MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
Georgia State Prison (GSP), the oldest prison in Georgia is rodent and
vermin infested with numerous maintenance problems. Tier II prisoners,
housed in what Georgia prison officials call a Long Term Segregation
Program based on your behavior, call it torture. Prison officials are
enforcing a regulation to ban all legitimate publications which
are mailed to prisoners in Tier II regardless of what phase (Tier II has
3 phases) they are on. These legal publications are mailed from the
publisher. They include newspapers, all books, and all magazines.
Specifically, the ban is on: San Francisco Bay View Newspaper,
Chattanooga Times, Free Press Newspaper, Prison Legal News Magazine,
MIM’s Prison Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, Atlanta Journal and any
other legally authorized publications. The ban is only on prisoners in
the Tier II Segregation Program. No one else.
The First and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution
guarantees me the right to free speech and to the press and equal
protection of law. The Georgia Constitution Article I Section I
Paragraph II (equal protection of law) and Paragraph V (freedom of
speech and to the press) are rights under Georgia Law.
To “return to sender” all my magazines, newspapers and books violates my
constitutionally protected rights. None of these aforenamed publications
were banned at any other Georgia prison I have been held at. I notified,
by letter, Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) Commissioner Gregory
Dozier; Statewide GDC Tier Coordinator Otis Stanton; GDC SE Region Field
Operations Manager Robert Toole; GSP Warden Marty Allen. All showed
deliberate indifference to my issue by failing to respond to the illegal
ban of publication problem.
Georgia prisoners are so divided along racial, class and STG gang lines
that any attempt to organize any form of mass action rebuttal to these
egregious and illegal acts by Georgia prison officials will falter. The
fear that the GDC has employed on most prisoners prevents the addressing
of constitutional rights violations.
As a “jailhouse lawyer” holding active membership with the National
Lawyer’s Guild, I have been fighting administratively and with civil
action for redress of Georgia officials’ numerous malfeasance since
2005.
This illegal publication ban fails to pass the “smell test.” I have
begun my quest to correct this illegal violation by filing a Formal
Grievance, which is a joke, but must be done as a start to any civil
action which will follow.
I solicit the assistance of all news organizations, prints, digital and
television as I again take on the GDC in court. My three (3) current
civil actions pending and my numerous previous civil actions show that
the GDC cannot and will not ever intimidate this writer. My fight for my
right to free speech and the press and equal protection of law
continues.
We here, at MDF, Contra Costa County Jail, that are of Latin descent and
not southsiders, are being held in Ad-Seg status now since 2010. And now
even more unjust treatment is being added to us, gang enhancements just
for being housed on this module, even if we don’t ask to be housed on
this module at time of arrest/booking. Classification, Administration
and the District Attorney’s office is using this module as an apparatus
to get harsher sentences from the courts.
Con respecto a la pregunta de las alianzas del frente unido con grupos
nacionalistas blancos, hay sus pros y sus contras al trabajar con otros
grupos. Ya voy escribiendo a MIM(Prisiones) por unos años y disfruto
leer el ULK. Soy prácticamente mi propia armada con un solo
hombre. No les pido a otras personas que hagan cosas que yo no haría por
mismo.
Me encuentro en una Penitenciaría Federal en Tuscon, Arizona. Este es un
pabellón para agresores sexuales, desertores de pandillas, Custodia
Preventiva. No me encuentro aquí por elección propia. Soy un agresor
sexual registrado por exposición indebida en un bar. Incluso aún cuando
se retiraron los cargos, me obligaron a registrarme y ahora me encuentro
todavía peleando el caso en el estado. Me encuentro en una prisión
federal por cargos que no se relacionan con el cargo estatal. Este
pabellón no tiene las mismas políticas que otros pabellones tienen. Sí
tenemos políticas, pero no al extremo. El salón chow se encuentra divido
por razas, pero te puedes sentar donde se te dé la gana. Lo que estoy
tratando de decir es que, yo podría dejar este pabellón e ir
probablemente a un pabellón activo, y que me asesinen por ser un agresor
sexual registrado, aún cuando se retiraron los cargos. Esa es la
política. Ahora, hay un montón de agresores sexuales y homosexuales,
ratas y desertores. Todos tienen una razón para estar aquí. He estado en
pabellones activos y muchas veces, en realidad la mayoría de veces, una
persona pone su vida en riesgo por alguien que no es más que una mierda
o un drogadicto. Ya no uso drogas y no me drogo en prisión.
