MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
A clenched fist goes up for the New Afrikan youth Trayvon Martin who was
murdered in Sanford, Florida on February 26 2012.
Here we are in this endless cycle of genocide inflicted on the internal
semi-colonies. Hunting season is never over in Amerika; it is merely
covered up with different words to describe it. But those of us in
prisons across Amerikkka understand what is taking place.
It has taken almost two full months for the arrest of George Zimmerman
to be finally carried out. That’s sad, when a Black 17-year-old is
executed in cold blood and the killer is allowed to roam free, but we
are arrested for reckless driving and given a life sentence. U.$.
soldiers slaughter villages, cut off ears, take photos of themselves
urinating on the bodies, without being charged; and when they are
charged they walk free. Migrants are shot and killed by white
supremacist militia groups, and not only does the corporate media not
report it, but bills are currently being pushed through that call for
militia groups to formally work in concert with border patrol.
The truth is the state operates in a way that allows many loopholes and
leeway for white supremacists to survive and continue their terror. This
is seen in the treatment these groups are given from Amerika. If you
look closely at this phenomenon it shows us what kind of a rotten system
we really live under. The problem is we have been born and raised in
this imbalanced existence so we now believe many things are “normal” or
“okay” when in fact they are very wrong.
Case in point: the existence of white supremacist militia groups. If we
were to have a handful of Chicanos with guns in any house we would be
labeled “gang members” and the SWAT team would come in and crush our
existence. If a handful of New Afrikans were at a house with guns and a
flagpole flying their banner, they would be labeled terrorists and
crushed. Yet there are entire compounds of white supremacists with guns
and websites proclaiming their objectives, and for the most part Amerika
leaves them untouched. Why is this? Well because these neo-Nazi or other
white supremacists actually complement the imperialists’ agenda here in
Amerika in many ways.
In one way they help to keep the mass attention off the state itself,
but they also make room for the state to step in and appear as some
savior. As in the Trayvon Martin murder, they allow this vigilante
psychotic maggot to run amok, allowing the people’s anger to boil, and
then step in to arrest him. This way many will think “they did the right
thing” or “the law works.”
These tired old bait-and-switch tactics don’t fool nobody. We know
Amerika is Zimmerman! Zimmerman is only a physical
manifestation of imperialism. Imperialism, like Zimmerman, travels the
world stalking Third World nations and then attacking the oppressed
nation, latching on and sucking the blood, the resources, leaving a
lifeless corpse in its place. They can call Amerika a “colorblind”
society; they can allow the public to be “intermingled”; they can
nominate Obama as president; but any way you slice it there is no
justice to be found here for Brown or Black folks. Our justice will only
come from our own hands through struggle.
Racism is generally understood by revolutionaries first and foremost as
an outgrowth of the ruling class, which nurtures these white
supremacists into fascist foot soldiers. They are imperialism’s reserve
army and are intertwined with the state apparatus. They have a mutual
interest in keeping things “the way they are.”
The most we’ve gotten out of Obama concerning this modern day lynching
was him saying “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon.” Really? He
couldn’t even make a speech denouncing the attack on Black people, the
problem of white supremacy, or the new caste-like system that encourages
these modern day lynchings lest he offend the oppressor nation. But
saying nothing at all would offend the Black nation. His “middle ground”
was “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon.”
These bourgeois politicians serve the ruling class, they serve capital,
they serve Wall Street. Our justice may not come tomorrow but it will
surely come, and until then let us prepare the people for the cold
reality in Amerika.
[This series of events followed two statewide food strikes in California
in 2011 focused on putting an end to Security Housing Units and
improving justice and conditions in CA prisons.]
When we, the prisoners housed in the Administrative Segregation Unit
(ASU1) of CSP-Corcoran, initiated a hunger strike to protest against the
inhumane conditions and constitutional violations we faced in the ASU1,
the prison officials responded with retaliation and indifference. Their
intent was clear: to set an example of what would occur if these
protests that had been rocking the California Department of Corrections
and Rehabilitation (CDCR) this past year continued. Their statement was
not only meant for the protestors in this ASU1, but for the entire class
of oppressed prisoners in the CDCR.
