MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
I write to let you know that I and all races here at Delano State Prison
Ad-Seg participated in the hunger strike from the 26th to the 1st in
support of our brothers in SHU placement because of validation.
Can you please keep me updated on all the current actions that are
happening because of the hunger strike? If there is anything else that I
or my brothers around us can do in support, please do not hesitate to
let me know.
3 October 2011 - Today we close our 8th day of this hunger strike. The
ASU here at Calipatria State Prison was the last to stop during the July
1st, 2011 hunger strike. Some prisoners went 27 days. They ended up
going to Centinela prison central health for treatment (IV and
observation). I myself lasted 16 days. Fell out on the 7th day and was
given an IV for a few hours.
This hunger strike is crazy! But living in ASU/SHU for years is straight
torture. It changes a person. More than half of us here at CAL-ASU are
validated waiting to go to Pelican Bay SHU. I’ve been waiting a year and
a half. So we all got together, and once again have joined the movement.
Last time CDCR retaliated by not giving us our liquids (milk/juice). We
602ed [institutional appealed] it and won. This time around they were
forced to give us our liquids. Not much but it’s progress. We’re
supporting the Bay’s 5 core demands, but we also have our issues here.
We’re SHU prisoners therefore entitled to SHU privileges: TVs, radios,
shoes, etc. Here we’re given nothing. We’ve argued, demanded, 602ed, and
yet we have nothing. CDCR’s run around and usual response, “we’ll look
into it,” or plain denials is all we get.
I drafted a group 602 for our TVs/radios. It’s been done before, but I
did it so I’ll be able to write a writ once it’s denied. It may work, it
may not. I refuse to just sit on my ass. If I gots to fight CDCR with
paper and pen, I will. If I gots to starve myself for a better tomorrow,
I have, and am, and will.
Last hunger strike we received many promises from Calipatria officials.
The only one they honored was to give us some of our canteen items
(chips, rice, beans) in their original packaging. We used to get them on
paper lunch bags. We’re demanding those promises be met! Mainly the
issuance of TVs.
The movement is strong here, we all try to motivate one another. Many
showed their support for a few days but their health prevented them from
continuing. Many continue believing in the movement, so they’re holding
strong even though they hear their stomach rumble. I’ve lost 10 pounds
in 5 days, the last weigh in we had.
I am a California State prisoner incarcerated in the Administrative
Segregation Unit (ASU) of Corcoran State Prison. The ASU where I am
housed is currently undergoing a hunger strike in support of the one
kicked off in the SHU. I am in support of it as well, for I believe
solidarity is needed amongst the oppressed to resist and fight against
the oppressor. Many people do not see that when it comes down to it,
there are only two sides, but these past few months have done a lot to
enlighten and educate many behind these concrete walls.
One of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s
(CDCR) current problems is not enough bed space inside the psychiatric
housing units. As a result of this consistent problem prisoner’s health
and federal rights are being compromised more and more. Currently there
are 4900 prisoners in Enhanced Outpatient Program (EOP) programs, but a
large number of EOP prisoners have been awaiting admission into the CDCR
Psychiatric Services Unit (PSU) for way too long.
This problem could have been solved by the prison administration a long
time ago, but with the CDCR, money takes precedence over prisoner’s
health and well being. They just do their best to camouflage that fact
creating legal technicalities to prevent liability. EOP Security Housing
Unit (SHU) prisoners who are currently in the PSUs are suffering and
paying the cost of overcrowding. Due to the prison administration’s
desperation to create bed space for EOP SHU offenders awaiting admission
to the PSU, many EOP prisoner’s level of care is being lowered without
regard to their medical needs by the interdisciplinary treatment team
(IDTT) committee members.
Recently a fellow prisoner comrade of mine went to his IDTT hearing,
which are held every 90 days. At the hearing he was told that because he
is “high functioning” his level of care would be reduced back to
Correctional Clinical Case Management System (CCCMS). He told them that
he has many medical reasons to stay on EOP level of care to help control
his symptoms, including hallucinations and inconsistent changes of
behavior. They ignored his medical history and dropped him from the EOP
program.
