MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
by a North Carolina prisoner November 2011 permalink
This is a cry out for help from the brothers in the struggle at the
confinement of Scotland Correctional Institution located in Laurinburg,
NC under the ruler and dictatorship of Karen Stanback, Asst.
Superintendent of Security. It grieves my heart to know and witness an
African American woman, apply rules of oppression to camp populated by
80% minority races. Actions of oppression ordered by K. Stanback are:
To ban all Under Lock & Key publications
No state or local newspapers
No shirt jackets worn in the dinner hall, school, or any religious
programs (no matter what the temp is)
No showering from 6pm until 9pm (with a population of 1500
prisoners)
No jobs for close custody prisoners once they lose their assigned job.
(All jobs are then referred to medium custody prisoners)
Confining over 145 prisoners in one unit called Green D,E,F or
“Gangland”. This is where all the gangs are housed at, mixed together,
and not giving any opportunity for regular programs or employment like
the regular population.
Only 1 hour of recreation. Without proper exercise, fresh air, and
movement an individual develops a mentality like a caged in animal.
She and the admins here have created a very hostile environment and seem
to enjoy it.
Brothers and sisters please! This is our cry for relief the hammer of
oppression being applied to us at Scotland CI under the watch of K.
Stanback. Please contact the appropriate resources to aid us in our
struggle.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We support this comrade’s call for
prisoners to stand up against oppression. This prisoner and others are
leading the struggle at Scotland and they provide an example to
prisoners across the the criminal injustice system who are facing
similar conditions.
Si se puede o no se puede? (Yes, we can or no, we can’t?) Which one is
it Mr. President?
Beginning in 2008 we started hearing from then presidential candidate
Barack Obama that if elected he’d take quick action on immigration
reform. During this time he also began straying to the left of the
bourgeois mainstream opinion by hinting at a distaste for workplace
raids of undocumented migrants. Also, he never bothered to mention
anything about the many undocumented people who’d committed a “crime” in
crossing the Mexico/U.$. border when he gave his speech at the National
Council of La Raza.(1)
Indeed, statements and positions such as these on the issue of
immigration reform helped popularize the Illinois Senator amongst
Latinos which in turn helped him to wrestle the Latino vote away from
then NY senator Hillary Clinton.(2) Yet here we are now three years out
from the election of the first Black President of the United $tates of
Amerika and time has once again shown us that Barack Obomber, like all
other Amerikan politicians, has nothing more to offer the oppressed
nations but broken promises and more oppression.
One million people have been deported from the U.$. since the taking of
office by Obomber in 2009. That’s 400,000 deportations a year with the
various Latino nations bearing the brunt of it.(3) It’s also important
to note that this number of deportations is actually up from the
previous Bu$h administration and ridiculously higher than the 500,000
people who were literally “railroaded” to Mexico between 1929-39 in what
the imperialists called “repatriation drivers.” This despite the fact
that not everyone who was deported were Mexican nationals.(4)
More recently the U.$. initiated the mass deportations under the guise
of the Obomber administration’s federally funded program called
“Secure
Communities” in which Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
officials, in conjunction with local law enforcement, searched out the
undocumented and carried out raids against them all across the
country.(3) The raids are conducted under the heading of “fugitive
operations.”(3)
At first local law enforcement was given the option of joining Secure
Communities but many were hesitant foreseeing the potential problems
this might pose to their daily functions as occupiers of the internal
semi-colonies as well as to the policing of neighborhoods with a high
density populace of newly arrived migrants.(3) ICE however was
eventually able to sell Secure Communities to the pigs after telling
them they’d only be going after the “worst of the worst.”(3)
According to government mouthpieces, half the people who’ve been
deported since 2009 were violent offenders, but investigations into the
program have revealed that many of the people deported have actually
been deported due to minor infractions such as Susana Ramirez who was
arrested by local law enforcement for a minor traffic stop, sent to a
federal detention center and was subsequently deported to Mexico from
Maple Park, Illinois. All this happened in the span of a few days
despite the fact that she had no criminal background and was raising
U.$. citizen children.(3)
But was Susana Ramirez actually one of the lucky ones considering the
circumstances? The answer is yes.
