MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
I’m enclosing a pamphlet recently circulated here titled “Help for
Victims of Sexual Abuse in Prison.” The official policies in New York
are actually pretty good and some staff are supportive. Sing Sing has
openly gay and lesbian corrections officers (COs), a high percentage of
young and/or female officers, and at least one transgender officer. Far
from ideal, but good enough to suggest there’s hope for the rest of the
country and struggles in this area will be successful!
Please note the #77 speed dial feature described in the pamphlet [a
speed dial to the Rape Crisis Program that does not need to be on the
approved telephone list and calls are not monitored.] This is an
innovative idea that could well be advocated elsewhere. I’ve heard one
positive comment from a user, and the speed dial does work well on a
technical level. But why not a #66 to report beat downs, or #55 for
corruption, or #1 to report injustice or ask for legal help?
MIM(Prisons) responds: We echo this prisoner’s call for a hotline
to report other abuses within prisons. Any opportunity for prisoners to
report abuse outside of the prison structure is a welcome addition to
the criminal injustice system that denies prisoners a voice to speak out
against abuse. But we do not yet have any evidence that prisoners speed
dialing a rape crisis program will result in any help or attention to
the problem beyond supportive counseling after the attack happens. If
this is just offering the prisoner an anonymous opportunity to talk
after a rape, the problem will continue. In a system that has
demonstrated its ability to dismiss or sweep under the rug any
complaints or accusations by prisoners, we doubt this new hotline will
be any different.
As for the existence of gay, lesbian and transgender COs, we see this
the same as having New Afrikan COs. Those who have joined the criminal
injustice system will be forced to conform to the rules or they will be
out of a job. And so we can now expect to see these new COs abusing
prisoners just like their straight counterparts. There are many male COs
who do not identify as gay, but who are part of the rape of male
prisoners. In all situations, the COs are in a position of power in a
system that is set up to denigrate and abuse the men and women it holds.
Rather than fight for COs of a different sexual orientation, gender
identity, or nationality we need to fight for an end to a system of
brutality that condones rape.
I have been a loyal supporter of the oppressed Palestinian people for
over 20 years now, when I was at liberty and since I’ve been an
unwilling guest of the Amerikan gulag system. I had a Palestinian
instructor in college and she really opened my eyes to the high-handed
imperialist tactics of the United States government.
Being a homosexual in Amerika during the 1980s and forced to confront
the atypical everyday injustices co-opted from oppressive world
religions and given the wink and nod by various White House
administrations and Congress, I thus opposed the despotic and
dictatorial government whose flag I am unfortunate to be forced to live
under. Unfortunately these revelations robbed me of my adolescence at 12
and 13 years of age.
My people have suffered and died under this regime since its inception
over 200 years ago. But even more tragic, we have suffered, as have the
Palestinian people, the consequences of the Hebrew/Jewish religious and
cultural influence that have poisoned the earth now for thousands of
years with its Zionist agenda.
Make no mistake, I have no quarrel with the common Israeli citizen nor
the adherents of Judaism. I am not anti-semitic in any way. But I do
however dream of a day when the food and destructive influences of
radical religions are all eliminated.
I wish these religious zealots no evil end or personal ill will. Only
that they could learn to live in peace and harmony with those of us who
simply want to live our lives as we choose as equals along with the rest
of the world. Not as half-men, half-women, freaks or outcasts. We only
ask equal rights and to benefit from equal justice.
Our people too suffered in places such as Bergen-Beese and the like. Our
extermination has been sought by all cultures and ethnicities since the
dawn of time. Mostly in the name of one God or another. And Yahweh - the
god of the Jews - seems to be the most bloodthirsty of all.
Our children have the basic human right and reasonable expectation to
grow up as homosexuals or heterosexuals without their fears and
insecurities being created as a result of the hatred and intolerance of
a sheep-like population that has been brainwashed by government stooges
through the world. Religion truly is the opiate of the masses. Sadly
though, these puppeteers sit, primarily in London, Washington and, yes,
Jerusalem.
We homosexuals in the United States and throughout the world have the
human right, as do the Palestinian people, to self-determination
notwithstanding the dictatorial influence of world religions propped up
by hypocritical governments seeking only to control the masses.
Sadly, we do not live in a true democracy. We live under an
authoritarian government. A democracy is a nation governed by the will
of the people that seeks social equality. No, friends, we live in a
theocracy that masquerades as a democracy.
