MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
UPDATE FOR AUGUST 2022: Now that Juneteenth 2022 has passed,
please use this updated
flyer and these updated
postcards now address the censorship across the state of Texas in
recent months. We need your support to keep increasing the pressure to
fight this censorship of political speech.
Download and print this flyer to hang or hand out.
We are also asking others to join our letter writing and postcard
campaign in support of the rights of MIM Distributors and activists in
Allred to freely communicate. There has been a rise in mail
censorship as organizing has progressed.
download PDF below
print 2-sided on cardstock
cut into 4
add $0.40 stamp (or more)
go to event or public space and ask people to sign their name, city
and state
explain the Junteenth Freedom Initiative to them
hand them a flyer (above) or Under Lock & Key
ask for a donation to pay for postage & printing
drop postcards in mail box (don’t mail them all at once we want a
consistent stream of cards coming in)
“We can’t afford rent and we’re sleeping outside. The youths are
jobless” -Yaw Barimah, Ghanaian taxidriver
In late June 2022, street protests erupted in Ghana’s capital city,
Accra. The above quote matches the general feel and demands of the
masses who took to the streets. Most lay persons are aware of the
current effects of inflation on the daily lives of the average people.
Many of us have not made the necessary connection that such inflation
and other tricks capitalists use to increase the amount of surplus value
extracted from the populace, are inherently apart of the internal
dynamics of capitalism itself. Our failure to understand this brings our
protests, and dissent to a screeching halt once the point of economic
reformism is reached.
In countries dominated under imperialist neo-colonialism, such as
Ghana, the weight of economic exploitation is maximized. As conditions
sharpen, the exploited classes of Ghana are beginning to stir. On July
4th four teacher’s unions went on strike in opposition to the
neo-colonial government’s refusal to pay ‘cost-of-living allowances’ of
at least 20% of their wages.
The government holds the position that due to ‘Annual inflation’ now
reaching 27.6% and the accompanied reduction in value of the Cedi(1),
they’re unable to pay this allowance. The system of imperialism works in
a way that parasitic countries like amerika hold economic hegemony over
Third World countries like Ghana. This allows for the U.$. currency, the
dollar, to dictate the value of the national currencies of Third World
countries. What this means for the Ghanaian and other Third World
workers is that because their wages are paid in money, the national
currency, the amount of their pay, although the same on paper, is
devalued along with national currency.
Month-on-Month inflation rates for the Cedi
So the exploitation of the Ghanaian worker has intensified. Their
labor is still required to be done at the same rate, same hours labored,
same amount of labor, and same wage paid. What has changed is the value
of their labor power; with inflation, the amount of cedi it takes to
maintain the worker’s needs is greater. Yet wages have not increased, or
not increased as much.
To allow the common people to overstand our common interest in
overthrowing capitalist dictatorship it is necessary to understand and
breakdown plainly, the inner-working of capitalism and how it effects
the lives of the people.
In Ghana, as described above, and many other places around the world
right now, the mechanism being used by capitalist exploiters is the
depression of wages. This generally occurs when the wages of the worker
are below the value of their labor power. Labor power here means human
work, the sum total of a person’s physical and mental effort.(2) Labor
power is the primary factor in society’s production. Uniquely however,
only in capitalist society is labor power a commodity.
The process of commodification of labor power manifests itself in two
conditions: (1) The worker is ‘free’ in that they can ‘choose’ to sell
their labor as a commodity. (2) The worker owns nothing aside from their
labor power (what the mind/body can produce). They have no means of
productions, or means of living and must sell their labor power to
live.
Therefore, what we know as ‘employment’ in the capitalist economy
consists of capitalists buying the labor power of the laborer and
converting them into hired slaves.
The exploitation of workers is examined by the advent of surplus
value. The degree of exploitation is examined by the rate of surplus
value. The capitalist devises ways to maximize this rate of surplus
value, which brings me back to depression and deduction of wages.
To comprehend wages, we must first overstand that wages are a
‘disguise’. They are a way to fool the people into thinking they’re
getting equal value for their labor.
Marx said, “wages are not what they appear to be. They are not the
value or price of labor, but a disguised form of the value or price of
labor power.”(3) Therefore the capitalists notion that they pay the
worker the price of their labor is completely fabricated.
A key in understanding political economy is to comprehend the
distinction between labor and labor power. Under capitalism what the
worker is selling isn’t labor, but is labor power, which is capable of
being commodified, while the former (labor) isn’t.
The next logical question is why? why is labor not a commodity?
Commodities exist in their final state prior to being sold, labor
doesn’t. Also commodities are exchanged for equal value, according to
the law of value. Therefore if labor was a commodity the capitalist
should pay the full value created by labor, which would eliminate
surplus value (the source of profit), which would eliminate
capitalism.
If labor was a commodity, it would have value and that value would be
determined by the amount of embodied labor. This can’t happen. How can
the value of a phenomenon be determined by the value of itself?
What labor is is the process of labor power. Therefore the wage paid
to the laborer is equal to the value of the labor power. In other words,
it is the amount required to keep the proletariat as a class alive and
working – that is the value of labor power. Whatever extra the worker’s
labor power produces above the value of labor power (the wage paid to
keep the proletariat alive) is called surplus value and
it is what is ‘exploited’ by the capitalist. The wage itself is the
chain that binds the exploiter to the exploited. The revolutionary
demand must be to abolish the wage system.
The term ‘cost of living allowance’, caused me to think of our need
to overstand where the idea of ‘cost of living’ or ‘standard of living’
has its roots.
We begin by concluding that these are two distinctive wages. In the
political economy of capitalism, there are nominal
wages and there are real wages. Nominal wages
are expressed by the wage payment of money.
In our quest to find the ‘cost of living’, we can’t use nominal wages
as representation. The cost of living will only be reflected by the
amount of means of livelihood which can be bought by the money wage
(nominal wage). What the nominal wage can purchase is the cost/standard
of living and is called real wages.
Declining value of Ghana’s cedi priced in U.$. dollars
What is taking place in Ghana is that there is a contradiction
between the nominal and real wages. The nominal wage is being held in
place, while the real wage is in a downward trend, a decline.