Crecí en el oeste, desde Montana a Arizona, en el corazón de la nación
Aria, un ejecutor de la Hermandad Aria con el viejo refrán, si no es
blanco no está bien. Fui un niño ciego pero un buen soldado. A los 41
años soy ahora mi propio hombre. Nunca he abandonado a mis hermanos pero
ya no peleo más esa batalla de odio. Hay sus pros y sus contras al
trabajar con otros grupos.
Tengo una pregunta: ¿No hay Maoístas que sean agresores sexuales o
soplones? ¿Los Maoístas escogen trabajar con otros grupos o intentan
convertir a otros grupos al maoísmo? Es algo diferente el trabajar con
un grupo distinto para lograr la misma meta. Soy un individuo en un
grupo y mis metas como individuo no son siempre las mismas que las del
grupo. Mi meta es la libertad de un gobierno opresivo y corrupto, y no
importa si es EUA o Rusia, opresión es opresión, corrupción es
corrupción y esto debería detenerse. Todos pertenecemos a grupos
diferentes, incluso a los grupos que sienten la necesidad de oprimir a
otros.
El enemigo de mi enemigo es mi aliado. ¡El Frente Unido por la Paz!
Esto no se trata más de política o a qué grupo pertenece una persona. Yo
soy un Hermano Ario independiente y apoyo al Ministerio
Internacionalista Maoista de Prisiones y a la lucha de personas
encarceladas. (No me gusta usar la palabra preso o convicto o cualquier
otra palabra para prisionero que se usa para tomar el poder personal de
una persona. Estas palabras hacen que las personas se sientan sin poder,
sin esperanza, y eso no es verdad). Somos personas, humanos. Tenemos
familias, amigos, al igual que el resto de personas.
MIM(Prisiones) responde: Esta es una carta interesante sobre los
frentes unidos porque viene de alguien que representa a dos de los
grupos con quienes, a menudo nos dicen, nunca deberíamos aliarnos, lo
cual levanta preguntas de la otra parte. Primero, con respecto a la
pregunta de agresores sexuales, este escritor demuestra porqué el
confiar en la etiqueta estatal de “agresor sexual” es tan malo como
confiar en la etiqueta estatal de “criminal”. Debemos decidir por
nosotros mismos cuales individuos son aliados y cuales son enemigos.
Sobre la pregunta de nacionalistas blancos y aliados, este escritor
todavía se encuentra en su grupo pero al parecer, tiene desacuerdos
considerables con ellos si apoyan a ULK y MIM (Prisiones). Este es un
ejemplo excelente de unir a todos los que se puedan unir contra el
sistema de injusticia criminal. Sabemos que la hermandad Aria se
encuentra básicamente en oposición a la liberación de naciones
oprimidas. Al igual que el Partido Comunista de China sabía que el
Kuomindang se encontraba esencialmente en oposición al comunismo. Pero
en China antes de que la revolución fuera un éxito, hubo la oportunidad
de construir una alianza contra el imperialismo Japonés, la
contradicción principal en su momento. Y nosotros tenemos una
oportunidad parecida de construir una alianza contra el sistema de
injusticia criminal dentro de las prisiones. Ciertamente, que a una
escala menor que la del frente unido en China, nuestro enemigo común en
las prisiones ofrece la oportunidad de alianzas con grupos que serán
nuestros enemigos, en otras batallas. Además es posible que ganemos
algunos de estos tipos de estos grupos que, como este escritor, piensan
que “la opresión es opresión…y debería detenerse”.
Este camarada menciona Rusia, tal vez como un ejemplo aleatorio. Pero
hablando de Rusia y la opresión, es algo que se está convirtiendo en un
asunto delicado en los Estados Unidos actualmente. Este fervor anti
Rusia, como siempre, se encuentra ligado al nacionalismo americano. Se
usa para atacar el régimen actual de Trump de forma que amenace al mundo
con un inter imperialismo e incluso una guerra nuclear. Rusia fue alguna
vez parte de la Unión Soviética, que bajo Lenin y Stalin fue socialista.