It is also sad that Palestine - primarily a Muslim, heterosexual nation
- do not enjoy even the limited human rights the vilified homosexual
minorities of the western world do.
It is my sincere hope that my homosexual brothers and sisters throughout
the world, those not brainwashed by the Israeli propaganda machines,
would stand in solidarity with the oppressed Palestinian people in
opposition to the jackbooted Israeli thugs in Jerusalem.
The Amerikan government stands behind and actively supports the genocide
of the Palestinian people by Israel through her leaders by financing
this obvious extermination attempt of an ancient people and culture with
Amerikan tax dollars and military aid, thus forcing all tax paying
Amerikan citizens to be unintended co-conspirators in these crimes
against humanity.
This purportedly is to defend a peace-loving nation claiming only to
want to exist. Yet that same nation actively seeks the utter
annihilation and complete extermination of a legitimate ethnic group of
human beings, with ancient ties to the disputed land in question, from
the face of the earth.
Amerika has demonstrated they are a nation of liars and hypocrites. We
have known since 1967 that Israel always has been. Never again, indeed!
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade correctly ties the struggles
of one oppressed group (gays) to the struggles of another oppressed
group (Palestinians) by noting one common source of oppression in
bourgeois culture in the form of religion. And further s/he correctly
points out that Palestinians enjoy even fewer rights than most gays in
imperialist countries, a point that is crucial for us to understand
because it underscores the relative wealth and power of those living in
oppressor nations compared to the oppressed nations like Palestine. In
fact, tax-paying Amerikans mostly support the U.$. government and the
I$raeli regime it supports, and so they don’t mind being party to these
crimes funded by U.$. military aid. In the arena of international
politics it is important that we are able to distinguish our friends
from our enemies. We do not want to create false unity with our enemies,
nor do we want to divide unnecessarily from those on the
anti-imperialist side of the struggle.
El bombardeo contra el pueblo Palestino no se puede describir en
palabras. Mi forma de ver a Israel a cambiado de un estado asentado a un
estado terroristico. Mas de 1,000+ Palestinos han sido asesinados por
Israel. La mayoría de las víctimas son civiles. Niños y ancianos
descuartizados por bombas Israelíes. Esta atrocidad sigue sin ninguna
palabra de los medios de comunicación Americanos crítica de parte de los
portavoces contra estos actos casi no existe, pero esto no es ninguna
sorpresa.
Yo sigo en lo que puedo, la guerra Israelí contra los Palestinos desde
este campo de muerte llamado Pelican Bay SHU. Lo que veo mas que nada es
que Israel ataca a niños y hospitales. La gente quedan enterradas en sus
hogares y cuando se hace atentos de rescate, los tiradores escondidos
disparan contra los rescatadores. Los militares Israelíes convierten los
hogares Palestinos en nidos para los tiradores escondidos después de
botar a los Palestinos. Están disparandole a mujeres y niños para
infligir terror a las vidas de los Palestinos que nunca van a parar su
lucha por su liberación.
Yo saco mucha fuerza de los Palestinos y aprendo mucho de sus ejemplos
concretos de lo que es luchar contra un ocupador terroristico. Pienso
que el mundo entero esta aprendiendo lo que es la resistencia. Los
Palestinos de hoy son un ejemplo en que podemos aprender. Están sin
asistencia económica pero siempre encuentran la manera de pelear contra
los tanques y misiles sufriendo de hambre, descalzos solo con AKs y
puños cerrados.
El estado terroristicos Israelí es un ejemplo audaz de colonialismo que
tiene que ser eliminado de la humanidad. Los Palestinos son rehenes
cuales son bombardeados al gusto de los Israelís. Pero la mayoría de los
asesinados son civiles y no se oye ni una palabra de los gusanos
Amerikkkanos. No dicen nada porque en muchas maneras el estado
terroristico Israeli es como un espejo de el estado terroristico
Amerikkkano. Todavía no nos atacan en esta escala en este pais, pero las
semi-colonias internas estan teniendo sus tierras ocupadas y estamos
siendo asesinados selectivamente. Amerikkka usa el terror “blandito” con
la tortura de el SHU, la pena de muerte y los guardias
“cochinos/puercos/marranos/cerdos/lechones.” En Palestina el terror no
es “blandito,” los misiles, tanques, y aviones de guerra masacrana la
gente.