“When the purchasing power of money declines and the prices of the
means of livelihood go up, the same amount of the nominal wage can only
be exchanged for a smaller amount of means of livelihood. Then the real
wage falls. Sometimes even if the nominal wage goes up a bit, but less
than the increase in prices of the means of livelihood, the real wage
will still decline.”(4)
This is essentially what we observe playing out in real time in Ghana
and elsewhere. As the above quote alludes to, simple economic reforms
like increase in wage will not end this phenomenon, the elimination of
surplus value is the only solution. The bourgeoisie will always use the
tools of inflation, price increases and rent increases to increase the
contradiction between the nominal wage (money paid) and the real wage
(what can be bought) to increase the rate of surplus value accumulation
(the exploitation of the people).
In conclusion, I want to point out that while the protests organized
by Arise Ghana and the work strike by the four teacher’s unions are
significant struggles for the daily hurdles of life for the Ghanaian
people, the people must be made to distinguish between the causes and
effects of economic hardship. When a sick person has a cold and a
running nose, they don’t merely get a tissue for the nose without curing
the cold itself. The people exploited by imperialism must synthesize the
economic and political struggles.
Closing with a word from Marx,
“The working class should not forget: in this daily struggle they are
only opposing the effect, but not the cause that produces this effect;
they are only delaying the downward trend, not changing the direction of
the trend; they are only suppressing the symptom, not curing the
disease.”(5)
DOWN WITH CAPITALIST-IMPERIALISM!!!
Notes: (1) The Cedi is the national currency of
Ghana. (2) Fundamentals of Political Economy, edited by George C.
Wang,;Chapt.4,pg.59 (3)K.Marx,Critique of the Gotha Program,selected
work of Marx &Engels Vol.3 (4)Fundamentals of Political
Economy,chapt.4,pg72 (5)K.Marx, Wages,Prices and Profit, Selected
Works of Marx &Engels, Vol.2
[CORRECTION: This article was published stating that Yogi was
Puerto Rican, when ey was actually of Nicaraguan descent.]
Peace Comrades. Recieved the latest issue of the newspaper &
passed it off to one of my comrades who just recently got into some
trouble. So if possible, I would like to receive that issue & the
one before it. Thanks with much love in revolution.
I’m writing this as an article that I’m hoping will get published for
the Black August Memorial in hopes that my earnest effort could perhaps
clarify things a bit further in terms of matter of perspective &
also to educate brothers/sisters on the legendary history of fallen
comrade George Jackson.
I read an article that began somewhat vacariously about the fallen
comrade & his connection to Hugo Pinnell who was also BGF & how
because of George’s wide encompassing views on race & its place in
standing to building political/military cadre’s, that this somehow means
that we need to abandon the rhetoric that is connected with groups who
are primarily concerned with fixing the “Black issue”.
I strongly disagree with the content of that article & not
because my views are just so diametrically different, but because I too
have wide encompassing views concerning race. However, I’m not under the
impression that we need to abandon our quest in building the support
that is needed to eliminate the black problem altogether. My first
reason for this is largely because I see that Blacks are the only group
who is told to forget about the monumental issue that we faced & are
still facing. But its also because of the fact that before we can ever
hope to build in the concept of global Asiatic unity & eventually
begin to merge our support with Europeans, we must first unify among
ourselves & use that unity to destroy the Black problem & then
we can go on to build with others & help others in their quest for
the same sort of thing.
You see, revolution is tied to long range politics. This is so
because revolution is so complex due to the fact that everything –
places, people, religion, economics, and sociology – will be impacted in
a major way. It’s not as simple as a government takeover & let’s be
real, if you cannot make revolution into a transmitter that spreads
through all cultural variations, then a government takeover here &
abroad will never be possible.
George was a people’s revolutionary & by people’s revolutionary I
mean people in terms of all humanity. However, even he had to develop
into that sort of personhood. Let’s not forget either that George
Jackson was a huge history major & for those who really know about
George, they attest to the fact that he loved being Black & even
wanted to be Blacker. That is not proof that he ever abandoned his
concern for his people’s plight nor did he have a lack of pride what
comes from a lack of knowledge. Through his studies on Afrikan history
as evidence through both of his books, I know he saw the connection
between the Original man globally. That means that he saw the black,
brown, yellow, red (a variation of brown) as Asiatics & all being
the same people, & the fact that we suffered at the hands of the
same forces & people was largely his reason to connect with these
people.
The Black Guerrilla Family was initially started to combat racism
within the confines of an openly oppressive prison system designed
against Blacks. Yeah, sure, George did overcome the counterproductive
effects of racism that would have surely stunted his growth as a
communist revolutionary. But when did the Black Guerrilla Family ever
become a family that forgot about the Black issue?
I think for a lot of people who became politically aware, they became
like Utopian anarchists in a way. I say this because a lot don’t see the
fact that whatever issue they faced like slavery here and abroad is what
fueled their passion to become revolutionaries in the first place. I get
that we cannot stay blinded by that issue alone, but how do you walk on
a broken leg? You have to heal that leg first. It’s like Malcolm said
“You can’t stab a man with a 12-inch knife and pull it out 3 inches and
ask him why he’s still complaining.” One issue doesn’t trump the next
one, however until we get free completely its righteous for brothers to
complain and use that concern to solve their problems.
Also as revolutionaries, it’s supposed to be our aim to help others
to eliminate their problems, not to beat them over the head for doing
so.
I also disagree with the fact that August 21 and the Attica uprising
were not events solely about George. Even if you believe the bullshit
“story” that the state concocted to assassinate George, this still means
that the events that took place and led up to the assassination were
about George and this means that the San Quentin 6 coming together was
for George. Perhaps it was solidarity across “national” lines but, if
Hugo Pinell was Puerto Rican, then how wasn’t he Black? Now I agree that
the revolt of Attica was already brewing, however George’s assassination
was the match that struck an already heavily gasolined situation.
If anything, no one needs to forget the Black issue, but I mean this
in a global sense, not an Amerikan sense, because the original man is
everywhere and everywhere he has come into some form of struggle. Read
the history books, don’t just get immersed into revolutionary theory.