The hunger strike in this ASU1 initially began on 28 December 2011. It
was a collective effort with various races and subgroups standing in
solidarity for a common interest. A petition was prepared with the
issues we wanted to address, and it was submitted to the Corcoran prison
officials and also sent out to prisoner rights groups in an attempt to
gather support and attention.
A few hours after the protest began, Warden Gipson sent her staff to
move the prisoners who were allegedly, and falsely, identified as
“strike leaders” to a different ASU. I was included in that category
because my signature was on the petition that was submitted to prison
officials. When we initially refused to move, the correctional staff
came to our cells wearing full riot gear to cell extract and move us by
force. Since we were engaging in a peaceful protest, we agreed to move
and were placed in the other ASU. This turned out to be 3A03 EOP, an
Ad-Seg unit that houses severely mentally ill prisoners.
While isolated in that psychiatric ward, we continued to refuse food
until we received word that the hunger strike ended in the ASU1. I later
found out that the Warden and Captain had met with the spokesmen of the
ASU1 protestors and promised to grant a majority of our demands but
requested three weeks to implement the changes and to have the
agreements in writing. The protestors agreed to give the prison
officials the benefit of the doubt, and for that reason the hunger
strike was put on hold.
I continued to file complaints and 602s during this period asserting
that my placement in a unit along with severely mentally ill prisoners
violated my Eighth Amendment right because I was not mentally ill; and
that my placement in this psychiatric ward was the result of illegal
retaliation by prison officials against me for exercising my First
Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest. These grievances went
ignored. In addition to my isolation in the psychiatric ward, I received
a 115 for “inciting/leading a mass disturbance” (12 month SHU term), and
was later found guilty although they had no evidence to support that
charge besides my signature on a petition. The other protestors who were
also falsely identified as “strike leaders” were issued the same 115 for
“inciting/leading a mass disturbance.”
On 18 January 2012, Warden Gipson ordered her staff to move me, as well
as the other isolated protesters, back to the ASU1 believing that the
hunger strike was over. Before we were moved back, she sent an email to
Lt. Cruz of 3A03 and asked him to read it to us. It contained a warning
that she would not tolerate any more disturbances in the ASU1, and a
threat that any such behavior would carry more severe reprisals.
After three weeks passed since the hunger strike was put on hold, it was
clear that the prison officials had no intent to honor their word and
keep their promises. The hunger strike resumed on 27 January 2012.
The ASU1 Lieutenant, after hearing that we resumed the protest, came to
a few protestors and stated the following: “We are tired of you guys,
all you guys, doing hunger strikes and asking for all this shit. I am
not only speaking for myself, but for my superiors as well. There are
correctional officers and staff getting laid off because the state
doesn’t have money, and you guys in here are asking for more shit? You
know what, we don’t care if you guys starve yourselves to death. You
guys aren’t getting shit. The only thing you’ll get are incident
packets.”
Two days later, on 29 January 2012, Warden Gipson sent her staff again
to round up the alleged “strike leaders” and place them in isolation.
This time, the spokesmen who had previously come out to speak and
negotiate with the prison officials regarding our demands were also
included in that category. We were all moved once again to 3A03
psychiatric ward although we were not mentally ill. Furthermore, our
visits were suspended by classification committee for the duration of
our “involvement in the hunger strike,” and we were issued another 115
for “inciting/leading a mass disturbance.”
The retaliation did not stop there. All the participants of the hunger
strike were issued 115s for “participation in a mass disturbance,” and
the most important of all, the correctional staff and prison officials
were deliberately indifferent to the medical needs of the starved
protestors in the ASU1. When some of the protestors started losing
consciousness, experiencing serious pain, and requesting emergency
medical attention, the correctional staff were deliberately slow in
responding, and in many instances just simply ignored them. This conduct
and this mindset, of prison officials to set an example by showing
deliberate indifference to the medical needs of the protestors, directly
contributed to the death of one of our own. His brave sacrifice and
unfailing personal commitment will never be forgotten, nor will it have
been for naught.
This is where they stand. The oppressors who take away our freedom and
liberty continue to fight tooth and nail to deprive us of even our basic
human rights. They employ brutal means of retaliation and suppression in
an attempt to keep us from exposing the harsh truths of everyday life
inside these prison walls. Although the ASU1 hunger strike may have
ended, I will continue to have the spirit of resistance. The outcome
will not be decided by a single battle but of many, and I will do my
part in hopes that my small contribution may make a difference.
