MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
…I would have responded much sooner to give notice to the fellow
comrades at MIM(Prisons) that I received
ULK 16. However,
at the time I was forced to remain in solitary confinement for
organizing an intellectual study group, which included members
affiliated with organizations such as Bloods, 5 Percenters and Latin
Kings. This oppressive institution of confinement and confusion charged
me with “group demonstration.” I am currently housed in Administrative
Segregation for that charge and serving a 365 day sanction. But in any
event, I received the ULK 16 and wish to be added to your
mailing list.
The basis for unity among lumpen is class. The lumpen are the
disenfranchised who derive from the economically depressed areas - the
Barrios and ghetto projects - and are for the most part oppressed
nations people. The lumpen are known to the oppressor nation as the
‘criminal element’ which is code word for persyn of color. The lumpen
usually come from a lumpen organization that the oppressors call a
‘gang,’ or survive as some type of parasitic hustler. Although we do
make choices, often times in imperialist society our choice to engage in
crime is a logical one due to the national oppression we endure.
As communists it is our job to fully understand the laws of social
development, and the lumpen are an essential part of these laws today,
especially here in the imperialist stronghold. In Marx’s theory of
‘social relations of production’ lies the question of ownership, that is
what ‘class’ owns the tools and what ‘class’ uses the tools. In this
imperialist society the lumpen neither own nor use the tools. We are
excluded from production and live under the heel of capitalist relations
of production. The propertied class has monopolized the productive
forces. The lumpen play a crucial role in Amerika in the creation of new
productive forces that will come into contradiction with the decaying
social relations of production. The current economic crisis is helping
to streamline this process.
The lumpen is a class, regardless of what nationality one comes from; we
all have similar relations to the tools of society and the distribution
of society’s wealth. It is a group that experiences the same oppression
and is fighting the same imperialist monster.
It is understood that as national oppression exists it is thus only
natural for there to also be national liberation struggles to combat the
unevenness in this society, and for revolutionary national struggles to
work to bring safety to the people who live in a constant police state
in areas of the oppressed nations. This is the correct stance in the
face of any oppression. But we can’t get caught playing the same
dog-eat-dog game that the imperialists play on us and our fellow lumpen.
We need an Aztlán Liberation Front that is in unity with the lumpen.
The lumpen in Amerika must begin to realize that we are a class and
lumpen fighting lumpen does nothing to liberate any oppressed nation. On
the contrary, lumpen-on-lumpen crime will only strengthen the
imperialist vice grip on our necks! This is why unity amongst the lumpen
is the first step to liberation of all oppressed nations in the United
$tates. We don’t have to agree on everything, but we must have unity and
work together with the full realization that we are up against not just
the same monster but one that happens to run the world militarily.
It is essential for the lumpen to come together in a united front in
order for liberation to ever be a reality on these shores. Without the
critical element of the united front, liberation struggles of any kind
are simply idle talk and will not produce. The function of the united
front for the oppressed nations and ULK should be 1) to
practice peoples’ power within the prison system and thoroughly
politicize the U.$. prison system, and 2) to practice peoples’ power
within the Barrios and ghetto projects out in society and thoroughly
politicize these oppressed nation areas. These functions should be done
with the idea of preparing these grounds for future insurrection.
Lumpen Unite with the International Proletariat!
The basis for unity between the lumpen and the international proletariat
is again class-based. The lumpen are connected to the international
proletariat by their common oppression by the imperialists and their
popular resistance to this oppression. What we must keep in mind is the
imperialists think and act on a global scale so we must do the same.
Just as many have used the saying “don’t show up at a gun battle with a
knife,” we don’t want to show up with a “not in my backyard” mentality
when the imperialists show up with an international colonization
mentality. We must think of the big picture and on a grand scale of
things. Of course we must first work in a particular area, as
MIM(Prisons) works primarily with the prison population, to start from
one area and eventually expand to include larger or multiple fronts of
struggle. All our efforts should be with the intention of chipping away
at imperialism.
Regardless of one’s oppressed nation, it really is the same struggle
against the same opponent. Currently this is seen unabashed by the
imperialists’ mega-prison system housing millions of Brown, Black, Red
and Yellow people. It is seen in people of color hunted down in urban
communities by the police and shot dead as if there were safaris in the
inner cities. It is seen in the unequal treatment that has been
festering in Amerika for over 500 years, the lynching of the body and
the lynching of the mind. Therefore, it is not just understandable or
justified but damn right necessary for these oppressed peoples to
struggle for national liberation. Until New Democracy is achieved, as
Mao
spoke of, and we finally achieve equality for all in all aspects,
the oppressed nations should continue to struggle for
self-determination.
As communists we should always maintain focus on our goal of
international communism rather than degenerating to simply Brown
capitalism or Black capitalism, etc. This is why our unity must be with
the international proletariat in mind as this will be our moral compass.
Some may say or think “If I can liberate my people in this or
that country why would I care about countries in another part of the
world?” Well, as I’ve said before, we are all up against the same
monster that cannot be defeated by one group of people, and even if one
could somehow liberate one group of people, the imperialists worldwide
would smash this isolated nation. We saw it happen in Grenada.