How can you say that you agree with George or any other revolutionary
leader if you don’t understand their philosophies which are the result
of history and the masterworks of theorists who came before them? I
don’t think those who are excited about Juneteenth are wrong at all. But
it’s an Amerikan tragedy & that’s what Juneteenth should be
about.
For Black August, we shouldn’t be bickering over Black this, Puerto
Rican that, we should be trying to show how we all the same people and
use that to connect with each other. Globally the Black man is 11 to 1
there’s no reason to argue over why brothers should deviate from Black
revolution. If you don’t understand that either you didn’t go through
the process of going from A to Z or you understand revolution only as
its all inclusive, which is good, but there’s a process to
inclusion.
So if you really champion George, then try to understand the core of
his philosophy, not by separating Blacks from other Asiatics, but seeing
them collectively as one globally.
Peace.
Wiawimawo of MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade
writes, “Blacks are the only group who is told to forget about the
monumental issue that we faced & are still facing.” We hear this a
lot from people of different nationalities, that they are told to, or
that their own people fight for the liberation of others but not
themselves. So I would say this is a misperception that probably stems
from the overall lack of revolutionary nationalism among all nations
entrapped by the United $tates at this time and a result of oppressor
nation chauvinism telling the oppressed to essentially “stop
complaining.”
We wholeheartedly agree with this comrade on the need to unify within
oppressed nations in order to build strong alliances between the
oppressed and especially with forces in the oppressor nation (who are
most likely to lead us astray). USW has a slogan, “Unity from the Inside
Out”, and this is one of the many meanings of that slogan. Like this
comrade states, we find the work of prisoners (and oppressed nations in
general) finding unity and inclusion amongst each other to be of great
important work. We also find it important for two oppressed groups to
100% understand/accept each other’s qualitative differences while
building unity as blind unity is bound to fall apart. Malcolm X used the
term “Black Revolution” as happening in Asia, Africa, and Latin America;
so from that angle we see the positive and internationalist application
of this model of thinking.
As we explain in another response on single nation organizing, the
main reason we think this is true is because imperialism is the
dialectical contradiction between oppressor and oppressed nations. To
resolve that contradiction, and to end oppression of all forms in the
world today, means prioritizing the struggles of the oppressed nations
to overcome the oppressor nations and end imperialism.
As to the term “Asiatic”, we don’t subscribe to the ideas of a
differentiation between original or aboriginal people and white people
being a demonic derivation of that. And i’ve never seen any indication
that George Jackson did either. We would use the term Third World
oppressed nations, as the Black Panthers did. It is the contradiction
between nations, which is an historical phenomenon, not a biological
difference.
The second annual Fourth of You-Lie fundraiser just wrapped up
successfully. Just two issues ago we published a detailed update on our
financial contributions with a graph for 2021. For the first two
quarters of 2022 we’ve had more contributors and more money donated than
any quarter in 2021. This steady increase in donations is great for our
work and a great sign of our growing mass base.
We did not see a surge of donations around July 4th, but we have seen
sustained contributions at a higher level since we began promoting the
fundraiser. Steady is good. The Fourth of You-Lie fundraiser did bring
in some generous donations from the outside, from at least one
supporter.
For those that don’t know, we ask that all comrades in prison who can
send in at least 7 stamps per year to cover your subscription to
Under Lock & Key. Our costs may increase this winter
though, we will keep you updated.
For outside supporters in particular, we have begun fundraising for
legal fees to fight censorship in Texas. Please send a note or email us
to let us know you are donating money for this purpose.
While our finances look sustainable, we remain in a deficit with
comrade time. We will be continuing to shift tasks in the coming months
to adjust for changes in support from outside comrades. Much
appreciation to our new comrade who did much of the transcribing work
for this issue! A few things that we continue to be behind on
include:
intro study group responses are going out months later than they
should be
advanced study group through the University of Maoist Thought
continue to be unavailable going on a couple years now
while we’ve been stepping up our efforts to combat the rash of
recent censorship, we are not appealing all instances or taking them
further
the Texas Pack has not been updated since 2020 and there are no
plans to update it
the zine Power 2 New Afrika has not yet been printed, but should be
soon
ULK continues to come out every 3 months instead of every 2 as it
used to, or every month as we would like
The above list is to let our comrades inside know what to expect, and
a call for support from people on the outside.
On 19 June 2022, prisoners across Texas abstained from celebrating
the federal Juneteenth holiday until real freedom is attained by the
oppressed in this country. Instead they organized, studied and made
their voices heard for the demands of the Juneteenth Freedom Initiative,
including:
End Solitary Confinement! End Restrictive Housing Units(RHU)!
End Mass Incarceration!
Stop Mail Censorship!
Transform the prisons to cadre schools! Transform ourselves into NEW
PEOPLE!
Updates Since Juneteenth
The response from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice(TDCJ) was
swift and coordinated. MIM(Prisons) sent hundreds of update letters to
comrades in Texas during the month of June, and almost all of them
appear to have been censored.
Prisons where our letters were censored for “inciting a disturbance”
or “riot” include:
Allred Unit
Beto I Unit
Boyd Unit
Christina Melton Crain Unit
Estelle High Security Unit
Estelle 2
Ferguson Unit
Gist
Hughes Unit
McConnell Unit
Mountain View Unit
Stevenson Unit
Telford Unit
Terrell Unit
Wallace Unit
Wynne Unit
We are still receiving and compiling censorship notices from June.
Needless to say, there was a coordinated effort to block our letters
across the state, and they were really worried about the Juneteenth
boycott. Of course, there was nothing about organizing a riot in our
letters. But the imperialists will consider a boycott a “disturbance”
worthy of violating Constitutional rights. Biden said we must celebrate
Juneteenth, so now we face the consequences of his goons in the
TDCJ.
The censorship at Allred Unit had been going on for months prior.
This is the worst RHU in the state, where a lot of the JFI organizing
began. Therefore we began a postcard
campaign to protest the political targeting of mail and of certain
prisoners at Allred. One comrade there received 22 mail denial notices
in one day in May! Another comrade in Allred wrote:
“I been denied 2 newsletters & 1 letter that ya’ll sent my way.