The CDCR takes a mental health patient who isn’t functioning well at a
CCCMS level of care, and changes his level of care to EOP, to help the
prisoner function better. Then they see the positive changes the
prisoner has made due to the level of care change, and so they decide to
change him back to CCCMS. But there is no help for these prisoners to
sustain their progress on CCCMS. That’s what the IDTT members are doing
to current PSU EOP prisoners simply to make bed space. There’s a huge
difference in treatment given when in CCCMS compared to being in EOP.
there is no possible way a prisoner that requires an EOP level of care
can cope at a lower inadequate non-suitable level of care CCCMS! That’s
medical malpractice! It’s the same as forcing a disabled prisoner that
can’t walk to be restricted from using a wheelchair!
As a United Soldier from Within member I’m asking for the EOP prisoners
who are experiencing this type of medical malpractice to come forward by
sending a letter to Under Lock and Key and let us know your
situation. If we can demonstrate that this is indeed a pattern someone
from United Soldiers will be assigned to look into the matter and work
on putting a cease to this form of injustice and inadequate medical
care.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This comrade demonstrates well the failure of
the health care system in Amerikan prisons.
First there is the failure of care in general: prisoners receive abysmal
health care services that amount to outright neglect. This got so bad in
California that a federal judge put California prisons in receivership
under a mandate to fix the health care services. Denial of adequate care
leads to an unknown number of deaths and illnesses every year in
Amerikan prisons.
In this case, the author is talking about inadequate mental health
services. It’s important to understand what is meant by “mental illness”
under capitalism to put this neglect in context. Prisoners who are
locked in isolated cells for years at a time are going to lose their
ability to function in society. This is just one example of how the
criminal injustice system literally drives people to mental illness.
We don’t see mental illness as a fixed situation but rather a result of
society. And in fact the definition of this “illness” changes based on
who has power in a society. There are many examples in history of
communists being labeled “crazy” for their beliefs in the equality of
all people. Further, those who are angered and depressed by the
exploitation, murder and oppression of the majority of the world’s
people are given drugs by the capitalist doctors to help make them
happier.
There are many people in prison who have been abused by society and then
abused by the criminal injustice system. And it should be no surprise
that they now have difficulty functioning. We are under no illusions
that a little “mental health” treatment is going to fix this problem.
But neglect and punishment is certainly only going to make things worse.
And the casual moving people from program to program with little regard
for their well being described in this article is just a financial and
numerical exercise for the prisoncrats.
As we have described in other articles on
mental
health, we need to keep in mind that we can’t rely on the enemy to
solve our problems. The criminal injustice system is behind many of the
mental health problems in prisons. And so they can not be counted on to
provide the solution, which requires more than some capitalist
counseling and drugs. We support our comrade’s call for adequate health
care, but we know that this must be a part of the larger fight against
the imperialist system, because the imperialists are the cause of many
of our health problems.
The refusal of this prison to meet all of the
five
demands has resulted in yet another hunger strike here in Pelican
Bay. The demand that was left untouched by prison officials was the
debriefing process. This debriefing process has forced people to either
snitch on someone or simply make up gangs in order to get out of the
torture chamber known as Security Housing Unit (SHU), and this has gone
on for decades.
Just think, most people in SHU are here for b.s. and are not even what
the prison claims they are, do not really belong to gang xyz, etc. And
so when someone can’t take the torturous conditions and wants to get out
of SHU, officials require them to debrief (inform) on others, yet this
person may not even know anything to tell about even if he or she wanted
to, so many times this persyn will make up his own random people while
at other times this may be the time for personal vengeance like how men
are sent to Gitmo often because their neighbor in Pakistan didn’t like
the loud music he played.