Pero después de que murió Stalin en 1952, el país adoptó rápidamente el
capitalismo estatal. Y el capitalismo es un sistema que crece con la
opresión y corrupción. Pero el renacimiento anti Rusia en los EE UU no
se debería confundir con anti imperialismo, sino más bien es
nacionalismo que se mueve alrededor del poder imperialista más grande y
peligroso en el mundo – los E$tados Unido$.
Analizando el sistema de control social en los Estados Unidos, es
imprescindible que sigamos la línea correcta. Actualmente, la posición
de muchas personas es la de argumentar que el sistema de injusticia está
basado en un “Complejo Industrial de Prisiones”, que nosotr@s en
MIM(Prisons) rechazamos. Un nuevo informe, “Following the Money of Mass
Incarceration” (Siguiendo el Dinero del Encarcelamiento Masivo) de Peter
Wagner y Bernadette Rabuy, proporciona nuevas pruebas para apoyar
nuestra posición.
Las prisiones generalmente son una red compleja de campos de
concentración para semicolonias oprimidas, más que una industria
económicamente rentable. De hecho, existen algunos beneficios que deben
hacerse (y l@s capitalistas/imperialistas son buen@s encontrando sus
nichos) pero, sobre todo, el propósito del sistema de injusticia hoy en
día es el control de la población.
Tal y como Wagner y Rabuy señalan en su artículo: “En este primer
informe, el primero de su tipo, descubrimos que el sistema de
encarcelamiento masivo cuesta al gobierno y a las familias de las
personas involucradas con la justicia al menos 182 mil millones de
dólares al año”. Estos 182 mil millones de dólares incluyen los $374
millones de dólares en beneficios recibidos por la industria de la
prisión privada. Los beneficios de est@s accionistas, que en número son
poc@s, apenas y representan una empresa que genera beneficios de manera
sistemática. De hecho, en el gráfico utilizado como resumen de su
investigación, los autores tuvieron que hacer una excepción en el corte,
en lo que respecta los sectores importantes del presupuesto para
prisiones en los U.$., ¡para poder incluir a las prisiones privadas en
éste!
“Esta industria está dominada por dos grandes sociedades de
cotización oficial, CoreCivic (que hasta hace poco se llamaba
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA – Sociedad Correccional de
Estados Unidos) y The GEO Group, así como por una pequeña empresa
privada, Management & Training Corp (MTC). Nos hemos basado en los
informes públicos anuales de las dos grandes sociedades y en cifras
estimadas de MTC utilizando registros de una solicitud de información
pública de hace una década” (1).
Las corporaciones de la prisión privada tienen muy poco que ganar en el
negocio penitenciario, razón por la cual la amplia mayoría (hasta un
95%) son todavía cárceles públicas (2). El Gobierno estadounidense (ej.
Los contribuyentes) afronta la factura de los 182 mil millones de
dólares. L@s poc@s beneficiari@s económic@s de la industria
penitenciaria son vendedoræs del comisariato, compañías de bonos de
fianzas y empresas telefónicas especializadas. Como Wagner y Rabuy
demuestran, estas son las industrias multimillonarias. Y estas, por
supuesto, se benefician, ¡sean las prisiones privadas o no!
¿Por qué estaría dispuesto el sistema imperialista a gastar casi 200 mil
millones de dólares al año en la pérdida de una amplia mano de obra
económica y consumidores? Por lo siguiente: “Muchas personas confinadas
en rejas no trabajan y los sistemas penitenciarios de cuatro Estados no
pagan nada” (1).
Tal y como Wagner señala en un artículo del 7 de octubre del 2015:
“Ahora, por supuesto, la influencia de las prisiones privadas variará de
Estado en Estado y, de hecho, han presionado para mantener el
encarcelamiento masivo; sin embargo, son mucho más influyentes los
beneficios políticos que l@s funcionari@s elegid@s de ambos partidos han
cosechado durante décadas por ser dur@s con la delincuencia, así como
los miles de millones de dólares ganados por l@s emplead@s de las
prisiones dirigidas por el gobierno y contratistas y vendedoræs
privad@s”.
“A l@s beneficiari@s de la generosidad de las prisiones públicas les
encanta cuando las prisiones privadas toman toda la atención. Cuánto más
centrado está el público en l@s propietari@s de las prisiones privadas,
menos se cuestiona qué pasaría si el gobierno nacionalizara las
prisiones privadas y dirigiera todas las instalaciones por sí mismo: De
cualquier manera, aún tendríamos el sistema penitenciario más grande del
mundo” (3).