[everything we’ve sent this comrade] I highly appreciate ya’ll. I’ve
sent them home. This only confirms that Texas don’t want us to know.
Your news letters were denied for tha reason of ‘inciting a
disturbance’.”
“I asked the mail room lady if anything sent from this address will
be denied and she said, ‘Yes.’ Just like that, freedom of speech
denied.”
This campaign is ongoing, as the censorship continues, and we ask
outside supporters to get involved. Mail from prisoners in Allred is
often delayed a month or more, so updates on the launch of the JFI have
not yet come in from some of the organizers.
Outreach during June included flyering and postcards on the streets,
hundreds of update letters sent to TX prisoners and radio interviews in
Texas and on Free Aztlán on 96.1 KEXU in Oakland.
One Texas comrade reported:
“The Juneteenth Freedom Initiative flyer was displayed for several
weeks here. On Juneteenth, no movement due to low staff and no special
holiday meal. The officers dining room had ribs, BBQ chicken and
brisquet with all the fixins, and these were supposed to be delivered to
each officer on duty. However, most were stolen en route. The warden and
kitchen captain were pissed.”
The JFI was initiated by TX T.E.A.M. O.N.E who has continued to lead
organizing efforts inside. Others, including Prison Lives Matter,
Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee Local 613 #1, the Texas
Liberation Collective, and United Struggle from Within cells, have
joined the call. On the outside, MIM(Prisons), Anti-Imperialist Prisoner
Support, and the Revolutionary Abolitionist Movement have been providing
support.
Phase 2
Per the plan below, laid out by TX T.E.A.M. O.N.E. the next phase of
the Juneteenth Freedom Initiative for prisoners is to file petitions
with the Department of Justice. If you need a sample petition, write us
to get a copy. This petition is not specific to Texas.
Prisoners in long-term solitary confinement in Texas can also join
the Dillard lawsuit against the TDCJ. If you need a copy of the
motion to join, write us.
Outside supporters can best assist organizers inside by joining our
campaign against censorship. We want to continue to let the TDCJ know
that people outside are paying attention and not willing to accept this
political repression. We will be following up with a lawsuit on behalf
of an affected party in Allred and MIM Distributors. You can help in the
following ways:
calling or writing letters to the TDCJ, and to Allred Unit in
particular
getting others to sign postcards protesting the censorship
As you may know, Juneteenth has now been made a federal holiday in
amerika. On this day many will sing the praises of Our oppressors or
otherwise negate the reality of the lumpen (economically alienated
class), that according to amerika’s 13th amendment We are STILL SLAVES.
While We do not wish to nullify the intensity of the exploitation and
oppression that New Afrikan people held in chattel slavery faced, We
must pinpoint to the general public, those upcoming generations of
youngsters looking to follow Our footsteps, that to be held in captivity
by the state or feds is not only to be frowned upon but is part and
parcel with the intentions of this amerikan government, and its
capitalist-imperialist rulers. We say NO CELEBRATING JUNETEENTH until
the relation of people holding others in captivity is fully
abolished!!
Comrades have been organizing around the Juneteenth Freedom
Initiative(JFI) for almost a year now, and we just completed phase 1.
Prisoners in Texas and North Carolina took up the campaign. Instead of
celebrating Juneteenth, boycotters worked to get out the voice of the
incarcerated in TX and NC.
Previous campaign materials include more demands and more details.
Add your own demands that speak to your local conditions and make the
JFI demands heard by the masses and the oppressors. Don’t just boycott,
organize.
The Boycott is just the first phase and launch of this campaign by
and for all Texas prisoners.
Juneteenth boycott and voice demands starting 19 June 2022
present petition to the Department of Justice Special Litigation
division (write in to get a copy if you still need one) – everyone
should mail copies of their own signed petition to the DOJ following
Juneteenth 2022
if (2) fails to bring proper response, we will petition the United
Nations – date To Be Determined – watch for announcement in Under Lock
& Key, we will be requesting testimonials and collecting statistics
to back up our arguments on each campaign position and submit them as
evidence to bolster the recent guilty verdict of the We Still Charge
Genocide, International Tribunal 2021 where mass incarceration and
solitary confinement were ruled to be vital tools in the U.S. campaign
of genocide for centuries against Black, Brown and Indigenous peoples of
this continent.
Thank you for the book MIM Theory 2/3 on Gender and Revolutionary
Feminism – this is exactly the kind of reading material I want and
need.
I do want to briefly comment on a recurring phrase I see in some of
your theory: “white worker”. Does this mean white collar worker as in
labor aristocrat or is this a prejudice that labor aristocrats are white
skin color? If you mean privileged as in white collar then why don’t you
say collar?
I have not read much of the book yet, just a few pages. However, I
can agree that much of the working class in amerika is labor aristocrat,
where you lose me is that when I think of labor aristocrat I see a face
like Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City, who is constantly calling
for more police and more oppression.
Here in California we have a lot of Brown faces, perhaps 50% Brown.
The point is whenever I talk to a Brown or Black person about socialism
the response is mostly the same. Black & Brown people in amerika
love their privilege, they enjoy exploiting 3rd world workers, there the
labor aristocrat is Brown and Black in the face and white in the
collar.
I think MIM Theory agrees with me that First World working class has
no use for revolution and is impossible to recruit or even harmful to
the movement, as bourgeoisie in any dictatorship of the proletariat is
only there to revive capitalism. However, as MIM states the majority of
First World working class is labor aristocrat, then I would assume MIM
is considering the demographics of the First World as a whole and means
“white collar worker” and not merely a racist jab of “white worker.” All
of the cops here have Brown faces.
