Seems clear that the United State’s lurch to the right is a done
deal. On a quantitative scale, how much so is still an open question,
but it is an astonishing thing to see and one we better get better at
grappling with.
The Biden administration has recently vetoed a UAE brought emergency
meeting to vote on a Gaza ceasefire in Israel’s “unceasing” assault on
Gaza. Time magazine of 10 December 2023 and virtually all U.S.
media describe it as a campaign to eliminate Hamas. Always the
materialists, they never forget to remind that it is due to Hamas
terrorist attack of October 7, its alleged sexual assault and taking of
hostages etc. In fact, U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Robert A. Woods
states as his reasons for vetoing this emergency resolution that it was
“an imbalanced resolution that was divorced from reality and would not
move the needle on the ground in any concrete way.”
Woods goes on to state the U.S. couldn’t understand why the authors
declined to include language condemning “Hamas’s horrific terrorist
attack” and “the resolution failed to mention Israel’s right to defend
itself.” Indeed the U.S. did propose adding language about its “role in
diplomacy, increased opportunities for humanitarian aid, encouraging
release of hostages, the resumption of pauses in fighting, and laying
the foundation for peace” the Time article wrote. But Wood says
the “recommendations for peace were ignored.”
The Time article was further confirmed by a clip of Wood’s
speech aired on Democracy Now! (11 December 2023), which then
went on to play a clip of Jamie Raskin’s outrage of U.S. society’s
obvious lurch to the right in regards to the ousting of an MIT president
for trying to defend bourgeois free speech. However, Democracy
Now! makes no mention of Raskin’s earlier calls for the need of
Israel to eliminate Hamas or his refusal to call for an immediate peace
agreement or even his stance on the UN resolution for an immediate cease
fire. All this clearly, even on the part of such petty bourgeois outfits
as Democracy Now! to accept and adjust to this obvious social
shift, but still find some space to claim to be left or progressive etc.
It should be noted Amy Goodman often has Raskin on to help her with her
Trump and MAGA bashing and to tell people to vote for their
democracy.
Back to Woods, he states the U.S. wants a 2 state solution, but
doesn’t support an immediate ceasefire as “this would only plant the
seeds for the next war because Hamas has no desire to see a durable
peace, to see a 2 state solution.” This stupid equivocation could only
be logical to a bully on the verge of victory. Recall he told the same
council it was due to the resolution not giving the U.S. its props for
all the fine things, like 4 hour “humanitarian pauses” and the U.S. aid
for Palestinians, not being in the resolution.
A “good thing” one could point to is how isolated the U.S. is on this
and the exposure of its hypocrisy on a world scale. Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas stated after the U.S. veto that the
U.S. is “complicit in war crimes” and the vote was “aggressive and
immoral.” China’s U.N. rep Zhang Jun accused the U.S. of “double
standards”, “claiming to care about the lives and safety of people in
Gaza.” Russian U.N. rep Dmitry Polyansky stated “our colleagues from the
U.S. have literally before our eyes issued death sentences to thousands
if not tens of thousands more civilians in Palestine and Israel.”
Even domestically, social democrat Bernie Sanders, who has
consistently (see below) refused to call for a ceasefire up to now, now
states the “U.S. should not be vetoing a U.N. (ceasefire) resolution.”
He goes on to his usual duplicitous doublespeak stating “children need
food” and “it’s imperative - it remains imperative that Israel puts a
premium on civilian protection.” Social democrat Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez (A.O.C.) went even farther: “Shameful. The Biden
Administration can no longer reconcile their professed concern for
Palestinians and their human rights while also single-handedly vetoing
the U.N.’s call for ceasefire and sidestepping the entire U.S. Congress
to unconditionally back the indiscriminate bombing of Gaza”
(Newsweek, 9 December 23)
As for the above comment of “sidestepping” Congress, she is referring
to the 13,000 plus, worth $106 million, of tank ammo sold to Israel that
Secretary of State Blinken et. al managed to get to Israel in an
emergency sale. The Biden administration additionally has a $100 billion
package in aid for Israel, Ukraine, and “other national security
priorities.” So A.O.C. is likely to get her wish. As to why this sale
required “sidestepping” Congress, Blinken stated, “The needs of Israel’s
military operation in Gaza justifies the rare decision to bypass
Congress.” He goes on, “Israel is in combat right now with Hamas and we
want to make sure Israel has what it needs to defend itself against
Hamas,” hence the $106 million sale of 13,000 plus ammo (shells) to
Israel.
And in case anyone missed it the larger bill which needs
Congressional approval is tied to the U.S. immigration issue and its
border, “National Security”.
On 10 December 2023, Mitt Romney stated on Meet The Press
that Biden didn’t have to tie the border policy issue to the Ukraine
issue. But he did so now the Republicans will be holding him to it.
