MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
My fellow comrades and I follow the 5 principles of the United Front for
Peace in Prisons, however it is a nonstop struggle to open the eyes of
the people here. That was the reason I started the lumpen organization
(LO) that I am a part of now. I am being held in Supermax for direct
action that I took to stand up to the swine for manhandling my comrade.
I am a comrade who happens to be white, and I started the LO to have
multiple races in it. I am looked upon as a different breed because
there are no LOs doing that. I base the foundation off of revolutionary
communist principles. After studying Marx, Mao, even the Panthers, Huey,
G. Jackson and the G. Jackson brigade (most of whom happened to be
white), I took the oath to live by as well as die by this. I will hold
my fist up till the very end. In fact I intend to die for the cause
whenever that day may be, but I try my best to lead by my actions.
Yes I am hated by many. The swine truly hate me, I mean deeply. In fact,
I have been told by the top brass, or white shirts as we call them, that
they will kill me. They have beat me a few times while I was handcuffed
and maced; most of this was at the slave camp in Lucasville. It’s a
free-for-all on prisoners there. The pigs harrass us for fun and indeed
they get rewarded and get promotions. There have been so many coverups
there, including the murders of many prisoners.
The LO I started is Greatness Over Other Desires Fellas Equals Love
Loyalty And Solidarity. We are called GF or Goodfellas for short. They
are now trying to kill the LO. I was the one who was giving the info and
teaching them, and now they got me locked in Supermax. My main aim was
and is to bring the indepth race issue to the forefront. It’s a major
issue here in Ohio prisons, as I’m sure in all prisons.
MIM(Prisons) adds: The United Front for Peace in Prison
principles
this comrade mentions are Peace, Unity, Growth, Internationalism and
Independence. They are printed on page 2 of every issue of ULK.
Below are some basic steps all groups can follow to get involved in this
United Front.
Study and uphold the five principles of the united front.
Send your organization’s name and a statement of unity to MIM(Prisons).
Your statement can explain what the united front principles mean to your
organization, how they relate to your work, why they are important, etc.
Develop peace and unity between factions where you are at on the basis
of opposing oppression of all prisoners and oppressed people in general.
Send reports on your progress to Under Lock & Key. Did you develop a
peace treaty or protocol that is working? Send it in for others to study
and possibly use. Is your unity based on actions? Send us reports on the
organizing you are doing.
Keep educating your members. The more educated your members are, the
more unity you can develop, and the stronger your organization can
become. Unity comes from the inside out. By uniting internally, we can
better unite with others as well. Contact MIM(Prisons)’s Free Political
Books for Prisoners Program if you need additional materials to educate
your members in history, politics and economics.
There comes a time when a person in oppressed conditions must wake up,
stand up and speak up about the conditions that we find ourself in. I’m
being held in a minimum facility that’s being run like a super max and I
realize the social and psychological effects that this has on a person.
Twenty two hours trapped inside a unit with no interaction with other
prisoners, except in passing and chow, living in a dorm unit that
doesn’t have enough seats for everyone to watch TV, not enough restroom
stalls, and the numerous mental states that a person has to deal with
while living in this boiling pot of confusion, depression, and
aggression.
A director of Colorado’s Correction Department, Rick Raemisch, spent the
night in an isolated cell as an experiment and he said it left him
“feeling twitchy and paranoid.” He also said he suffered mental anguish
after spending only 20 hours in solitary confinement on 23 January 2014.
Some of our brothers spend 20 months in these confined conditions, and
some 20 years. Most people who get tossed into solitary confinement
already have mental problems and these places are dumping grounds for
the mentally ill.
There was a prisoner here in the Nebraska state pen who did most of his
time in confinement. He told the staff that he had mental issues and
that he needed help before he got out but they refused to help him. He
told the staff that if he didn’t get any mental health programming or
help that he just might get out and kill someone, but they didn’t help
him, they just made him do his full time and tossed him back into
society. Within 30 days he went and killed 4 people. This is just one
issue out of many and our problems run deeper than just mental health
and substance abuse treatment. There are issues that need to be
addressed like political interest, job skill programs, and community
development. The prison overcrowding issues needs to be addressed as
well because this overcrowding is causing prisons to put these
institutions on a modified lockdown status which is why our minimum
institution is run like it’s one big Ad-Seg.
So let’s wake up, stand up and speak up, about these issues and
conditions. Much love and respect to the brothers on the east coast,
fighting in the belly of the beast, stay strong to my family in the
Midwest and down south and to all my comrades on the West, go hard till
ya go home.
MIM(Prisons) adds: Colorado Executive Director of Correction Rick
Raemisch wrote an
editorial
in the New York Times about his experience in solitary confinement
that this comrade describes. In this article he quotes
Terry
Kupers on the psychological effects of long term isolation.