Tent cities, cramped quarters, no right to attorneys, racism, verbal
abuse, mental abuse, beatings and sexual assault, this is the stark
reality that awaits the undocumented as they are imprisoned and deported
at the hands of Amerikans.(3)
Case in point is the Willacy, Texas Federal Immigration Detention Center
where a recent investigation by the ACLU determined that there was
“widespread sexual abuse of female detainees and a systematically
positioned injustice system with no accountability firmly intact.”(3)
This information was further corroborated by former Willacy guards and a
former Willacy psychiatrist who gave eyewitness accounts of the abuse,
contrary to a 2009 ICE audit of the prison camp in which the detention
center was given a rating of “good.”(3)
During the same period ICE also conducted a survey of the prisoners
supposedly to encourage grievance filing. Unfortunately, the survey was
nothing but a ruse orchestrated and conducted by ICE officials
themselves in an effort to pinpoint those attempting to file complaints
and dissuade them from following through.(3)
What’s to Come?
So what is in store for the migrant population of the U.$.? Well, if
current reality and the number of people currently locked up in
Amerika’s prisons can serve as indicators of what’s to come then we
should expect the country with the highest percentage of its population
behind bars to now become the country with the highest percentage of
foreign nationals behind bars as well. This is more proof of how the
U.$. oppresses the world’s majority. They are political prisoners
indeed.
Liberal critics of the Secure Communities program such as the ACLU have
pointed out that it is nothing more than the Bush administration’s
immigration policies juiced up on Obomber steroids.(5) And while we’d
have to agree we’d also have to go further. Secure Communities is the
utilization of the Amerikan injustice system as a proxy resolution for
its superfluous migrant population which the U.$. directly displaced to
begin with! Descendents of the original inhabitants of this land migrate
to the United $tates to work at jobs that Amerikans won’t do, making
less than Amerikans make in wages. But there are only so many of these
undesirable jobs that need to be filled, and open borders would result
in an equalization of Amerikan wages with the rest of the world – the
biggest fear of the labor aristocracy. This economic reality, combined
with political threats that an expanding oppressed population inside
U.$. borders poses, explains why Amerika targets migrants (particularly
those coming across the Rio Grande) for strict control.
At an El Paso speech earlier this year President Obomber was once again
telling lies and talking out of both sides of his mouth when he stated
that there would be no comprehensive immigration reform because of
Republican stubbornness.(3) Bottom line, there will be no comprehensive
reform and there will continue to be “enforcement on steroids.” And no
reform means the requirement under Secure Communities to deport 400,000
people a year, according to an ICE internal memo, will continue to be
enforced to maintain funding from Congress.(3)
When asked about the toll these numbers would take on migrant families
in the U.$., Cecilian Muñoz, an Obomber administration top official with
Interior Affairs, answered in typical oppressor nation rhetoric, that
“broken families are the result of broken laws.” She then went on to
state how it was all just part of the immigration problem.(3)
To that coconut we say quite the contrary. There is no immigration
problem, but there is an imperialism problem. As a matter of fact it’s
the number one problem in the world today: principally U.$. imperialism.
In the wake of Susana Ramirez’s deportation there was a push to have a
Senate Bill voted on and passed to deny ICE any more funding for Secure
Communities. The bill was called “Susana’s Law,” and it was defeated.(3)
by a North Carolina prisoner November 2011 permalink
On October 17 I received
Under Lock & Key
22 even though I was not supposed to. It was a mistake made by an
officer who was passing out mail. Attached to the publication was a
notice to prisoners of statewide disapproval of the publication; this
particular issue has been banned statewide. I was supposed to sign this
notice to verify I’ve been informed but luckily the officer was
distracted by his duty of distributing mail and instead of having me
sign the notice attached to ULK 22, he just slid them both
under my door.
When I realized what the notice was for, I grew kind of excited. The
kind of excitement one has when you feel you just got over on someone in
power. This made me even more interested in the ULK
publication. First, because I’m thinking I’m the only one statewide who
has one. And second I know this publication has material and information
the state doesn’t want me to know; why else would they ban it statewide?
Before I began to read the ULK, I read over the notice to find
out exactly why this particular publication was banned. The notice said:
“The publication/material violates Division of Prisons Policy at Section
D.O 109 and is disapproved for the reason listed ‘violence, disorder,
insurrection or terrorist/gang activities against individuals, groups,
organizations, the government or any of its institutions.’” With that my
excitement grew even more, thinking I obtained material of such nature.
