MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
January 2011 will be a legislature year in Texas. A petition has been
put on the internet to ask our state leaders to reform the Texas parole
board system, a tyranny agency ruining thousands of lives, in prison and
in our own society. For some years now, since the mysterious death of
David Ruiz (a Brown brother who achieved federal action to demand prison
reform in Texas) we continue to raise awareness of the new and old
injustices of the “justice” system as it pertains to parole.
Texas prisoners are not granted parole, even though they have done
everything possible to be eligible for parole as required by their
Inmate Treatment Plan (ITP). When the judge, the lawyers for both sides,
and the offender all agree to a sentence, why does the parole board have
the right to deny the parole because they decide the prisoner hasn’t
served enough time? Doesn’t make sense or seem fair, does it? Prisoners
have a time calculated date which is the parole eligibility date and
those having met their ITP requirements should automatically make parole
on that date. As the system works now, prisoners can not know whether
they can exercise their special review rights, effectively ask for a
review, or even know why or if they have been turned down, because they
do not have access to their files. It is impossible for anyone to know
if they have been falsely or wrongly accused of a transgression while
incarcerated. If information has been erroneously placed in the file
that may actually belong to another prisoner, or if their parole is
being thwarted by a campaign by others they won’t know. They can not
know if rules have been violated or if evidences that would prove their
worthiness for the privilege of parole is actually in their file.
Good time is currently not calculated or used to achieve parole or
financial compensation for prisoner labor. At present it is awarded but
discounted as part of the parole process (ignored and not honored),
meaning modern day slavery is going on. The system currently continues
to vindictively punish even the “ideal” prisoners who have been
rehabilitated (which supposedly is the goal of the incarceration) making
them wonder why they keep trying and causing them to lose all capacity
for hope as the promised parole is disregarded and becomes one setback
after another. In addition it callously wrecks the lives of families and
children of prisoners who suffer needlessly while trying to find some
reason for the parole board’s coldness and tyrannical practices acting
above the laws of the land.
Taxpayers are being robbed of funds by the corrupt parole practices.
Prisoners in Texas seem to be the exception to the 13th amendment of the
U$ constitution abolishing slavery as a large amount of capital is
raised by the prison work generated by the incarcerated people now in
prison. However, in the united states of america we should not allow
slavery for state and corporate profit. It is criminal in itself to keep
prisoners incarcerated for financial benefit by enslaving inmates past
their parole eligibility date when they prove that they have gotten
rehabilitated and qualify for parole release.
If you want to help change these parole injustices, please have your
families and friends go to the following website and sign the petition:
www.petitiononline.com/tcb123/petition.html Also
please have them write each one of their representatives.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We agree with this prisoner that the
parole system in Texas, and throughout the criminal injustice system in
the U$, does not work, not even by the laws of this illegal government.
We find the demands in the petition agreeable in that they would lead to
a general reduction in imprisonment in Texas.
However, disagree with the common misperception that the U$ prison
monstrosity is driven by a desire to exploit prison labor. Certainly the
workers benefiting from their well paid jobs running the prisons have an
interest in denying parole, and the politicians who want the votes of
the workers and their families, share this interest. But as we explained
in an article on
the
U.$. prison economy, prison labor can offset some of the costs of
imprisonment, but prisons are not profitable. They are a tool of the
government that both provide jobs for the mostly oppressor-nation labor
aristocracy workers while providing social control of the mostly
oppressed nation population that is incarcerated. The U$ prison system
is a massive suck on superprofits extracted from the Third World to pay
staff and provide basic needs for those imprisoned. This is one of the
costs of operation the imperialists are willing to pay, not something
they are making money off of. That an industry has developed around this
massive project is only a product of this reality that helps tie labor
aristocracy interests to the imperialist state.
United Front is the theory of uniting different groups across
class lines for a common goal or interest, while maintaining
independence where those groups disagree. The application of united
front theory is about recognizing different contradictions in society
and utilizing them in the interests of the international proletariat.
The primary united front is the Anti-Imperialist United Front, which is
made up of the majority of the world’s people whose material interests
lie in defeating imperialism. This is a strategic united front based on
the principal contradiction.
In this article we will address a couple of contemporary issues in the
United $tates and analyze their potential for united front work. We’ll
see that many of the big conflicts in a First World country are between
the enemy classes, but that does not always mean we sit on the
sidelines. Some forms of united front are tactical and require fast
action based on thorough knowledge. To successfully navigate the
potential for united front in the First World that serves the interests
of the Third World proletariat we must first have a correct analysis of
our conditions. The first section of this article provides a quick
background to get us started.
