others do not want such change to take place. So lets come together to
overthrow this oppressive imperialist system. This is the only thing
that will truly bring peace and unity to us in prison.
Meditations on Frantz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth: New Afrikan
Revolutionary Writings by James Yaki Sayles Kersplebedeb and Spear
& Shield Publications 2010
Available for $20 + shipping/handling from:
Kersplebedeb CP
63560, CCCP Van Horne Montreal, Quebec Canada H3W 3H8
“THE BOOK IS ABOUT HOW THE”WRETCHED” can transform themselves into the
ENLIGHTENED and the SELF-GOVERNING!! If you don’t take anything else
away with your reading of [The Wretched of the Earth], you must take
this.”(p.381)
Like many of the books reviewed in Under Lock & Key,
Meditations On Frantz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth is written
by someone who spent most of his adult life in a U.$. prison. That there
are so many such books these days speaks to the growing plague of the
mass incarceration experiment that is the U.$. injustice system. The
content of many of these books speaks to the development of the
consciousness of this growing class of people in the belly of the beast.
While of the lumpen class, they differ from the subjects of Fanon’s
The Wretched of the Earth in both their incarceration and their
First World status. And while great thinkers are among them, their ideas
are reflected in the general prison population superficially at best.
The need for the development of mass consciousness (one based in
revolutionary nationalism, and an understanding of how to think, not
what to think) and the project of oppressed people taking their
destinies in their own hands make up the main theme of this book.
Wretched has greatly influenced many in our circles, and is
itself a book highly recommended by MIM(Prisons). It is of particular
interest in being perhaps the most complete and accurate discussion of
the lumpen-proletariat that we’ve read to date. While not completely
applicable to conditions in the United $tates, it is even more relevant
to the growing numbers of displaced Third World people living in slums
and refugee camps than when it was first written. For the most part,
Yaki discusses Wretched as it applies to the oppressed nations
of the United $tates, in particular New Afrika.
The four-part meditations on Wretched make up the bulk of the
book. The introduction to this section is an attempt to break down
The Wretched of the Earth for a modern young audience. In it
the author stresses the importance of rereading theoretical books to
fully grasp them. He also stresses that the process of studying and then
understanding the original and complex form of such works (as opposed to
a summary or cheat sheet) is itself transformative in developing one’s
confidence and abilities. At no stage of revolutionary transformation
are there shortcuts. The only way to defend the struggle from
counter-revolutionaries is to thoroughly raise the consciousness of the
masses as a whole. “Get away from the idea that only certain people or
groups can be ‘intellectual,’ and think about everyone as
‘intellectual.’”(p.192) And as he concludes in part two of the
Meditations, We often forget that our whole job here is to
transform humyn beings.
The National Question
As part four of the meditations trails off into unfinished notes due to
Yaki’s untimely death, he is discussing the need for national culture
and history. He echoes Fanon’s assertion that national culture must be
living and evolving, and not what the Panthers criticized as “pork chop
nationalism.” He discusses the relevance of pre-colonial histories, as
well as the struggles of oppressed nations during the early years of
colonization, to counter the Euro-Amerikan story that starts with them
rescuing the oppressed nation from barbarity. These histories are
important, but they are history. Sitting around dressed in Egyptian
clothing or speaking Nahuatl aren’t helping the nation. It is idealism
to skip over more recent history of struggles for self-reliance and
self-determination in defiance of imperialism.
We don’t even need to go back to ancient times to identify histories
that have been lost and hidden; many of us don’t even know our recent
past. Recording the little-known history of the “wretched” of the
richest country in the world is the first step to understanding how we
got here and how we can move forward. We are working on this with a
number of comrades as an important step to developing national (and
class) consciousness.(1)
Yaki agrees with the MIM line that nation is the most important
contradiction today, while presenting a good understanding of the class
contradictions that underlay and overlap with nation. Recently, debates
in another prison-based journal, 4StruggleMag, have questioned
the relevance of nationalism as the basis of revolutionary organizing;
taking an essentially Trotskyist view, but justifying it via “new”
conditions of globalization.(2) Really the theory of globalization is
just one aspect of Lenin’s theory of imperialism. The author, critiquing
nationalism, discusses that nations themselves were a modern concept
that united many groups that were once separated by culture and land.
This was true for the nation-states of europe that united internally and
the nations of the colonial world that were united by their common
oppression under european domination. It was in this colonial
relationship, and specifically with the demands of imperialism, that
nations solidified in dialectical relationship to each other: oppressor
vs. oppressed.