Estos actos terroristicos desatados por los perros Israelíes son los que
me inspiran a propagar el anuncio que Palestina tiene que ser libre.
Este avance militar me ha educado más que todos mis años de estudio.
Después de ver el trato barbárico de los Palestinos lo único que puedo
decir es que nunca más los Palestinos estarán solos peleando el
colonialismo.
En meses recientes se ha vuelto más común leer cuentos noticieros sobre
el hundimiento irreversible de glaciares en Antártica y en otras partes
alrededor del mundo, como resultado de temperaturas crecientes en la
Tierra. Este degradación de nuestro medioambiente global es accionado
por emisiones humanas de gases invernaderos. Mientras la realidad de
destrucción humana de sistemas naturales de la Tierra se hace más claro
a diario, y científicos proporcionan más claras y alarmantes evidencias
que estamos a punto donde los efectos no se podrán anular, vemos un
argumento convincente para el comunismo como el único sistema económico
que tiene la posibilidad de proveer la supervivencia a largo plazo de
humanos.
Maoístas enfocan en combatir la represión y brutalidad de humanos contra
humanos, cual es un elemento inherente de capitalismo. Cuando llega la
pelea por la supervivencia de los humanos más oprimidos en el mundo,
pelear por la vida del planeta en cual todos vivimos llega a ser
inextricablemente entrelazado con nuestro humanismo. Sin un
medioambiente que puede sustentar vida humana, la pelea contra opresión
de grupos de pueblos se vuelve irrelevante. Vemos una fuerte razón para
que comunistas apoyen ambientalismo revolucionario, y para unidad entre
activistas ambientales y aquellos que pelean la opresión de pueblos.
Pero no ganaremos la batalla por el medioambiente sin primero liberar
los pueblos oprimidos del mundo y derribar el imperialismo.
Alla en 1997 MIM publicó la revista MIM Teoria titulado “Medioambiente,
Sociedad, Revolución.” En el escribió, “Nuestra meta fundamental es
erradicar la opresión de pueblo sobre pueblo, y esta meta también es la
manera más efectivo para liberar el medioambiente de agresión humana. No
creemos que socialismo necesariamente lleve a cabo salvación ambiental,
pero si argumentamos que solamente por el socialismo tendremos la
posibilidad a si.”
Históricamente la peor devastación ha sido causado sobre el
medioambiente como resultado de opresión entre pueblos: guerras,
fabricación usando trabajo explotado, y incautación de tierras por
corporativos. En guerra, herbicidas y agentes químicos son usados para
deforestar tierra y destruir producción de cosecha, que tiene severas,
duraderos impactos no solo sobre la plantas, pero sobre la gente y fauna
también. Agente Naranjo, uranio agotado, napalm, y fósforo blanco son
ejemplos de este tipo de guerra. Una bomba que pone en blanco un
“enemigo” también destruye el medioambiente en la área circundante.
Producción capitalista permite prácticamente no regular el tiro de
basuras en nuestros ríos y océanos, incluyendo derrames de petróleo.
Cuando mercancía no puede ser vendido es literalmente tirada al océano o
incinerado, impactando la vida oceánica y contaminación del aire.
Ademas, los imperialistas ponen en blanco al Tercer Mundo con residuos
de países imperialistas, colocando industrias sucias ahí y vertiendo
desechos tóxicos en patios de otra gente.(1) Y esta claro que los países
que contribuyen lo menos a cambios de clima serán impactado lo máximo
por el. Tifones golpeando el sureste de Asia y India, sequías en Africa,
e islas que pronto desaparecerán a crecientes niveles del mar son todos
consecuencias que ya han tomado las vidas de muchas personas y amenazan
a destruir todavía más. Donde los países imperialistas podrán
reconstruir infraestructura y defender contra los impactos de cambios de
clima más fácilmente debido a su riqueza robado, residentes en el Tercer
Mundo no tendrán este privilegio. Al mismo tiempo, contaminación y otros
efectos de actividad humana han llegado a una escala donde es mas
difícil para las naciones opresoras aislarse de estos problemas. Por
esta razón, ambientalismo puede probar hacer la mas fuerte fuerza
material para construir internacionalismo verdadero.