He admits that “I would spend a total of 20 hours in that cell. Which,
compared with the typical stay, is practically a blink. On average,
inmates who are sent to solitary in Colorado spend an average of 23
months there. Some spend 20 years.” But he still tries to justify the
use of solitary confinement as targetting the “worst of the worst”,
those who “act up” when in reality it is often those who are politically
aware and organizing that get slammed behind the isolation door.
Not only does Colorado have formal control units, but they also have
Restricted
Privileges units which are on lockdown 22 hours a day. Further,
Colorado prisons, like those across the country, continues to refuse to
address prisoners’ grievances, a battle taken up with a
grievance
campaign in that state. We are not optimistic that Raemish’s words
will translate into fundamental change in the Colorado prisons. Until we
eliminate the basis of prisons as a tool of social control, even the
best sentiments of one executive director will not have a significant
impact on the system.
It has often been the position of readers of ULK and members of
the United Struggle from Within that economic means and methods should
be tried and applied in the struggle of prisoners against the
capitalist-imperialists. Some say to boycott the commissary and deprive
each state of the prisoner dollar it so much cherishes. Others say stop
ordering packages from the state approved vendors. More sophisticated
circles would say create more damages via civil action suits: state
tort, personal injuries, small claims, you name it. Others have said to
boycott prisoner accounts altogether to avoid any fees or cuts the state
takes from it for restitution, release, medical co-pay, etc.
All of these tactics can potentially prove devastating if the right
group of people apply them and progress the idea into material reality.
With $0.50 a prisoner can do so much, as that is the cost of a postage
stamp. A letter can contain a list of new subscribers to Under Lock
& Key. It can include an article, poem submission, or art. It
can contain study group responses or a criticism to push our struggle
forward.
Even if you don’t draw, i know there’s an artist next door to you.
He/she lives off of their artwork alone. They don’t go to the store,
they just draw their tail off. For just a dollar that artist next door
will draw four drawings of your imagination, the size of about a quarter
of an average sheet of paper. With those four pieces you could express
the walls of prison crumbling, or a lumpen prisoner handing their dinner
tray to the family of an underdeveloped country through the window of a
prison cell. You can commission this artist to draw anti-imperialist art
to submit to ULK to be printed in the next issue. That one
picture is surely going to touch more people than the artist expected it
to.
Yet, in the economic struggle, lumpen prisoners often fail in the
materialization of their own wealth. We must change this. In prison we
often see ourselves as the haves and have-nots, when in the material
reality of things we all have something to offer. Take the commissary
industry. Not everybody actually submits an order form. There are those
with monies to spend and those who have the heart to work with those who
spend, earning a share of the spender’s purchase. I persynally don’t
deposit monies in my trust. I use craft and trade to survive. I braid,
cut and style hair. Many prisoners who have money to spend inside get
monies from a source outside of prison. These sources deposit money into
a prisoner’s trust to take care of the prisoner. In return the prisoner
takes care of hself. My specialty is helping the prisoner do this by
keeping up their appearance and in return they offer a product from the
commissary, where i then have purchasing power. Me, an anti-imperialist.
I bring in anything from $1.50 to $3.00 easy per client on a yard that
allows time and opportunity. Fast forward about ten clients per week and
in a month’s time i’ll have $120. Off of this buck twenty i can order a
pair of hair clippers with the works and the hottest legal commodity in
prisons: coffee. Adding haircuts to my service, i’ll double clientèle.
Sixty dollars worth of coffee on the shelf will grow legs and trade
itself. One dollar for a coffee lid of coffee, or an exchange of one
full jar on credit for two jars at the convenience of the creditor (the
value varies).
I don’t drink coffee so there’ll never be a loss due to persynal
consumption. The product will pay for itself and expand at a controlled
rate. I’m doing hair and trading coffee. The service can be offered to a
wide range of characters and political affiliations: Black, Brown, Red,
Yellow, Pink, Blue or Purple, the objective is Green.
Doing such, i’m offered the opportunity to socialize with a wide range
of characters and gossip about the latest and greatest revolutionary
culture, from international news to news on the hip hop revolution
underground affiliates. I alone as a USW leader, taking the scraps that
are there amongst the so-called prison ballers, have become a resort for
prisoners caught in the trappings to retreat to when they must spend
their money and look good doing it.
The coffee will expand from my cell to the cell of another USW comrade
proving themselves capable of opening up shop on the same facility, and
when ripe we will venture out into another legal commodity (soap, body
washes, shampoo and body oils).
We can turn all this paper money into fuel for the fire to finance the
anti-imperialist machine, funding independent institutions like the
University of Maoist Thought, extended printing of ULK,
MIM(Prisons)/USW-hosted events, Prisoners Legal Clinic, MIM(Prisons)’s
Free Political Books to Prisoners. These are just to name a few. In this
microcosm of Amerika, great revenue will come to be. What separates us
from most collecting such revenue is we’ll be providing a service at a
very low cost to those who have and ALL of the proceeds will go to those
who don’t. We are funding revolutionary cadres of our USW and
MIM(Prisons) across the snakes.