Yaki disagrees with the reading of history that sees nations as a modern
construct. He stresses the importance of recognizing that oppressed
nations existed as people with rich cultures before europeans drew up
national boundaries based on colonial land claims (ie. Egypt, China,
Maya). While true, talking about “nations” that predate capitalism is
similar to talking about the “imperialism” of the Roman empire. For
followers of Lenin, empire does not equal imperialism. Imperialism is
the highest stage of capitalism; an economic system forced by the
extreme accumulation of capital that requires its export to other people
(nations) to maintain profit rates, without which capitalism will not
continue to produce (one of its inherent contradictions and flaws).
When we talk about nations, we are talking about imperialist class
relations; the relations of production and distribution under the
economic system of imperialism (which is not more than a couple hundred
years old). More specifically, we are talking about a system where whole
nations oppress and exploit other nations. While different classes exist
within each nation, these questions are secondary to the global class
analysis in the period of imperialism. To answer the anti-nationalist
author in 4StruggleMag who claims nationalism never led to
liberation, or to internationalism, we refer to socialist China, the
most advanced movement for the liberation of people from capitalism to
date in humyn history. Even within the confines of this imperialist
country, the most advanced movement took nationalist form in the
Black
Panther Party.
Any theoretical questioning of the relevance of the nation to
revolutionary anti-capitalism must address the nature of imperialism.
Within the United $tates the lines between oppressor and oppressed
nation have weakened, particularly on the question of exploitation. This
provides a material basis for questioning the relevance of nationalism
within our movements here. As Yaki wrote, “here, in the seat of empire,
even the ‘slaves’ are ‘petty-bourgeois,’ and our poverty is not what it
would be if We didn’t in a thousand ways also benefit from the spoils of
the exploitation of peoples throughout the world. Our passivity wouldn’t
be what it is if not for our thinking that We have something to
lose…”(p.188) But globally, the contradictions between nations continue
to heighten, and there is no basis for debate over whether nation
remains the principal contradiction.
As we said, nations, like all things in the world, are dialectical in
nature. That means they constantly change. There is nothing to say that
nations will not expand as implied by the globalization argument, but
this will not eliminate the distinction between exploiter and exploited
nations.
While we won’t try to address the relevance of revolutionary nationalism
within the United $tates definitively here, Yaki is very adamant about
the need for an understanding of the internal class structure of the
internal semi-colonies. And as different as conditions were in
revolutionary Algeria, many of the concepts from Wretched apply
here as Yaki demonstrates. “[D]on’t We evidence a positive negation of
common sense as We, too, try to persuade ourselves that colonialism and
capitalist exploitation and alienation don’t exist? Don’t We, too, grab
hold of a belief in fatality (very common among young people these
days)? And, what about OUR myths, spirits and magical/metaphysical
superstructure? In our context, We employ conspiracy theories, the
zodiac and numerology, Kente cloth and phrases from ancient languages;
We invoke the power of a diet and the taboo of certain animals as food
products.”
Those studying the class structure within the oppressed nations, New
Afrikan or not, within the United $tates will find much value in Yaki’s
writings. Even in the introduction, the editors remind us that, at the
very least, revolutionary nationalism was a powerful force in our recent
history. For example, in 1969 Newsweek found that 27% of northern Black
youth under 30 “would like a separate Black nation.”(p.19) And in the
1960s communist teens from the Black Disciples organized comrades from
various gangs to defend Black homes in other parts of Illinois from
drive-by shootings by the White Citizens Council and their backers in
local police departments.(p.16) In the same period, when Malcolm X was
alive and pushing a no-compromise revolutionary nationalist line on its
behalf, the Nation of Islam had reached over 200,000 members.(p.18)
Shortly thereafter, a majority of Blacks in the United $tates felt that
the Black Panther Party represented their interests. When we look around
today and ask whether New Afrikan nationalism has any revolutionary
basis, we cannot ignore these recent memories.
Class, then Back to Nation
In his essay, On Transforming the Colonial and “Criminal”
Mentality, Yaki addresses George Jackson’s discussion of the
potential in the lumpen versus their actual consciousness, which
parallel’s Marx’s point about humyns consciously determining their own
conditions and Lenin’s definition of the masses as the conscious
minority of the larger proletariat, which as a class is a potentially
revolutionary force.(3) He quotes a critique of Eldridge Cleaver’s line
on the lumpen, which glorified organized crime. The critique argues that
organized crime has its interests in the current system, and it is a
carrot provided to the internal semi-colonies by imperialism.