En los E$tados Unidos los capitalistas están intentando reformas
pequeñas para tratar el creciente problema ambiental, pero estos
intentos nos enseñan claramente porque capitalismo va fallar en salvar
la raza humana. La Organización de Protección del Medio Ambiente
recientemente propuso regulación de emisiones de plantas de poder,
enfocandose en plantas de carbon existentes. En movimiento lento de
capitalismo, la Organización de Protección del Medio Ambiente ultimará
su propuesta algún día en 2015, dará un año a estados para descifrar
como implementar los nuevos reglamentos, pelear los juicios que estados
amenazan, y tal vez ver unos pocos cambios muchos años en el futuro. La
Organización de Protección del Medio Ambiente optimistamente predice el
propuesto podría reducir emisiones de bióxido de carbon de estas plantas
hasta un 30% para 2030.(2) Los medios corporativos ya están quejandose
de normas de emisiones siendo “mal para negocios,” que bajo capitalismo
es mas importante que vidas humanas. Y fiel a la moda capitalista, hay
platica de sobornar a las compañías de carbon y compensar a personas
quienes tienen buenos trabajos de sindicato con sueldo-alto que serán
afectados.(3) Entonces por los capitalistas ricos y los pudientes
trabajadores del Primer Mundo, habrá años de dispúta para la posibilidad
de hacer algunos pequeños cambios, mientras gente en el Tercer Mundo
están muriendo hoy de efectos de cambio de clima que ya están
sucediendo.
Mucha gente bienintencionada piensa que pueden tratar problemas
ambientales con soluciones individuos. Sugieren que todas necesitamos
reciclar y manejar autos eléctricos, o quizás no comer carne. Es cierto
que dietas Americanas, cultura de auto y producción despilfarrador
tienen que ser cambiados dramáticamente en una sistema ecológico
sostenible. Pero tal estilo de vida política están moviendo mas lenta
que reformas capitalistas en términos de actualmente reducir los indices
de contaminación, agotacion de recursos y destrozos de sistemas
naturales. Movimiento social tiene que ser apoyado con organización,
cambios estructurales y poder verdadero. Los capitalistas tienen todas
estas cosas, pero les falta la motivación para el cambio. Estableciendo
instituciones independientes que actualmente cambian nuestros sistemas
de producción y consumo para estar en linea con lo demás del mundo
natural tiene que ocurrir. Si esto puede ser antes de la toma de poder
estatal, es algo que ecologistas revolucionarios tienen que explorar. Si
sabemos que la dictadura conjunto del proletariado de las naciones
oprimidas será necesario para finalmente hacer cumplir los cambios
necesitados a la escala global. Esto es necesario porque una porción
considerable de las naciones opresoras no reducirán su consumo por
voluntad propia, y mientras haya la potencia para aprovechar por via de
practicas ecológicas miopes, habrán personas que tratarán hacerlo. Hoy
en los E$tados Unidos los fuerzas que mantienen el status quo son mas
organizados que las fuerzas para imponer practicas ecológicas sanas.
Un tercer enfoque común para problemas ambientales es el enfoque de pura
tecnología. Mientras la ciencia de ecología ha avanzado en décadas
recientes, ha sido limitado por la estructura social forzada por el
capitalismo. Primer mundialistas pueden crear carreras alrededor de
trabajar con comunidades pequeñas para resolver problemas locales, pero
estos curitas no pueden curar la herida cuando la navaja de
especuladores capitalistas continua torciendo de un lado a otro. Tales
ecologistas académicas pueden contribuir a nuestro conocimiento, pero
sus esfuerzos no hacen nada para desafiar el modelo capitalista en si
mismo. Es mucho mas eficiente y efectivo hacer cambios necesarios para
la supervivencia de la humanidad con un gobierno centralizado actuando
con los intereses de la mayoría, a un ONG o sector no lucrativo, o hasta
por vía del método de acción directa favorecido por bandas anarquistas.
Comunismo suelta la creatividad de todas la masas de una manera que
empuja estos proyectos para delante con entusiasmo y anchura sin medida.
(Vea nuestro discusión de China: Ciencia Camina Sobre Dos Piernas en
nuestra revista de revolutionaryecology.com - only available in English
right now). Animamos ecologistas con perspectivas globales ha
desarrollar una estrategia que verdaderamente hace uso de su trabajo
globalmente, y les recomendamos el comunismo como la mejor manera de
cumplir sus metas que valen la pena. Hoy en los E$tados Unidos, tenemos
mas estilistas de vida y reformistas en la banda ambientalista.