Biden, obviously acknowledging he must move to the right, has recently
hinted he is willing to make significant compromises on the border. He
seems to be saying he needs to be able to say he had no choice. J.D.
Vance has stated, “What will $60 billion (going to Ukraine alone) more
do that $100 billion hasn’t done?”
In both of the last 2 presidential candidate debates, Vivek has
stated he will be smoking the terrorists on the southern border and
“Bibi” has to do the same.
Something we can’t go into here but worth mentioning is the
conservative Center for Renewing America’s Project 2025 handbook, which
is a 1,000 page “Let’s finish what we started” playbook, which is part
of the Heritage Foundation’s think tank. This involves many “right
flank” organizations, many new to mainstream bourgeois politics. This is
to do away with the “deep-state” and in doing so avoid Trump’s 1st term
pitfalls of being thwarted by those not willing to go as far as he
wished. The point made here is that all Democrats and ol’ fogey
Republicans realize this shift is very real and it seems a little
conscious compromise is a tactic the bourgeois left is making for its
own reasons. Late capitalism is not running on fumes though pixie dust
no longer seems to suffice. Now the machine requires the flesh and blood
of little boys and girls.
Recently heard our old friend Bill Fletcher on KPFA’s Sunday
Show (10 December 2023) saying, like always, 3rd parties are a
waste of time, must vote for the Democrat even though he agrees it is
genocide in Gaza and Biden administration was wrong for their U.N. veto.
Again, according to Fletcher, we must do as he suggested the first time
and push Biden to the left.
If only Mao was here and could fight our battles for us. Obviously no
real revolutionary is saying this but in practice we are saying these
are not revolutionary times and I contend this is why we’re in this
situation. Yes these are revolutionary times. We simply must learn and
apply the stages of revolution. We may be limited by majority having no
current interests in revolution. But we are in no position to be talking
about a majority any way. We clearly accept objective factors. Even
MIM’s 3 dividing line principles.
But contradictions (all) carry within them their very opposite. It’s
a unity of opposites, mere “identity”, not absolute of contradictions.
We indeed should be pushing some to the left but not bourgeois
politicians who would have no interest in social change in any situation
but our own nations, prison class, musicians. And we definitely should
be serious about drawing clear distinctions between ourselves and the
bourgeoisie with its values and world outlook. This is simply accepting
the phase of revolution we’re in. Too many fear armed struggle and fear
its adventurist aspects. I contend this means to fear the people or at
the very least fear they are unable to grasp revolutionary theory or its
requirements.
We’re in the middle of it. This rightward shift is but a shift no
more to my mind than a deeper neo-Liberal shift. Only by relying on the
bourgeoisie and the fakes should we care if its a rightward shift or
leftward shift. Especially if out of our control.
From the outset of this flareup and resulting genocide of Palestine
the pretensions of the left media and settler nations obvious new center
of gravity has led it to pretend the U.S. is at least grappling with the
moral consequences of innocent civilians. Yet Blinken, Biden, and
Sanders as well as virtually all bourgeois outlets and mouthpieces have
stated “Israel has an obligation to defend itself” Blinken 13 October
2023, Biden “Israel has the right to respond, indeed has a duty to
respond” 10 October 2023, and 300 former staffers of Sanders asked
Sanders (very nicely) to support a ceasefire saying “We believe in you.”
In mid October, Jamaal Bowman was roundly condemned for going to Israel,
to see the apartheid for himself, by A.O.C.’s and Sander’s Democratic
Socialist of America (DSA). Even MSNBC’s Al Sharpton states “Gaza is not
occupied.” We could literally go on and on about how this lurch is not
only acknowledged but immediately dressed up and condoned by all
progressives, leftists, moderate Republicans, and a great majority of
this settler nation.
In the backdrop is always Trump, the MAGA movement, and settler
nation chauvinism. Beside Project 2025 mentioned above, recently Trump
announced the need for “ideological screening” to “bar Christian hating
communists and Marxists” stating “those who come to our country must
love our country.” Such is already the practice in Israel. Trump goes on
to list things that would be grounds for disqualification: “If you want
to abolish the state of Israel you’re disqualified”… Again we encourage
all to check this out because this shift is now much bigger than any
individuals or even movements. Trump was one of the first to
congratulate the Congresswoman who held the 3 college presidents to
these new standards.
As stated we are very much in “heightened contradictory times.” Not
having the right line on the make up of the U.S. and world economy,
nature of settler society, neo-Liberalism, following idiotic communists,
and being afraid to rely on ourselves and our own nation has led to very
bad practice for years and deprived our people of a prepared and
organized fighting force. Lurch to the right or revolution.