This pathetic way of “weeding out” supposed gang members or security
threats is broken and changes nothing, the truth is SHU is a racist
operation directed at the oppressed nations. In addition, guards are
getting paid higher salaries for working in these units. Of all the
people in SHU, none are the rich, the wealthy, no billionaire ever been
validated as a gang member, I have yet to meet a millionaire in SHU. We
are the poor, those coming from barrios and ghetto projects, those who
can’t even walk down the street in our hood without getting tracked by a
predator pig and slammed against the wall threatened, beaten, or worse
we of the oppressed nations are open game in the streets of the united
snakes.
Today is the fifth day into the strike and there is no light at the end
of the tunnel and most know this. Here in SHU conditions cannot possibly
get worse, we are stuffed into solitary confinement boxes, locked into
isolation for the rest of our days - what is worse than this existence?
I’m reporting back to you about this fascist penal system here at Chino
minimum yard. They have put up a memo about the food strike and they are
threatening us by saying that if we participate, they will move us off
the yard and put us in Ad-Seg!
I told the comrades to keep on doing what we are doing and to hell with
the fascist pigs! We will not stop, until our comrades are let out of
the SHU! I told the comrades to keep the faith and if these pigs send us
to the hole or the SHU, always remember, it’s just another part of the
prison.
In the struggle, from the belly of the beast!
MIM(Prisons) adds: The list of facilities that have reported
hunger strikers reported by the
CDCR
does not include the California Institution for Men in Chino, bringing
into question their count of hunger strikes at 4252 as of Thursday,
September 29. There was not as much advance notice this time around, so
the word that the strike is back on is still spreading.
2 October 2011 UPDATE:Latest
reports are that around 12,000 prisoners were participating on
September 28. This higher number includes people who have participated
at any level, and includes prisoners transferred out of state.
I’m one of the prisoners struggling to stop the torturous Security
Housing Units (SHU) practice on prisoners in California. It is only
right. In Calipatria State Prison Ad-Seg they’re calling this peaceful
hunger strike a disturbance strike. A memorandum was passed to urge
prisoners to stop or else they would get a serious violation write-up.
The following day a large quantity of prisoners with a couple of serious
rule violations started accepting their trays in order to avoid getting
an indeterminate assignment in SHU. Which is understandable. But,
nonetheless a lot of prisoners are still going strong.
In Calipatria State Prison Ad-Seg, hunger strike prisoners are
participating peacefully. They’re in compliance with the COs and medical
staff, so this does not meet the criteria of a disturbance. The
memorandum was another tactic of reprisal towards the prisoners who are
participating. I hope for a positive outcome for all the prisoners in
SHU confinement and for all of us here in Calipatria Ad-Seg. Along with
the struggles of the SHU prisoners, we’re looking for something
positive. In Calipatria we’re asking for what Ad-Seg is supposed to
have. Nothing more, nothing less.
“Power in defense of freedom is greater than power on behalf of tyranny
and oppression.” - Malcolm X
As most of you may know, we are engaged in a protracted struggle to
secure our liberation from perpetual torture and uphold our human
rights. On July 1st the Pelican Bay
SHU D-Corridor
Collective called for an indefinite
hunger
strike to peacefully protest the decades and decades of subhuman
conditions we have endured in these sensory deprivation torture units.
The NCTT, along with 6,600 other prisoners and untold thousands the
world over answered that call. We did not eat for 21 days. I personally
lost 42 pounds and had to be rushed to the emergency room at least once.
Men older and less physically resilient than myself, some with chronic
disease such as diabetes, asthma and cancer survivors, made these same
sacrifices, and we are prepared to make those sacrifices again, taking
them to their ultimate conclusion if necessary, to achieve what is by
right ours already.
This makes the events of 16 August all the more perplexing, even though
we were forewarned and expected it. At approximately 08:00 on 16 August
2011 some 20 to 25 Correctional Officers (COs) and some 10 to 12 ISU and
IGI [“gang intelligence”] officers converged on 4B1L-C-section under the
pretext that they’d received a “kite” alleging New Afrikan and/or
“southern” Mexican partisans in 4B1L-C-section were going to “assault
staff.”