L@s capitalistas no sacan beneficios económicos del supuesto “Complejo
Industrial de Prisiones”, pero l@s polític@s se benefician con la
obsesión de l@s estadounidenses blanc@s con la “delincuencia”. Teniendo
esto en cuenta, descubrimos la verdad tras la enigmática frase de Wagner
y Rabuy: “Para estar seguros, existen razones ideológicas y económicas
para el encarcelamiento masivo y la sobrecriminalización” (1).
Ya hemos examinado las razones económicas (grupos de poder como las
compañías de bonos de fianzas y los vendedores del comisariato están,
obviamente, buscando sacar beneficio). Así que, ¿cuáles son las razones
ideológicas?
Si observamos la población de las prisiones (ya sean públicas o
privadas), podemos ver dónde gana impulso el encarcelamiento masivo. La
gran mayoría de l@s prisioner@s son nuev@s african@s, chican@s y gente
de las Primeras Naciones (aunque la mayoría de la población general es
euroamericana). La cárcel no es un fraude de ingresos, sino un
instrumento de control social. El factor motivador es la dominación, no
la explotación.
Aunque si estamos siguiendo el dinero, entonces tenemos que observar
cómo se desglosan los gastos. Wagner y Rabuy presentan la división de
los costes de esta forma: costes judiciales y legales, costes
policiales, decomiso de activos civiles, cargos de fianzas, costes del
comisariato, cargos de llamadas telefónicas, “agencias de corrección
pública” (como emplead@s públic@s o asistencia médica), costes de
construcción, pagos de intereses y costes de comida e instalaciones.
Los autores resumen su metodología para llegar a sus estadísticas y
admiten que “existen muchas cosas para las que no hay disponibles
estadísticas nacionales ni manera sencilla de desarrollar una cifra
nacional a partir de los datos limitados estatales y locales” (1). A
pesar de dichas debilidades obvias para obtener datos concretos fiables,
sobresale el análisis abrumador.
Wagner y Rabuy hablan sobre la industria de la prisión privada al final
de su artículo. Ahí, escriben:
“Para ilustrar tanto la escala de la industria de la prisión privada
como el hecho clave de que esta industria funciona bajo contrato para
agencias del gobierno (en vez de arrestar, procesar, condenar y
encarcelar personas por sí mismas), expusimos a estas compañías como un
subconjunto del sistema público penitenciario” (1).
Tal y como se discutió en “MIM(Prisons) sobre la Economía de las
Prisiones de EE UU,”si el trabajo penitenciario fuera una mina de oro
para especuladoræs privad@s, entonces veríamos corporaciones de todo
tipo dirigiendo el camino para más prisiones” (2).
Teniendo esto en cuenta, el gobierno utiliza el sistema de injusticia en
Estados Unidos y las prisiones (tanto públicas como privadas) para
oprimir a las minorías nacionales. Y l@s estadounidenses blanc@s, que se
alínean en formación con emoción cuando polític@s racistas como Donald
Trump continúan siendo “dur@s con la delincuencia”, premian al gobierno
con entusiasmo y renovado vigor.
El MIM Thought (Pensamiento de MIM) hace hincapié en el imperialismo,
tanto dentro como fuera de Estados “Ofidios” (Unidos). La red de
prisiones no es una excepción: en este caso el imperialismo funciona
como método de control para l@s estadounidenses de las naciones
oprimidas. Como las estadísticas de Wagner y Rabuy demuestran
claramente, no existe un “Complejo Industrial de Prisiones”, existe un
intento sistemático de destruir individuos, comunidades y naciones (4).
Alabama Correctional Industries (ACI) “utilizes inmate labor to produce
goods and services that are sold to governmental entities within the
State,” the ACI website states. “The revenues generated go to offset the
costs of incarceration and provide inmates with job skills and practical
work experience.”
Participating prisoners are paid 25 to 75 cents per hour for their work.
Alabama law states that products made by state prisoners can only be
sold to “entities whose operational budgets are funded all or in part by
tax revenues (e.g. state, county, and city governmental and educational
organizations),” according to the ACI website.