In Solidarity,
a California prisoner
Wiawimawo of MIM(Prisons) responds: Sounds like we have
a high level of unity on the class structure in this country, and the
world. The truth is the analysis has evolved since the 1980s, when it
was more reasonable to talk about a proletariat in the internal
semi-colonies (by which we mean New Afrika, Boricua, Aztlan, and the
First Nations). So back then writers like MIM and Sakai would talk about
a Black or Chican@ proletariat, while seeing the white workers as an
enemy class. And yes, by white we mean white people, though we use it to
talk about nation, rather than race, which is a myth. Therefore today
we’ll often use Amerikan instead. And many “non-white” people have
integrated into Amerika today. Euro-Amerikan is a term for the
oppressor nation, but white is still a valid term that is
understood by the masses today.
In the introduction to our pamphlet, Who is the Lumpen in the
United $tates, we wrote:
“If we fast forward from the time period discussed above to the 1980s
we see the formation of the Maoist Internationalist Movement as well as
a consolidation of theorists coming out of the legacy of the Black
Liberation Army and probably the RYM as well. Both groups spoke widely
of a Black or New Afrikan proletariat, which dominated the nation. MIM
later moved away from this line and began entertaining Huey P. Newton’s
prediction of mass lumpenization, at least in regard to the internal
semi-colonies. Today we find ourselves in a position were we must draw a
line between ourselves and those who speak of an exploited New Afrikan
population. If the U.$. economy only existed within U.$. borders then we
would have to conclude that the lower incomes received by the internal
semi-colonies overall is the source of all capitalist wealth. But in
today’s global economy, employed New Afrikans have incomes that are
barely different from those of white Amerikans compared to the world’s
majority, putting most in the top 10% by income.”
The above quote is referring to the MIM Congress resolution, On
the internal class structures of the internal semi-colonies. Even
since that was written we’ve seen the proliferation of what you talk
about, Chican@ prison guards being the majority in much of Aztlan, and
New Afrikan prison guards being the majority in many parts of the Black
Belt. This of course varies by local demographics. Regardless, it makes
one question whether there are even internal semi-colonies to speak of,
or at what point we should stop speaking of them? The massive prison
system in this country is one reason we do still speak of them.
So we agree with you that the term “white worker” has kind of lost
its meaning today. However, we still see the principal contradiction in
this country as nation. Despite the bourgeoisification and integration
of sectors of the oppressed nations, and the subsequent division of
those nations, we still see nationalism of the internal semi-colonies,
if led by a proletarian line, as the most potent force against
imperialism from within U.$. borders.
A couple more minor points. We’d probably say Eric Adams, and high
ranking politicians like em, are solidly bourgeois. Whereas the labor
aristocracy would be those Brown guards overseeing you. In addition, we
do not use labor aristocracy and white collar synonymously either, as
white collar work has always been petty bourgeois or at best
semi-proletariat by Marxist standards. So the real controversial issue
is to say there are “blue collar” workers who are not exploited.
Organizations for Whites
Another comrade wrote saying that ey had no organization to join
because ey is white. They had mistakenly thought that we think people
should only organize with their own nation. We do not take a hard line
on this question. And it is obviously related to the above.
MIM(Prisons), USW and AIPS are all multinational. Yet in our
understanding of nation as principal, it seems necessary for there to be
nation-specific organizations to play that contradiction out between the
oppressed and oppressor nations. We certainly have supported
single-nation organizing, and in another resolution we put out, we cite
that as one of the handful of legitimate reasons
to start a new organization instead of joining MIM(Prisons) or
USW.
But there may be situations where multinational organizing in this
country is actually more effective. At this stage our numbers are so
small that it should be strongly considered just out of necessity to
begin building our infrastructure. And when single-nation organizations
do exist, the united front exists for them to work with others outside
their nation.
Printing Anarchist Content
Finally, we had a discussion with a comrade who submitted an article
that was favorable or uncritical of anarchist organizing strategy. The
comrade wanted to know why we asked em to change eir article, because we
claim we will print articles form anarchist allies.
Just because we will print content from anarchists, even content we
might have disagreements with, it doesn’t mean we always will. First,
our goal is to win people over to the Maoist line. So if you submit
something that disagrees with that, our first response will often be to
struggle with you over that line with the goal of gaining a higher level
of unity.
Now some comrades are avowed anarchists. For them we do not need to
keep having the same debate. Nor do we need to have that debate in
ULK. When we say we’ll print material from anarchists we’re
talking about material that actually pushes the struggle forward. Not
material that is debating issues we think were settled 100 years ago.
This is similar to a critic
complaining about us not printing eir piece in ULK when we
responded, because we weren’t showing both sides of the debate over the
labor aristocracy. Again, this is a debate that was settled decades
ago.
On top of this there are many comrades and organizations we work with
that aren’t in the camp of the international communist movement such as
the Nation of Gods and Earths for one example. While many aspects of the
Supreme Understanding taught by the NGE certainly goes against the
Maoist worldview, we are able to find solidarity in practice and in a
united front. We don’t necessarily have to battle out whether the
Supreme Understanding or Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is correct in the
newsletter. We encourage line struggle on the ground.
In summary, this is a Maoist newsletter, edited to represent the
Maoist line. We get to pick and choose when to print stuff that
disagrees with Maoism if we think it is useful to advancing the
struggle. Sure we find it important for cadres to be able to commit to
line struggle scientifically and principally, and communists in general
should have the ability to look at sources that challanges their
viewpoint and uphold their line while analyzing what’s wrong/correct
during line struggle. There is infinite non-Maoist material out there;
and we advise our readers and comrades to go to those materials if they
want to see what our critics are saying. We certainly won’t expect our
critics to use space in their newsletters publishing entire polemics
that we wrote against them, nor would we say that’s unfair to us.
On 27 June 2022, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of
Ecuador (CONAIE) agreed in opening discussion with the Ecuadorian
government in solutions for the national strike that has paralyzed parts
of the country for two weeks.(1) Before declaring its openness to
negotiations with the government however, CONAIE rejected President
Guillermo Lasso’s move in calling for price cuts of gasoline for 10
cents in diesel.(2) Currently, the fuel prices of Ecuador has doubled
from 2020 with diesel going from $1 to $1.90 and gasoline from $1.72 to
$2.55.(3) From CONAIE’s “Agenda of National Struggle,” the first point
demanded:
“Reduction and freezing of the prices of fuel: diesel at $1.50 and
extra and eco gasoline at $2.10. Abolish Decrees 1158, 1183, 1054, and
focus instead on the sectors that need more subsidies: agricultural
work, farming, transportation and fishing.”