The notice went on to say that this “violence, disorder, insurrection…”
was on page 4 of the publication.
I immediately thumbed to page 4 and found the headline “Time for
Peaceful Revolution” written boldly atop the article. I began to read. I
was confused. I retrieved the Notice to Inmate of Statewide Disapproved
Publication once again to make sure I read it correctly, and I had. I
was so confused that I had to go over the article once more because
maybe I misread!
I was confused by the reasons given for banning this material. It was
banned because it was supposedly promoting violence, disorder and so
forth against individuals, groups, organizations, the government or any
of its institutions. But really, one hundred percent honest, the article
was speaking of a peaceful revolution. In none of its lines through the
article did it speak of violence against anyone. It spoke of unity
amongst the many LOs and a little history of Kingism.
It was then that I really and truly realized the power we have amongst
us if only we could just unite as one and struggle together. I realized
it’s not us as individuals who they are afraid of, it’s we as a people
who they fear. Why else would they ban an article speaking of a peaceful
revolution and that urges others to come together as one? And also, it’s
not necessarily violence that they avoid, it’s a revolution, period!
It’s not how we go about the revolution that frightens them, whether its
violently or peacefully, it’s simply the thought of a revolution, an end
to their domination over us, that unsettles them.
And they will do what they have to do in order to maintain control,
whether it’s murder, imprison or, in our case, censor mail. If the
officer hadn’t mistakenly given me the ULK 22 I would have
actually thought that maybe MIM(Prisons) was influencing violence. But
now the truth is out and it has me in question about the other
publications that were banned. Were they really banned because of the
reason these prison administrators told you they were? I don’t think so.
Our rights are being trashed! We must, I repeat, we must, stand up for
our rights. Fight censorship!
by a South Carolina prisoner November 2011 permalink
I am a prisoner in the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC),
where the prisoners are forced to march around in filthy, tattered
uniforms, and most are packed three to a cell, with one sleeping on the
floor. But in addition to a huge list of miserable conditions here, the
state has a sickening carrot-and-stick method of converting prisoners to
Christianity.
Our cafeteria basically serves dog food, and even that is withheld from
prisoners as punishment for minor rule infractions. The prison only
serves real nutritious food to prisoners who have attended a certain
number of religious indoctrination programs. This amounts to many
prisoners not being able to eat well unless they convert to Christianity
and jump through all kinds of Jesus-themed hoops.
Prisoners are also being recruited, in the guise of “education,” into an
indoctrination and training program that eventually ships them to other
prisons to proselytize and spread Christian propaganda. As a
requirement, new recruits must sign a paper that declares their
willingness to be transferred to any prison SCDC desires. Often
prisoners sign up for this program to temporarily escape the violent
conditions at other prisons, only to be returned to the same brutal
dungeons after completing the program. In such institutions, prisoners
are commonly beaten, stabbed, and raped. Who wouldn’t sign up for the
Christian fascist training program to escape that?
It all amounts to the prisoners being coerced into religious social
control programs. And many of us must choose between going to church or
going hungry; between being indoctrinated or being beaten, stabbed, or
raped.
MIM(Prisons) responds: It is typical of the Amerikkkan criminal
injustice system to force feed their approved form of “education” on
prisoners while denying them real education through censorship or just
refusal to offer programs. Religion has a long history of being used as
a tool of social control by obscuring the material conditions that
determine our reality on Earth.
Many people ask us about religion because they have heard that communism
is anti-religion. In some ways communism is the best way for religious
people to uphold their beliefs and put an end to the evils of murder,
rape, hunger and other miseries of humyns. Some argue that Jesus Christ
must have been a communist because he gave to the poor.
An issue
with religions, however, is that they uniformly reject scientific
thinking. Religions require people to accept on faith that there is a
higher power controlling life for humyns. So the first problem with
religions is that they are fostering idealist thinking. Even those who
do not believe in organized religion often look for answers in ideas,
rather than a scientific study of the material world.
In addition, historically many religions have acted as
apologists
for the oppressor class in power, telling the oppressed people not to
worry about their terrible conditions in this life because a better
afterlife awaits them if they just suffer in silence. There are notable
exceptions to this, including the liberation theologists of Latin
America, some Muslim activists, and others.