Most Amerikan self-described “communists” will not even listen to this
album as soon as they see the title. Those same white nationalist
socialists refuse to read MIM’s writings because of all the KKKs and
dollar $igns. They claim it’s too distracting. We say transforming the
oppressors language is a necessary part of building a revolutionary
culture to replace the old one.
A week ago, the top results brought by a search for “Amerikkka” on
youtube.com(1) brought up songs from Ice Cube’s Amerikkka’s Most
Wanted album, some other hip hop singles, and videos from a former
associate of MIM with explicit anti-Amerikkkan messages. This week, Joey
Bada$$’s new album is rising to the top for that query. All
Amerikkkan Bada$$ isn’t as edgy as Ice Cube (it does lack Cube’s
misogyny) and certainly not as edgy as Shubel Morgan (who did music
videos for MIM and LLCO), but it’s got a pretty strong message of New
Afrikan unity and struggle.
In one interview Joey Bada$$ said:
“It’s like hella vegetables. It’s hella good for you, and it’s almost my
hesitance with it: the fact that it’s so good for you, because these
kids these days want candy.”(2)
It’s an interesting quote, because Shubel Morgan often talked about the
need for “sugar-coated bullets” in their artwork to help the message go
down.
The album title, All Amerikkkan Bada$$ is no doubt a reference to
Badass’s late partner in rhymes, Capital STEEZ’s mixtape Amerikkkan
Korruption. Lyrics on this new album hit references to that mixtape as
well, such as the track “Dead Prez” that was produced by Joey Bada$$.
Both Capital STEEZ and Joey Bada$$ are respected as lyricists, with fast
New York styles of rapping.
The album cover (and associated art) features an Amerikkkan flag made
out of red, white and blue bandannas. The song “Legendary” makes a
reference to Crip culture with the line “the legends they never die, the
niggers they only multiply.” More explicit are the lines in “Rockabye
Baby”:
“Peace to my Slimes, and peace to my Crips Neighborhood police and
they always on the shift Protect my Bloods, look out for my cuz
When it’s all said and done, we be the realest there was Who else if
just not us? If you ’bout this revolution, please stand up”
ScHoolboy Q of the Hoover Crips in Los Angeles comes into eir verse
with, “I’m part of the reason they still Crippin’ out in Brooklyn” and
goes on to echo the struggles of New Afrikans against police brutality
and unemployment.
While the first single, “Devastated” has been out for months, the
second, “Land of the Free”, came out just before the album dropped this
week. The first song is about success, and the video has a party vibe to
it. “Land of the Free” is about the struggle, and the video features
some strong imagery, including all-white pigs executing Black and Brown
people in all black. Joey Bada$$ intervenes to free some of them, but is
later shot and hung by cops in Ku Klux Klan robes. And while the video
shows Joey Bada$$’s U.$. flag made of bandanas throughout, what is not
so prominent is the upside down U.$. flag on the back of eir jacket.
“Land of the Free” features lyrics like, “sorry Amerikkka, but i will
not be your soldier, Obama just was not enough, i want more closure.”
The apt-titled opening track, “Good Morning Amerikkka” references Black
Panther Geronimo Pratt’s framing for murder by the state.
While the album features the usual “fuck the police” and “fuck the
government” refrains, the last track, “Amerikkkan idol”, also says,
“Fuck white supremacy,” a slogan that seems to be coming into vogue
following the election of Donald Trump.(3) This track closes with some
pretty sober and explicit lyrics:
“What the government is doing amongst our people is downright evil,
disturbing. But not surprising, that’s for certain… I believe they are
simply trying to slander, start a civil war within the U$A amongst Black
and white. They want us to rebel so that it makes it easy for them to
kill us and put us in jails… Alton Sterlings are happening every day in
this country, around the world…And it’s time for us to rebel, better yet
raise hell. I just want everyone to be cautious about how they go about
it… not only battling them on a physical plain, but to outsmart them… As
Black men, i think our gangs need to do a better job at protecting us,
the people, our communities and not assisting in destroying them
brutally. It’s time they even the score… We need solutions. You better
start plotting now.”
On 3/16/17 I received from the Michael Unit mailroom a “Publication
Review/Denial Notification” refusing to deliver to me the
above-referenced publication based upon a finding that “it contains
material that a reasonable person would construe as written solely for
the purpose of communicating information designed to achieve the
breakdown of prisons through offender disruption such as strikes, riots,
or security threat group activity.” At the place for Remarks, “Pg. 13
contains info that could cause a prison strike and prison disruption.”
