Mao
Zedong: A Life
by Jonathan Spence
The author of this book, Jonathan Spence, teaches at Yale University.
his awards include a Gugenheim and MacArthur Fellowship so it was of no
surprise from the very first pages to read criticism of Mao with many
false claims adding no sources to validate the slander found in this
book. Spence’s ludicrous claims of Mao being disinterested in education
‘browsing through newspapers for months’ seemed humorous, I thought, who
believes this shit? Mao was known for his intense study and his ground
breaking theory reflects this.
As I navigated through the bullshit I found glimpses of history peppered
throughout ’ a life’, I found interesting Mao’s early years pre-1920’s
Chinese civil war. His Book Society Club and being editor of the
progressive journal “New Hunan” seemed to build public opinion during
these early years. I did enjoy reading in Chapter 4 of the formation of
the Chinese Communist Party which was assisted by the Soviets, at this
time Chinese were sent to Russia and France to study who would return to
help build China. Spence did give a brief description of the Chinese
Communist Parties first congress, which was ultimately held on a boat on
a Zhejiang lake, and the secrecy that was needed at that time, the first
congress decided they would focus on organizing factory workers for the
immediate future.
In chapter 5 Spence points out that in 1925 British forces shot Chinese
civilians demonstrating and sparked popular movements against
imperialism. According to Spence, in 1925 communist party membership was
under 1,000 but by 1927 it expanded to over 57,000. What Spence fails to
point out is it took public opinion and the communist party to seize
these opportunities to show the people, teach and guide them to action
against the imperialists acts of atrocity to create over 57,000 members
in the CCP.
In Chapter 5 Spence begins surprisingly well when describing how in 1926
Mao was one of those chosen to organize the peasants in the countryside
including in his homeland of Hunan, which proved a success, and how the
poorest of peasants seized power from the dominating landlords and how
in the liberated areas women were no longer enslaved by husbands. The
petty criminals, secret societies and even children began to partake in
the new liberation areas. However, the credit was short lived as Spence
got back to criticizing Mao’s attention to detail in his writings with
tables and neat rows of figures on the size and location of each peasant
association. Later in the book Spence even criticizes Mao in his later
years for not being detailed in his writings as before.
Every now and then Spence will give Mao his due respect, one such
instance is in chapter 6 when describing Mao’s guerilla episodes when
Mao and his forces used the JiangXi county town of YongXin as their
“center” and as a base for organizing “insurrection” in the neighboring
counties. At this time Spence goes on to say “Mao was 34, lean from
privation, rich with experience from his organizational work among the
peasantry, and a storehouse of knowledge about communist and Guomindang
party leaders.” Spence goes on to criticize the long march with much
death and disaster, however he fails to note that had Mao not initiated
the long march, the communist troops would have been wiped out by the
Guomindang at “Jiangxi soviet” which was the new communist base area on
the FuJian border.
There were three pages on Stalin and Mao’s meetings that were
informational yet when discussing the cultural revolution Spence seems
to limit this great achievement to closing brothels and construction of
buildings. When discussing the Korean War Spence goes on to mention how
Mao’s oldest son died in this war and goes on to say “when Mao was
finally told of his son’s death by Peng DeHuai in person, he agreed to
let the body remain in Korean soil, as an example of duty to the Chinese
people.” This I think shows Mao’s character and what kind of leader he
was.
Overall this was a horrible book about Mao, written with a blatant
imperialist bias. I thought I could sort through the bullshit and pick
out good information but I had many headaches attempting to do so,
Spence often cites “facts” about Mao without any notes or references as
to where he found these “facts.”