MIM(Prisons) looks to organized crime to find an independent national
bourgeoisie (such as Larry Hoover, whose targeting by the state is
mentioned in the book’s introduction), but many are compradors as well,
working with the imperialists to control the oppressed for them. This is
even more true where the state has more influence (i.e. prison
colonies).
While Yaki’s focus on consciousness is consistent with Maoism, we have
some differences with his application. Yaki, and his ideological camp,
disagree with George Jackson and the MIM line that all prisoners are
political. The state is a political organization, serving a certain
class interest. We say all prisoners are political to break the common
misperception people have that they are in prison because they did
something wrong. Yaki’s point about the lumpen is that if they don’t
turn around, understand the conditions that brought them there and then
work to transform those conditions, then they are no use to the
liberation struggle, and they are therefore not worthy of the term
“political prisoner.” He argues that to allow those with bourgeois ideas
to call themselves a “political prisoner” dilutes the term. His camp
uses “captive colonial” to refer to the New Afrikan imprisoned by
Amerika regardless of one’s ideology. That is a fine term, but by
redefining the commonly used “political prisoner” from its narrow petty
bourgeois definition, we push the ideological struggle forward by
reclaiming popular language. In our view, “political prisoner” does not
represent a group with a coherent ideology, just as “proletariat” does
not.
Yaki puts a lot of weight on ideology when he defines nation as a “new
unity” as well by saying, “[t]o me, being a ‘New Afrikan’ is not about
the color of one’s skin, but about one’s thought and practice.”(p.275)
While skin color is an unscientific way to categorize people, we would
caution that there are in fact material factors that define a nation;
it’s not just how we identify as individuals. Saying it is only about
thought and practice leaves open the possibility of forming nations
along lines of sexual preference, colors, favorite sports teams - lines
that divide neighbors in the same community facing the same conditions.
On the flip side, it creates space for the white-washing of national
liberation movements by denying the group level oppression that the
oppressor nation practices against the oppressed. To say that nations
are fluid, ever-changing things is not to say that we can define them
based purely on ideas in our heads and have them be meaningful.
Yaki Offers Much Knowledge
The use of the term “meditations” in the title is indicative of Yaki’s
approach, which clearly promotes a deep study of the material as well as
making connections that lead to applying concepts to current situations.
It is not a study guide in the traditional style of review questions and
summaries. It does provide a critical analysis of the race-based
interpretations of Fanon, such as that in Fanon for Beginners,
which make it a valuable counter-measure to such bourgeois work.
His stress on hard work to build a solid foundation leads him to an
agreeable line on armed struggle in contrast to others we have studied
from the same ideological camp. On the back of the book,
Sanyika
Shakur quotes the author as saying, “i’d rather have one cadre free
than 100 ak-47’s” after Shakur was imprisoned again, related to
possession of an assault rifle. Shakur writes, “t took me years to
overstand & appreciate that one sentence.” Discipline is something
the revolutionary lumpen must develop, and taking a serious, meditative
approach to study can help do just that.
In his essay, Malcolm X: Model of Personal Transformation, Yaki
concludes, “We can go through the motions of changing our lives… but the
test of the truth comes when the prison doors are opened, or, when
otherwise We’re confronted with situations which test our characters.”
(p.118)
Yaki was a New Afrikan revolutionary and a Prisoner of War. As part of
the post-Panther era, Yaki reflects realistically on security questions,
pointing out that it’s too late to start instituting security measures
after Martial Law has been enacted. From reading this book, everything
you can gather about Yaki builds an impression of seriousness and
commitment to our cause. In this way, this book is more than just a
useful study guide for understanding and applying Fanon’s ideas; it is
an exemplary model for revolutionaries to help develop their own
practice.
I am an Alaska prisoner at a Cornell company, Cornell Corrections, a
private for profit facility in Hudson, Colorado. This facility is not to
be confused with a state or federal operated prison. It has private
investors and is contracted to the state of Alaska to house prisoners
because of the so-called overcrowding.