Overall we see the best of the religious movements and groups as allies
in the fight against imperialism. But we still caution people that
religion, like television, is an opiate for the mind. Even worse,
religion provides a philosophical justification for never searching for
real solutions to the problems and contradictions we face. Belief in
spirituality or religion is not a dividing line question to work with
MIM(Prisons), and we accept into USW all who take up the
anti-imperialist struggle. We will be honest in our push for everyone to
study materialist thinking and why we oppose idealism.
I have much unity with Loco1’s
piece
concerning a strategic retreat and after reading his essay I now
have some things I’d like to speak on concerning the strike. However, as
I myself am not currently housed in the SHU my words should be taken
merely as food for thought, as it is up to those participating directly
in the movement to analyze their own conditions.
Firstly, I believe that the SHU prisoners are currently in a crucial
period. They have successfully completed the first stage of their
struggle but if they are to successfully complete the next stage then
they must enter into a period of criticism, self-criticism as it is the
best way to avoid any left-deviations or rightist errors. The SHU
prisoners are the vanguard in this struggle and it is up to them if the
movement moves forward or dies a humiliating death. By moving forward I
in no way am implying that the struggle must continue full steam ahead
regardless of their present conditions.
Loco1
is correct to point out the fact that this is a protracted struggle,
and the SHU prisoners aren’t going to go anywhere anytime soon, except
to another SHU. This is especially true for the ones that are
“validated;” they have all the time in the world to sit and hammer shit
out. Or as the Afghans like to say of invading oppressor armies: “you
have the clocks, but we’ve got the time.”
Thus, here are some points of attention:
The life and death of the struggle depends on the willingness of the
prisoners to remain united. It is essential that contradictions between
the oppressed and the oppressors do not become contradictions between
the oppressed themselves.
The main force of the movement are the SHU prisoners. The immediate
reserves are the general population prisoners. Loco1 is correct to call
out specific LOs as they have the ability and influence to organize the
vast majority of the prison population. Therefore they should exert all
their power and energy into catapulting the masses to complete victory.
It is integral to the struggle that a correct political line should be
developed so that the masses may gather round it to find guidance in the
movement.
Indeed, practice is principal but this is also the time for studying
theoretical knowledge and to concentrate on concrete study, criticism
and self-criticism. Weakness in the ideological level will turn into
errors in the political field, which will ultimately manifest themselves
into mistakes in the organizational level.
“Over a long period we have developed this concept for this struggle
against the enemy: strategically we should despise all our enemies but
tactically we should take them all seriously. This also means we must
despise the enemy with respect to the whole but that we must take him
seriously with respect to each and every concrete question. If we do not
despise the enemy with respect to the whole, we shall be committing the
error of opportunism. But in dealing with concrete problems and
particular enemies we shall be committing the error of adventurism
unless we take them seriously. In war, battles can only be fought one by
one and the enemy forces can only be destroyed one by one. The same is
even true of eating a meal. Strategically, we take the eating of a meal
lightly - we know we can finish it. But actually we eat it mouthful by
mouthful. It is impossible to swallow an entire banquet in one gulp.
This is known as piecemeal solution. In military parlance, it is called
wiping out the enemy forces one by one.” -
Mao
Zedong
Knowing that the prisoncrats hate to lose ground to the prisoner
population, whether it be an inch or a mile, it then becomes the duty of
the strikers to focus all of their efforts into wiping out the most
debilitating aspects of their oppression one-by-one. One way of doing
this is to de-fang their paper tiger (SHU), thereby rendering it next to
useless.
Some might argue that the most debilitating aspect of the SHU is the
long-term isolation. We must keep in mind that the oppressors will never
give up this method of torture and oppression; it’s too effective.
Instead We must focus on winnable battles and while We can’t at this
time shut down the SHUs, We can fight going there.
It is the debriefing process that keeps people sent to the SHUs and
locked in the SHUs past their kick-out dates, and it is the debriefing
process that turns people into snitches and ensures that more people
enter the SHUs rather than leave it.