19 April 2012 - Greetings comrades in struggle. Here in Texas at
Clements Unit I am engaging in a hunger strike in protest of the gang of
racist officers systematically targeting New Afrikan prisoners with hate
as a mechanism to control or punish us. I’ve sent in numerous grievances
and complaints to the administration to no avail.
I’m in the high security building as an administrative segregation
prisoner for a weapon planted in my cell by one of these racist
officers. They have done cell searches to steal my legal documents,
destroy my property, defile my religious books and prayer rug, and leave
obscene drawings of monkeys or apes being hung or impaled with a KKK
cross. They have been doing this to the New Afrikans here for a while
and are getting more and more violent and vindictive.
As a political prisoner, I’ve been targeted not only because of my ebony
hue, but for my constant struggle to enlighten these slave-mentality
prisoners to unite and take a stand. I’ve been told by Sergeant
Mondragon and Correctional Officer Ruiz that they will make sure I die
in this cell. Captain Boland, Major Hardegree, Lieutenant Hancock and
Warden John Adams have created this kind of fractal injustice as there
is not one New Afrikan officer/employee on 2-Card/1st Shift High
Security.
Comrades this is only the beginning of my hunger strike - 2nd day - and
wish for your support and solidarity to keep me strong and vigilant. I
can only hope to force a change and get outside recognition to the abuse
and hate crimes committed by these racist gangs in the guise of
correctional officers.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We stand behind this comrade’s fight
against racist injustice. But we don’t fight to add more Black officers
in the prison. We know oppressed nation pigs are still pigs. This kind
of integration is not progressive. We encourage our comrades to explore
all non-violent methods of struggle, including hunger strikes when
necessary. But these actions should not be taken without building
necessary support for success. Even in California where thousands of
prisoners joined the
hunger
strike, the victory has resulted in few immediate changes, while at
least one comrade died in that struggle. These movements require careful
planning by an organized leadership and time spent building mass
support.
Below is a response to
“Validation
Leads to Longer Sentences for Oppressed Nations” from ULK
24. I would like to say first and foremost that I feel for these
brothers in the state of California. From what I can tell the gang
validation program in California is what the Department of Corruptions
(DOC) in Connecticut call Security Risk Group (SRG). Our system is also
corrupt but the process seems harder in this state. We also have a
Safety Threat Member (STM) designation, which is a more severe version
of an SRG. STM is for someone with a leadership role, or a repeat
offender.
I believe if the California comrades looked at the DOC’s model over here
it would help in presenting a more productive model for them to use in
reform. They used to be able to designate us at will with no evidence.
Now it goes by a point system. A tattoo is not enough to designate you
alone. And when you finish the program here, there’s no debrief. You
just have a piece of paper of renunciation; no information is needed.
They have found ways to corrupt this process, of course, but it is a
step up from what California is doing to our comrades.
Our mission is to put an end to these methods altogether, but I believe
there are steps in that process. Not only should we be giving a list of
demands, but also presenting a model for reform that honors our human
rights as well as our due process rights.
MIM(Prisons) responds: California Prison Focus, a reformist
organization focused on issues related to SHU prisoners, recently put
out an issue of their
newsletter almost entirely devoted to analysis and criticism of
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR’s)
proposal for a new gang validation system.(1) The CDCR’s proposal rests
on a point system similar to the one used in Connecticut. A point system
might make it more challenging for prison staff to frivolously send
someone to a control unit indefinitely, but only if the evidence used to
calculate the points is disclosed. Another key difference in the
Connecticut DOC’s system is that it lacks a debriefing process, and is
therefore not as self-perpetuating as the CDCR’s.
It may be a tactical advantage to model our reforms off of those which
have led to some improvements in other localities. This would depend on
the conditions in each location and time. A point system is slightly
more objective than the CDCR’s earlier protocol of identifying just
three pieces of evidence, which were often kept secret as
“confidential.” But as Ed Mead reports in Prison Focus,
The stated purpose [of CDCR’s proposal] is still to “prohibit inmates
from creating, promoting, or participating in any club, association, or
organization, except as permitted by written instructions.”(1)
MIM(Prisons) stands in strong opposition to this stated goal of the CDCR
in our efforts to support prisoners in organizing themselves for
democratic rights as a class and for self-determination of the oppressed
nations.