This should be our matter of concern, if we truly hope to shift the
economy into a landslide towards the people. Don’t boycott the
commissary, use it as a uniting factor!!!
MIM(Prisons) responds: It is a strong statement to say a
well-executed boycott can have “devastating” impact. More likely, the
prisoncrats will notice what is happening and make a simple policy
change to ensure they are able to milk prisoners for all they have. The
main benefit of organizing boycotts isn’t the financial impact, but
coming together to organize around a collective interest. The
connections, networking, and unity are more valuable than any amount of
money we’re saving from the oppressors’ collection.
When assessing the “value” of an action or investment, we need to always
keep in mind the political value. There are a lot of ways we can use
what little money and resources we have to make a big political impact.
As long as we aren’t harming the people, the importance isn’t in how we
hustle, but in why we hustle. Use your creativity and resourcefulness to
find a way to hustle for the people!
Throw a fist in the air for Fred, George, and Marx Oppression we
override all it takes is heart This is for my comrades who recognize
the trap This a unified movement far from a rap Let’s seize the
time the government we overthrow And eliminate spies informing on the
low All nations we together as one With our lives on the line
freedom shall come Nothing is given, it’s taken and demanded It’s
a war with the oppressed left standing Organize your mind focus on
the war Dumping on the pigs, peace to Assata Shakur The struggle
on the rise this I truly see This is dedicated to the people who
standing on their feet It’s a war going on nobody is safe Birthing
solid troops who don’t bind, fold or break The past is present and
the present is the past Oppressed against oppressor forever we
clash 21 guns comrades truly honored Too many sold us out I call
’em transformers All power to the people who fear nothing on this
land We learn from the past with an organized plan United Blood
Nation riding with the Panthers I’m standing on mine with
revolutionary standards In this war blood must be shed Either them
or us that’s what Denmark said I pledge allegiance to the struggle my
life is dedicated My words uplift for those who motivated First
and foremost all my true brothers stand up We will never fall cause
we always stand up!
por un@ prisioner@ en California March 2014 permalink
El mayor propósito de la publicación #7 de Bajo Llave &
Candado es el mostrar quién y quienes no quieren la paz. También
nos enfocaremos linea ya - sostenida - por tiempo de que los presos no
logran nada desuniendose y peleando entré sí mismos o con el personal de
la prisión. Cada prisión que censura este boletín reconoce que la paz
entre los presos va en contra de su meta la cual según llaman
“seguridad,” y además sostiene nuestra tesis presentada abajo.
El tiempo ha comprobado … que la deferencia ciega a los oficiales de las
correccionales no les hace un verdadero servicio. El asunto judicial con
la regularidad de procedimiento tiene relación directa sobre el
mantenimiento de la orden institucional; el cuidado ordenado con el cual
las autoridades de la prisión haces sus decisiones esta íntimamente
relacionado al nivel de respeto con el cual los prisioneros observan esa
autoridad.
No hay nada más corrosivo a la estructura de una institución pública,
como una prisión, que aquellos a los que contiene tengan el sentimiento
que están siendo tratados injustamente.” Palmigiano v. Baxter, 487 F.2d
1280, 1283 (CA1 1973). Como lo notó el Juez Principal en Morrissey v.
Brewer, 408 U.S. @ 408 U.S. 484, “Tratamiento justo…aumentará la
oportunidad de la rehabilitación evitando reacciones de arbitrariedad.”
- opinión disentido de Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)
Nuestros registros de rastreo hablan por si mismos. Por lo menos docenas
de presos y ex-prisioneros han dejado esas vidas que alguna vez incluían
ataques físicos a los policías, y a menudo peleas contras personas,
después de haber tomado la lucha anti-imperialista mediante MIM.
Desafortunadamente, nuestra información esta un poquito desertada pues
solo podemos hablar por los prisioneros con los que estamos en contacto.
Depende de un investigador ambicioso el demostrar estadísticamente que
esos envueltos en el anti-imperialismo son menos violentos que aquellos
que no. (o más así como las oficinas de correo de las prisiones a lo
largo del país sostienen en este caso).
Mientras tanto, hay una abundancia de estudios que enseñan como todo
tipo de programas educacionales y familiares ayudan a reducir la
violencia y el carácter anti-social. (1) Desafortunadamente, en un
sistema enfocado en el castigo y a condenar al ostracismo a grupos de
personas, estos programas son usados para manipular en vez de
rehabilitar. Las prisiones de EE.UU. que ofrecen estos programas lo
hacen con el esfuerzo de tentar a los presos con una zanahoria. Tomando
este enfoque individualista ellos no están verdaderamente invirtiendo en
paz o progreso. Cuando las prioridades cambian y un preso pierde su
trabajo, o ya no puede ver a sus seres queridos, entonces ya no existe
el incentivo para ser pacifico. En contraste, una dedicación a la lucha
por un mundo sin opresión no puede ser quitado por administradores
futuros de la prisión.