Necesitamos mas revolucionarios.
Socialismo pondrá un fin a métodos “eficientes” capitalistas de hacer
ganancias. Y con la tierra en los manos del pueblo, podemos empezar
hacer decisiones mas inteligentes sobre uso balanceado para la
supervivencia humana sin destrucción ambiental. La mayoría de los
pueblos del mundo están interesados en vivir en una planeta saludable,
pero los capitalistas con dinero y poder están enfocados en ganancias.
Como tienen el poder y armas, ellos no tienen que darle cuentas a la
mayoría. Desperdician recursos o hasta los destruyen, si les sirve a sus
intereses competitivos. Y no les importa qué o quién muera en el
proceso. Bajo el capitalismo vemos como agencias gubernamentales y el
gobierno mismo están obligados con los intereses especiales mas ricos, y
incapaz de implementar hasta reformas modestas. Solamente derribando a
los capitalistas y hacer cumplir pólizas que aseguran la supervivencia
de humanos en la tierra tenemos una chanza de hechar atrás la
destrucción de el medioambiente.
I am housed at Suwannee Correctional Close Management Unit, which is the
Florida Department of Corruption’s equivalent of the SHU or AdSeg. On 4
August 2014, myself and several other political prisoners on my cell
block were targeted for repression during a shakedown which was
conducted by the pigs. This shakedown was in retaliation for several
grievances/complaints being filed about the corrections officers denying
us outdoor yard access and indoor day room activities, including access
to the phones.
During the shakedown the pigs read some notes I had written down from
studying politics, history, and communism. These notes contained some
commentary that wasn’t very patriotic or friendly toward the Amerikan
imperialist regime. When the pigs ordered me to explain the notes I told
them that “I like to take notes on politics and current events,” and “I
like to keep tabs on what’s going on in the outside world.” The sergeant
then held up one of the notes referring to “sovereignty” and said “so
you’re a sovereign citizen?” To which I replied, “No, I’m just a normal
human being.” Then he told me to explain why I had notes on weapons. I
told him how I was in the U.$. army and developed a fascination for
firearms, and he responded by saying, “so now you’re a domestic
terrorist?” I then told him that the average Amerikan citizen is more
likely to be terrorized by their own local law enforcement than by
so-called “terrorists.”
Myself and three other prisoners were placed in confinement after the
shakedown and we were charged with the disciplinary infraction of
“Possession of Gang Related Paraphernalia.” They tried to validate me as
a member of a Security Threat Group (STG) on the basis that in the notes
I made a reference to “Popular Sovereignty” and that therefore I was in
possession of documents related to the sovereign association, which the
imperialist bureaucrats view as a STG because sovereign citizens are not
compelled to abide by U.$. laws.
When I went to my disciplinary hearing I told these pigs that the
so-called evidence they have against me (the “gang paraphernalia”) is
merely a bunch of notes I copied from social studies. I explained that
“Popular Sovereignty” is (supposed) to be one of the five basic
principles of Amerikan government and that anyone who claims to be a
patriotic Amerikan citizen should at least know this.
I used this argument to beat this charge and I also presented my own
evidence as a defense – part of a social studies assignment on Amerikan
government from FDOC’s very own educational department which explains
(what is supposed to be) the Five Basic Principles of Amerikan
Government; 1) Federal System, 2) Popular Sovereignty, 3) Separation of
Powers, 4) Checks and Balances, and 5) Limited Government. In real life
these “principles” hold no valuable meaning, just as the U.$.
constitution is merely a piece of paper.
It seems evident that anyone making an attempt to educate themselves is
viewed as a threat by the imperialist bureaucrats and anyone who is
against oppression and imperialism is a “domestic terrorist.” As
revolutionaries, it is imperative that we educate ourselves and our
fellow comrades and expose the true terrorists for who they really are:
the terrorists in pig clothing, masquerading as those who “protect and
serve” and provide “care, custody and control.”
We shall prevail in our struggle against imperialist oppression.
MIM(Prisons) adds: We have heard from some comrades that even
writing to MIM(Prisons) or participating in our correspondence study
groups can be used as evidence for STG validation. We know there is a
risk to corresponding and working with MIM(Prisons) but the education
and organizing opportunities are great. We hope others will take this
comrade’s example to fight false validation attempts made against them
and stay active in political work and study. For those not yet involved
in political study, write to us to join our next introductory study
group.