The U.$. government uses the domestic injustice system to justify the
denial of democratic and Constitutional rights to a growing segment of
its internal semi-colonies. The recent CDCR proposal refuses to
eliminate the use of secret evidence to put people in SHU, which is a
denial of due process. Meanwhile, not only is SHU used to punish people
for associating with others, but the recent proposal includes plans to
expand the range of Security Threat Groups targeted for repression. If
these policies were implemented for the overall population we would call
it fascism. Organizing strategies of our comrades behind bars should
reflect this reality.
What is so sinister about the
debriefing
process, why it has been a primary target of the anti-SHU struggle,
is because the statements given are used as secret evidence to put
others in SHU for indefinite sentences, translating to years if not
decades, in long-term isolation torture cells. As long as this
continues, and as long as prisoners are denied basic First Amendment
rights of association then we see no progress in the “new” proposal.
MIM(Prisons) calls for the abolition of long-term isolation, as it is a
form of torture that destroys humyn beings. In addition, the way it is
used attacks whole nations by targeting leaders of the oppressed and
isolating them from the masses. There are reforms that could weaken the
second effect, but people would still be tortured unless control units
are abolished completely. The proposed point system barely puts a dent
in either problem and can hardly even be considered a reform. Therefore
we stand with the broad consensus among prisoners opposing the proposal,
and call on supporters on the outside to do the same to remove all
legitimacy from the government’s attempts to keep the oppressed from
organizing for any purpose.
When Republican Bill Haslam was elected Governor of the $tate of
Tennessee, he appointed Derrick D. Schofield as Commissioner of the
Tennessee Department of Corrections (TDOC). I assume the “D” in
Schofield’s middle name stands for either dumbass or dickhead, because
since then the conditions in prison have deteriorated. Schofield is one
of the $nakes that was instrumental in causing the largest prison
sit-down in United Snakes hystory.
It is no doubt that the Governor brought this individual to cause chaos
and mayhem to the captives at all the prisons in Tennessee. They do this
in the hopes of enticing the captives to riot so that they can receive
federal funds and justify turning the state plantations over to
Correctional Corporation of America (CCA). This way they can pad their
pockets and implement new legislature that will rob the captives of what
little dignity they may have left.
Many of your politicians have stock in CCA as well as political
allegiance to their dubious goals. Recently it was revealed that CCA had
sent
letters to
most state governments offering to buy up prisons on the condition
that the state contracts with them for at least 20 years, and that the
state keeps the prison at a 90% occupancy rate or more. Such a move
would further cement the prison industrial complex that profits off
humyn suffering while lessening government oversight in how prisoners
are treated.(1)
Schofield has attempted to remove all identity and dignity from all
captives. His agenda is to persecute instead of rehabilitate the
captives. His tactics have been to disregard policies and procedures
that have been in place for years and implement unwritten rules. He has
caused an atmosphere of hate, discontent and danger for both his
employees and the captives.
Captives are required to walk single-file under escort on the compound,
a specified distance apart. Captives are not allowed to talk or have
their hands in their pockets while under escort, even during cold
weather, and the TDOC has not issued gloves to all captives. Captives
must be neatly dressed and keep their cells in an orderly condition with
beds made, and must stand at attention during morning inspections
without speaking, engaging in any other activity or making eye contact
with the inspectors. This includes captives who work night shifts who do
not get off work until early in the morning, yet must be out of bed for
inspection. When captives are called to meals, they are required to line
up and wait outside until it is their turn to go to the dining hall,
even when it is pouring rain. Captives must keep their property in
specific locations in their cells, and property storage rules have been
changed multiple times in an arbitrary manner, leading to confusion and
frustration among both captives and staff. Captives may no longer
possess coat hangers, which makes it difficult to dry wet towels.
Permissible items on the property list have been changed and, rather
than be grandfathered in, items that are no longer allowed have been
confiscated or required to be mailed out.
Wardens have been transferred to different facilities, and it has been
stated that Schofield intends to continue transferring Wardens every few
years, which may have an adverse impact on institutional stability.