When Marx and Engels put together the theory of communism, it was with
internationalism in mind as they saw even back then that the bourgeoisie
would not sit back and allow the people to begin liberating themselves.
We must always work in unity with the international proletariat in order
to rise from lumpen to true revolutionary. Only then will we liberate
our people.
La Lucha Continua!
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade did a good job of stressing
the importance of internationalism in the united front, and in
particular pointing out that the international proletariat must be our
moral compass. The question we need to ask though is to what degree the
imperialist country lumpen’s interests are united with the international
proletariat, and therefore how they fit into the united front as a
class. What this comrade wrote about the need to support everyone’s
national liberation is true for any oppressed nation in the world, but
we face particular challenges due to our material conditions.
MIM(Prisons) sees the lumpen in the United $tates as a bourgeoisified
lumpen, in that the whole country benefits from imperialism in the form
of basic needs like food, clean water, electricity, etc. as well as in
the form of cheap consumer goods. The latter allows the lumpen to own
small amounts of capital, creating a spectrum of wealth where a minority
in the lumpen organizations are at the level of national bourgeoisie due
to their relations to production, distribution and ownership. Even for
the relatively poor majority of the lumpen class, a combination of state
welfare and the drug game have allowed for access to the material
benefits of imperialism the proletariat do not have.
We are watching closely the efforts of the white nation to take away
welfare and
local
drug markets from the lumpen, as well as
jobs
from the undocumented. Even if these trends are successful, we see
compradors among the lumpen and a popular desire for and belief in the
Amerikan dream. While the lumpen are a class forced into criminality,
there is a class consciousness and culture that derives from this
criminality that is individualistic and parasitic. As this comrade
alludes to, there is a transformation that must occur to replace the
lumpen mentality (in particular its capitalistic elements) with a
proletarian one. No national liberation struggles can succeed in this
country without tackling this great challenge.
In addition, a growing lumpen class due to imperialist crisis will also
touch the white nation. As we wrote about in
ULK
14, a declassed white population is the makings of fascist foot
soldiers. History has shown this to be the case for oppressor nations.
So we agree with the author’s alternating use of lumpen and oppressed
nations in most cases, but disagree when s/he says the lumpen have the
same interests regardless of nationality. Only if the oppressor nation
lets go of its white privilege would this be true. This is an even
stronger reason why a thesis that the lumpen in general in the U.$. are
a progressive force does not hold true.
Sergeant S. S. Crandell, Yega, S. Motto, S. Byers, and Fish victimized
me on 15 October. They stole my television and lied, saying it had wires
sticking out.
Guard Yega handcuffed me and took me to the program office over a 602
[grievance] for indigent envelopes I never received. When I returned to
the cell, all my legal materials were in a large pile on the floor,
covered with shampoo, coffee, hair styling gel and baby powder. My
television was gone. Officer S. Motto threatened to kick my ass if I
602ed it.
Can you please help? My aunt has cancer, and my family is sick living on
a fixed income.
I want to tell my story about what’s happening to me and others like me.
I’m labeled a Security Risk Group Threat Member (SRGTM) because I fight
against oppression. Me and other members of groups are being targeted.
We are being punished, and the form of punishment being use is violating
the United States Constitution 8th Amendment. During our legally
mandated meaningful hour recreation in outside air, I and other SRGTM
prisoners are being handcuffed behind the back, and we can’t properly
get exercise while handcuffed in this painful way. After a half hour
with my hands cuffed behind my back my wrists and shoulders are in pain,
and this pain continues even after the cuffs are removed. And all SRGTM
have been going through this for 5 to 6 months, maybe more. I believe
this is cruel and unusual punishment.
Here’s what I wrote to the unit manager captain Marinelly. I also wrote
to Deputy Warden Faucher, Warden Angel Quiros, and Commissioner Leo
Arnone. These people, these pigs of oppression, don’t have morals or
principles.
Mr. Marinelly,
I am hereby addressing this policy that the administration has put into
effect. This is my second complaint, since early this year about this
condition where security risk group threat members have to be handcuffed
behind the back. This in fact is a violation of my 8th amendment, the
right to be free “cruel and unusual punishment”, as guaranteed by the
eighth amendment of the United States constitution…
I am an A.S./Phase 2 prisoner, I am also labeled as a Security Risk
Group Threat Member and due to that label I am forced to be handcuffed
with my hands behind my back if I want to go outside to exercise for my
entitled one hour recreation. I already have pain in my wrist and
shoulders being cuffed from the back for an hour. How can I exercise
like that?
Sir, if you take a look at the “Connecticut prisoners right handbook”
and look at chapter 8 page 66, “Exercise and Recreation,” you’ll in fact
see how serious and severe this violation is.
Paragraph 2 explains this: Prison officials cannot take a prisoners’
“exercise privileges for a substantial amount of time without a good
reason. Restrictions on exercise must be limited to ‘unusual
circumstances in which exercise is impossible because of disciplinary
needs.’”