Verdades:
En décadas de trabajo el Movimiento Internacionalista Maoista nunca ha
roto leyes burgueses. En años de trabajo, tampoco MIM(Prisiones) lo ha
hecho.
Miembros de MIM y miembros de MIM(Prisiones) siempre se les ha prohibido
el romper la ley.
La literatura de MIM nunca ha promovido romper la ley o tomar armas en
contra del gobierno de los EE.UU. o algún gobierno u organización local
de hecho.
Cada publicación de Under Lock & Key, el periodico de
MIM(Prisiones), anima a que los presos obedezcan las leyes y evadir
conflictos físicos.
La experiencia anecdótica provee evidencia de un modelo de violencia
reducida entre prisioneros que se han envuelto en programas educativos
guiados por el MIM y/o compañías organizacionales.
A pesar de las verdades enlistadas arriba, nuestros programas y
materiales son rechazados rutinariamente a los presos a lo largo de los
EE.UU. A finales del 2007, lanzamos nuestra página de internet donde
hemos grabado 509 incidentes de censura. La mayoría de esa censura es
para MIM(Prisiones). De estos, 11 dicen STG - “Grupo de Amenaza a la
Seguridad,” 34 dicen “Seguridad” en general, 14 dicen una amenaza de
“violencia,” y 26 dicen de nuestra amenaza a la “ley” como la razón de
la censura. Además, 164 tomaron lugar en California, donde todo el
correo de MIM fue prohibido porque supuestamente “aboga el tomar el
poder público mediante lucha armada y derribar las administraciones de
las prisiones”quitandoles el control.”(2) Mientras que las luchas
legales recientes de un camarada en California han traído a la luz un
documento que inválida esta prohibición, esta aún se sigue aplicando en
muchas de las prisiones donde MIM(prisiones) tenía una multitud de
lectores. La mayoría del resto de los incidentes de censura caen bajo
varias categorías de “inaceptable,” “no permitido,” “no
autorizado:,”rechazado” o no se daba ni siquiera una razón.
Security Threat Group (STG) o “Grupo de Amenaza a la Seguridad,” es la
palabra de moda adquirida en los años 1990 que se aplica a
organizaciones políticas y callejeras por igual, muchos según llamados
“profesionales correccionales” afirman que MIM(Prisons) es un STG. Pero
exactamente, ¿para quién somos una amenaza a la seguridad? Copiando el
lenguaje del precedente marco de jurisprudencia, se usa frecuentemente
como “perjudicial a la seguridad, buen orden, o disciplina de la
institución o […] que facilitaria actividad criminal.” El problema con
el fraseo de la decisión de esta corte es que muchas prisiones
interpretan que significa que si tu le dices a prisioneros que presenten
demandas, escriban a la prensa, que se unan a organizaciones o entablar
un juicio en respuesta a la tortura, abuso físico, falta de cuidado
médico, censura, etcétera, entonces tu estas amenazando el buen orden o
disciplina de la institución. (THORNBURGH v. ABBOTT, 490 U.S. 401
(1989))
Revisiones de esta y otra jurisprudencia demuestran que bajo capitalismo
en America, prisioneros realmente tienen derechos y la interpretación
dearriba es una violación a ellos. El real significado de esta ley sería
permitir a administradores de las prisiones a censurar materiales que
fomentan real e inmediatas amenazas de riesgo y seguridad, tal como
planear atacar a alguien más en la prisión o contrabandear armas. El
caso más reciente condenando encerrocratas por prevenir a prisioneros
recibir materiales que promueven resistencia legal, fue justo el año
pasado cuando un camarada en Wisconsin, ganó su pleito en la corte
federal.(3)
En algunos casos la administración de la prisión ha interpretado la ley
de la misma manera que nosotros lo hacemos, pero todavia afirma que
violamos esta al representar una amenaza de riesgo y seguridad. El
boletin de prohibición de California, citado arriba es un ejemplo de
esto. En estos casos además, no estamos de acuerdo hasta el punto de
llegar a involucrar a las cortes burguesas.
El memorándum de Octubre del 2006 del Director del CDCR Scott Kernan
prohibiendo publicaciones de MIM (supuestamente no todo nuestro correo)
tiene completamente inexactas declaraciones en este, tales como el
citado arriba. Si fuera posible demostrar que MIM fomento o violó la ley
sin mentir, uno de los abogados del estado ya habría hecho esto. Su
defensa favorita en muchos estados es esconderse detrás de las paredes
de la prisión, en vez de mentir como Scott Kernan lo hizo. Por eso es
que oficiales del estado necesitan ser públicamente responsables en
cualquier sociedad que alega democracia en cualquier forma.