If and when the debriefing process is finally defeated then the strikers
can move on to a secondary and less crucial aspect of the
5
Core Demands which should then be able to gain primary importance,
and so on and so forth. It is in this way that the piecemeal solution is
applied.
by a Massachusetts prisoner November 2011 permalink
I read the article in Under Lock & Key 22
FL
Grievances Forbid Helping Others and I would like to thank the
comrade in Florida for having the dedication and strength to fight
against these pigs.
To my Florida comrade, I want to tell you to stay strong.
Like
Mao said “In times of difficulty we must not lose sight of our
achievements, must see the bright future and pluck up our courage.” I’m
asking all of our comrades to remain constant to fully override this
oppression in all prison systems. I’m in similar conditions in the Mass
DOC, I’m in a control unit serving three years with one hour free to
roam around a steel cage I call a dog kennel. Not only do we suffer from
isolation, prisoners here are beaten by the staff and fed cold meals.
Not only do the Correctional Officers in this facility oppress us
directly but they also provoke situations between other comrades to
enjoy the show and watch us destroy each other.
The staff continue to steal magazines and not allow grievances to fix
these problems. I for sure will continue to speak my mind regardless of
the repercussions or reprisals . Until next time stay strong united and
positive.
MIM(Prisons) adds: One of the important contributions of the
Under Lock & Key publication is connecting prisoners across the U.$.
to share information and organization. As with the recent
hunger
strike in California, prisoners all across the country are inspired
to learn about activism and unity. Do your part to share ULK and send
donations to help with the cost of printing and mailing.
To an amazing extent, my organization, Mandingo Warriors, would like to
put our strength with your strength and unite as one, under one common
cause - the United Front for Peace in Prisons. It is our honor to be
listed as an affiliate of the United Front for Peace in Prisons.
The Mandingo Warriors are a non-disruptive organization in Texas prisons
which was formed to protect each other from harm and defend our
community from oppressors. We strive to improve spiritually, morally,
mentally, politically and economically. Our concepts and principles are
no different than the United Front organization: peace, unity, growth,
internationalism and independence. We study and uphold the five
principles, our cause is not about self-destruction and mis-educating
the people. Instead our purpose is to educate the people and uplift our
people from fallen humanity. We will incorporate no different principles
into our cause than the United Front’s five divine principles. We will
help promote peace and unity between factions where we are at on the
basis of opposing oppression of all prisoners and oppressed people in
general.
by a South Carolina prisoner November 2011 permalink
Peace, comrades in the struggle! First and foremost, the South Carolina
Department of Corrections (SCDC) is a modern day slave plantation. Being
political is a crime within itself; once I became aware of the truth
then the system considered me a threat. I’m a Black man in solitary
confinement due to my passion to stay alive, and I strive to use this
time to analyze my legal problems and how to continue to educate myself.
I write to this so-called law library to request certain law books and
other legal material, but I am denied because the law library is not up
to date and lacks current books we need. So I reached out to receive The
Georgetown Law Journal 2010 Edition from Georgetown Law. I was denied
permission to purchase that journal out of my own funds. Then I wrote to
Prison Legal News, South Chicago ABC Zine Distro, Justice Watch, Turning
the Tide, the Maoist Prison Cell, the National Lawyers Guild and the
Center for Constitutional Rights. All these organizations sent me
material but I was denied access to have the material and it was sent
back because of the so-called policies OP 22.12 and PS 10.08.
The SCDC has designated a ban on all magazines, newspapers, books,
photos, etc. that come from outside sources, whether it be from
publishing companies or organizations. In Special Management Unit, where
prisoners are housed 23 hours a day behind a locked door, SCDC mandates
all above material must come from its institutional library, whereupon
no newspapers or magazines are allowed, period. Only the inadequate
out-of-date law books and library books. Because of this ban many people
suffer from lack of information and educational and legal materials.
And the thing about it is the mailroom staff has a list of names of
publications that aren’t allowed to send mail to this institution. She
has no education in security besides searching mail for contraband.
I have limited information I can use to fight oppression as a whole. I
have offered my problems at the hands of my oppressor to hopefully serve
as a springboard for further war against oppression. Times do get
hectic, and recently I was placed in a full restraint chair off the
words of another prisoner’s statement! I am aware of some cases that
deal with censorship, so I’m doing my research the best way possible
even though the law books inside the library don’t have cases past 2001.