Land, Housing and the Settler Nation
One of the arguments made against the labor aristocracy thesis is that
corporations have no interest in sacrificing profit to pay First World
workers more, and there is no corporate conspiracy to enforce such a
policy. This is based in the theory of free market capitalism, or only
reading the beginning chapters of Marx’s Capital and treating
that as an accurate model of reality in all places for all time. As a
class, capitalists do depend on the labor aristocracy, not just
politically, but economically as consumers and cogs in their growing
pyramid scheme of finance capital. And there is at least one place where
the U.$. imperialists can exert their will as a class (more and more
these days) - it’s called the U.$. government. The promotion of home
ownership by the feds is one of the biggest examples of the imperialists
consciously building a labor aristocracy within the heart of the empire.
Home ownership has been a staple of Amerikan wealth since the settlers
stole this land from the First Nations and built their homesteads on it.
The net worth of Amerikan families compared to First Nations and those
descended from slaves in the U.$. is one legacy of this form of
primitive accumulation. While land ownership among the earliest European
invaders was 100% (that’s why they came to the Americas), by the 1775
War of Independence, land ownership was still at 70% for the
Euro-Amerikan nation.(1) Arghiri Emmanuel pointed out that Amerikan
wages were able to stay so high in this early period of capitalist
development, even as land ownership ceased to be universal, because the
abundant “free” land stolen from the First Nations provided a fallback
plan for European settlers.(2) This primitive accumulation through
genocide was the basis for wealth that the Amerikan labor aristocracy
enjoyed as industrialization transformed more of the settlers into wage
laborers.
Following the inter-imperialist struggles of WWI, the United $tates
became the dominant imperialist power. The influx of wealth that came
with this allowed for the integration of southern and eastern European
immigrants into the white nation leading up to the Great Depression.(1)
From 1900 to 1950, home ownership rates in the United $tates averaged
about 45%, with the lowest rates in the Black Belt South and the highest
in European dominated northwest states.(3) After the economic recovery
that came with the spoils of WWII, the United $tates embarked on the
suburbanization of Amerika with numerous incentives from the federal
government to bring home ownership above 60% again.
Since 1960, home ownership has stayed above 60% for U.$. citizens as a
whole.(4) This rate was above 70% for white Amerikans in recent years,
but the census does not have comparable statistics by race going back
very far. Blacks and Latinos are just under 50% for rates of home
ownership, even though national oppression has ensured that they
currently face foreclosure disproportionately.
Emmanuel’s theories in Unequal Exchange demonstrate how the
significantly higher incomes of people in the First World actually
transfer wealth to the imperialist countries from the Third World,
reinforcing their economic advantage. Similarly, the oppressor nation
has equity and is able to increase wealth in ways that the internal
semi-colonies have not been able to do despite access to exploiter level
jobs. All of this fits with the general trend of capitalism, which is
the accumulation of capital. The more you have, the more you tend to
get.
Collapse of the U.$. Housing Market
The left wing of white nationalism (whether self-described anarchists,
socialists, Maoists or Democrats) has been saying that the increase in
home foreclosures is an indication of the heightening contradictions
between the Amerikan proletariat and the capitalists. These people
defend the stolen land that was the foundation of wealth for settler
Amerika, and the modern home ownership pyramid scheme that is the
foundation of the Amerikan dream today.
Not only have millions of people lost their homes to foreclosure in
recent years, but fear-mongers point out that the “2008 sub-prime
mortgage market resulted in the disappearance of $13 trillion in
American household wealth between mid-2007 and March 2009… on average,
U.S. households lost one quarter of their wealth in that period.”(5)
Such alarmists ignore that Amerikans gained $10 trillion from 2006 to
2007 to reach an all-time high, and that net worth of the country’s
citizens has generally gone up at increasing rates since WWII.(6) The
bigger ups and downs in all financial markets are certainly signs of
crisis, but to act like Amerikans are being sunk to Third World
conditions in 2010 is ludicrous. If only these activists would cry so
loud for those who really have had to live in Third World conditions for
their whole lives and for generations!
Most, if not all, of the loss in Amerikans’ net worth is accounted for
by stock portfolios and values of homes (which are bought and sold like
stocks these days); in other words losses in finance capital.