Desde oficiales de corrección hasta el director, desempeñan el papel al
pie de la letra del burócrata intentando defender su institución
corrupta, y para poder actuar en el nombre de trabajos lucrativos.
Nosotros admitimos ser una amenaza a los trabajos de oficiales corruptos
e instituciones abusivas, como cualquier consciente ciudadano debe ser.
En esta edición leerás historias de planes frustrados de paz, violentos
montajes, y riesgo de pago para los C.O.s. Varios de los sindicatos
representando a los así llamados oficiales de paz, son algunos de los
mas fuertes en el país y su principal herramienta de influencia es la
seguridad personal. Ellos dicen “estamos poniendo nuestras vidas en
juego para proteger tus mierdas, es mejor que nos paguen bien.” Por lo
tanto la inherente motivación por más violencia, más motines, más
miembros de gangas “validados” y más máxima seguridad y prisiones
supermax. Todo esto significa más dinero en sus bolsillos.
Por lo general, Amerikanos en su totalidad se benefician de sus
posiciones de poder sobre los oprimidos. Ciudadanos Estadounidenses de
clase media se benefician por ser miembros del grupo de gente quienes
pueden ser policías o que pueden consiguen trabajos similares como
opresores en el sistema de injusticia criminal, y se benefician de los
servicios que los policias proporcionan manteniendo lineas entre los
grupos sociales.
Esto no es solo una motivación individualista de un pago más alto, esto
es además una conciencia nacional que es necesaria para crear la
mentalidad de “Nosotros vs. Ellos,” que es necesaria para dirigir
prisiones de la manera que ellos lo hacen en los Estados Unidos. Un
ejemplo esta conciencia surgió durante el reinado de terror de Guiliani
en la ciudad de Nueva York en los años 1990s, cuando el New York Times
reportó que la mayoría de residentes blancos estaban conformes con la
conducta de la policía que ellos veían, mientras que nueve de diez de
Negras sintieron que “la policía se dedicaba en la brutalidad contra
Negras.”(4)
Estas normas nacionales de “ellos contra nosotros” fueron creadas por
los colonizadores blancos y esta profundamente dentro de la historia de
arrebatos de tierras y comercio de esclavos. Después del tiempo esto
forzó al oprimido a ver el mundo de una manera similarmente dividida,
dejando a los opresores con dos alternativas; ellos pueden retractarse y
usar esto como una justificación para su propia brutalidad o pueden
disminuir la contradicción. Nuestro análisis de imperialismo y la
contradicción principal predice que Amerikanos no pueden disminuir la
contradicción, y hasta ahora hemos probado tener la razón. Y eso es
porque prisiones de Estados Unidos llegaron a ser un pequeño mundo
perversamente violento de la sociedad Amerikana.
Mientras que creemos que policías y oficiales correccionales en general
tienen intereses conferidos para oponerse a nuestros esfuerzos para
promover paz, estamos actuando en un Frente Unido con algunos empleados
del enorme sistema de justicia criminal quienes están mas interesados en
llegar a casa con sus familias cada noche, que consiguir una chance de
pago y nuevos juguetes de alta tecnología para jugar. Esto es poco
probable en lugares como California donde la historia ya ha mostrado que
les pasa a los empleados de las prisiones que hablan contra estos
intereses. En una nota asociada, MIM(Prisons) no amenaza las vidas de
las personas ni induce gente al suicidio, ni lleva a cabo asesinatos.
Muchos empleados de las prisiones afirman que MIM(Prisons) es una
amenaza porque animamos a prisioneros a organizarse. Miramos a la
historia otra vez, y ayudamos a sofocar esos temores tomando una mirada
a dos de los mas grandes ejemplos de prisioneros organizadose ellos
mismos: Attica y Walpole. En la rebelión de Attica en 1971, no fueron
asesinados oficiales correccionales hasta que la Guardia Nacional entró
y baleó a muerte a 11 empleados junto con 29 prisioneros. Hasta ese
punto los prisioneros de Attica habían organizado una sociedad dirigida
democráticamente dentro de las paredes de la prisión, incluyendo cosas
tales como su propia comida y servicios médicos, mientras que estaban
negociando con el Estado en nombre de todos los prisioneros. A los
guardias se les dio trato superior todo el tiempo.
Un par de años más tarde, prisioneros en Walpole se les fue permitido
dirigir la prisión ellos mismos cuando el sindicato de los guardias se
fue a la huelga. Ellos crearon servicios similares como los prisioneros
de Attica, y en realidad incrementaron la eficiencia de operación de la
prisión con los guardias y burócratas fuera del camino. Esto mostró que
tan pronto como a principios de los años 70s, que a los guardias de
prision se le pagaban altos salarios por hacer nada. Desde entonces la
población de la prisión se ha incrementado ocho veces, haciendo engordar
la labor aristocrática con trabajos de salarios más altos a lo largo del
camino.