There are daily cell inspections, including by Wardens and deputy
Wardens, which means that all of a facility’s highest-ranking
administrators are on the compound at the same time, which may
constitute a security risk.
The policy changes that Schofield has implemented have significant
consequences. This is not a concern that is only an opinion of the
captives. At least four Wardens have resigned or retired since Schofield
was appointed commissioner, some due to the implementation of
Schofield’s new unwritten policies. Also, a number of TDOC staff, from
the Warden level down, have contacted the Human Rights Defense Center to
express their concerns about the effect Schofield’s policy changes have
had on both captives and staff in terms of frustration and discontent
among prisoners and decreased morale among employees. None of the staff
members who spoke with Human Rights Defense Center were willing to
publicly identify themselves, citing fear of retaliation. The atmosphere
here is very vile and becoming extremely dangerous. As is the case in
the state of Georgia, the fights, assaults on captives and assaults on
staff have gone up significantly, all because of Schofield’s silly
unwritten rules.
At Turney Center Industrial Prison (TCIX), captives are targeted to fill
up the hole commonly known as segregation. It once held Close Security
captives, and once they were transferred to other plantations, the
oppressors began to target captives by issuing both arbitrary and
capricious disciplinary reports for so-called infractions that the
captives have never been informed of, not to mention the unwritten rules
are as silly as the individual who implemented them. The ridiculous
rules have no penological interest. Moreover, most of the disciplinary
infractions issued are fraudulent and without legal authority.
Within the masses of captives at TCIX, you would be hard pressed to find
many that are willing to fight against their oppressors for the
liberation of the basic human rights. I call them the “i can’t crew.” I
like to say that i am part of the “i can crew.” There is a famous
saying, which goes like this, “if you won’t stand for something, you
will fall for anything.”
Since the atmosphere here and at all the prisons has become vile, a few
of us decided to get together and address our concerns in a petition. We
recognize that the oppressor wants for us to riot and that we must first
put our struggle out there before we start busting heads.
We got together and put all our concerns down on paper. We then found
someone with a typewriter and asked him to type up our concerns. After
this petition was typed up it was given to a person in each pod to go
door-to-door asking individuals to sign. The only ones not asked to sign
were known rats. The signatures were then sent out to be copied and we
sent copies to many organizations, State Senators, State
Representatives, Turney Center Warden, Commissioner Schofield and
Governor Bill Haslam. The petition has also been placed on the internet
and Facebook.
To protect the large number of captives who participated in
brainstorming this movement, we submitted our demands in the petition.
The demands included and were not limited to a meeting between the
Warden, Commissioner, Governor and various other officials, with the
Captive Counsel Members and different religious organizations. The
purpose of having the other organizations present at such a meeting is
because the individuals who go to counsel are generally intimidated by
the current Warden. Even if they were allowed to speak freely, they are
ill-equipped to speak on matters they have no interest in or have no
knowledge about. As in the past, a majority of them cannot be trusted.
Some are sincere, but most are there to be close to the oppressor to
feel some sort of worth.
If the oppressor does not acknowledge or dialogue with us, we will be
forced to conduct a sit-down. The sit-down will consist of all of us
refusing to go to work, and refusing to purchase commissary items or use
the phone. The oppressor can serve the food and make the beds in the
metal plant for the new prison that they have built in Bledsoe County.
We want all of the captives held against their will in all the prisons
in the State of Tennessee to stand up for themselves, before they are
unable to fight for their dignity, identity, freedom and justice.
What the captives don’t realize is that the fiscal year for the TDOC is
July of each year. They can expect more legislation coming that will
give the bourgeoisie more authority to take more inmate property and
continue to deprive us of basic human rights. The food will become worse
than it is presently; there will be less opportunity to access the fresh
air; it will be mandated for all to cut our hair in a military fashion,
including facial hair; and visits will be by monitor, thus denying human
contact with your family, friends and loved ones. There is a laundry
list of atrocities that are on the way, and instead of complaining about
them, the captives must rise up and do something about it, in every
single death camp in this state. If anyone wants to help in the cause
and has ideas, please contact MIM(Prisons).
