In a recent MIM(Prisons) Re-Lease on Life newsletter there was an
article on what it is like to be a communist and on probation. In
September 2016 in a ULK there was an article about sex offenders
and status within the prison. This article will complement both, talking
about what my experience has been like over two years as a communist
post-probation.
The current revolutionary communist party versus the party branch I have
been loyal to and committed to during my 10 years on probation, jail,
prison was reluctant of taking me back. The reason why I only was
allowed as supporter/sympathizer status was a defense mechanism from the
COINTELPRO and now 9/11 days, where the ruling class or reactionaries
could use my case if they found out to discredit the party.
The idea of another “other” somehow possibly discrediting the party
makes sense. Especially if it was front line news that a socialist
party, that has already been attacked throughout its history for all
sorts of untrue accusations, was now “exposed” as harboring sex
deviants. This would possibly make other party members uncomfortable.
And it would appear to other groups that the party was not being a
radical feminist communist party.
But my situation became a non-issue, probably due to members forgetting.
I joined the same branch I was part of in the past. For a year I jumped
into environmental work, anti-war work, feminist work, and helping with
a homeless bill of rights. I also jumped into the leadership of an
ex-prisoners’ organization, as well as with Samizdat Socialist Prisoners
Project. Also working on a memoir of my thoughts as a thought-criminal.
When activists and revolutionaries of all stripes found out about me
having a background, or of my crime, I did not shy away from
acknowledging it. I told them I did not have a victim, that it was a
sting by local cops. I am doing what I think communist sex deviants
should do: work towards eliminating the capitalist state that creates
schizophrenic and contradictory mores and norms in the first place. I
was the guy that did prisoner liberation work in my area.
After a year, someone calling themselves a feminist found out what I had
done and lambasted me on Facebook. As a white, male, sex offender,
atheist, and communist I had to refrain from attacking a female feminist
to avoid seeming like a white sexist and chauvinist. So I left the
feminist group along with other feminist groups I was a part of.
But it did not stop there. There was nothing I could say to defend my
actions or defuse the situation especially on social media. Only two or
three people, who were hardly activists, were attacking me, questioning
why someone like me should be in a feminist group. They found a paper I
wrote about being in college as a sex offender, and did not interpret it
correctly as I am no longer entitled, deviant, and uber-sexualized.
Throughout a week of turmoil, many comrades and friends defended me
saying that I have never hid what I have done, and no opponent of me
reached out to me to defend myself. My comrades pretty much asked if a
sex offender’s best place is in a feminist group attacking the
chauvinism, sexism in the days of Trump, Weinstein, and Brock Turner.
Currently after two months, I still have not participated in any
feminist-related event.
These opponent feminists are a possible example of carceral feminism.
The carceral feminists are people who believe the best punishment is a
thrown-away prison key. They have allied with conservatives on this
issue. If I had my chance to defend myself, I would say I am more
committed than any of the carceral feminist armchair activists. I would
tell them how most of my close female friends, sexual partners, and even
my girlfriend have experienced rape, sexual assault, etc. and they
accept me. The one to two years off of probation, jail, and prison have
been very rocky and it is hard to figure out my voice and place in the
revolutionary struggle. I hope many of the released do not return to a
life imposed on them by the bourgeoisie, but partake in liberating a
prison world.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade’s experience speaks to the
universal struggle of former prisoners, and more specifically to the
question of how revolutionaries should work (or not work) with people
convicted of sex offenses. To clarify, ey is working with some
organizations that we have significant disagreements with, but that
doesn’t change the relevance of what ey writes.
This is a case where someone who was convicted of a sex offense is not
disputing the accusation. Instead, ey comes to the conclusion that the
right thing for someone who committed gender crimes to do is to fight to
end the system that creates a culture of gender oppression. This we very
much agree with.
We did not see the social media debates with and against this persyn so
we can’t comment directly on what people said when arguing that ey
should not be allowed into feminist organizations. But there are several
problems we see with this incident. First, attacking someone on social
media rather than taking criticisms directly to em and eir organization
does not do justice to the seriousness of this political debate. Also,
pushing someone out of an organization before hearing eir side and
investigating the issue thoroughly just does the work of the government
by dividing the movement.
As Maoists we believe that people are capable of change, and so when we
learn about errors people have made we ask for self-criticism and an
analysis of why those actions were taken. Those who not only make
sincere self-criticism but also demonstrate through their actions that
they have changed should be given the opportunity to contribute to the
revolutionary movement.
Sex offenders are generally pariahs, both on the streets and behind
bars. All people with a criminal record face extra scrutiny, criticism,
and ostracization when they hit the streets. It’s important that
revolutionary organizations don’t play into this. We shouldn’t dismiss
former captives who want to be activists. Instead we should set up
structures to help them get involved and support their work. And for
those who have committed crimes against the people in the past, we can
help them better understand not only why these actions were wrong, but
also to transform their thinking to best avoid hurting others in the
future and how to build a society that doesn’t foster those crimes in
the first place.