[This series of events followed two statewide food strikes in California
in 2011 focused on putting an end to Security Housing Units and
improving justice and conditions in CA prisons.]
When we, the prisoners housed in the Administrative Segregation Unit
(ASU1) of CSP-Corcoran, initiated a hunger strike to protest against the
inhumane conditions and constitutional violations we faced in the ASU1,
the prison officials responded with retaliation and indifference. Their
intent was clear: to set an example of what would occur if these
protests that had been rocking the California Department of Corrections
and Rehabilitation (CDCR) this past year continued. Their statement was
not only meant for the protestors in this ASU1, but for the entire class
of oppressed prisoners in the CDCR.
The hunger strike in this ASU1 initially began on 28 December 2011. It
was a collective effort with various races and subgroups standing in
solidarity for a common interest. A petition was prepared with the
issues we wanted to address, and it was submitted to the Corcoran prison
officials and also sent out to prisoner rights groups in an attempt to
gather support and attention.
A few hours after the protest began, Warden Gipson sent her staff to
move the prisoners who were allegedly, and falsely, identified as
“strike leaders” to a different ASU. I was included in that category
because my signature was on the petition that was submitted to prison
officials. When we initially refused to move, the correctional staff
came to our cells wearing full riot gear to cell extract and move us by
force. Since we were engaging in a peaceful protest, we agreed to move
and were placed in the other ASU. This turned out to be 3A03 EOP, an
Ad-Seg unit that houses severely mentally ill prisoners.
While isolated in that psychiatric ward, we continued to refuse food
until we received word that the hunger strike ended in the ASU1. I later
found out that the Warden and Captain had met with the spokesmen of the
ASU1 protestors and promised to grant a majority of our demands but
requested three weeks to implement the changes and to have the
agreements in writing. The protestors agreed to give the prison
officials the benefit of the doubt, and for that reason the hunger
strike was put on hold.
I continued to file complaints and 602s during this period asserting
that my placement in a unit along with severely mentally ill prisoners
violated my Eighth Amendment right because I was not mentally ill; and
that my placement in this psychiatric ward was the result of illegal
retaliation by prison officials against me for exercising my First
Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest. These grievances went
ignored. In addition to my isolation in the psychiatric ward, I received
a 115 for “inciting/leading a mass disturbance” (12 month SHU term), and
was later found guilty although they had no evidence to support that
charge besides my signature on a petition. The other protestors who were
also falsely identified as “strike leaders” were issued the same 115 for
“inciting/leading a mass disturbance.”
On 18 January 2012, Warden Gipson ordered her staff to move me, as well
as the other isolated protesters, back to the ASU1 believing that the
hunger strike was over. Before we were moved back, she sent an email to
Lt. Cruz of 3A03 and asked him to read it to us. It contained a warning
that she would not tolerate any more disturbances in the ASU1, and a
threat that any such behavior would carry more severe reprisals.
After three weeks passed since the hunger strike was put on hold, it was
clear that the prison officials had no intent to honor their word and
keep their promises. The hunger strike resumed on 27 January 2012.
The ASU1 Lieutenant, after hearing that we resumed the protest, came to
a few protestors and stated the following: “We are tired of you guys,
all you guys, doing hunger strikes and asking for all this shit. I am
not only speaking for myself, but for my superiors as well. There are
correctional officers and staff getting laid off because the state
doesn’t have money, and you guys in here are asking for more shit? You
know what, we don’t care if you guys starve yourselves to death. You
guys aren’t getting shit. The only thing you’ll get are incident
packets.”
Two days later, on 29 January 2012, Warden Gipson sent her staff again
to round up the alleged “strike leaders” and place them in isolation.
This time, the spokesmen who had previously come out to speak and
negotiate with the prison officials regarding our demands were also
included in that category. We were all moved once again to 3A03
psychiatric ward although we were not mentally ill. Furthermore, our
visits were suspended by classification committee for the duration of
our “involvement in the hunger strike,” and we were issued another 115
for “inciting/leading a mass disturbance.”
The retaliation did not stop there. All the participants of the hunger
strike were issued 115s for “participation in a mass disturbance,” and
the most important of all, the correctional staff and prison officials
were deliberately indifferent to the medical needs of the starved
protestors in the ASU1. When some of the protestors started losing
consciousness, experiencing serious pain, and requesting emergency
medical attention, the correctional staff were deliberately slow in
responding, and in many instances just simply ignored them. This conduct
and this mindset, of prison officials to set an example by showing
deliberate indifference to the medical needs of the protestors, directly
contributed to the death of one of our own. His brave sacrifice and
unfailing personal commitment will never be forgotten, nor will it have
been for naught.
This is where they stand. The oppressors who take away our freedom and
liberty continue to fight tooth and nail to deprive us of even our basic
human rights. They employ brutal means of retaliation and suppression in
an attempt to keep us from exposing the harsh truths of everyday life
inside these prison walls. Although the ASU1 hunger strike may have
ended, I will continue to have the spirit of resistance. The outcome
will not be decided by a single battle but of many, and I will do my
part in hopes that my small contribution may make a difference.