Dir Sir or Madame:
I am … confined in the Michael Unit of the TDCJ.
On 3/16/17 I received from the Michael Unit mailroom a “Publication
Review/Denial Notification” refusing to deliver to me the
above-referenced publication based upon a finding that “it contains
material that a reasonable person would construe as written solely for
the purpose of communicating information designed to achieve the
breakdown of prisons through offender disruption such as strikes, riots,
or security threat group activity.” At the place for Remarks, “Pg. 13
contains info that could cause a prison strike and prison disruption.”
Instead of seeking the least restrictive measures of censorship, like,
for example, marking out the offensive language, they refused to deliver
the publication summarily citing to TDCJ-ID policy and procedure
BP-03.91, the same rule used to reject delivery of biblically-based
religious materials sent to me by my sister.
I appealed the denial to the Director’s Review Committee (DRC) whose
address is PO Box 99, Huntsville, TX 77342-0099. On 3/29/17 I received
the “DRC Approved/Upheld Denial on 3-28-17.” However, that denial was
not signed so I have no idea who is personally responsible and
accountable or if this is - as commonplace - a summary, arbitrary, and
capricious disposition of my appeal, similar to the practices generally
experienced when using the TDCJ-ID administrative grievance process
required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Nevertheless, I will not be receiving the publication, and,
notwithstanding my notice of anticipated litigation to prison
authorities, am notified that “the publication will be destroyed within
60 days of the initial denial.” And, again, I am not notified of the
identity of the person(s) who will engage in this illegally destructive
and criminally culpable conduct designed to deny and impede my rights
both to the publication and access to the courts. Thus far, my efforts
to report the criminal acts and conduct to civilian law enforcement
authorities and the State and Federal prosecutors’ office under Texas
Penal Code, Section 39.04 and Title 18 U.S. Code Section 242, have
proven to be futile.
Accordingly, I am asking you to engage your expertise and resources in
the litigation of this unlawful censorship to which you have standing to
complain and request that you name me as a complaining party litigant.
The proper venue is in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas sitting at Tyler, Texas.
I will at all times make myself available to you and to any legal
representative whom you choose. I retain all evidence of my claims but,
as I’m sure you know, is subject to confiscation, loss and destruction
by prison officials and their employees.
In closing, I am reminded of a passage I read somewhere. “Acts without
words are open to all kinds of interpretation and words without acts are
hollow promises [or just lies],” The ball is now in your park. I need
your help. Anxiously awaiting your response.