Los prisioneras funcionando pacíficamente sin supervisores impactó a los
puercos, quienes entonces empezaron a correr rumores acerca de motines
dentro de Walpole. Los motines nunca sucedieron, y de hecho hubo a fin a
toda violencia y violaciones durante la semanas en que los guardias de
la prisión estuvieron ausentes, y por algún tiempo después. Esta clase
de rumores continuos no es única a un grupo particular de guardias
malévolos. En vez de eso, ellos estaban representando el mismo interés
heredado de esta clase de gente. En los últimos 15 a 20 años en
California, ellos han tenido éxito en crear una atmósfera de disturbios
y violencia. Unicamente la minoría lleva a cabo su-mismo-interés en paz,
porque esta es una amenaza a sus trabajos como clase.
Desafortunadamente, podemos esperar mucha violencia de los opresores
antes de que podamos esperar un honesto juicio de lo que esta pasando en
estos reservados calabozos. La gente quiere paz ahora. Comunidades que
están siendo ocupadas, encarceladas y bombardeadas quieren un inmediato
fin a la violencia.
Huey P. Newton dijo que le corresponde al opresor decidir si satisfacer
tales demandas del oprimido pasan de una manera pacifica o de una manera
violenta. Frantz Fanon dijo que la violencia es parte del desarrollo
humanista y nueva conciencia entre la gente. Aún si Fanon esta en lo
correcto, toma mucho para presionar a las multitudes hasta el punto de
violencia como Huey lo indicó. Esto es obvio con la tanta gente que ha
pasado más días en sumisión pacifica que estos quienes no. Resistencia
violenta de la gente surgirá como esta sea necesitada por los que
monopolizan violencia a través de su propio poder.
MIM(prisons) únicamente entabla y promueve medios legales para combatir
injusticia. Cuando el personal de las prisiones reprime cada salida
educacional y legal para prisioneros para reparación de sus quejas,
entonces se hace claro que clase de estrategias están promoviendo. En
esas prisiones, predecimos que habrá violencia, y ellos no pueden
culparnos de esto porque ellos nos han mantenido fuera.
Esto es igual a lo que decimos de todas las luchas por justicia
alrededor del mundo. Creemos que la violencia es necesaria para acabar
con la injusticia porque la historia ha mostrado que el opresor nunca
para de oprimir de una u otra manera. No queremos fomentar violencia,
estamos simplemente declarando nuestra conclusión leyendo la historia.
En cada caso de guerra revolucionaria, dependió del opresor decidir si
la violencia fuera usada o no. La historia muestra que lo mismo ha sido
verdad en el movimiento de los derechos en la prisión; la lucha por los
derechos de los prisioneros ha llegado a ser únicamente
violenta cuando el Estado ha iniciado la violencia.
Vea además The Nation, March 4, 2005: “Estudios claramente han mostrado
que participantes en educación dentro de la prisión, vocación y
programas de trabajo tienen índices de reincidencia de 20 a 60 por
ciento más bajos que los no participantes. Otro reciente y mayor estudio
de prisioneros encontró que participantes en programas de educación eran
29 por ciento menos probables de terminar de regreso a prisión, y que
participantes han ganado un salario más alto en libertad.” 2. El
texto completo de esta carta esta disponible en nuestro sitio web a lo
largo con ciento de toneladas de otros documentos relacionados a la
prohibición de California:
https://www.prisoncensorship.info/campaigns/ca/
(si tu eras un preso de California probablemente ya la has visto.) 3.
Lorenzo Johnson v. Rick Raemisch, Daniel Westfield, and Michael Thurmer,
Case No. 07-C-390-C US District Court Western District of Wisconsin.
Disponible pronto en nuestra página de archivo. 4. Hayden, Tom.
Street Wars. The New Press, 2005, p.108.
Once there was a time you could tell me any lie; I was at the
bottom of the pyramid believing there was someone, something,
watching and judging from up in the sky. Now I am the eye above the
suspended eye and am no longer susceptible to their oppressive
lies! Their lies and stories of dread and fear no longer have
their delusional hold on me. Sure death brings a final rest, but I
now also see that life is to be lived completely free. Stand up, live
free, lift your eyes up high! You no longer have to fear their
devious lies! We get one life to live and you can choose to live it
free! You don’t have to be the scared little sheep that they want
you to be!
Franklin Correctional Facility is a medium classification prison that
does its best to oppress. Rules are broken on a constant basis by this
administration. Their need to control every tiny moment and movement
really displays their fears of us ever getting on the same page to take
action. I’m not speaking riot, just trading info and court actions when
it comes to confronting their gestapo tactics. The physical beatings in
front of others by guards has placed fear into many hearts so that
writing a grievance is taboo.