The demand was obviously not met, and CONAIE still continued to
blockade the roads with President Lasso claiming,
“Ecuadorians who seek dialogue will find a government with an
outstretched hand, those who seek chaos, violence and terrorism will
face the full force of the law.”(4)
Seeking to appease the rebellion in other ways, Lasso has lifted the
state of emergency for the nation. CONAIE leader Leonidas Iza who was
arrested by the national police on 14 June 2022, was rejected by
President Lasso who claimed that the indigenous leader was an
“opportunist.”
“We will not return to dialogue with Leonidas Iza, who only defends
his political interests and not those of his base. To our indigenous
brothers – you deserve more than an opportunist for a leader.”
Historical
Overview of Rebellions in Ecuador
Two years earlier, Ecuador faced another similar rebellion led by
workers and students which sparked on the International Workers’ Day of
1 May 2020. The political-economic crisis heightened by the COVID-19
pandemic revealed quite a few corrupt decisions made by the
government.(6) Workers and students demanded better wages, coordinated
sit-ins in medical facilities, and demonstrated in the streets with
rallies. The main goals were for better wages, and ousting of
then-President Lenin Moreno.
A year previous to the 2020 demonstrations, in October of 2019,
another rebellion raged in Ecuador as the month started with President
Lenin Moreno declaring 6 economic measures, and 13 restructuring
proposals which was part of an agreement the government took in a $4.2
billion loan with the IMF.(7) One of the key reform acts targeted by
demonstrators was a 20% cut in wages for new contracts in public sector
jobs, and a cut of a decades long fuel subsidies which led to an
increase of fuel prices.(8) The leading two groups of this rebellion
were the aforementioned CONAIE and the United Front of Workers
(FUT).
Prior to that, there was also a rebellion in 2015, a rebellion in
2012, and another nationwide crisis in 2010. CONAIE and other indigenous
national groups all played a role in these movements with varying
degrees of involvement. From 2010 to 2022, there have been 6 major
rebellions with the workers, students, and indigenous nations playing a
leading role in the movements. Crisis after crisis, what is causing this
trend? Every time the workers or the indigenous nations rise up
(oftentimes together) they are accused of staging a coup by the
government. In 2000, there was a short-lived coup, but the Amerikans
interfered to remove indigenous leaders from power. Despite this, they
have denied the accusations in recent protests, while also following
their word through with action. How come they seem to have no desire to
seek state power despite having the independent institutions and
subjective forces that are able to paralyze the country each time they
rebel?
After many years of regular protests against politicaleconomic
crisis in Ecuador, there was a rise of the social-democratic movements
in Latin America that became prominent in the mid-2000s. This trend was
strongly guided and inspired by the ideology of “Socialism of the 21st
Century”, which argued that societal change and shift from capitalism to
socialism can be done in gradual and non-violent means.(9) Prominent
leaders who have taken up this ideology include Hugo Chavez of
Venezuela, Nestor Kirchner of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil, Michelle Bachelet of Chile, and finally
Rafael Correa of Ecuador.
Rafael Correa, was the 45th president of Ecuador from 15 January 2007
until 24 May 2017. President Correa – leading the left-wing coalition of
the PAIS Alliance – began the “Citizen’s Revolution” in hopes to
reconstruct the country into a socialist state. The government ended its
relationship with the IMF, and took an active part in creating the “Bank
of the South” – a pan-South American monetary fund alongside the
political-economic bloc of the Union of South American Nations.(10)
The class character of this movement can clearly be seen as that of
the national bourgeoisie of South America: the bourgeoisie of South
America stunted by imperialism as opposed to requiring imperialism to
function as a class. With this national bourgeois led anti-imperialist
movement in Ecuador, we see another example of a failure in reformism
and social-democracy in history. With the PAIS alliance’s right-wing
turn under the next president Lenin Moreno, Correa distanced himself
from PAIS due to disagreements. Under Lenin Moreno’s presidency, and
through the political-economic crisis brought by social democracy (such
as national debt), the strategy of working within the system found
itself reversing all its progresses. By the time Correa left office in
2017, there have already been 2 major rebellions. The rebellion in 2012,
was part in reaction to the joint Ecuadorian-Chinese company
“Ecuaorriente SA” commencing a 25-year contract of extracting natural
resources on indigenous nations’ land.(11) So with the failures of
social-democracy and reformism came another lesson learned by the
Ecuadorian masses. Whether this lesson can be synthesized back to the
masses through a revolutionary lens is a question for the
revolutionaries of Ecuador.
During the rebellions, one can see in images hammer and sickles,
anarchist A’s, and myriads of other ideological imagery painted across
makeshift shields, helmets, and banners. With the tactics and strategy
of blockades and insurgencies the rebellions which seems to constantly
appear in the country seem to be eclectic and non-ideological. When
constantly accused by the regime that these groups are forming coup
d’états, CONAIE and organizations representing the workers and students
constantly deny the accusations of ousting any presidents. They follow
through with their actions as well. Short lived insurgencies don’t lead
to state power.
Lessons For Us To Learn
Fidel Castro has famously said that the reasoning behind his armed
action and revolution against the Batista government was because working
within the existing political system has been exhausted of its
effectiveness. Yet, when the new generation of Latin American leftists
and self-proclaimed “communists” came to prominence, Fidel Castro also
famously claimed that the new generation is lucky because they are in a
situation where power can be obtained through the ballot not the bullet.
Throughout his life, Castro kept representing the petty-bourgeoisie and
the national bourgeoisie of Cuba through its alignment with the
social-imperialists of the USSR: a similar move that Correa’s government
had done with the Chinese social-imperialists and the national
bourgeoisie of Ecuador. In the end of his life, Castro closely aligned
himself with the pink tide of Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, etc.