Traditionally, the petty bourgeoisie in Marxism was not exploited, nor
did it significantly exploit others. To claim that those who reap
profits from investments of finance capital are anything less than petty
bourgeoisie is a rejection of Marxist definitions. With home ownership
around 68% in recent years, that is a solid two thirds of people in the
United $tates who fall squarely into the category of petty bourgeoisie
or higher, including 50% of Blacks and Latinos (minimum). This group is
210 million people, or only 3% of the world’s population in 2010, yet
they hold more net wealth than the total market capitalization of all
publicly traded companies in the world.(7)
Our critics point to the great wealth inequalities within the United
$tates as reason to organize Amerikans for revolution. So let’s just
look at the bottom 80% of Amerikans, who owned 15% (a mere scrap from
the table if you will) of the net wealth in the United $tates in 2007
(and this was a 15-year low for them).(8) While their share has
decreased a few percentage points since 1983, total net worth in the
United $tates has increased by almost 5 times. Therefore the lowest 80%
of Amerikans went from about $2.2 trillion in net worth in 1983 to
almost $10 trillion in 2007. (Two trillion dollars could eliminate world
hunger for the next 66 years, until 2076.(9)) “Middle class” Amerika has
assets that are greater than the GDP of China,(10) the world’s
industrial powerhouse representing about 20% of the world’s population.
That’s comparing just the Amerikan “middle class” and “poor” to the
whole nation of China, including its well-developed capitalist class.
Since the proletariat, by definition, has negligible net worth in the
form of assets, let’s look at their income.(11) Income generally
increases proportionately with net worth across the globe.(12) Almost
half of the world’s population lives on less than $1000 per year. That
is 3.14 billion people living on less than $3 trillion in a year.(13)
Now before we condemn Amerikans’ huge assets, let’s make sure that they
just aren’t better at saving and investing their money than the
proletariat. In 2005, the wealthiest 20% of the world accounted for
76.6% of total private consumption. The poorest fifty percent accounted
for only 7.2% of consumption.(13) A conservative estimate leaves us with
Amerikans, on average, consuming at least 27 times the average persyn in
the poorest half of the world.(14) So money management skills cannot
explain Amerika’s huge net worth.
A just, sustainable humyn society requires the Amerikan labor
aristocracy to be brought down to consumer levels much closer to the
Third World. But this little exercise demonstrates that this is far from
happening, despite the alarmists’ cries.
Ultimately, the contradiction we’re describing is between the labor
aristocracy and the imperialists. The imperialists, in particular
finance capital, are a dynamic, opportunist class. In contrast, the
labor aristocracy benefits from stability of the status quo. The finance
capitalists were able to make quick profits by selling the labor
aristocracy short, so Amerikans are pissed. While perhaps pushing the
labor aristocracy towards fascism, the finance capitalists are also
undercutting the consumerism of Amerikans that their system depends on
so much. What we are witnessing is an internal contradiction in the
imperialist system playing out. Both groups control trillions of dollars
in super-profits from the Third World, and the Anti-Imperialist United
Front has no interest in one of them getting more than the other. We
need to keep sitting this one out.
Migration to the United $tates
As discussed above, high wages and ballooning housing values reinforce
themselves in our current economic system, making the rich richer.
However, neither could be maintained without erecting a border outside
of which these two things cannot flow. Therefore, keeping wages and
housing values high is directly linked to the battle over increasing
repression of migrant laborers within U.$. borders. The contradiction in
this struggle is between oppressed nations who are trying to gain access
to jobs in the United $tates and the oppressor nation that is trying to
keep them out. This challenge to imperialist country privilege indicates
that the battle for migrant rights is part of the anti-imperialist
struggle.
While Third World people and some Amerikan youth faced Amerikan labor
aristocrats on the streets, it was the U.$. District Court that put in
place an injunction on most of the provisions of Arizona’s Senate Bill
1070 (SB1070), in light of a lawsuit filed by the U.$. Department of
Justice (DOJ) against the state of Arizona. The DOJ held that
immigration was under federal jurisdiction, and that they had a plan for
the whole country to balance its various interests related to
immigration that Arizona would not be allowed to mess up.
The interest of the bourgeois internationalists is in having free access
to markets and labor, not to mention international relations. This camp
includes the federal government and their finance capitalist backers as
well as smaller businesses that only operate in the United $tates, but
depend on migrant labor. Their conflict is with other bourgeois
interests and the bourgeoisified majority of Amerikans whose position of
privilege stems from the elitism of who is allowed to enter their
fortress of jewels.
There is effectively a united front between the internationalism of the
mass resistance to SB1070 on both sides of the Mexican border and the
U.$. government acting on behalf of bourgeois internationalism. And for
now, it is the imperialists who are really throwing a wrench in the
works for Amerikans, even though the contradiction at its base is
between oppressed nations and the oppressor nation.