As an Orientation Facilitator, I used to inform those coming to this
prison what to expect and how to protect themselves. Someone snitched on
me and I was fired.
I wrote a total of 42 grievances but it was never enough for me. The
next step was to meet the oppressors face to face, and I became the
Inmate Liaison Committee (ILC) Chairman, and that’s when the fireworks
started. Contempt and hatred for me was freely displayed. I stayed on my
horse until I was set up with a misbehavior report that sent me to the
box.
When I got out I tried to get back to the ILC but was always
stonewalled. My so-called peers refused to assist me, claiming it would
hamper their agenda and they don’t want any trouble. In other words they
are comfortable and satisfied. Sellouts is what I call them. In order
for any progress to take place snitches and sell-outs must be contained.
Corrections depends on them for their services. The “I don’t want to get
involved” types complain and bitch but don’t take any action. 1,700
prisoners reside here and about 20 will lay a pen game down. Law library
sucks because the workers want to get paid to do nothing for you.
The prisoner organizations are so controlled that we are not allowed to
advertise how to become a member. We are told what to spend and where to
spend. I say let’s organize and write Corrections in Albany, but my
prisoner peers say we don’t want to cause any trouble. How can people
who weren’t afraid to break the law be afraid to write in defending
yourself or make a point. Even if you don’t know how, ask someone. Make
the pen your gun.
The capitalist company Corcraft runs sweatshops in this prison to make
officer and prisoner clothing. Guys can’t wait to work for them because
it pays the best in comparison to 10 to 20 cents an hour for other
assignments. Commissary prices continue to increase.
Any time I attempt to band us together in writing grievances and Article
78s someone snitches on me. Microphones are placed in the library,
chapel and other places we congregate. How can any movement get
generated when dudes snitch or are going home soon? I have done all I
can, but fear and the lack of education gives corrections an
all-systems-go for future oppression in a big way. We are losing in this
injustice system and a lot of us don’t care to know how to win.
Organize!
MIM(Prisons) responds: Our work in the criminal injustice system
in Amerika involves a constant battle between those who see the value in
uniting to fight the system, and those who are taken in by the bribery
offered by the prisons in exchange for complacency or snitching. This
contradiction exists throughout the prison system in this country, but
in some states we are winning more unity and strength while in others
the anti-imperialist forces are still a small minority. New York state
still does not have a
grievance
campaign while prisoners in twelve other states have already stepped
up to push this important work forward. There was an important action
last year in Auburn Correctional Facility in New York, where prisoners
joined the food strike in California.
Activists must evaluate the conditions in their state and their prison,
and then determine what they can do to most effectively educate and
organize other prisoners. In some states this may involve mass protest,
in others we are still at the point of building study cells and
educating whoever is willing to talk with us. Wherever your struggle is
at, MIM(Prisons) can provide material to help with the educating and
organizing.
They don’t care. They’re not involved or don’t want to get involved,
but they are. Their involvement just masquerades as indifference
or inattention. It is the silent “acquiescence” of the millions that
supports the system, your silence becomes approval, for it does
nothing to interrupt the system. People use all sorts of excuses for
their indifference. They appeal to god as a shorthand route for
supporting the status quo. They talk about law and order, but
look at the present system, look at the present social order of
society. Do you see god? Do you see law and order? There’s
nothing but disorder, and instead of law and order there is only the
illusion of security. It’s an illusion because it is built upon a
long history of injustices; racism, criminality and enslavement and
genocide of millions. Many people say it is insane to resist the
system, but actually, it’s insane not to.
8 March 2014, Jackson, MS – Today hundreds attended the funeral service
for Mayor Chokwe Lumumba who died after just eight months in office. His
son, Chokwe Antar Lumumba, eulogized his father. He has also announced
his plans to run in an April 8 election to replace his father as Mayor
of Jackson.
Days before his death Chokwe was sick with a cold. On 25 February, he
was pronounced dead of “natural causes,” with local officials claiming
it was heart failure. But family requests for an autopsy were denied.
His family is working with the National Caucus of Black Lawyers to fund
an independent autopsy. Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam has
offered to put up the money for the autopsy.(1)
Chokwe Lumumba was a leading figure in the struggle for the liberation
of New Afrika since the founding of the Provisional Government of the
Republic of New Afrika in 1968. He went on to launch and work with
organizations such as the New Afrikan Peoples’ Organization and the
Malcolm X Grassroots Movement. As a lawyer he fought many historic cases
for New Afrikan humyn rights in the United $tates. He represented Assata
Shakur, Tupac Shakur and the Scott sisters, to name a few.