Instead of seeking the least restrictive measures of censorship, like,
for example, marking out the offensive language, they refused to deliver
the publication summarily citing to TDCJ-ID policy and procedure
BP-03.91, the same rule used to reject delivery of biblically-based
religious materials sent to me by my sister.
I appealed the denial to the Director’s Review Committee (DRC) whose
address is PO Box 99, Huntsville, TX 77342-0099. On 3/29/17 I received
the “DRC Approved/Upheld Denial on 3-28-17.” However, that denial was
not signed so I have no idea who is personally responsible and
accountable or if this is - as commonplace - a summary, arbitrary, and
capricious disposition of my appeal, similar to the practices generally
experienced when using the TDCJ-ID administrative grievance process
required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Nevertheless, I will not be receiving the publication, and,
notwithstanding my notice of anticipated litigation to prison
authorities, am notified that “the publication will be destroyed within
60 days of the initial denial.” And, again, I am not notified of the
identity of the person(s) who will engage in this illegally destructive
and criminally culpable conduct designed to deny and impede my rights
both to the publication and access to the courts. Thus far, my efforts
to report the criminal acts and conduct to civilian law enforcement
authorities and the State and Federal prosecutors’ office under Texas
Penal Code, Section 39.04 and Title 18 U.S. Code Section 242, have
proven to be futile.
Accordingly, I am asking you to engage your expertise and resources in
the litigation of this unlawful censorship to which you have standing to
complain and request that you name me as a complaining party litigant.
The proper venue is in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas sitting at Tyler, Texas.
I will at all times make myself available to you and to any legal
representative whom you choose. I retain all evidence of my claims but,
as I’m sure you know, is subject to confiscation, loss and destruction
by prison officials and their employees.
In closing, I am reminded of a passage I read somewhere. “Acts without
words are open to all kinds of interpretation and words without acts are
hollow promises [or just lies],” The ball is now in your park. I need
your help. Anxiously awaiting your response.
On 10 February 2017, I was accused of by unit administrator (UA) John L.
Grevious and internal affairs captain Michael Williams of stabbing
another inmate, which I never did at all. The disciplinary report that
UA Grievous wrote up said “on February 8th, 2017 at approximately
5:15p.m. inmate [me] attacked inmate [X] around the Dorm 12, DAL and
yard area out of camera view. After a interview conducted by
Capt. Michael Williams, inmate [me] claimed sole responsibility.” I
never attacked [X] and I never admitted to nothing.
Another thing is I have been letting the medical staff and other medical
personnel know about my right knee and leg hurting, locking up and
giving out when I lay in bed and get up to walk to the bathroom or just
walk around. They never did nothing about it until December 2016, when
they put me in physical therapy and then stopped it in February 2017
because my knee and leg ain’t getting better. Then on March 16, 2017 at
12:00am my knee and leg gave out in the shower and I fell and busted my
head, and CO Bick Ford Badge #397, never did anything when he was the
walk officer. It took other walk officers to get me medical attention.
Medical only put ointment on it and sent me back to my cell with an open
gash.
Right now all my complaints is been ignored and my letters is been
unanswered by warden Aaron Smith, deputy warden Anna Valatine, deputy
warden James Coyne and the unit administrators and caseworker. Grievance
coordinator Casey Dowden is refusing to answer my letter and refusing to
fulfill my legal request forms for civil rights complaint forms, acts,
standards, motions, forms, addressed, etc. I turned in on February 20,
2017; February 27, 2017; March 6, 2017; and March 13, 2017. Then fire
and safety super Brian Hilabrandt have the ACA standards on religion for
me, but on March 1, 2017, he told me they said I couldn’t have them and
he couldn’t get them to me until I’m out of segregation.
This is a little on what’s going on with me and what I’m having trouble
with. They are talking about transferring me, so I want to be able to
file all paperwork I need to challenge these injustices. I’ve been
denied my full medical-physical therapy-psychiatric files, adjustment
committee & grievance files and my full institutional files so I can
properly prepare my cases and file on them. This is why I am needing
legal, political, religious, material, financial, etc. help &
support and support groups/networks through letters, Jpay email &
videograms and Jpay money transfer to buy books, stationary, hygiene,
fund my Jpay media fund, pay court fees and to be financial stable.