A majority of Amerikans in a number of polls supported SB1070 or a
similar law. The highest percentage listed in one article, 79%, did not
agree that “illegal aliens are entitled to the same rights and basic
freedoms as U.S. citizens.”(15) This is the definition of Amerikan
chauvinism. At best, one fifth of U.$. citizens don’t think they deserve
more than other humyn beings by virtue of being born in the United
$tates. This is why we even keep an eye on the imperialists for glimmers
of internationalism in the First World.
With Latinos, we can see how quickly this consciousness develops by
tracking the percentage of coconuts in the population over time. A
Latino Decisions poll found that 12% of second-generation
Latino voters in Arizona supported SB1070. By the fourth generation it
had increased to 30% supporting the coconut position.(16) Amerikanism is
an insidious disease that has claimed significant portions of the
internal semi-colonies of the United $tates.
Unite All Who Can Be United
While many dogmatists still criticize Mao for allying the Chinese
Communists with the national bourgeoisie, we can take united front
theory even further and come up with examples of progressive forces
allying with the government of the imperialist superpower of the world
against an oppressor nation. This goes to show that we cannot let
ultra-left ideas of purity prevent us from allying with those who might
help our cause.
The rightist errors in applying united front theory happen when we have
incorrect lines elsewhere. Not recognizing a united front as working
with an enemy class, or becoming convinced that other contradictions
have been resolved, and not just pushed to a secondary position, are the
main forms of rightism to guard against. Mao had to fight much rightism
from other communists who thought the communists and national bourgeois
forces should merge into one, where inevitably the reactionary
bourgeoisie would lead because of their relative power. Rightism in the
United $tates looks like people getting caught up with legislative
battles over migrant rights. Without national liberation, there is no
freedom for oppressed nations under imperialism. The imperialists will
always oppose that, just as the Nationalists fought the Communists in
civil war once the Japanese were forced out.
We do not seek unity for the sake of unity. We seek unity that utilizes
all the forces possible to tackle the principal contradiction, or
battles that push the principal contradiction forward. When we find
strategic unity with others, the united front also provides a basis for
unity-criticism-unity, which advances the struggle and deepens the unity
of revolutionaries and all oppressed people for a better future.
by a North Carolina prisoner August 2010 permalink
I am currently on I-Con [lockdown] for assault on staff, but the write
up was false. In December 2009 an officer was told to write me up for
assault because I refused to sit down in the day room. She called me out
by name and then told me to go to my bunk. As I was going to pass her
she stood in my way so that she was blocking my path, and she said I
pushed her. Prisoners later told me that while I was in segregation she
stated I never touched her, and that she wrote me up because she had the
authority to do so.
In June 2010 my room got searched while I was still on I-Con for the
assault charge, and I got written up for another assault on staff charge
as well as destruction of state property and disrespect. They charged me
with assault because the officer told me to drop my socks outside of my
trap door. So I dropped them out my door because I was following a
direct order. Now it’s four officers standing outside my door and this
particular officer is standing right in front of my door when the sock
falls on his foot. So he says that I threw a sock at him. Officers claim
I “assaulted” him but one of them told me that you can’t assault anybody
with a sock and she never saw me assault anyone but she wrote a
statement claiming I did.
Even if I did what they claim, the charge A-3 assault on staff is for
“throwing objects that are likely to produce injury or by any other
means hitting, kicking and pushing.” A sock doesn’t produce injury and
they claimed it hit him in the leg. I’ve never known a sock to injure
anyone. The only reason I was found guilty is because it was the word of
two officers and a sergeant and I had no witness. But the evidence that
I asked to be submitted was never submitted in my case. I’m currently
appealing the charge.
Greetings to everyone standing up for prisoners and human rights. My red
fist goes to all MIM social or prison reformers who continue to carry
truth, facts and hard struggles in their hearts against a democracy that
does not serve all equally but serves the few rich imperialist greedy
elites. MIM(Prisons) is speaking hardcore about a reality destroying
many all over Amerika, especially those in prison of Black or Brown
crimes, also known as the “War on Drugs.” I am not trying to justify
that smuggling or selling drugs should be permitted. Yet thousands now
sit in prison with long harsh prison sentences that usually don’t even
balance out to such drug crimes. For example, in Texas the court judge
gives you a certain prison sentence for drug crimes so that when you’re
up for parole the parole will be denied for reasons like “excessive
amount.” These reasons will be used each time you go for parole, not
only violating Texas parole board policies but state law and U$
Constitution Amendments like the double jeopardy clause.
The Fifth Amendment of the U$ Constitution states, “…nor shall any
person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of
life or limb…” This clause assures three basic protections: it protects
against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, it
protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after
conviction, and finally it protects against multiple punishments for the
same offense.