Indeed, the fact that a prisoner is violent may justify segregating him
or her from general prison population, but does not necessarily justify
prison failure to make other exercise arrangements. In addition, prison
may not invoke cost consideration in denying prisoners the opportunity
to exercise.
Prisoners’ right to exercise does not require prisons to provide games
or weight equipment for indoor or outdoor exercise areas since reliance
on running, calisthenics, and isometric and aerobic exercise satisfies
the exercise requirements of the 8th amendment. Prison need only provide
time and space.
Sir, how can one do any of the above mentioned exercises that satisfies
the requirements of the 8th amendment with his hands cuffed behind his
back. This situation isn’t for a week or two weeks, but for however long
it takes for those who are “SRGTM” to get to 2 East, those of us have to
do 4 months as phase 1 with our hands cuffed behind our back. So a month
in AS/phase 2 and 4 months in phase 1 of the SRGTM equals 5 months or
more. I believe that is a substantial amount of time, wouldn’t you
agree?
This violation not only deprives me of my adequate exercise. May I
remind you that’s protected by our 8th amendment of the United States
constitution. It also puts me in danger, how can one defend himself if
someone slips his cuffs off and attacks me while my hands are cuffed
behind my back. I am asking, Sir. Marinelly that this violation be
investigated and corrected immediately.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This is yet another example of the
brutality of the Amerikan criminal injustice system which barely pays
lip service to even following their own rules and regulations. Because
these are not just individual cases, MIM(Prisons) focuses on fighting
the entire system. We know that we can’t win until imperialism is
defeated. But exposing the injustice system and organizing prisoners in
a United Front are important for developing the anti-imperialist
struggle here in the belly of the beast.
Flattbush’s newest album Otomatik Attak (Koolarrow Records) is
a prime example of form meeting content to create a superior piece of
cultural art. A metal/grind band out of Los Angeles founded by two
members originally from the Philippines, Flattbush keeps a “fuck the
system” tradition alive with themes of atheism, revolt, and
anti-capitalism. These comrades scream for liberation in English,
Tagalog, and Kapampangan, accompanied by guest vocals in Spanish. They
go the distance lyrically by focusing on U.$. fascism and imperialism in
the Philippines, calling on the people to stand up against the Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo dictatorship in people’s war.
From “Dear Uncle Sam,”
the sadistic american imperialists they are always at war and they
always dictate so they can maintain their self interests but uncle
sam we are not afraid of your high tech warfare and atomic
bombs uncle sam fuck you uncle sam it is necessary to take
action it is necessary to oust the u.s. gloria fascist regime if
not now then when?
And from “Otomatik Attak,”
automatic attack on the people the strike of the fascist to
wipe out the solution to their attack is to counter
attack people’s war
Flattbush hopes to expand their cultural work to the Philippines in the
near future, live! To show solidarity with the peasant masses, the lead
vocalist often performs in a conical straw hat and plain jacket, similar
to a Mao suit. Supporting his powerful and compelling vocals, the
bassist, guitarist, and drummer are all phenomenal players. On stage
they are humble, not pausing for applause between songs. This album
would satisfy anyone into metal for the music, or anyone who is fighting
intensely for revolution. Get more info about Flattbush from
[url=http://www.flattbush.com.]www.flattbush.com.
1 November 2010, The San Francisco Giants won the World Series, and in
addition to the tens of thousands of fans in the stadium, an estimated
12 million people watched the game on TV (not counting the millions
watching in sports bars, restaurants and other public venues). As in
other winning cities in years past, the city of the winning team erupted
into “joyful mayhem,” as the San Francisco Chronicle calls it,
with tens of thousands of people taking to the streets in drunken
celebration that included property destruction, traffic disruption, and
violence.
In classic bourgeois press form, pretending neutrality, the SF
Chronicle’s headline article today was titled “SF Giants Series
Celebration is Joyful Mayhem” and stated: “On Market Street, the
celebration quickly turned wild and unruly, with an estimated 7,000
revelers in the streets, some jumping on cars, rocking Muni buses,
tossing beer bottles, lighting fireworks and blocking traffic at Seventh
Street.” A much smaller article, hidden on the Chronicle
website, also mentioned “In the Mission, there have been reports of
fires, broken windows and an alleged stabbing.” Compare this with the
same newspaper’s January 8, 2009 report on the Oscar Grant protests. The
article was titled “Protests Over BART Shooting Turn Violent” and gave a
negative review of the protest which “mushroomed into several hours of
violence Wednesday night as demonstrators smashed storefronts and cars,
set several cars ablaze and blocked streets.”
We see that the same street violence is condoned when it’s in the name
of professional sports. Police wandering the streets after the World
Series were friendly, often clapping and cheering, and shutting down
streets to help out traffic while enabling the celebration. During the
Oscar Grant protest the cops showed up in riot gear and
attacked the crowd.
While we’re no fans of imperialist
elections, the World Series victory happened the night before election
day and begs the comparison: people are more passionate about baseball
than they are about the political future of their country/state/city.
This is no surprise to those of us familiar with the decadence of
Amerikan imperialism. Amerikans don’t need to worry about politics – the
government is working in their interests to secure resources at the
expense of Third World peoples to maintain wealth at home.