The Montana prison suppression machine has pulled the wool over the eyes
of several prisoner advocacy groups by pretending to disband their
security housing unit (SHU) program. It’s not actually gone, it’s just
been given a shiny new title. It’s now known as LH1 - AdSeg and LHII -
Max population or step down program.
The SHU program started in Montana State Prison (MSP) in approximately
2004-2005, designed to hold validated gang members or violent prisoners
deemed security threats. Unfortunately in Montana the only requirement
for validation is to associate with suspicious prisoners or interact
with known gang members. No activity is required to validate you. Anyone
who disagrees with a corrections officer, files grievances, or otherwise
remotely questions the capitalist authority is deemed a security risk.
MSP’s favorite use of control units is for a growing number of mentally
ill prisoners. MSP has no resources to house these prisoners separately
so they use long term isolation, trying to induce forced sumission over
them.
The LHII step down program is creating jobs for high risk prisoners who
would normally never have the opportunity to earn a few dollars, but at
the cost of long term isolation for most prisoners who are only here
because they questioned policy, filed grievances, refused a pig’s order,
or are scared by prison life. This does not make for a prisoner who will
fare well once turned back to population or society.
So MSP has once again fixed nothing, but it might have fooled a few
people with the name change. We must expose the new system for what it
is: a renaming of the same long term isolation.
MIM(Prisons) adds: We need prisoners to help us keep our
statistics on
control units across the country up to date. We estimate over
100,000 long term isolation units exist in the United $tates, but this
data is incomplete for many states. If you know about a control unit in
your state, write to us for a control unit survey so that you can help
us collect this data on torture in Amerikan prisons.
It’s amazing how some of these institutions specifically discriminate
against Black publications from entering into their prisons, stating
their writings are offensive and inappropriate to prison standards. This
is how prejudice and bias their views are when it comes to Black
literature.
I received a notice from the Incoming Publication Review Committee at
SCI-Benner, stating that the Movement Newsletter is being
denied. They indicated that three of its pages advocated violence,
guerrilla warfare against the government, assist in criminal activity
related to prison misconduct, and its material is racially motivated
that could cause a threat to inmates, staff, and security in the prison.
This accusation is not only a derogatory attack on Black publications,
but also towards Blacks in general. They have the audacity to link a
race of people to a criminal behavior as though it’s inbred in them.
The Black community frowns on criminal activities, as well as violence,
much more so than anyone else because many are personally affected by it
one-way or the other. And for anyone to imply they abet it, is in a
state of illusion, because many of them are unfortunate victims of
crime, not participants.
Most of the Black publications are structured to educate readers on
past, and current events, give encouragement to those in despair, and to
let the community know that they are not forgotten. We’re fortunate to
have a newsletter of sure caliber as the Movement that’s
fearless, judicious, and full of profound data that’s reliable.
Newsletters such as the Movement, Graterfriends,
Fortune Society, Innocence Denied, and many others
that give a voice to those whose voices have been disregarded. They
advocate justice for those who have been denied it, and advocate humane
treatment to those men and women in captivity.
It is judged inappropriate for Black publications to denounce racial
discrimination, corruption, oppression, hypocrisy, injustice, and
whatever else infringe on the rights of others. Are they permitted to
execute their so-called Constitutional rights under the First Amendment
to freedom of speech, which includes the rights to criticize the
government or state officials? Is censorship in effect or is it just my
imagination?
MIM(Prisons) responds:The Movement is a newsletter
published by the Human Rights Coalition (HRC), which describes itself
as: “HRC’s quarterly news magazine, The Movement, is a powerful source
in public awareness that serves not only to tie prisoners to the outside
world, but also to tie the public into prison issues. It represents the
voices, faces, causes, and ideas of prisoner families and prisoners
themselves.” This is not even a New Afrikan publication, except in that
it covers prison issues and a disproportionate number of prisoners of
the United $tates are New Afrikan.
MIM(Prisons) is not surprised to see this censorship because we face
constant problems with censorship of Under Lock & Key in
prisons across the country. Prisons make up bogus reasons to deny
ULK as a threat to security because of our work educating and
organizing prisoners. Any publication that reports honestly on the
Amerikan criminal injustice system is going to include coverage of
national oppression and the struggles of New Afrikans and Chican@s in
particular. This reporting and organizing work is seen as a threat to
the prisons, but we must fight for our right to this legal form of
education.