Violating the double jeopardy clause qualifies as a constitutional
violation in satisfaction of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No 104-134. 110 Stat. 1321. When evidence indicates the parole
board has violated the U$ Constitution the matter may be reviewed by a
Federal Court pursuant to §1983.
2011 will be a legislature year. Black, Brown and other brothers in
prison in Texas should ask their family and friends to protest such
failed parole policies, state laws or constitutional amendments, now
broken by this war on drugs by homeland terrorists calling themselves
our nation’s leaders.
The War on Drugs is not only a failed war on drug dealers, but against
our families and communities, especially the Brown barrios and Black
ghettos which many have always called home. The war on drugs sole
purpose was to be able to create a new home, called prison, now filled
with prisoners for drug crimes under harsh laws of sentencing ruining
thousands of lives. And even our nation seems to be under attack by a
democracy that serves more the rich than the poor or needy ones. I
encourage others to draft protest petitions or letters and have their
loved ones send them to John Whitmore who is a Texas Senator in charge
of The Sunset Commission looking into this kind of prison violation.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We condemn this practice of
refusing prisoners parole based on their original sentence, but we can
learn from history that
elections
are not the answer to the problems of the oppressed. The
imperialists and their supporters will be elected, and candidates truly
serving the people will never gain any real power in the United $tates
through elections. However, we can exert pressure on the criminal
injustice system through protest letters and actions. Sometimes we can
win small gains for the people through these struggles. And there is
nothing wrong with using election time to push a progressive cause, just
keep in mind that many legislators get elected on a “get tough on crime”
platform. All this rhetoric is bullshit that has nothing to do with the
reality of crime and punishment in Amerikkka, but the publicity is
important to politicians so they are probably less likely to take
progressive action in an election year if it might make them look “soft
on crime.”
Brothers we got to correct our backward thinking. You call yourself OGs?
Black gangsters got no lore for a Black-men, never have, but you play
the script well? OG why blind our youths with lies, false hope, why give
them guns to do your dirty work? OG you leave prison wrap up with the
right knowledge, but jump right back in the life, and call yourself an
OG, but in prison you was fumbata now you are Mac-G. This madness got to
stop whatever street tribes you claim: South, East, West, North, and in
between, we got to rise above stop lying to our youths, like this is the
best of lives being in these concentration kamps, doing time have never
been cool, now these kids think it’s part of life in order to get OG
status. This false status got to die.
This is a call to all older OGs to say stop this false status among our
youths. Here in Tennessee we are reversing the old time order of things,
we refuse to be followers of reactionary ideals. Our family falls in
line with comrade brother George Jackson ideals, Mr. OG please kill that
statue. The law of the land is very real. Mr OG you will be judged by
your deeds. The klan loves your status, cause they know you will
continue to let our youths kill one another. The STG also love your
status. Tag by your name Mr OG-Gangster.
This war is real, as the blood that flows on the streets. Mr. OG our
youths look up to us inside of these concentration kamps. The judicial
system don’t care about our youths, we got to save them from this
madness. They listen to us and they want to be like us. I’ve spent half
my life in prisons and saw these OGs play the role real good. This
system has always been a sanctuary to preserve and proliferate the
criminal mentality.
Mr OG, let’s rise up, you are the shot caller. Want to kill someone? -
hit that criminal mentality - kill it, and bring to life the
revolutionary mentality. As comrade brother George Jackson said, we got
to transform the criminal mentality into a revolutionary mentality.
Let’s save our kids. In doing so we also save ourselves. To deceive
others is reprehensible, to deceive ourselves is a damn tragedy.
This
Report is an analysis of the censorship experienced by MIM(Prisons) from
July 2009 through June 2010. In January 2008, MIM(Prisons) released our
first censorship
report, documenting what we can and can’t get into which prisons.
Last year we decided it would be best to analyze our censorship status
annually instead of biannually because it often takes months to
determine the status of a piece of mail.
To compile this data we rely solely on censored mail that is returned to
us by mailroom staff and reports from prisoners themselves. From July
2009 to June 2010, we sent in five digits worth of mail, of which 83%
were unconfirmed as received or censored. In the last reporting period,
only 80% of the mail was unconfirmed. This trend shows us that even less
people are reporting what mail they’ve gotten from us than last year,
which makes drawing conclusions from our records nearly impossible. For
example, when reading the state-by-state chart, it is important to
remember that “no censorship reported” does not mean that all the mail
got in, just that we don’t know what happened. Some states with no
censorship reported were: Colorado were 96% of the mail was unconfirmed;
in Indiana 92%; in Mississippi 93%, and in Nebraska and New Hampshire,
100% of the mail was unreported.