Sports passion includes a remarkable number of fans cheering “we did
it!” and “we won!” as if they had anything to do with the team that won
the game. In reality the SF Giants, like all professional sports teams,
are made up of players from across the country, who are paid a
ridiculous amount of money to wear a jersey for this team. Their
allegiance to the city lasts only as long as the paycheck continues. In
fact people point to statistics about the Giants’ last World Series
victory 56 years ago when they were based in New York as if that team
had something more in common with the SF Giants than the font they use
for their logo.
MIM(Prisons) would like to take all the sports passion in Amerika and
turn it against imperialist violence or world hunger. We’d even call it
progress if people get off the couch and play sports rather than get
drunk watching millionaires play. Perhaps the improved circulation would
help people think a bit more rationally about politics and the relative
importance of professional sports.
Fronteras Unidas es la teoría de unir grupos diferentes por líneas de
clase para un objetivo común y interés, mientras manteniendo la
independencia cuando estos grupos no están de acuerdo. La aplicación de
la teoría de la frontera unida es como el reconocer de las diferentes
contradicciones en la sociedad y utilizarlas en el interés del
proletariado internacional. La primera frontera unida es la Frontera
Unida del Anti-imperialista, la cual está formada por la mayoría de las
personas quienes intereses materiales se basan en el fracaso del
imperialismo. Esta es una frontera unida estratégica basada en la
principal contradicción.
En este artículo hablaremos de un par de asuntos contemporáneos en los
E.U. y analizaremos su potencial para el trabajo de la frontera unida.
Veremos que muchos de los conflictos grandes en un país del Primer Mundo
están entre las clases enemigas, pero eso no quiere decir que siempre
vamos a sentarnos en el banquillo. Algunas formas de las Fronteras
Unidas son tácticas y requieren una acción inmediata basada en
conocimiento a fondo. Para navegar exitosamente la potencial de las
Fronteras Unidas en el Primer Mundo que sirve a los intereses del Tercer
Mundo proletariado, debemos tener un análisis correcto de nuestras
condiciones. La primera sección de este artículo se proporciona un fondo
rápida de hacernos comenzar.
La Tierra, Vivienda y la Nación de Colonos
Un argumento contra la tesis trabajo del aristocrática es que las
corporaciones no tienen el interés en sacrificar sus ganancias para
pagar más a los trabajadores de países del Primer Mundo, y no hay una
conspiración corporativa para hacer cumplir esta conducta. Esto se basa
en la teoría de mercado libre capitalista, o solo por leer los primeros
capítulos de El Capital por Marx y aplicándolos como un modelo de
realidad específico en todos lugares por todo el mundo. Como una clase,
los capitalistas depende en la aristocracia del trabajo no sólo
políticamente sino económicamente como los consumidores y engranajes de
su sistema de pirámide de crecimiento de capital financiero. Y hay un
lugar, al menos, donde los imperialistas EEUU pueden ejercer su voluntad
como una clase social (mucho más estos días) - se llama el gobierno EEUU
La promoción de propiedades domésticas por los federales es uno de los
mayores ejemplos del imperialistas conscientemente construyendo una
aristocracia del trabajo en el corazón del imperio.
La propiedad doméstica en la América ha sido un elemento básico de la
riqueza de América desde que los colonos le robaron la tierra de la
Primeras Naciones y construyeron sus hogares en ella. El valor neto de
las familias americanas comparado con las primera nación y los
descendientes de esclavos en los EEUU es una herencia de esta forma
primitiva de acumulación. Mientras la propiedad de la tierra entre los
invasores europeos los más tempranos era 100% (este es porque vinieron a
las Américas), por la Guerra de Independencia de 1776, la propiedad de
la tierra era todavía a 70% para la nación euro-americana.(1) Arghiri
Emmanuel señaló que los salarios americanos fueron capaces de permanecer
tan altos en el periodo temprano del desarrollo capitalista, aunque la
propiedad de la tierra cesó de ser universal, porque la abundancia de
tierra “gratis” - robada de las Primeras Naciones presentaba un plan
alternativa para los colonos europeos.(2) Esta primitiva acumulación a
través del genocidio fue la base de la riqueza que las trabajadores
aristocráticas americanas disfrutaron mientras la industrialización
transformó más de los colonos a trabajadores asalariados.
Siguiendo la lucha inter-imperialista de WWI, los EEUU han llegado a ser
el podar imperialista dominante. La afluencia de riqueza que vino con
esto permitió la integración de la parte de inmigrantes del sur y del
este de Europea a la nación blanca conducía a la Gran Depresión.(1)
Desde 1900 hasta 1950 el promedio de la propiedad domestica en los EEUU
era casí un 45%, con los precios lo más bajo en la cinturón negro del
sur y el más alto en los estados del Norte que eran dominados por
Europeos.(3) Después de la recuperación económica que comenzó después de
WWII, los EEUU se embarcó en la sub-urbanización de América con
incentivos numerosos del gobierno federal para traer la propiedad
domestica encima del 60% de nuevo.