The lessons we can learn from the failures of reformism or “Socialism
of the 21st century” can be standard lessons we have drawn from the
failures of all reformist or electoral methods of achieving proletarian
dictatorship/socialism. The state is a tool wielded by a class: the
bourgeoisie. Despite this, finance capital finds its ways to implement
social-democracy (or fascism) as a means of governing. Using the tools
of the enemy won’t get us state power. They will crush us as soon as we
cross their lines.
The lessons we can learn from the CONAIE and the various workers and
student organizations which rebel constantly in Ecuador are valuable as
well. One lesson is in regards to the distinction of having reforms
through violence in contrast to a revolution. Through a
Marxist-Leninist-Maoist lens, just because one uses violent tactics or
bears arms does not necessarily mean they are revolutionary or
conducting meaningful armed struggle. One can be just as reformist
through violent means as with electoral means. This highlights the key
idea that reform vs revolution isn’t a matter of strategies or tactics,
it is a question of the correct analysis of how the change from a
capitalist society to a socialist society happens. Thousands of masses
can rally on the streets throwing firebombs at the police, but if the
goal is to change laws and protest austerity measures then it is no
different in quality than reform. In similar methods, things that might
seem reformist at a shallow glance such as building independent
institutions and spreading public opinion against world imperialism
(advancing the objective and subjective forces) can be revolutionary if
the goals are aligned and preparing for proletarian dictatorship during
non-advanced stages.
Long live Ecuador!
Self-determination for all oppressed nations!
Notes (1) AP News, June 25, 2022, “Ecuador president:
Indigenous leader is trying to stage coup.” (2) Lina Vanegas, June
27, 2022, “Protesters Meet Ecuador Govt After Rejecting Fuel Price Cut,”
International Business Times. (3) Ibid. (4) Ibid. (5)
Ibid. (6) Rhonny Rodriguez, October 7th, 2022, “Ecuador, el peor
evaluado en la región sobre el manejo de la pandemia” Expreso (7)
Kimberly Brown, October 10th, 2019, “Ecuador unrest: What led to the
mass protests?” Al Jazeera (8) Ibid. (9) Socialism of the 21st
Century – Economy, Society, and Democracy in the era of global
Capitalism, Introduction by Heinz Dieterich (10) El Mundo, April
16th, 2007, “Ecuador cancela la deuda con el FMI y amenaza con echar al
representante del Banco Mundial” (11) Amy Silverstein, March 9th,
2012, “Ecuador natives begin two-week march to protest Chinese mining
company” The World
For Afrikan people in the United $tates, captivity began in Afrika
when we were captured and confined in slave forts like the Gold Coast’s
Elmina and Goree Island’s “House of Slaves”. From those colonial forts
we left Afrika in chains and shackles through the “Door of No Return”
and we were transported to the Americas in the bowels of slave ships.
Afrikans were dropped off in various places around around the world, and
what is now referred to as North America, in chains and colonized here
to work as slaves on the plantations of the settler-colonies of European
imperialists.
As slaves we were chattel owned as private property, becoming the
first commodity that gave rise to a global colonial-capitalist system.
Slavery was absolute captivity with complete deprivation of life. The
only means by which Afrikans could seek freedom was by revolt or escape,
which is something we’ve struggled to do since our first initial capture
from our homeland.
Colonizers’ plantations were forced labor camps where Afrikans slaved
in the fields and were housed in hovels and fed slop. We were forced to
work day in and day out, suffering severe beatings and some of the
greatest acts of cruelty to force our submission. If we
escaped, we were hunted and tracked by slave catchers with guns and
bloodhounds. Once caught, we were brought back to the plantation from
which we fled. Escaping slavery was a crime that was punishable by
flogging and lashing, branding, mutilation and death. After 13 of the
settler-colonies within North America consolidated into the “United
States,” slavery was expanded to new territories as the colonizers
continued stealing more Indigenous land, or killing them, like the case
in the Caribbean island of Puerto Rico. It continued to reap the filthy
lucre of the dirty business of the flesh-peddling slave-trade and the
human trafficking of slavery until slavery was finally abolished after
the Civil War – an intra-conflict between two rival settler-colonialist
groups – the Union versus the Confederacy. With the abolition of
slavery, Afrikans ceased to be formally held as slaves, but we remained
colonial subjects all the same as colonialism continued to rule and
regulate every aspect of our lives through the brutal exploitation of
our labor through sharecropping, peonage and court-leasing.
As we have seen, U.$. administrators – Republican and Democrat alike
– asserted their right to interfere directly in the domestic affairs of
countries in Central America and the Caribbean for the sake of “national
interest”. One island nation, however, remained under permanent Amerikan
control. Puerto Rico became part of the United States as a result of the
Spanish Amerikan War. In July 1898, in retaliation for the sinkage of
the U.S. vessel Maine in Cuba, Amerikan troops disembarked in Puerto
Rico, instigating the country’s first act of European-style colonial
expansion. The island thus became the pawn in a war between Cuban
patriots and Spanish garrisons. It had not expected military occupation,
quite the contrary, Spain had already agreed to grant Puerto Rico
autonomy and to devise some sort of “house rule” for the island. The
U.S. invasion changed all of this. Suddenly, Puerto Rico became a
crucial factor in U.S. global strategy – not only because of its
potential for investment and commerce, but also because of its
geopolitical role in consolidating U.S. naval power.
But there remains a basic question: Why did the U.S. take Puerto Rico
as a colony while helping Cuba achieve independence?? The difference may
well reside in the histories of the two islands. There was a large
standing armed insurrectionary movement against Spain in Cuba. Puerto
Rico, however, was on the way to a negotiated settlement and could
present less resistance to outside forces. Puerto Rico thus became
caught in a complex struggle between major powers and Cuba’s
insurgents.
During the colonial period, the island had served as a supporting
military garrison and commercial center for Spain, roles that
intensified as the slave trade reached its peak in the 1700’s. Sugar
production became the predominant agricultural enterprise. There were
also small farmers, jibaros, rugged individuals who cultivated staple
crops and helped maintain a diversified economy. Because of this, the
slave population always remained a minority. After 1898 residents of the
island had no clear status of our land. In 1917 they were granted
citizenship in the U.S. due to W.W.I. In 1947, nearly half a century
after the invasion, Puerto Rico was permitted to attempt
self-government. In 1952 the island was granted “commonwealth” status
within the United States. Puerto Rico at this moment is the oldest
colony in the world.