This lack of data continues despite the fact that every issue of
Under Lock & Key and many of our letters request that
subscribers tell us what they receive from us and when each time they
write. At our congress this summer we voted to adjust our policies to
require subscribers to notify us of their mail status in order to stay
on our mailing list. We have started sending comrades we are in
correspondence with Unconfirmed Mail Forms that will list what mail we
have sent them that we do not know the status of to encourage reporting.
But even if you don’t receive one of these forms, you should still let
us know what you get from MIM Distributors or MIM(Prisons). In fact, if
you tell us what you get from us before we send out the form you’ll save
us printing and postage costs!
Across the country, it appears that our censorship is gradually
decreasing. However, if we aren’t facing state repression, then we’re
probably doing something wrong politically. For this reason, we don’t
expect to ever be completely free of censorship while the United $tates
is still an imperialist state. We attribute these decreases to the hard
work our comrades inside have been doing to file appeals when their mail
gets censored. Another reason it may appear that our censorship status
is decreasing is our incomplete data – there may be censorship in places
that we just don’t know about.
Prisoners’ Legal Clinic
In the last year we started coordinating our legal efforts in a more
structured way with comrades inside through the MIM(Prisons)-led
Prisoners’ Legal Clinic. Members of the PLC have edited and added to the
Censorship Guide that we send to prisoners who have had our lit
censored; shared info and analysis about important legal issues relating
to our anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist work of fighting censorship and
political repression; and contributed several articles to the legal
strategy issue of
ULK issue
13. In this reporting year, we doubled the amount of Censorship
Guides we sent out in the previous reporting year, so the help we’ve
gotten on this guide is invaluable. We hope the PLC will eventually
expand to offer counseling and preparation assistance to comrades filing
anti-censorship lawsuits in the next year.
The PLC is facilitated by MIM(Prisons) but it is only as useful as the
comrades who are contributing to it from the inside. Anyone who wants to
engage in this important work should hook up with the PLC via
MIM(Prisons); no experience necessary.
Grieving Censorship is Crucial
At Menard Correctional Center in Menard, Illinois, Under Lock &
Key issue 9 was censored from dozens of comrades because of alleged
“STG references and depictions of violence.” A prisoner filed a
grievance, and Central Review in Springfield approved ULK 9 for
entry into Menard CC. We only received confirmation from this one
prisoner that he received the newsletter, so it is possible that Central
Review only permitted it to him. That is one example of why it is so
important to file grievances about censorship.
California Ban
In November 2009 we reported that the ban of literature from the Maoist
Internationalist Movement was lifted in a settlement between Prison
Legal News and CDCR. Even after this settlement, High Desert State
Prison and Pelican Bay State Prison still returned or trashed all mail
from MIM Distributors. Finally, in April 2010, High Desert Warden Mike
D. McDonald assured us that ULK would be reviewed on an
issue-by-issue basis instead of being automatically rejected based
solely on the return address. We recently sent out issue 14 and it got
in to at least some prisoners without a hitch. No such luck in Pelican
Bay where even a letter saying “Hi, how’s it going?” is still illegally
returned to sender uninspected. The San Francisco Bay View
newspaper and Revolution (by the rcp=u$a) have complained of
similar problems with their publications.
Feds Use Censorship to Make Room for Infiltrators
At the United Snakes Penitentiary - MAX in Florence, Colorado, ULK
issue 13 was censored because it contains the article “Security in
the Prison Movement” that is MIM(Prisons)’s analysis of how we should
deal with potential infiltrators, agent provocateurs, and snitches in
the movement. Our advice was basically to treat everyone as a potential
pig, and only give out information on a need-to-know basis. We also
defended our work with prisoners on Sensitive Needs Yards and Protective
Custody for similar reasons. While such prisoners are often viewed as
working with the state, we pointed out that many comrades have had to
leave their LOs for SNY in order to stop working for
the state.
The state sees this perspective as a threat to the security of the
institution (of white supremacy, no doubt). The reason given by the USP
mailroom staff for its censorship is that “p. 6 and 11 discuss what to
do with potential infiltrators who join the movement, not suitable for a
prison environment.” We wonder who they are targeting in our circle in
USP Florence, that it would blow their cover to share this advice with
them. The answer is probably everyone.
This report was written by our legal coordinator who took over the
job shortly before our last yearly report. While building on previous
work, s/he is responsible for many of the advances we made this year.