Desde 1960, la propiedades doméstic se mantenido encima del 60% para los
ciudadanos de los EEUU en su conjunto.(4) Esta tasa fue superior al 70%
de los estadounidenses blancos en los últimos años, pero el censo no
cuenta con estadísticas comparables por la raza que se remonta muy
lejos. La tasa de propiedad de la vivienda por los negros y los latinos
es poco menos del 50%, a pesar de la opresión nacional ha asegurado que
actualmente se enfrentan la ejecución hipotecaria en forma
desproporcionada.
Las teorías de Emmanuel en el “Cambio Desigual” demuestran que como los
salarios significantemente más altos de las personas del primer mundo en
realidad transfieren las riquezas desde el Tercer Mundo a los países
imperialistas, reforzando sus ventajas económicas. Del mismo modo, la
nación opresora tiene la equidad, y es capaz de aumentar la riqueza de
una manera que las semi-colonias internas no son capaces de hacer a
pesar de acceso a empleos de nivel explotador. Todo esto encaja con la
tendencia general del capitalismo, que es la acumulación de capital.
Cuanto más se tiene, más se tiende a obtener.
La Caída del Mercado Domiciliario en US
El ala izquierda del nacionalismo blanco (si se describan anarquistas,
socialistas, Maoístas o democráticos) ha estado diciendo que el
incremento en la reposesión de domicilios es una indicación de las
contradicciones aumentados entre el proletariado americano y el
capitalismo. Estas personas defienden la tierra robada que ha sido la
base de riquezas para los colonos de América y la esquema pirámide
moderna de propiedad domestica que es la base del sueño Americano hoy.
No solo han perdido millones de gente su domicilio por reposesión en
años recientes, sino los traficantes del miedo señalan que en el
“mercado hipotecario de alto riesgo resultó en la desaparición de 13
trillones de dólares en la riqueza domiciliario americano entre el
medio-año de 2007 y marzo 2009. . . en el promedio, el domiciliario
estadounidense ha perdido un cuarto de su riqueza en ese periodo.”(5)
Tantas alarmistas ignoran que estadounidenses ganaron 10 millones de
dólares desde 2006 a 2007 llegar a un nivel alto más alto, y que el
valor neto de los ciudadanos del país ha generalmente ha amentado a
tasas incrementando desde WWII.(6) Las subidas y bajadas más grandes en
todos los mercados financieras son seguramente señales de crisis, pero
para actuar como los americanos se han estado hundidos a condiciones del
Tercer Mundo en el 2010, es ridículo. ¡Si solamente esas activistas
gritaran tan fuerte para ellos que realmente tienen que vivir en
condiciones del Tercer Mundo por toda sus vidas y generaciones!
La mayoría, si no toda, la pérdida del valor neto americano es contada
por carteras de acciones y valores de domicilios (las cuales se vende y
se compra como acciones hoy) en otras palabras pérdidas del capital
financiera. Tradicionalmente, la pequeña burguesía marxista no fue
explotado, ni tampoco ha significantemente explotado de ningún otro.
Para decir que ellos que ganan de inversión de capital financiera son
algo menor que los miembros de la pequeña burguesía es un rechazo a la
definición marxista. Con la propiedad doméstica alrededor de 68% en años
reciente, eso es un sólido dos tercios de las gente en los Estados
Unidos que ciertamente cae en la categoría de la clase media, o más
alto, incluye 50% de Negros y Latinos (mínimo). Este grupo tiene 210
millones de gente, o solo 3% de la población mundial en 2010, pero ellos
tienen más riqueza neta de la capitalización total del mercado de todas
compañías que cotizan en bolsa en el mundo.(7)
Nuestros críticos señalan a las iniquidades grandes de riqueza en los
Estados Unidos como una razón de organizar americanos para la
revolución. Entonces déjemos mirar sólo al 80% inferiores de los
americanos, quienes eran dueñods de 15% (un insignificante arañazo de la
mása) de la riqueza neta en los E.U. en 2007 (y esta fue un mínimo de 15
años para ellos).(8) Mientras su parte ha bajado unos pocos porcentajes
desde 1983, un total de la riqueza neta en los E.U. se ha incrementado
por cinco veces. Por eso lo más inferior 80% de americanos fueron acerca
de $2.2 trillones de riqueza neta en 1983 hasta casi $10 trillones en
2007.(9) La clase media en América tiene activos que superan el Producto
Interno Bruto de China(10), la potencia industrial del mundo que
representa casi 20% de la población mundial. Eso se compara solo las
clases americanas “media” y “pobre” a toda la nación de China, incluye
su clase capitalista muy desarrollada.