The 13th Amendment to the U.S. constitution, often believed to have
formally abolished slavery, simply limited slavery, making it a
punishment for crime, and that punishment was imprisonment.
Therefore, slavery became a penal servitude and prisoners became
“slaves of the colonial state”. Prisons became slave labor camps and
being sentenced to prison was to be forced to do “hard labor”. It was a
sentence of forced labor in addition to a term of imprisonment. This was
where the term “hard labor” came from. As a direct result of black codes
developed specifically for our people, Afrikans were arrested for petty
violations of those codes (other ethnic groups of minority also:
Latinos) and sent to prison where we not only toiled in slave labor
camps and worked in chain gangs, but were also contracted out to private
companies to work for railroads, mines and mills.
We became the new slaves in a new convict lease system that was
created by colonial capitalism so that it could acquire a steady supply
of cheap labor to exploit for the greatest profit without paying for
that labor because we were slaves of the state. After enduring the
captivity of forced chattel slavery, Afrikans began to endure the
captivity of imprisonment under colonialism. We went from being slaves
on plantations to convicts in prison.
Colonialist law was established and created to protect the colonial
system and primarily criminalize and punish Afrikans and other colonized
peoples – Latinos.
During the Black Revolution of the 1960’s, the police arrested and
jailed Afrikans such as Fannie Lou Hamer for “civil disobedience”. They
arrested Huey P. Newton and Geronimo Pratt on trumped-up charges. At
that time the voices of Puerto Ricans to be recognized as a nation
joined hands with the Black revolution in the struggle against the U.S.
empire. Oscar Lopez, Alejandro Torres, Antonio Camacho, and many more
were railroaded to prison. The FBI asassinated leaders like Malcom X, Dr
Martin Luther King Jr., Fred Hampton through COINTELPRO. In 2005,
Filiberto Ojeda Rios, leader of EPB “Eercito Popular Boricua” better
known as the Macheteros, was assassinated in Puerto Rico by FBI agents.
Those who were captured and thrown in prison became political prisoners
and prisoners of war.
At the height of the Black Revolution, the CIA flooded Afrikan
colonies (to the United States Puerto Rico is considered another Afrikan
Colony) with heroin from the golden triangle in southeast Asia where it
had long worked to finance its covert operations against China at the
same time the U.S. was waging a war of imperialist aggression in
Vietnam. With this process of narcotization our communities fell
completely under control and influence of drugs: the illegal drug
business and drug traffickers began a deadly epidemic of addiction. The
war on drugs was escalated by Ronald Reagan with the beginning of the
crack epidemic, started after the CIA flooded the Afrikan community with
the drugs from Central America, funding dirty wars against Nicaragua. It
led to increased militarization of the police, tougher drug laws, and
the greatest prison build-up in history. Afrikans and Latinos became the
main causalities of that war.
As prisoners, we are just bodies that fill cells in prisons, situated
in economically depressed rural areas, producing jobs for settlers.
Today, Amerika has the largest prison system in the world. More
Afrikans are now convicts in prison in 2022 than they were slaves on the
plantation in 1852, and hardly have any more rights than we had when we
were slaves.
Crime simply provides the justification for locking us up behind the
razor-wire electrified fences. Imprisonment is an integral and
indispensable part of the colonization and of Afrikans and Latinos in
the United $tates. I was born and raised in Puerto Rico, my father a
black Puerto Rican and my Mother a white Puerto Rican; as colonial
subjects we have always been captives of Colonialism.
The imprisonment in the U.S. will only end when we throw off the
chains of colonial-capitalism and free ourselves from the rule of the
colonizer.
We, all minorities, Blacks, Latinos, etc need to come together under
the same line of thinking – I encourage every one to educate yourself,
know your history, know your past, know your culture. It doesn’t matter
how dark the color of your skin is, what state or country you’re from,
in prison there’s only two uniforms – the prisoners and the guards –
remember always which one you wear. The only way to beat this monster is
by uniting, and come together as one body.
CAUSE NUMBER:3:21-CV-00337
STYLED NAME: F. MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET. AL.
RE: COURT FEES TO OBTAIN
Dear Friends:
Greetings, I am the leading plaintiff in the above styled and
numbered case. Please be aware of the court fees to obtain copies of the
case. Basically they charge 10 cents per copy, and the total fees for
the following documents are as follows:
The Complaint (no exhibits) 32 pages
Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction (no exhibits) 31
pages
It will be a total cost of $6.30 to obtain the above documents from
the clerk of the court. You need to send a money order or institutional
check to the clerk of the court at:
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
601 ROSENBURG STREET
ROOM 411
GALVESTON, TEXAS 77550
Styled Name: F Martinez, Doll, Pineapple Pictures, et al. Versus
Members of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice, et al.
Dear Friends:
Greetings! I am the leading plaintiff in the above styled and
numbered case. I filed this lawsuit on my behalf and others similarly
situated prisoners in TDCJ. I also represent the interest of Doll,
Pineapple and other commercial vendors.
The reasons in filing this lawsuit is to challenge the
constitutionality of the rules 1(C) and IV(A)(10)(11) of the “Uniform
Offenders Correspondence Rules” (BP-03.91)
Rule 1(C) which limits to receive ten photos per envelope is
unreasonably and arbitrarily applied to deny catalogs, brochures, and
flyers from commercial vendors. Rule IV(A)(10)(11) which totally bans
“sexually explicit images” coming into the general population all in
disguise of rehabilitation purposes.
On or about 17 June 2022, I filed in court a “motion for temporary
restraining order and preliminary injuction.” I hope that the court
grant me this motion and temporarily enjoin the defendants from
enforcing these rules until the merits are decided in trial or through
the summary judgement process.
Anybody interested in copies of the complaint and the “TRO” motion
may request copies form the court. To request the price fees you may
write to the clerk of the court at:
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Texas
Galveston Division
Clerk of the Court
601 Rosenberg Street, Rm 411
Galveston, TX 77550