For months, IGI has been attempting to manufacture fear and reactionary
resentment amongst building COs that New Afrikans were planning to
attack staff during Black August memorial. Mindful of the daily
injustices visited upon indeterminate SHU prisoners, and already fearful
of the dreaded retribution, some staff actually bought into this
absurdity. There was no threat, there was no “kite” found – this was
simple unadulterated retribution for the hunger strike and the unwanted
public attention it has brought to the domestic torture camps they are
managing at Pelican Bay, Corcoran and Tehachapi SHUs.
We were all stripped down and escorted out of the building and placed in
the small management yard caged (imagine a K-9 kennel cage – that’s what
our yard is). For approximately 6 hours they systematically tore our
cells up, cut open mattresses, tore down or trod upon personal photos,
confiscated any item they felt would hurt us on a personal level, with
abject disregard for personal property regulations. Coffee and tooth
powder was strewn over personal letters and laundry was taken or trod
underfoot. We were brought back to our cells only to find what I can
only describe as the leavings of a tornado of F-5 proportions.
That this was done as retaliation was itself insulting, how it
was done was blatant disrespect – but what perplexes the mind is what
did they hope to gain by such a transparent reactionary response? We
are, and have demonstrated historically, that we are fully prepared
to die to secure our human rights and dignity. So surely this
could not be some act to deter resistance. Perhaps it was an act of
provocation, an attempt to engender a reactionary military response to a
psychological and political attack? But no, this couldn’t be the case
because unlike the blindly violent monsters they would make us out to
be, the truth of the matter is that we are men of principle who believe
in self-defense and clearly exhausting all legal and peaceful means of
protest. Unlike the state, for us violence is a last resort and
we are not, and cannot be, compelled to react to provocation or allow
such to deter us from the legitimate struggle for our, and the people’s
human rights and dignity.
So this leaves us with the obvious conclusion that like a petulant child
or a bully who’s been exposed for the sadist they are, they strike out
blindly, to inflict whatever discomfort they can in an act of impotence
and frustration; an acknowledgment of their weakness in the face of the
people’s power.
Men in ernest are not afraid of consequence. There exists no set of
retaliatory actions, no sanctions they can bring to bear, that will
deter our course, as long as we have you, the people,
supporting us we will win. Together we can attain even greater
victories than these. It is our sincerest hope that you continue to
support this effort and open yourselves up to the prospect of more
progressive initiatives to come. Stand with us and we will forge a
brighter tomorrow.
In an attempt to quell resistance, the above list of petty actions
have been approved according to a memo from the CDCR.
As thousands of prisoners wrap up day five of round two of the
California Food Strike, the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) has stepped up its repression and propaganda in
response to prisoners’ demands for basic humyn rights. They have even
declared it a punishable offense to peacefully campaign the state for
these rights by refusing state-issued food.
The bourgeois press has been repeating the CDCR’s ridiculous claim that
if prisoners went on strike again it might delay reforms in the SHU
system. Their audacity is laughable. We all know the strike is nothing
but a scapegoat, and not the cause of their “delay.”
Meanwhile, they have indicated that they will make conditions worse on
three main points of the original
Five
Core Demands. All three points address the systematic repressiveness
of the whole California prison system.
MORE GROUP PUNISHMENT - Not only has the CDCR threatened that reforms
will be slowed down by another round of hunger striking, but they have
implied that non-striking prisoners will also lose their programming as
a result.(1) This is in direct contradiction to the first demand.
MORE SECURITY THREAT GROUPS - While the prisoners have demanded an end
to the arbitrary and secretive system of giving people endless sentences
in the Security Housing Units (SHU, long-term isolation) for “gang
affiliation,” the CDCR has publicly discussed broadening the “Security
Threat Group” category to include street organizations. This will mean
more people in SHU for indeterminate sentences.
MORE LONG-TERM ISOLATION - The third demand calls for an end to the
torturous practice of long-term isolation. While the state has continued
to assert that these practices are constitutional based on court
rulings, they have promised to send more prisoners to Administrative
Segregation and SHU just for participating in the hunger strike!