Puesto que el proletariado, por definición, tiene un valor neto
insignificante en forma de activos, dejemos a mirar a sus ingresos.(11)
El ingreso generalmente crece proporcionalmente con la riqueza neta
alrededor del mundo.(12) Casi una mitad de la población mundial vive en
menos de $1000 al año. Eso es 3.14 billones de la gente vive en menos de
$3 trillones en un año.(13) Ahora, antes de condenar los activos grandes
americanas, hay que estar seguro que ellos son mejores en el ahorro y
también el invierto de su dinero que el proletariado. En 2005 el 20% del
mundo lo más rico contaba con 76.6% de todo del consumo privado de
bienes. el 50% lo más pobre contaba con sólo 7.2% de consumo(13) Una
estimación conservativa nos deja con los americanos consumiendo al menos
de 27 veces más que la persona promedia en la mitad del mundo lo más
pobre.(14) Entonces las habilidades de administrar el dinero no pueden
explicar la riqueza neta americana grande.
Una sociedad humana justo y sostenible requiere que la aristocrática
obrera americana se reduzca a los niveles de consumo mucho más cercanos
a los del Tercer Mundo. Pero este ejercicio demuestra que esto está muy
lejos de pasar, peso a los gritos de los alarmistas.
Últimamente, la contradicción que estamos describiendo está entre la
aristocracia obrera y el imperialismo. Los imperialistas, en particular
el capital financiero, son un clase oportunista dinámica. En contraste,
las obreras aristocráticas se benefician de la estabilidad del estado
actual de los asuntos.
Los capitalistas financieras eran capaces de hacer unas ganancias
rápidas por la venta en corto de la aristocracia obrera, entonces los
americanos están disgustados. Aunque tal vez empuja la aristocracia
obrera hacia el fascismo, los capitalistas financieros están
malvendiendo al consumismo de los americanos en lo que su sistema
depende tanto. Lo que estamos presenciando es una contradicción interno
en el sistema capitalista llevando a cabo. Los dos grupos controlan
trillones de dólares en riquezas del Tercer Mundo, y anti-imperialista
Frontera Unidas no tiene un interés en uno de ellos teniendo más que el
otro. Hay que mantenernos sentados fuera de nosotros.
La Migración a los EEUU
Como discutido arriba, altos salarios y crecientes valores domiciliarios
se reafirman en nuestro sistema económico actual, haciendo el rico más
rico. Sin embargo, no podría mantenerse sin levantar una frontera afuera
de lo que estas dos cosas no puede fluir. Entonces mantener los salarios
y el valor domiciliario de alto está directamente relacionado con la
lucha por la creciente represión de trabajadores migrantes en las
fronteras de los EEUU. La contradicción en esta lucha es entre las
naciones
oprimidas que están tratando de acceder a puestos de trabajo en los EEUU
y la nación opresora que está intentando de mantenerlos afuera. Esta
desafío a los privilegios de los países imperialistas indica que la
lucha por los derechos del inmigrante es parte de la lucha
anti-imperialista.
Mientras la gente del Tercer Mundo y algunos jóvenes americanos
enfrentaron las obreras aristocráticas americanas en la calle, fue el
Tribunal del Distrito de los E.U. quien puso en marcha una orden
judicial contra la mayoría de lo dispuesto en el proyecto de ley del
senado del estado de Arizona 1070 (SB1070) a la luz de una demanda
presentada por el departamento de justicia (DOJ) contra el estado de
Arizona. El DOJ sostuvo que la inmigración es de la jurisdicción federal
y que el DOJ tenía un plan para todo el país para equilibrar sus
diversos intereses relacionados con la inmigración que Arizona no se le
permitiría echar a perder.
El interés de los miembros de la clase media internacionalista esta en
teniendo acceso gratis a los mercados y trabajadores, no mencionar que
también relaciones internacionales. Este campo incluye el gobierno
federal y sus capitalistas financieros como también los negocios
pequeños que solo operan en los EEUU pero dependen en el trabajo de
inmigrantes. Su conflicto es con los intereses de otros miembros de la
clase media y la mayoría de de la clase media americanos cuya posición
de privilegio viene del elitismo de quienes son permitidos entrar a sus
fuentes riquezas.
Entonces hay una frontera unida efectiva entre el internacionalismo de
los más resistentes a SB1070 en ambos lados de la frontera con Méjico y
el gobierno de EEUU que actua a favor de los miembros de la clase media
internacional. Y por ahora, son los imperialistas quienes son los que
realmente lanzan una llave en el trabajo de los americanos, aunque la
contradicción es básicamente entre naciones oprimidas y naciones
opresoras.
Una mayoría de los americanos, en una serie de encuestas, apoyo a
SB1070, o una ley similar. El mayor porcentaje que figura en un
artículo, 79% no estuvieron de acuerdo que los “inmigrantes ilegales
tienen derecho a los mismos derechos las libertades fundamentales como
un ciudadano de los EEUU.”(15) Esta es la definición del chovinismo
estadunidense. A lo mejor, un quinto de ciudadanos americanos no piensan
que ellos merecen más que otras personas humanas por la virtud de haber
sido nacidos en EEUU. Eso es porque nosotros dejamos de buscar un rayo
de luz en el imperialismo del primer mundo.