Of course I’m aware of the Prison Litigation Reform Act; that’s why I am
going through the grievance procedures now. I will continue fight this
system and hopefully my voice will be heard outside of these walls.
SCDC has no educational programs so it’s more about self-education, but
as you see I’m limited on that also. They have even started feeding
prisoners in here two meals on Saturday and Sunday due to so-called
budged cuts, but Monday through Friday we receive three meals per day.
This is a very hard battle but my will is to survive physically and
mentally until there’s no fighting left. I hope you can continue to send
me updated info because I can receive up to five pages of material
printed out like the Censorship Pack you recently sent. Thanks for your
support.
MIM(Prisons) Legal Coordinator adds: Since 2010, MIM Distributors
and South Carolina prisoners have been challenging the policy of “no
periodicals allowed on lock-up unit.” From our study of case law, we
don’t believe that this policy could withstand the scrutiny of the
higher courts, but to date all prisoncrats who have responded to our
letters have upheld the censorship and/or evaded our direct questioning.
SCDC is not the only prison administration that is more interested in
political repression than rehabilitation. Because national oppression is
the name of the game, all prisoncrats try to push the boundaries of
legality, and fortunately bourgeois democracy sometimes get in their
way. Regarding this particular type of repression, we have received
similar reports from prisoners held in North Carolina, California,
Connecticut, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania.
It is a set-up for backwardness, which is the obvious goal: no
programming, no reading materials, and you are barely able to prepare a
lawsuit. They can’t actually expect prisoners to reform.
As a movement, we are held back by this censorship in South Carolina.
But rather than it defeating us, we should be inspired to push even
harder to spread ULK, the United Struggle from Within, and the
United Front for Peace in Prisons where we are able. Comrades affected
by censorship should file grievances and go to court if necessary, so
that conditions where they are don’t mirror South Carolina’s. Those with
legal knowledge should write in to get involved in the Prisoners’ Legal
Clinic.
Set in the year 2161, In Time is a science fiction film
portraying a world where people stop aging when they hit 25 years old.
At that point they have one year of life in their bank, and living time
has become the currency instead of money. When a person’s time runs out
they die instantly, and so rich people have lots of time, while poor
people live in ghettos, living day to day, barely earning enough to
survive another 24 hours. Poor people literally have to rush around to
earn enough time to survive, eat and pay their bills, while rich people
can waste time relaxing or doing nothing, without fear of death.
This movie has a solid proletarian premise with the few rich bourgeois
people living at the expense of the poor masses. “For a few immortals to
live many people must die.” The movie’s hero, Will Salas, learns that
there is plenty of time for everyone from a wealthy man who is ready to
die and transfers all his remaining time to Will in order to commit
suicide. Will decides to use this time to seek revenge and end the
brutal rule of the time rich.
When Will buys his way into New Greenwich where the rich live entirely
separate from the poor masses, he meets a young woman, Sylvia, who
suggests that rich people don’t really live because they spend all their
time trying to avoid accidental death. This is not a bad point to make:
capitalism’s culture is bad for everyone, including the bourgeoisie. But
the case of Sylvia is a pretty good example of what happens in real
life: only a very few of the bourgeoisie will commit class suicide and
join the proletarian cause and the youth are the most likely to do this.
Sylvia and Will set out to steal time from Sylvia’s father’s companies
and redistribute the wealth to the poor people. They plan to distribute
time in such large quantities so as to bring the entire system down.
This is where the politics of the movie fall apart. Capitalism will not
be ended with a quick massive redistribution of wealth liberated from
the banks by a few focoist fighters.
The In Time world includes police who enforce the system. The
Timekeepers work for the wealthy to ensure the poor never escape their
oppression. But the Timekeepers seem to have very limited resources and
staff so it’s not so difficult for two people to out run and out smart
them. And except for one key Timekeeper, the others are happy enough to
just give up and stop defending the rich. Under capitalism the ruling
class understands the importance of militarism to maintain their
position and they won’t trust enforcement to just a few cops.
In another interesting parallel, In Time includes a few
characters who play the part of the lumpen, stealing time from the poor.
At one point, the leader of this lumpen group explains that the
Timekeepers leave them alone because they don’t try to steal from the
rich.