This facility as with all private for profit facilities is extremely
corrupt. Cornell Corrections has a long history of corruption and
illegal actions. I, along with a large percentage of the prisoners at
this corrupt facility, should not be here because we are maximum
security and maximum custody. The Alaska DOC/Cornell company’s contract
and the state of Colorado statutes both state that no maximum security,
or maximum custody prisoners are to be housed in private, for-profit
prisons in the state of Colorado.
The employees at this corrupt facility are not sworn to oath
correctional officers. They are untrained or extremely poorly trained
private citizens. Cornell employees are not empowered in any official
capacity. If indeed they employ a law enforcement or correctional
officer, these COs may not exercise their official authority while
employed by a private party or contractor. This is a conflict of
interest and allows for lawsuits to be filed on them for this illegal
action.
I am at present in the SHU, Special Housing Unit, due to a fight
instigated by a Cornell employee, Joe Hammock, employee number 17454.
Joe Hammock had harassed and humiliated me numerous times prior to this
incident which took place in May, 2010. A Black female employee,
Larnette Mingo, employee number 17432, joined Joe Hammock in this fight.
I had filed several complaints and grievances over harassment,
humiliation, and discrimination actions by Mingo towards me and other
non-Black prisoners. These two employees were then joined by two more
employees, Stephen Mannan, employee #17273 and Paul Price, employee
#17219, with Price being the senior employee in charge. I at this point
had approximately 900 to 1000 pounds jumping on top of me. Stephen
Mannan put handcuffs on me squeezing them down until they cut into my
wrist and then stood and kicked me in the lower rib cage. I was then
basically dragged through the G-A Mod by pulling and jerking on the
handcuffs by Price and Mannan, through two sets of doors and then Mannan
and Price threw me in a corner with Mannan then slamming my head into
the wall cutting my right eye, while yelling, “I never liked you anyway,
I’ll make you sorry for what you did you scumbag. I’ll make life a
living hell for you.”
I was then escorted to the SHU unit (the Hole) where I have been since.
I ask for law enforcement to be summoned in accordance to law, and they
were not. When I ask for law enforcement to be called I was told by a
female employee, good luck, as she walked away laughing. Law enforcement
was supposed to be called due to this being an assault issue at a
private, for-profit prison. I ask at least three times for police to be
summoned. A medical employee then came to the cell I was in. I asked to
see credentials as to who and what part of the medical profession she
was, which she stated she did not have to produce. I then refused to
speak to her due to the fact that medical issues are to be confidential,
and not to be shared with non-medical employees.
They claimed that I am charged with assault on staff members. I have not
received any paperwork from the Colorado court system or law enforcement
that any charges were filed on me. I have been hauled to the Weld county
courts two times and was appointed a public defender, whose name I do
not know.
In June 2010 a disciplinary hearing officer from Cornell Corrections, J.
Becker, came to the cell I was in and stated that the District Attorney
of Weld county, Greely Colorady had dismissed all charges and that I was
not charged by DOC Alaska for assault of a staff member. A disciplinary
hearing was held by J. Becker after the charges were dismissed and I was
sentenced to 30 days of punitive segregation which I served and was
completed. The state of Colorado is now re-charging me for violations I
have been sentenced and served my punishment for ending. I find this
action to be extremely corrupt and illegal. The public defender
appointed to me has done nothing in my defense. I am just one of an
extremely large number of Alaska DOC prisoners to be corruptly and
illegally treated at this Cornell companies facility. All of the corrupt
and illegal actions mentioned prior are promoted by, condoned and
endorsed by very corrupt Cornell company and facility heads,
superintendent Rick Veach and his cronies, Trevor Williams, and Scott
Vineyard.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This prisoner gives some good documentation
about the private prisons in Colorado along with details about the
employees who are perpetuating a system of corruption and abuse. As we
explained in our article on the
U.$.
Prison Economy, private prisons are a small portion of the criminal
injustice system, at least partially due to their inability to remain
profitable. But we know from reports from other prisoners and our own
research, private prisons cut costs in ways that lead to even more
atrocious conditions and danger for prisoners. We print this article as
further documentation of the conditions in private prisons.
I fully support the United Front and the five principles, because these
five principles should be lived out within lumpen organizations. What
the United Front means to me is this is one form that we can use to
better ourselves as a whole, as well as liberate our minds to become
better people so that we can help better others. I also feel that the
principles are important because within U.S. prisons the
prisoner-on-prisoner oppression is at an all-time high and I feel that I
must do all I can to help put a stop to this madness.