Fighting censorship is central to our work with the imprisoned lumpen
population in the United $tates and we always have projects for
volunteer lawyers and legal assistants. The easiest thing our
subscribers can do to help us out is tell us exactly what mail you have
received from us and when, each time you write.
On January 1 after an altercation with another patient I was escorted
out the day area to the sideroom. After being placed inside the
sideroom, someone came to the sideroom and asked me do I want to take
psychotropic drugs oral or by needle? I told him I would take the drugs
by mouth. A lot of other TAs began grouping up outside of the sideroom.
They ran in the room and started punching and kicking me while they were
pulling me out into the hallway. One of them kicked me in the groin and
one of them punched me in the mouth. Out in the hallway they forcefully
injected me with the medication. They then put me in the restraint bed
and put me back in the sideroom. After that three TAs wheeled me over to
the sideroom on ward 402. While being wheeled over there and still fully
restrained in the bed a TA named Frank Wench assaulted me by punching me
in the backside of my head about 4 times and started grabbing me by my
shirt and choking me with it and said “you fucked with the wrong
person”.
I am a prisoner at High Desert State Prison (HDSP) and one of 60
prisoners who were wrongfully validated in August 2009. Z-unit is
notorious for its disregard for prisoner’s rights. Likewise HDSP and
CDCR are disproportionately validating prisoners as gang members and
associates, regardless of their actual affiliation.
In the past 3 years HDSP has validated over 110 “Hispanics” off of
C-yard. Institutional Gang Investigations (IGI) is very prejudice and
racist here in HDSP. All validations here are racially motivated. All
IGI workers here are white and the new Lieutenant is Mexican but wants
to be white. The validation system is a sham. The most bothersome thing
is in R&R the COs ask you who you roll with. If you say no one
they’ll ask you where you live and when you tell them they declare that
you are a northerner or southerner just because of your region of
habitation.
CDCR validation procedures are vague and overly broad. HDSP is not
following court orders nor administrative regulations. Information from
informants and debriefers is being taken and used as 100% fact. Some of
us are issued validation points for a drawing. However we are not given
any notice of what is considered gang related. So how are we supposed to
know what is against the rules? Instead this is being utilized to
validate us and confine us to the Security Housing Unit (SHU) for life.
CDCR is using “kites” [written notes] to validate us. If a prisoner is
caught with your general information, CDCR uses that as a validation
point, saying you committed “gang activity.” How do you get a validation
point for someone having your name!? Anybody has access to your
information as COs post this info on our doors. This whole process is
ambiguous.
CDCR has a motivation for all these unjust validations. On January 25th,
2010, California legislators passed a new law (Senate Bill xxx18) in
regards to new credit earning for prisoners. General Population
prisoners are now receiving half time credits. While SHU and ASU have to
do 100% of the time they were sentenced. CDCR is wrongfully validating
prisoners as a tactic to ensure their job security. Many general
population prisoners will be getting kicked out because of the
overcrowding issues but ASU and SHU prisoners will be stuck with the COs
needing to guard them. It costs $50,000 to house a SHU prisoner so of
course the “Green Wall” wants to line their pockets with “Green Money.”
There are many inhumane conditions of confinement here in Z Unit.
Prisoners are kept in their cells 22 hours a day with no windows, TVs or
radios. Prisoners are not given adequate winter clothing. It rains,
snows, and an average temperature stays below 30 degrees and the only
things we get is a jacket. Prisoners are forced to strip buck naked in
the snow and freezing temperatures. Lastly, staff complaints and
grievances are often trashed or just not answered. In ULK 15 (July
August 2010)
your
feedback to a prisoner regarding grievances not being handled
property was to get involved in a petition campaign for grievances. I
want to get involved along with other prisoners here! I look forward to
your response.
MIM(Prisons) adds: CDCR has a long history of ignoring
grievances and it is in this state that the
grievance
campaign started. It has now expanded to many other states. Contact
us for more information and to get a copy of the petition for your state
(or to get a generic petition that you can customize for your state).
Sequel to Toy Story 1 and 2, this movie starts off
with Andy, the boy who owns the toys featured in the movie, heading off
to college and packing up his stuff. His toys are long forgotten in a
trunk and are feeling forlorn about being abandoned. The toys end up
being donated to a daycare, but not without much whining about the
importance of loyalty to their original owner. Woody, the apparent hero
of the movie, is an especially strong advocate of devotion to their one
and only owner, even in the face of the logical argument that Andy has
grown up and has no need for them any longer and so they should hope to
move on to new kids.
We’re not looking to liberate the toys of the world, but this movie has
some insidious messages for both kids and adults. First there’s this
theme of loyalty to one owner, a message that is repeated later at the
daycare center by the toys that have become evil dictators because they
felt abandoned by their owners. This is a good subtle way of encouraging
kids not to question the status quo or try to make change independently.