Between the years 2007 and 2011, 13 prisoners died from the heat in
Texas prisons. Two wrongful death lawsuits have been filed in a
Galveston Federal Court accusing Texas prison officials of negligence in
the deaths.
Scott Medock, an attorney for the Austin based Texas Civil Rights
Project, which filed the suits with Austin attorney Jeff Edwards, called
some east Texas prisons “death traps.”
The Constitution does not require prisons to be maintained at a
comfortable temperature. However, if there is extreme heat or cold,
prisoners’ Constitutional rights are affected. Extreme heat can violate
the Constitution. Refer to: Brock v. Warren county 713 F. Supp 238 (E.D.
Tenn. 1989) - Maddison County Jail Inmates v. Thompson 773 F. 2d 834,
838-39 (7th cir. 1985) - Hamilton v. Love 328 F. Supp 1182, 1190 (E.D.
Ark. 1971).
Prisoners with heat restrictions are in “grave danger” of serious injury
and possible death. To win a Section 1983 lawsuit you must show that
staff officials acted with “deliberate indifference” to your health
risk. “Deliberate indifference” exists when an official knows about a
serious danger to a prisoner and yet is “indifferent” (unconcerned,
uncaring) to that danger. You can use the fact that the conditions were
“longstanding, pervasive, well-documented, and/or expressly noted” by
officials in the past to prove indifference. It is enough that the
official acted or failed to act despite his/her knowledge of a
substantial risk of serious harm. There are several kinds of
circumstantial evidence that you can use to prove an official’s
deliberate indifference. These include copies of grievances and appeals,
copies of informal notes and letters (I-60s) that you wrote to
officials, and you can explain in a declaration exactly when and how you
told officials about risk in prison.
As a general rule, officials may not refuse to respond to a substantial
risk of serious harm on the grounds that it would be too expensive to
fix it. Cost is not a defense to Constitutional liability.
The Eighth Amendment to the U.$. Constitution, among other things,
protects convicted prisoners against cruel and unusual punishment. The
conditions of confinement must not involve the wanton and unnecessary
infliction of pain, nor may they be grossly disproportionate to the
severity of the crime warranting imprisonment (Rhodes v. Chapman 452 US.
337, 347, 69 L.Ed. 2d 59, 101 S. Ct 2392 (1981).) Whether conditions of
confinement are cruel and unusual must be determined from the
contemporary standards of civilized decency that currently prevail in
society. At a minimum, the Constitution requires the state to provide
minimally adequate living space that includes reasonably adequate
ventilation, sanitation, bedding, hygienic materials and utilities
(Grubbs v. Bradley, 552 F. Supp 1052, 1122 (M.D. Tenn. 1981).)
Constitutionally adequate housing is not denied simply by uncomfortable
temperatures inside cells, “unless it is shown that the situation
endangers inmates health” (Smith v. Sullivan, 553 F. 2d 373, 381 (5th
Cir 1977).) TDCJ may be held liable under Section 1983 if deprivation of
prisoners’ Constitutional rights were the result of “custom” or “policy”
(Monell v. New York City Department of Social Services, 463 US 658, 56
L. Ed. 2d 611, 98 S.Ct. 2018 (1978)).
Texas prison conditions do not meet Constitutional standards!
MIM(Prisons) adds: We print this caselaw for prisoners to use in
filing grievances against the dangerous heat conditions in Texas. We
have received many reports on the battle against this health risk. Get
involved in this fight, file grievances, document the situation, and
write to us for the Texas grievance guide.
This is a continuation of a letter I wrote you in July about the
Long
Term (LT) scam here in the Oregon Drpartment of Corrections. Since
that letter there have been some changes in here. For starters, these
pigs’ schemes worked: they were given authorization to expand the LT
program by an additional 24 cells. So they opened up another Intensive
Management Unit (IMU) section as LT and are currently using the top tier
of that section (12 cells) as LT status. They’ll eventually fill up
every cell in that section as LT, then most likely ask for another
extension.
One of the counselors also mentioned that they stopped using the custody
status “Long Term” and are now calling it “Retain Custody Level 5.” They
can call shit by any other name and it’s still gonna smell the same.
Additionally, a not-very-well-thought-out lawsuit was partially won
recently against IMU resulting in a 90-day review of all IMU and LT
status prisoners. Upon review Inmate Program Committee (IPC) is either
supposed to decide to keep us in IMU, release us to mainline, or place
us in alternative housing (which will most likely be LT or Ad-Seg).