As laid out in the Five Core Demands, these are parts of a system of
oppression that affects all prisoners. While comrades in SHU have the
drive to put it down hardest because of their living conditions, the
CDCR is making it clear that the implications will affect the whole
system.
Even the reforms offered in the Gang Management Policy Proposal of 25
August 2011 allow the continued practice of keeping the most progressive
and politically active prisoners in isolation indefinitely.(2) While
this would put California more in line with what is done in most other
parts of the country, it is hardly progress. This proposal highlights
the political nature of the injustice system.
Even the Eight Short-term Action Items affecting prisoners in Security
Housing Units listed in a 27 September 2011 CDCR memo(3) may not be
granted to prisoners refusing to eat state-issued meals. They hope that
by granting the more petty demands that they can break up the unity of
California prisoners, convincing some to give up while they are ahead.
The unreasonable actions of the CDCR during this whole conflict should
convince any prisoner that such a move would be a mistake. There is no
indication that California will be reducing its repression, and every
indication that it hopes to heighten Amerika’s war on oppressed nations.
State of California
Memorandum
Date September 27, 2011
To All CDCR Inmates
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Subject- INMATE PROGRAMMING EXPECTATIONS RELATIVE TO HUNGER STRIKES
Information has been received that a number. of inmates have engaged in
behavior consistent with initiating a demonstration/hunger strike event.
The Department will not condone organized inmate disturbances.
Participation in mass disturbances, such as hunger strikes or work
stoppage will result in the Department taking the following action:
Inmates participating will receive disciplinary action in accordance
with the California Code of Regulations.
Inmates identified as leading the disturbance will be subject to removal
from general population and placed in an Administrative Segregation
Unit.
In the event of a mass hunger strike, additional measures may be taken
to more effectively monitor and manage the participating inmates’
involvement and their food/nutrition intake, including the possible
removal of canteen items from participating inmates.
All inmates are encouraged to continue with positive programming and to
not participate in this or any other identified mass strike/disturbance.
These types of disturbances impact inmate programming and day-to-day
prison operations for the entire population. While every effort will be
made to continue normal programming for nonparticipating inmates, a
large scale disturbance of this type will unavoidably impact operations.
The Department will notify inmates and families when and if normal
programming is impacted.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens
State of California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Memorandum
Date : September 27, 2011
To : All CDCR Inmates
Subject: REVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNIT AND GANG POLICIES
In May 2011 the Department began the complex process of assessing the
policies and procedures associated with the Gang Validation Process,
Indeterminate Gang Security Housing Unit (SHU) Program, as well as
privileges associated with inmates on Indeterminate SHU status. The
purpose of the review is to improve our policies by adopting national
standards in gang/disruptive group management. Before commencing this
review, the Department received input from internal and external
experts, other state and federal correctional systems, inmates, and
other stakeholders While the process of policy review and change will
take several more stakeholders to implement, much has already been done.
In fact, a draft of the new policy should be ready for stakeholder
review next month. In addition, several changes have already been made
by the Department, including:
Short-term Action Items:
Authorization of watch caps for purchase and State issue. Authorization
of wall calendars for purchase in canteen.
Authorization of exercise equipment in SHU yards (installation of
permanent dip/push-up bars is still under review).
Authorization of annual photographs for disciplinary free inmates.
Approval of proctors for college examinations.
Use of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR)
Ombudsman for monitoring and auditing of food services.
Authorization of sweat pants for purchase/annual package.
Authorization of Hobby items (colored chalk, pen fillers, and drawing
paper).
Mid-term Action Items:
As noted above, the Department is conducting a comprehensive review of
SHU policies that includes behavior-based components, increased
privileges based upon disciplinary free behavior, a step down process
for SHU inmates, and a system that better defines and weighs necessary
points in the validation process. The initial policies will be completed
shortly and upon Secretary approval will be sent for stakeholder review
and comment. Upon receipt of this input, the Department will initiate
any regulation changes in the administrative law process necessary and
implement the first major changes to the validation process in the last
two decades. Of course this work may be delayed by large-scale inmate
disturbances or other emergency circumstances.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens