By a bit of serendipity, I recently ran across the contact info for
MIM(Prisons) and on a whim subscribed to the newsletter without fully
understanding what I was to receive. After reading ULK 66 (the
first response to my initial request) I feel inspired to offer my first
thoughts of the movement in hopes it may aid in future recruiting.
First and foremost, I tend to be distrustful of any organization,
especially those with strong viewpoints. However, this fear was greatly
abated by the statement that members need not agree with all points of
the group so long as they do not actively oppose them. I feel this is an
incredible strength of USW, and inclusion in any individual organization
is a powerful tool for recruitment. It projects confidence by saying “we
don’t have to control your views” and encourages those who are close to,
but not in, alignment with said views to sit and listen to what you have
to say.
Secondly, I was impressed by the article/response format and
self-criticisms. As an extension of the first point, it shows that USW
practices what it preaches by allowing uncensored articles to be
published, and independently it shows that no one, party leaders
included, is above reproof. In my opinion, any organization willing to
hold its members/leaders responsible for their actions is a cut above.
We are all human, and prone to human error. To pretend otherwise is a
discouragement.
My one word of criticism would be the use of jargon which made some
articles obfuscated. I’ve written this article to mirror the way I
normally speak, without regard to what my readers may understand, to
help illustrate this point. While I have no doubt many readers will
understand all my words, I’m sure there will be many who are put off by
my use of uncommon terms. The same is true of any specialized language.
While most words can be looked up in a dictionary (although lumpen still
puzzles me), I think it is best to use simple language in recruitment
material, or be sure to include a quick definition hear the beginning.
I hope these observations will prove helpful to others. May your words
match your deeds, your deeds match your values, and your values match
your beliefs.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This is a good reminder to all writers for
ULK that we should try to write in language that is accessible to
our readers. Sometimes it will be necessary to use a word like “lumpen”
because it is the only word that describes what we are talking about.
But even then we can try to define our words in context. Sometimes we
receive article submissions that are clearly written by well educated
folks, but which seem to be showing off their vocabulary, and making it
much harder to read than necessary. So we agree that writing as you
would speak is a good general guideline.
With that said, we welcome everyone to submit articles to ULK
regardless of your writing skill and political education level. We often
get letters from folks who are hesitant to submit articles until they
get more education. We suggest instead to just write about something you
know. If you see some abuses at your prison, write about that. If you
see some good organizing going on where you’re housed, write about that.
Start from what you know based on your real world observation, and add
political analysis to that as you are comfortable. We can always help
with the analysis, and we are happy to help with your writing too. But
if you write like you talk, chances are it will come across as readable
and make for a good article.
Let us know if you need a copy of our writers guide which gives you some
helpful tips on language and format and topics.
And here’s a definition of First World lumpen, the term we most commonly
use: The class of people in the First World who are excluded from the
productive process. By virtue of living in the First World this class,
on average, receives more material benefits from imperialism than the
global proletariat. As such their interests are not the same as the
exploited classes and we do not include them in the
“lumpen-proletariat.” But their conditions in many ways parallel those
of the lumpen-proletariat standing in stark contrast to the majority of
the First World populations.