History has plenty of examples of a few focoists setting out to take
back wealth to help the people and ending up in prison or dead, often
bringing more repression down on themselves and the masses. A quick
action to liberate money from banks will not put an end to the system of
imperialist repression. True and lasting liberation will only come from
a protracted struggle organizing the oppressed masses to fight and
overthrow the imperialist system.
The other major political flaw of In Time is the complete lack
of any parallel to the national oppression that inevitably exists under
imperialism. In the movie the oppressed and the wealthy are mostly
white. There are a few Blacks and people who might be other
nationalities among the oppressed, but they all are oppressed equally.
National distinctions have disappeared and class oppression is all that
exists. While this is a fine science fiction premise, we fear that the
Amerikan petty bourgeois audience will see in this movie false parallels
to life in the U.$. where workers actually have more in common with the
time rich people than the poor in the movie. The reason for this, found
in imperialism and the superexploitation of colonial people, doesn’t
exist anywhere in this movie. And with an audience that likes to
consider itself part of the
99%
oppressed, this movie is going to reinforce this mistake of ignoring
the global context of imperialism.
Helping Prison Activists Stay Active on the Streets
MIM(Prisons) has spent years trying to build the Re-Lease on Life
program for prisoners coming back to the streets. Our goal is to help
prisoner activists stay politically active when they are no longer
incarcerated. An important component of this is helping our comrades to
set up stable life situations that won’t lead them back to prison. As
most of our readers know, this is very challenging, demonstrated by the
recidivism rate of 43% within the first 3 years post-release in
Amerika.(1)
While in prison, people have a unique opportunity of having much time on
their hands to study and engage in political organizing. While prison
oppression certainly interferes with daily life, the structure of prison
and this same oppression enables and in fact encourages political
activism. When prisoners are released they face the difficulties of
meeting their basic necessities, and dealing with people in random and
complex settings, often after years of isolation. And with
discrimination against people with a prison record, things like housing
and a job can be very difficult to find. Consumed with day to day life
issues, it becomes much more difficult for former prisoners to stay
active on the streets.
As hard as those challenges are, the primary barrier to reaching our
goal is preparing people mentally to deal with these challenges and
prioritize serving the people. Even those with a stable home and support
on the streets struggle to stay politically active. They are often
pulled back into street life with their LO. Other times, their free time
is taken up by friends and family who have an expectation of consuming
free time with destructive behavior like alcohol, drugs, or just wasted
time watching TV.
Part of MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease Program involves reaching out to
prisoners well before they are expected to hit the streets, and working
with them to build a study program and a release plan. If you hope to
stay out of prison and support the struggle after you get released,
having a strong political education is a vital piece for staying on
track.
It is never too early to start preparing for continued activism outside
the walls. We’ve seen too many solid politically active comrades
disappear once they get out and are faced with the realities of getting
by on the streets.
MIM(Prisons) has very limited resources and we cannot offer the kind of
release support that is needed in the United $tates. Instead, we focus
on working with our comrades who are active behind bars and who show a
commitment to stay politically active when they hit the streets. This
means we want to work with you now, both to satisfy some general study
requirements, and put together a release plan that will help ease the
transition to the streets. If you want our support, we need yours.
Requirements for participating in MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease on Life
Program include:
Creating a realistic post-release plan for both practical living needs
and political involvement
Participating in required study programs behind bars
Undertaking political work while in prison
Planning for both contact and political work once on the streets
Prisoners who do these things are offered our resources and support
to help stay politically active and focused on the streets. Keep in mind
that we can’t offer housing or a job, but we can provide support, help
finding resources, and most importantly a strong tie to maintain
political sanity and activism.
We work with our comrades to develop a plan for what sorts of political
work can be done after release. On the outside there is a lot more
freedom to do political organizing, but it’s also harder in some ways.
There is no longer all the free time there was in prison, and there is
not the same level of political interest among the people on the
streets. And we know it’s hard to walk away from the temptations or
difficulties of street life.
This program needs help to expand. We need people who are expecting
release in the next few years to get in touch with us to work on a
release plan. And we are collecting stories from our comrades who have
been out and back in about the challenges they faced trying to stay
politically active on the streets. This will be the focus of an upcoming
issue of Under Lock & Key, so send us your submissions
soon!