However, very few prisoners were released from IMU and 2 Long Termers
got released. That’s nothing to celebrate about when the release of the
2 is weighed against the expansion of 24 cells.
Most prisoners never even get a response about the review, and they’re
prime candidates for release due to lack of write-ups or any misconduct
while in IMU or LT. The reviews therefore become a convenience for these
pigs: when they need the room for more IMU intakes, they’ll release
someone to open that cell. It also sets the stage for prejudice and
discrimination. If for any reason they don’t like us they can simply
deny any change to our status without ever giving a reason why: maybe
they don’t like the way we look, our skin art, who we’re accused of
associating with, maybe we’ve had confrontations with the piglets and
counselors, or maybe even filed grievances and lawsuits. Without ever
needing to say why, they can simply deny us, and conveniently declare to
have given us our due process.
I will be drafting up a petition to challenge the schemes, but I still
don’t feel it’s right for us to individually challenge this after the
fact that we’ve been placed in these mental torture chambers. So I will
be contacting activist groups to see if they can help to abolish this
altogether. I got bigger plans in mind which I’ll share once I get the
petitions prepared. It’ll require taking this to the courts, attempting
to seek justice in the imperialistic playground of jesters and
hypocrites.
MIM(Prisons) adds: We agree with this comrade that reforming any
system of control units to allow a few people to get out is not going to
change the system. We must demand that all long-term isolation units be
shut down. Of course this is still just a small part of the criminal
injustice system that we are fighting to dismantle, but it is an
important part because it is used to target politically active and
conscious comrades, punishing them for their work fighting abuse and
isolating them from influencing other prisoners.
On 20 June 2014 from 7pm to 9:30pm, 65-year-old Juan Nave pleaded with
CO Justin Jernigan for cold water, for medical staff, and to be let out
his cell to get some cool air from the dayroom fans because he didn’t
have a fan in his cell and it was about 100 degrees in our cells. My
cell is nearby so I listened as Mr. Nave told to the unconcerned Officer
Jernigan he was really ill and needed medical attention. I also
attempted to request water and to be let out of my dangerously heated
cell for a little cool down time, and CO Jernigan said, “I’m hot too,
handle it like me,” and he walked away with no consideration for our
health or life. Around 9:30pm was the last time I heard Mr. Nave beg
Officer Jernigan for help only to be ignored again. At 10pm Jernigan
went home and CO Brake took his place. It wasn’t until CO Brake was
doing a bed count around 1:30am that he discovered Juan Nave was dead.
Both Wardens, the Major and Captain were there within 30 minutes. They
called their own medical examiner to rule the death a heart attack, but
I knew it was heat that caused Mr. Nave’s death. I asked the shift
supervisor Lt. Ruth if they were going to get statements from us
witnessing prisoners. Lt. Ruth said they would a little later, but no
one questioned me or other witnessing prisoners. I filed a grievance but
it was denied per grievance policy, “no inmate can file complaint for or
about another inmate.” About 3 to 4 days after Mr. Nave’s death, CO
Jernigan worked on the same wing, with a very arrogant and flamboyant
attitude. When I mentioned Mr. Nave’s death to Jernigan he said, “it was
not my fault, he had a heart attack,” and walked away.
This time I filed my grievance against Jernigan failing to let me have
water and call a supervisor when I informed him I was overheated. That
upset Jernigan, and he retaliated by ransacking my cell, taking things
he had to give back. I filed another complaint mentioning CO Jernigan
killing Mr. Nave and trying to kill me in retaliation for me filing
these grievance complaints. A few weeks later Sgt. Thomas informed me
Justin Jernigan was removed from the unit work schedule. But that won’t
bring Juan Nave back to life or relieve his suffering the day of his
death. This is why I need all the firepower I can get with all the
grievance support that’s available.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This fight against the dangerous heat in Texas
prisons is literally a battle of life and death, as demonstrated by this
article and
others
we have received from across the state. This is a good opportunity to
push the Texas grievance campaign and demand grievances be heard. The
rule that a grievance can be denied because a dead prisoner is unable to
file his/her own grievance is just one more ludicrous reason used by
TDCJ to reject our valid complaints against mistreatment. Write to us to
request a copy of the
Texas
grievance guide.