“It is up to us to organize the people. As for the reactionaries in
China, it is up to us to organize the people to overthrow them.
Everything reactionary is the same; if you don’t hit it, it won’t fall.
It is like sweeping the floor; where the broom does not reach, the dust
will not vanish of itself.”(1)
In taking on the charge of fighting a national revolutionary struggle
and building an anti-imperialist movement, those leading that movement -
a vanguard party made up of internationalist proletarian leadership -
have the principal task of educating the backwards masses so that they
may come to understand the nature of their suffering and oppression.
The Black Order Revolutionary Organization (BORO) has taken
responsibility of being part and parcel of the education and
organization of the lumpen and prisoners in the United $nakes, alongside
and in fraternity with MIM(Prisons) and the United Struggle from Within
(USW), and those lumpen and organizations that work with them.
In our brief history of revolutionary organiz- ing, BORO’s tactical
experiences have taught us is that we must struggle vigorously to teach
prisoners in a practical way, understanding that a great percentage of
U.$. prisoners are victims of mis-education by the colonial school
system and practically none have any history of political
struggle/activism.
In fact, because of their ignorance of the true laws of hystorical and
social development, most prisoners disdain politics and political
struggle, and instead have been heavily influenced by idealism, namely
religion and metaphysics. There could also be a myriad of other reasons
to explain this particular phenomenon, but that is not the purpose of
this essay.
The purpose of this essay is to discuss how do we transform the lumpen
colonial-criminal mentality into a revolutionary proletarian
consciousness. As revolutionaries and aspiring Maoists, we do this by
employing the science of revolution – Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, a
dialectical and hystorical materialist education.
The first thing we try to teach prisoners is that even though we are in
prisyn, we are still defined by our relationship to the means of
production, not by our religion or what state or neighborhood we come
from. As a comrade demonstrated in
ULK 17,
“in Marx’s theory of ‘social relations of production’ lies the question
of ownership, that is what ‘class’ owns the tools and what ‘class’ uses
the tools. In this imperialist society the lumpen neither own nor use
the tools. We are excluded from production and live under the heel of
capitalist relations of production.”(2)
The above point is critical to transforming the colonial-criminal
mentality into a revolutionary proletarian mentality and is a part of
the critical examination of our lives in relation to society in general,
and the revolutionary transformation of it, in particular. It’s also one
of the most difficult steps to take for many prisoners, because it
requires that one be critically honest and unreserved in the examination
of their lives and critique of one’s philosophical understanding of the
real world and how it really works. Many of us are afraid to admit our
parasitic roles in society. But even these should be critically examined
within the context of the society that helped produce us as a class, and
not as individuals.
It is idealists who “focus exclusively on conflicts within the
individual, which are held to be constant across time and space.
However, by not even noticing the presence of class struggle, which is
the principal driving force in human action, they are unsuccessful in
even explaining, much less changing, human behavior. Contradictions
within the individual are reflections of contradictions in society, not
autonomous from those contradictions. We define a person’s character not
in terms of the aspects of the individual as related to each other, but
rather in terms of the individual as related to society through the
individual’s participation in it. An individual’s struggle to resolve
internal contradictions is dialectically related to other individuals
and the struggle of human society as a whole to resolve conflicts in
society.”(3)
We must continue to provide prisoners with revolutionary educational
materials that challenge them to critically study and understand their
position in society and how to change it. No effective revolutionary
organization can be built in the United $nakes without a powerful base
inside of the penal colonies, undocumented workers and ex-prisyners. No
effective revolutionary movement in the prisyns can be built without
strong ties to a revolutionary movement on the streets. This is the
dialectical relationship that exists between those on the inside and
those on the outside of U.$. prisons.
If we want to brush away the dust that is capitalist-imperialism, then
we must continue to push forward the development of a united front
against imperialism. He who does not fear the death of a thousand cuts
will dare unseat the emperor!
Just as it is in all of the places that are discussed in Under Lock
& Key, the system here in Maryland is a joke. Prisoners in this
system who wish to air their grievances have no outlet because the same
pigs who were writing them up are the same pigs that handle the
administrative remedy process.
In 2008, a memo was put out to prisoners, written by the Prisoners’
Rights Information System of Maryland (PRISM). It indicated that a
Federal lawsuit had been filed by a prisoner represented by PRISM and
that that lawsuit resulted in the division of corrections, revising
directives governing the administrative remedy process. One of the
changes included the adoption of a two-piece carbon copy complaint form
so prisoners can retain a copy of the ARP, thus reducing risk of loss
and destruction and providing proof of exhaustion of remedies.