Sure it didn’t work out for the bad toys, but loyalty paid off for the
good toys who end up in a good home in the end, with the blessing of
their original owner.
Toy Story 3 does hammer home the point that it’s not good to
have evil dictators in charge. The Ken doll makes a little speech about
how everyone should be treated equally to underscore that message. But
this message is so blunt it’s hard to see how anyone would really learn
anything from it. And although the good toys work together against the
evil dictator, they don’t do any work among the masses of other
oppressed toys to try to rally them to help. It was just a few focoist
heroes, out to save themselves, who accidentally overthrew the evil
dictator in their attempts to escape a bad situation. So the writers
pass up an opportunity to promote organizing the people against the
power structure in favor of focoist hero worship.
The one correct message in Toy Story 3 comes when the evil
dictator toy and the good toys end up in the trash burning machine and
they are all about to die. The good toys try to work with the evil
dictator bear to save themselves and him, and he abuses their trust to
save just himself. This is a lesson we can apply to the imperialists who
will never give up their power peacefully and work with the people for
the common good.
The last thing worth commenting on in this movie is the reinforcement of
patriarchal gender roles. The two main female characters are Barbie
(playing, well, a barbie doll who spends most of her time working on her
relationship with Ken) and Jessie, who’s a bit of a tom boy who at least
gets to go along on adventures with Woody, but who is very much taken in
by the romancing of a Spanish-speaking Buzz Lightyear. So basically the
focus of the plot involving the two main female characters is romance.
There is some mild mocking of gender roles around the Ken doll who has
way more outfits than, it is implied, a normal man might have. But the
implication seems to be that he’s a toy more fit to be played with by a
girl than a boy. Nothing very progressive.
Overall MIM(Prisons) would recommend this movie to supporters of the
patriarchy and the imperialist system. It would be useful for training
their children in some of the norms of the oppressive world that they
love.
About three months ago I started filing grievances to the Warden about
the verbal abuse Sergeant Watkins was using towards me and several other
prisoners. I asked two other prisoners to address this issue also and we
started filing grievances on any misconduct that was happening on our
housing unit.
In June as I was approaching the chow hall, I got stopped by Captain
Mercer, Watkins and four other officers. Watkins said “if you and your
buddies don’t stop filing grievances, we gonna make y’all life hell
around here.” I took that threat, and did not let it affect my agenda.
See, these devils will use fear as a tactic to get us to submit to their
will or ultimatum. Two other prisoners and I kept on filing, and as you
may assume, they came at us with bogus disciplinary infractions. They
placed us on property restriction, where we have only a pair of boxer
shorts to clothe ourselves, and we don’t get a mattress or bed roll.
Around shift change the Captain Mercer started to give everyone in our
confinement unit a lecture on prisoners abusing the grievance
procedures. Comrades, these pigs will use force to break up anything
they deem a threat to security. I was sprayed multiple times with
chemical agents, denied meals several times, and denied my right to use
the legal library. I had another prisoner write to the supreme court of
Florida explaining my situation. The court treated the letter as a Writ
of Habeas Corpus motion, and now I am awaiting the outcome of the
court’s decision.
My family was writing me, but these pigs were discarding my incoming
mail, so after weeks of unanswered letters my family filed a complaint
with the Secretary of the DOC, and finally I was taken off restrictions
given proper hygiene products and legal papers. I still get harassed
occasionally, but they don’t play with my mail anymore or steal my
grievances. My agenda is to get a transfer to another facility, but
until then I will not let these devils stop me from utilizing my civil
and constitutional rights.
Comrades we must prepare ourselves mentally to be able to persevere. The
oppressor has advanced, this is a psychological war and genocide is the
goal. While doing your part to unite the movement internationally you
become a force in our battle to achieve freedom, justice, and equality.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This story of grievances being ignored or
leading to retaliation is all too common in the Amerikan criminal
injustice system. And not all of our comrades behind bars have family on
the outside who are so diligent in defending the rights of their loved
ones who are locked up. We need more comrades like this one, and his
family, defending the legal rights of prisoners against the abusive
prison staff. MIM(Prisons) and United Struggle from Within have launched
a grievance
campaign to help prisoners get their grievances recognized. We have
petitions specific to several states and need more comrades to step up
to make them applicable to more. Prisoners whose grievances have gone
unheard should help build a library of custom grievance petitions for
your state by sending them to MIM(Prisons). To participate in this
grievance campaign, write to us and we will send you the info.