Con los latinos, nosotros podemos ver rápidamente esta consciencia
desarrollar por siguir el porcentaje de coco en la población. Una
encuesta de decisiones latinas que encontró que un 12% de la población
latina de votantes de la segunda generación en Arizona estaban de
acuerdo con SB1070. Por la cuarta generación ha incrementado a 30% de
acuerdo con la posición de coco (16) El americanismo es una creciente
enfermedad que ha aclamado proporciones significantes de las
semi-colonias internas de los EEUU.
Une a todos los que puedan unirse
Mientras muchos dogmáticos todavía critican a Mao por aliarse a los
comunistas chinos con la clase media nacional, podemos tomar la teoría
de Fronteras Unidas aún más y llegar a ejemplos de fuerzas progresivas
aliándose con el gobierno de los superpoderes imperialistas del mundo
contra una nación opresora. Esto nos enseña que no podemos dejar que las
ideas de extrema izquierds de la pureza prevenirnos aliarse con aquellos
que podrían ayudar a nuestra causa.
Los errores de la derecha en aplicar la teoría de Fronteras Unidas
sucede cuando tenemos líneas incorrectas en otras partes. No reconocer
que la Frontera Unida trabaja con una clase enemiga, ni llegando a ser
convencida que otras contradicciones han sido resueltas y no empujada a
una posición secundaria son la formas principales del derechismo para
protegerse. Mao tuvo que luchar el derechismo con otros comunistas
quienes pensaban que los comunistas y la clase media nacional deberían
fundirse en uno, donde inevitablemente la clase media reaccionaria
llevaría a causa de su poder relativo. El derechismo en los EEUU se ve
como gente que se encontró con batallas legislativas sobre los derechos
de obreros migrantes. Sin la liberación nacional no hay libertad para
las naciones oprimidas bajo al imperialismo. Y los imperialistas siempre
se oponen eso, como las nacionalistas se fajaron con los comunistas en
una guerra civil cuando los Japoneses fueron forzados afuera.
No buscamos unidad por el privilegio de estar unidos. Buscamos la unidad
que usa todas las fuerzas posible para parar la principal contradicción,
o las batallas que empujan la contradicción principal adelante. Cuando
encontramos grupos en los cuales podemos unirnos estratégicamente, las
Fronteras Unidas también ofrecen un base para la unidad - crítica -
unidad la cual avanza la lucha y depende de unidades revolucionarias y
toda gente oprimida por un futuro mejor.
By aligning Amerikans’ immediate interests with their long-term
interests, the militarization of the U.$./Mexico border has become a
machine that will not likely slow down on its own. This machine is
propelled by the imperialist politicians, imperialist businessmen (often
the same people), and the Amerikan labor aristocracy. This collusion of
interests at a time when Amerikan hegemony is fragile spells danger for
the oppressed nations, in particular for Aztlán.
National Public Radio (NPR) released a report this week exposing
financial and political connections between the Correctional Corporation
of America (CCA) and those behind Arizona’s oppressive
SB1070
law.(1) The law, which is still under judicial review after being put on
hold, legalizes racial profiling and empowers state police to enforce
federal immigration laws in the process. The scandal, now being denied
by the bill’s sponsor Senator Russell Pearce and others, is that they
passed the law to increase their income and the profits of their
corporate backers.
Without SB1070, CCA was getting an estimated $117 million a year from
the federal government for imprisoning migrants. Meanwhile,
Wackenhut/G4S, the next largest private prison company, has a $76
million a year contract to bus migrants around the border for the U.$.
government. Of course, both of these sums are chump change compared to
the $3.6 billion budget for Border Patrol in 2010.(2) All of this is
federal money going to the oppressor nation to do its thing – oppress.
The essence of what is going on is Amerikans getting paid a lot of money
to make sure Amerikans get paid a lot of money. That’s why the border
exists and why it must be militarized. If it is not, the masses whose
labor value has been stolen and exported to the United $tates would come
here to benefit from the fruits of their labor. Without closed borders,
we can’t keep the wealth inside.
The NPR report exposes the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC),
an organization of state legislators and powerful corporations that get
together to draft and propose laws (see figure above). The companies pay
tens of thousands of dollars to attend such meetings with those who make
the law. And according to NPR, the number of legislators who sponsored
SB1070 was almost unprecedented and 30 out of the 36 received
contributions from prison companies or prison lobbyists in the 6 months
following SB1070’s passage. Meanwhile, two of Arizona Governor Jan
Brewer’s top advisers are former prison lobbyists.(1) All of this makes
CCA’s and Sen. Pearce’s denials of corporate influence look silly.
None of this is new to CCA, which was founded in Nashville, Tennessee by
former chairman of the state Republican Party, Tom Beasley and his
former roomy from the U.$. Military Academy at West Point, Doc Crants.
Initial investors included the governor’s wife, Honey Alexander, and the
Speaker of the Tennessee House of Representatives, Ned McWherter.(3)
Ever since then, their business model has relied on close political ties
just as most military, defense and security business does. Apparently,
CCA agrees with MIM(Prisons)’s
assessment
that migrants are and will continue to be the fastest growing prison
population in the United $tates. But while we are fighting this trend,
CCA is doing all they can to foster it.
