U.$. imperialist leaders and their labor aristocracy supporters like to
criticize other countries for their tight control of the media and other
avenues of speech. For instance, many have heard the myths about
communist China forcing everyone to think and speak alike. In reality,
these stories are a form of censorship of the truth in the United
$tates. In China under Mao the government encouraged people to put up
posters debating every aspect of political life, to criticize their
leaders, and to engage in debate at work and at home. This was an
important part of the Cultural Revolution in China. There are a number
of books available in this country that give a truthful account, but far
more money is put into anti-communist propaganda books. Here in the
United $tates free speech is reserved for those with money and power.
In prisons in particular we see so much censorship, especially targeting
those who are politically conscious and fighting for their rights.
Fighting for our First Amendment right to free speech is a battle that
MIM(Prisons) and many prisoners waste a lot of time and money on. For us
this is perhaps the most fundamental of requirements for our organizing
work. There are prisoners, and some entire prisons (and sometimes entire
states) that are denied all mail from MIM(Prisons). This means we can’t
send in educational material, or study courses, or even supply a guide
to fighting censorship. Many prisons regularly censor ULK
claiming that the news and information printed within is a “threat to
security.” For them, printing the truth about what goes on behind bars
is dangerous. But if we had the resources to take these cases to court
we believe we could win in many cases.
Denying prisoners mail is condemning some people to no contact with the
outside world. To highlight this, and the ridiculous and illegal reasons
that prisons use to justify this censorship, we will periodically print
a summary of some recent censorship incidents in ULK.
We hope that lawyers, paralegals, and those with some legal knowledge
will be inspired to get involved and help us with these censorship
battles, both behind bars and on the streets. For the full list of
censorship incidents, along with copies of appeals and letters from the
prison, check out our censorship reporting
webpage.
Virginia DOC
The Chair of the publications review committee for the VA DOC, Melissa
Welch, sent MIM(Prisons) a letter denying ULK 56, and then the
next month the same letter denying ULK 57. Both letters cite the
same reasons:
“D. Material, documents, or photographs that emphasize depictions or
promotions of violence, disorder, insurrection, terrorist, or criminal
activity in violation of state or federal laws or the violation of the
Offender Disciplinary Procedure.
“F. Material that depicts, describes, or promotes gang bylaws,
initiations, organizational structure, codes, or other gang-related
activity or association.”
Pennsylvania DOC
Last issue of ULK we reported on the censorship of
ULK57 in Pennsylvania. After sending a protest letter to appeal
the decision we had a rare victory! From the Policy Office, PA
Department of Corrections:
“This is to notify you that the publication in issue does not violate
Department Policy. As such, the decision of the correctional institution
is reversed and the inmates in the PA Department of Corrections will be
permitted to receive the publication. The correctional institutions will
be notified by the Policy Office of the decision.”
If anyone in PA hasn’t received ULK 57 yet, let us know and we
will send another copy to you.
Pennsylvania SCI-Camp Hill
From a prisoner we were forwarded a notice of incoming publication
denial for ULK 57: “create a danger within the context of the
correctional facility” p.21, 24
The description quotes sentences that can’t be found within ULK
including: “PREA system strip searches for harassment in PA”, “Black
prisoners deserve to retaliate against predominantly white ran system”,
and “This is a excellent reminder of PA importance of fighting.” They
are making up text as reasons for censorship in Pennsylvania.
Texas - Bill Clemens Unit
A prisoner forwarded us a denial for ULK 57 “Page 11 contains
information that could cause a prison disruption.”
In March 2017, our study pack Defend the Legacy of the Black Panther
Party was censored for
“Reason C. Page 9 contains information that could cause a strike or
prison disruption.”
This adds to the growing list of our most important literature that is
banned in the state forever, including Settlers: Mythology of the
White Proletariat and Chican@ Power and the Struggle for
Aztlan. We need someone with legal expertise to challenge Texas’s
policies that allow for publications to be banned forever in the state.
Florida - Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
A prisoner forwarded us a notice of impoundment of ULK 57. The
reason cited: “Pages 1, 11, 14, 15, & 17 advocates insurgency and
disruption of institutional operations.”
We appealed this denial and got a response from Dean Peterson, Library
Services Administrator for the Florida DOC, reiterating the reasons for
impoundment and upholding the denial: “In their regularly scheduled
meeting of August 30, 2017 the Literature Review Committee of the
Florida Department of Corrections upheld the institution’s impoundment
and rejected the publication for the grounds stated. This means that
issue will not be allowed into our correctional institutions.”
Florida DOC
Following up on a case printed in ULK 57 regarding Florida’s
denial of the MIM(Prisons) censorship pack, for no specific reasons. We
received a response to our appeal of this case from the same Dean
Peterson, Library Services Administrator, named above.