Many close to Lumumba are questioning his sudden death, following his
election in a state with a long history of murdering New Afrikans. In
our report on his election, we questioned his ability to
build
dual power in Mississippi in line with the New Afrikan Liberation
Movement from within the city government. We pointed out that true dual
power must have an independent base of force from which to defend
itself. Only an independent autopsy can tell whether this was a case of
political assassination, brutally proving that very point. Whatever the
cause of death, it was quite untimely for such a leading national
liberation figure who just won a major election. We will continue to
watch the developments in Jackson where young New Afrikans must prove
themselves as determined as Lumumba and so many others of his generation
who fought for socialism and national independence for New Afrika.
In November 2013, the elected government of Ukraine caused a stir for
rejecting a deal with the European Union citing the overly burdensome
terms of the aid package offered by the U.$.-dominated International
Monetary Fund (IMF). Since
we
last reported on Ukraine (see ULK 36), opposition forces
with Western support have implemented a regime change, ousting president
Viktor Yanukovich from the country. This put a deal with the IMF back on
the table. Ukrainians once again face the prospect of more wealth being
sucked from their country via imperialist loans and imposed economic
policies.
While opposition to the oligarchy that has ruled Ukraine has united the
Western imperialists with Ukrainian fascist parties, austerity measures
imposed by the IMF will threaten this alliance shortly. The new offer
from the IMF will require hiking energy prices that have been subsidized
by the state, one of the deal breakers cited by Yanukovich in November.
The regime change was a loss for Russian economic interests. In
response, on 27 February 2014, Russian forces seized control of the
Crimean peninsula, a majority Russian region of the current Ukraine
state. On 6 March 2014 Crimea’s regional assembly voted to secede from
Ukraine and join the Russian Federation. The next day leaders of the
Russian Parliament said they would support this move. The decision calls
for a referendum for the people of Crimea to vote on this, scheduled for
16 March.(1)
The New York Times has made much of the battle over the right
to self-determination in recent strife between the United $tates and the
Russian Federation. Struggles in the Black Sea region in recent decades
have been primarily inter-imperialist battles, and there is no principle
behind the imperialists’ actions except for their economic interests to
have access to more markets, natural resources and people to exploit.
Meanwhile, the proletariat’s interest is defined by putting an end to
this exploitation. Therefore we support the side that most threatens the
control and penetration of the imperialists over the oppressed nations.
The Amerikans are saying the Russian invasion of Crimea is totally
different from their meddling in Libya, Venezuela, Syria, Iran… just to
name a few. But this is all posturing and a question of tactics, and the
United $tates often is able to use more subtle tactics because of its
greater power. In all cases it is the continuation of imperialist war to
maintain profits.
While the situation in Crimea is still unresolved and potentially
volatile as we write this, Russian officials have been quoted
recognizing Kiev has gone pro-West. At the same time, Russia is talking
with the IMF to get in on the Ukraine bail out.(2)
The IMF was part of the Bretton Woods project, which was organized by
the imperialist countries after World War II in an attempt to prevent
the protectionism and trade barriers that led to the economic crisis in
the capitalist core, and drove them to war in both WWI and WWII. Many
sanctions and trade barriers are being threatened in the current
conflict. But, if Russia is allowed to export some finance capital to
Ukraine as part of the imperialist plan for the country, and Russia gets
to keep Crimea under its sphere of influence, then a hot war between
Russia and the West will likely be averted.
The IMF is basically run by the United $tates, which has 16.75% of the
votes. Meanwhile the U.$.-led imperialist camp (U.$., Japan, Germany,
France, U.K., Italy and Canada) has 43.74% of votes. Russia has only
2.39%.(3) In addition to the IMF loans, the United $tates has talked of
unilateral aid, as long as Ukraine “takes the reforms it needs.”(4) So
Russia will see a significant loss in its economic interests in the
Ukraine overall, but will likely see a small piece of the pie as serving
its interests better than an all out war with the United $tates.
The framework developed at Bretton Woods has been a relatively effective
solution to one of the inherent contradictions of the imperialist
economic system. However, it does not eliminate inter-imperialist
rivalry, it just manages it. While a war on North Amerikan or Western
European soils is being avoided at all costs, it is not out of the
question. It will certainly come before socialism can reach those lands.
War is inherent to imperialism. And it is our position that World War
III has been an ongoing low-intensity war against the Third World by the
imperialists since the end of WWII.(5) In recent decades this war has
been primarily waged by the United $tates. While inter-imperialist war
has been secondary in this period, the struggle between different
imperialist interests is an antagonistic contradiction that cannot be
resolved without ending imperialism. As such conflicts heat up, those in
the imperialist countries will be reminded that imperialism does not
serve their interests when it comes to the threat of annhilation in war.
These conflicts also create breathing room for the oppressed nations to
develop their own political interests independent of imperialism. The
key to the survival of the humyn species is to develop such movements
before the imperialists kill us all.