I don’t rely on lawsuits alone but on connecting my struggle with the
outside struggle. I am trying to build bridges instead of burn bridges.
I am organizing from the inside out, at least trying to. If I got 10 or
20 people or so helping me and organizing with me I’m happy.
I will appreciate your and others’ help, support and response soon and
future organizing soon. Please forward this letter to others who can
help & willing to support me and organize with me.
I believe that having alliances with lines that are military minded is
somewhat dangerous to the united front. First and foremost, I do believe
in armed struggle, but building public opinion on imperialism and moving
toward communism as the ultimate goal to end all oppression is key. Some
lumpen orgs or nationalists might criticize MIM(Prisons) on their line.
But truth be told we must study the history of the Cultural Revolution
in China, which gives us the best way to move toward socialism, ending
in communism. It also allows us to learn from the mistakes of the past.
Amerikkka targets lumpen orgs, and nationalist groups. So alliance with
a militia group might jeopardize the united front. And once the
imperialist policies place everyone in one basket who they feel are a
threat, they will place them in prisons or worse eliminate them as what
happened to many BPP members in the late 1960s. So, I must say comrades,
that MIM(Prisons)’s approach with study groups and challenging all
comrades to study history and dialectical materialism prepares us to use
public opinion to change the minds of the lumpens and all those who are
oppressed.
What good is guns if you don’t know who the enemy truly is? By enemy I
mean, just going up against amerikkka’s army is not enough. The enemy is
the system which must be changed. Guns with no vision or discipline is
suicide to the united front. The best weapon in the struggle is unity,
and armed struggle is also important. But each one teach one is the
method to awakening the masses on how capitalism destroys lives.
Once the American people become self-reliant and help their fellow man
and stop supporting this economic monster (capitalism-imperialism) then
hopefully through public opinion and democratic centralism we can
achieve the goal we all want which is communism.
As for snitches, there are different levels of snitching. But I will not
allow a person in my circle who I know has the tendencies to crack under
pressure. I mean those individuals who work for the prison
administration, receiving goods in order to cause chaos. They would go
so far as telling prison officials that you are sharing revolutionary
material and having your books confiscated.
Even on the outside you have to be careful aligning with rats who will
jeopardize the united front in order to demoralize and cause
dissociation. But as long as those who represent the militant side of
fighting oppression can agree that we must use strategy and wait for the
right time to strike the imperialist monsters, I’m all for it. But if
militants feel as though focoism is their aim, I’m all out. Educate the
poor and oppressed first, to show them the real enemy. And there needs
to be a change in habits and consciousness so that we will not allow
materialistic ideology to control us.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade raises a good point about the
risks of allying with those who are engaging in military actions now. We
agree with em that focoism is not the right strategy. But the value of a
united front is that we can disagree on this point of strategy in terms
of the right time for armed struggle, but still unite in our fight
against imperialism. We can work with these organizations while
struggling with them over these points if such struggle seems fruitful.
We do not need to have complete agreement on points of strategy in order
to work together in a united front. We would also want to keep these
groups at arms’ length for the simple fact that advocating armed
struggle now is a known tactic cops use to wreck a movement from within.
But beyond the question of uniting without complete theoretical
agreement, this writer is arguing that it is too risky to unite with
focoists because their premature military action could bring down the
whole united front. This is certainly a risk we need to consider. Groups
within the UF have the autonomy to act independently of the group, and
so some may engage in actions that others disagree with. While we
wouldn’t automatically exclude focoists from a UF based on their
political line, this comrade is correct to warn that we need to stay
vigilant about actions that present a risk to our work and to our
organization.
At the same time, resistors of all stripes, even those who aren’t
focoist, bring down repression from the state. Even anti-imperialist
academics and people working in electoral politics are harassed, and
murdered, by the state when their words are too effective. One could
also argue that the frivolous security practices of other groups will
jeopardize the UF. We have to find a balance between putting ourselves
out there, and getting the work done.
We can’t make up easy rules to answer to this contradiction. Instead
everyone has to evaluate alliances based on the circumstances and
current situation.
There were two recent riots here. One on the 3A yard here at
Corcoran, the other at SATF Corcoran, on 3C yard. No one severly hurt,
but it’s hard to organize with situations like that.