“From the number of the FDC form you reference and your description
of what happened it is apparent the institutional mailroom did not
handle the Censorship Guide as a publication, but instead handled it in
accordance with the Florida Administrative Code rule for routine mail.
As such, the item was not impounded, was not posted to the list of
impounded publications for any other institution to see, was not
referred to the Literature Review Committee for review, and thus does
not appear on the list of rejected publications. That means that if the
exact same Guide came to any other inmate mailroom staff would look at
it afresh. In theory, it could even be allowed into the institution.
…
“The Florida Administrative Code makes no provision for further review.”
Florida - Florida State Prison
ULK 58 was rejected for what appears to just be a list of titles
of articles, some not even complete:
PGS 6 Liberation schools to organize through the wall (talk about the
hunger strikes)
PGS 8 DPRK; White Supremacy’s Global Agenda
PGS
11 Case law to help those facing
PGS 19 White and gaining
consciousness
Florida - Jefferson Correctional Institution
Meditations on Frantz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth: New Afrikan
Revolutionary Writings by James Yaki Sayles was denied to a prisoner
at Jefferson Correctional Institution because “inmate has received a
second copy of the same edition of this publication violating chapter
33-501.401 (16)(b) and procedure 501.401(7)(d).”
Washington state - Coyote Ridge CC
The invitation to and first assignment for our correspondence
introductory study group was rejected by Mailroom Employee April Long
for the following reasons:
“Advocates violence against others and/or the overthrow of
authority.
Advocates that a protected class or group of individuals
is inferior and/or makes such class/group the object of ridicule and/or
scorn, and may reasonably be thought to precipitate a violent
confrontation between the recipient and a member(s) of the target group.
Rejected incoming mailing from MIM. Mailing contains working that
appears to be referring to law enforcement as ‘pigs’ it appears to be
ridiculing and scornful. There is also a section in mailing labeled
solutions that calls prisoners to take actions against prison industries
and gives specific ideas/suggestions. Nothing to forward onto offender.”
A recent study assignment for the University of Maoist Thought was also
censored at Coyote Ridge. MIM(Prisons) has not yet been informed of this
censorship incident by the facility. The study group participant wrote
and told us it was censored for being a “copy of copyrighted material.”
The material in question was published in 1972 in the People’s Republic
of China. Not only did that government actively work against capitalist
concepts such as copyright, we believe that even by the United $tates’
own standards this book should not be subject to censorship.
Washington state
Clallam Bay CF rejected ULK 58 because: “Newsletter is being
rejected as it talks about September 9 events including offenders
commencing a hunger strike until equal treatment, retaliation and legal
rights issues are resolved.”
Coyote Ridge CC rejected ULK 58 for a different set of reasons:
“Contains plans for activity that violates state/federal law, the
Washington Administrative Code, Department policy and/or local
facet/rules. Contains correspondence, information, or other items
relating to another offender(s) without prior approval from the
Superintendent/designee: or attempts or conveys unauthorized offender to
offender correspondence.”
Canada
We received the following report from a Canadian prisoner who had sent
us some stamps to pay for a few issues of ULK to be mailed to
Canada.
“A few months ago, on July 18, I received notice from the V&C
department informing that five issues of ULK had arrived here for
me. The notice also explained that the issues had been seized because of
a Commissioner’s Directive (764.6) which states that ‘[t]he
institutional head may prohibit entry into the institution of material
that portrays excessive violence and aggression, or prison violence; or
if he or she believes on reasonable grounds that the material would
incite inmates to commit similar acts.’ I grieved the seizure, among
other things, citing the sections on page 2 of ULK, which
‘explicitly discourage[s prisoners] from engaging in any violence or
illegal acts,’ and citing too the UFPP statement of peace on page 3,
which speaks of the organizational aim to end needless conflicts and
violence within prisons.
”Well, I can now report that my
grievance was upheld and that all copies of ULK were released to
me, but not without the censorship of drawings deemed to portray or
promote the kind of violence described in the above-cited Commissioner’s
Directive. It’s a decision I can live with for now.”
Missouri
We got reports from two people that the blanket ban on ULK in
Missouri was removed and ULK 58 was received. If you’re in
Missouri and still not getting your ULK, be sure to let us
know.
Michigan - Richard A Handlon CF
ULK 58 was rejected because “Articles in Under Lock & Key
contains information about criminal activity that might entice criminal
activity within the prison facility - threat to security.”
Illinois - Stateville CC
ULK 58 was rejected because: “The publication appears to:
Advocate or encourage violence, hatred, or group disruption or it poses
an intolerable risk of violence or disruption. Be otherwise detrimental
to security, good order, rehabilitation, or discipline or it might
facilitate criminal activity or be detrimental to mental health.
Detrimental to safety and security of the facility. Disrupts order.
Promotes organization and leadership.”
Read More Censorship Reports