When imperialism reaches the point where the arms of oppression are
major sources of profiteering, and the people are dependent on these
operations for their paychecks and standards of living (i.e. where
oppression and the oppressors’ financial interests become one in the
same), we will see the national contradictions within imperialism
heighten rapidly. This leads to increased repression both in laws and in
actions but also the opportunity for raising consciousness and
resistance among the oppressed nations. Even those Latinos who supported
imperialist politics had to think twice about the Arizona law as it
could impact their persynal safety if they visit that state. The
imperialists expose their blatantly chauvinistic goals with these
reactionary laws and the alliances that create the laws and it is our
responsibility to point out the contradictions and organize against
imperialist national oppression.
Huey P. Newton, co-founder of the original
Black
Panther Party for Self-Defense, once taught that “the purpose of a
vanguard group should be to raise the consciousness of the masses
through educational programs and certain physical activities the
party will participate in.”
MIM(Prisons) is actively involved, along with several groups and
leaders, in the building of a United Front among lumpen in the U$ and
has asked the questions, “what makes up the basis for unity among the
lumpen?” and “what is the basis for unity between the lumpen and the
international proletariat?”
I believe that the basis of unity among prisoners and the lumpen in
general is our common oppression. We are all catching hell from a common
enemy, that we all come from oppressive conditions - that your community
and mine, suffer from the same symptoms caused by U$ imperialism -
poverty, despair, mis-education in inferior schools, addictions of
various sorts, pigs killing us, etc. This is the premise that I work
from in trying to unite, educate and organize with prisoners.
The unity between the lumpen and the international proletariat should be
based upon the fact that we all suffer under conditions created by our
principal enemy: U$ imperialism. U$ imperialism and the political
economy of capitalism are at the root of all the social problems that U$
lumpen and the international proletariat suffer from.
We seek to unite with all poor and oppressed nations and the people who
are willing to unite with us around the primary goal of the destruction
of U$ imperialism: our principal enemy. It matters not if one is
socialist or communist at this time.
The United Front has been seen throughout history to be effective
strategically and tactically in revolutionary struggles. Membership in a
United Front does not mean that a group loses its independence to pursue
its political objectives. It means that we all agree that we should work
together against our principal enemy and work with each other on
projects which push development of the struggle ahead.
Our analysis should include each of these forces able to reach consensus
on the above questions. We should check thoroughly each proposal and the
efforts put forth to realize them by the respective forces, the extent
to which resources are acquired and how allocated, the level of priority
given by each force to the realization of the effort.
Without a United Front our enemies will be able to continue to defeat us
and repress our organizing activities. United, our work becomes that
much more effective. The more groups involved principally, the stronger
our movement will become and the greater our efforts will be in
combating national oppression and imperialism.
Let us push forward the struggle by pushing forward the development of
the united front. Without struggle, there is no progress.
As of this writing I’ve been confined to a special management unit
because, of all things, a drawing. The artwork however is not the
problem, but what it supposedly represents. From a larger standpoint the
censoring of such work is another form of passive cultural destruction.
What they can’t control they restrict. What they don’t understand, they
tend to fear. And of course the “they” I’m speaking of are those
upholding Amerikan values of whitewashed virtues.
The drawing was one I chose to adopt because of its high symbolism and
esoteric meanings. But because this symbol was first used by the Nation
of Gods and Earths (Five Percenters), a branch of the Nation of Islam,
which is deemed a “security threat group” within penal institutions in
six states, I was also branded a threat. I have no affiliation with that
organization or any gang. I don’t adhere to the NOGE’s or NOI’s
religious dogmas. I do however share in their militant outlook and
agree, for better, with what they’ve done to reeducate Black youth to
the realities of this system. Because of this they, and anyone even
duplicating a representative symbol of such organizations, are deemed a
threat.
I must assume the motivation behind the government labeling a peaceful,
cultural religious organization as a gang can be found in a real
warranted fear of this group’s objectives. To name just a few: its
obvious work in enlightening individuals about this police state, its
very successful strategy in reducing the recidivism rate, and most
importantly empowering youth to be leaders and conduits of true culture
in their families and communities. These priorities, and numerous
others, are something to fear, especially when privatized institutions
can prospectively lose millions annually.
The programming of the masses through corporate-owned media propaganda
has not been done haphazardly. Sensationalism, violence, stereotypes and
desensitization through repetition of crime and cop shows has not only
controlled opinion but has thoroughly turned people into mindless
robots, keeping the rich in control, middle class happy and poor
discontented but helpless. Any organization that exposes this government
for what it is and directs its energies to providing and teaching what
true responsibility is to a community, is one I’d gladly be a part of.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We agree with this prisoner that the
criminal injustice system has a real reason to fear any organization
that is educating people about the prison system, working to reduce
recidivism, and organizing oppressed nations. These organizations
threaten their use of the prison system as a tool of social control. And
it is true that the media plays a major role in promoting imperialist
policies to the Amerikan people. However, this is not the only reason
the masses are passive. Amerikan citizens are acting in their economic
self-interest when they play the role of happy robot and accept
imperialist policies. See our article
Amerikkkans:
Oppressing for a Living in
ULK 2.