For a while this two-piece carbon copy complaint form was beneficial to
prisoners, however, like everything else that has been put into effect
to ensure that “justice” for prison inmates is upheld, officers have
found a way to undermine the system. At first many officers began to
refuse to sign the ARPs, but after prisoners began to complain about
this injustice the cowards gave in because they did not want to be
written up. Then they created a new system stating that no officers
could sign an inmate’s ARP, only a Lieutenant (Lt) or a “designated
officer” could do so. These Lts and designated officers pick and choose
which ARPs they want to sign and which ARPs they want to scrap. We have
to give our ARPs to a tier officer to take to the Lt because a Lt will
never come get it himself. If the Lt is okay with what you’ve written it
will be signed and the carbon copy will be returned to you. If not,
you’ll never see it again.
The whole point of the carbon copy is to prevent loss or destruction. It
is supposed to be signed and dated in front of you so that the carbon
copy can be handed back to you right then and there so that you will
have proof that you wrote the ARP if something happens to it.
In the segregation unit of Eastern Correctional Institution, Lt
Galligher is one of the leaders of the good ol’ boy network. It is he
and he alone who is in charge of signing ARPs and he must have worked as
a magician before working for the division of corruption because he sure
does know how to make a grievance disappear. Not many people write this
up because this Lt and the other pigs who put this system into place
will not hesitate to retaliate on anyone that attempts to expose them.
I, however, am not afraid and plan to attack this joke that they call a
grievance procedure from every angle possible.
I agree with the brother from Washington who stated that in
ULK 19, “[t]he
only way that we as prisoners will be treated fairly and with justice is
if a neutral outside company or corporation dealing solely with
grievances and our claims is constructed.” Otherwise we’re just
complaining to the same people who are administering the many forms of
injustice that we are fighting against. It’s a new era, it’s time for
change, it’s time for solidarity. I’m especially speaking to those of
you who are in an organization, this is what our energy should be
focused on, instead of trying to destroy the many forms of injustice
that we are shadowed with on an everyday basis. It’s time for change.
The time is now. Power to the people!
MIM(Prisons) adds: In response to this sort of injustice around
prisoner’s grievances, some United Struggle from Within (USW) comrades
initiated a grievance campaign. Write us to get a copy of the
grievance
petition for your state if you reside in California, Missouri,
Oklahoma or Texas, or a generic petition that you can customize for your
state if you are anywhere else.
I am currently serving a state sentence at Florida State Prison on Close
Management (24 hour lock-down). The prisoners are treated like hogs in a
barn, not human beings. The clothes here are filthy and stained with
blood, urine, feces, oil, and semen. They are passed out on a weekly
basis. We can catch a disease this way.
And the meals are always underdone. Prisoners have gotten sick from
this, a stomach virus. If you file a grievance on it, the correctional
officers won’t feed you the next day.
The pigs will write prisoners bogus disciplinary reports sometimes, and
if you try to file an appeal after they found you guilty of the
infraction your appeal comes up missing. How can a prisoner win like
that? The system is designed for us to lose even if we’re right in our
argument.
The correctional officers like to jump on prisoners in
handcuffs/shackles in the assigned cells, on the rec yard, anywhere
where there’s not a camera to catch the injustice. How can anyone defend
themselves when they’re helpless?
The COs try to discourage prisoners on a daily basis out of their
institutional call-out, meaning they will bribe them with contraband
like cigarettes, chewing dip, coffee, knives, etc. A lot of them will
fall for it all the time because they are trying to support their bad
habits. It’s sad on both parties’ behalf.
Florida prisoners have no unity whatsoever and they never will as long
as they continue to be brainwashed by the COs and continue accepting
contraband that is being brought in by DOC workers to prisoners. As long
as this keeps going on there will always be fights between one another.
MIM(Prisons) adds: The oppressive conditions in Florida are
similar to those throughout the criminal injustice system, and this
comrade’s call for prisoners to unite underscores the motivation behind
the
United
Front for Peace in Prisons. One of the 5 principles of the United
Front is Independence. The oppressed need to develop
institutions that meet their needs. There are plenty of examples of
prisoners pooling their resources to take care of each other, rather
than relying on the COs who only hope to poison the prison population
with drugs, weapons, rumors and jealousy.