Warden Jerry Lester recently told one of his minions that he does not
have to respect the captives. Is this a directive from Schofield, or is
this the Warden’s mentality and/or the result of Schofield’s
intervention that is causing this oppressive thinking?
The captives cannot change their condition until they want to change
themselves. Every captive needs to realize who their real enemy is and
come together so that they can maintain what dignity, respect, manhood
and rights they have left.
I recently received MIM Theory #9 about the psychology of imperialism.
This magazine has so much eye opening knowledge in it! I am very
grateful for my copy and for helping me understand myself. I have been
labeled as insane for so long and looked down on because of it.
I have been tortured in mental hospitals for refusing to take medication
that caused me such very painful side affects. I was billed 29 thousand
dollars for a few days of treatment. I was told I had to take medication
that was given to make me unhealthy. This medication was priced at
thousands of dollars a month.
I was told that my vision of a new world was psychotic delusion. I was
told that wanting to have revenge for what was done to the natives of
this land was threatening to myself and others. That since I was having
vision that I was just a nigger slave on a plantation in chains that I
was crazy. That my fear that these damned imperialists might just start
a war that will kill us all was not rational.
Many people can’t see the world as a whole so it doesn’t affect them.
Others just need to take a pill for their nerves. I know this enemy of
the people and I will expose it. From now on I have pledged to fight for
freedom. My next move is to educate myself so I can use my mind as a
tool to end injustice. I plan to study law so I can help others. I will
try to serve the rest of my time without violence.
MIM(prisons) adds: We agree with this comrade, psychology is used
as a tool to control people who do not conform to the norms of
imperialist culture. We do not agree with the oppressor’s definition of
mental
health. It is healthy to question the oppression and exploitation of
the world’s people. It is correct to want to challenge inequality and
injustice. And those who are truly in need of help are the ones who
think it is ok to profit off the suffering of others. Under communism we
can re-educate these people and help them understand the need for a
world system that works for the interests of all people.
Ho Chi Minh on Revolution, Selected Writings, 1920-1966 edited
and with an introduction, profile written by Bernard B. Fall Signet
1967
One of the first things that reached out and grabbed the interest of
this writer is the revelation of Uncle Ho’s humble beginnings. In
contrast to such stalwarts as Marx and Lenin who lived the life of the
middle class of their times, Uncle Ho, born on May 19th, 1890, lived the
life of the lumpen proletariat.(p.v-vi)
Another thing of interest was his use of aliases. Ho Chi Minh, an alias
itself, was actually born Nguyen That Thanh. Among a number of aliases
used during the 1920s, Nguyen O Phap, used during his time in France,
speaks volumes as to his attitudes and brazenness - so characteristic of
the lumpen today - for in translation his name meant “Nguyen Who Hates
the French.”(pviii)
The opening chapters/writings of section one (In Search of a Mission) do
an excellent job bringing to light Uncle Ho’s awakening and rising of
political consciousness, his move from nationalism to internationalism
(Marxism/Leninism, socialism and communism), his love and deep
admiration for Lenin himself, his intense interest and study of the New
Afrikan Nation in the United $nakes, slavery, reconstruction, ku klux
klanism and the such, and the atrocities that were committed by the
French, that led to the liberation movement the U.$. tried so
repugnantly to derail, but failed to do so - the raping, slavery,
systematic introduction of opium and alcohol, forced inscription,
decapitations, hangings, impailings, burnings, torture, ad infintum.
A quote brings to mind the crux of capitalist Christianity brought down
upon the backs of all Third World peoples subject to First World
colonialism, neo or otherwise:
“[T]he Annamese peasant is crucified on the bayonet of capitalist
civilization and on the cross of prostituted Christianity.”(pg38)
Another quote, in the complementation to U.S.S.R. practice at the time,
catches the eye:
“Colonialism is a leech with two suckers, one of which sucks the
metropolitan proletariat and the other that of the colonies. If we want
to kill this monster, we must cut off both suckers at the same time. If
only one is cut off, the other will continue to suck the blood of the
proletariat, the animal will continue to live, and the cut off sucker
will grow again.”(pg43)
And then a third, in section two (The Comintern Way) which provides
writings upon Uncle Ho’s full embracement of the communist
international, rings both artistic and still so true, to the colonized
brood:
“Justice is represented by a good lady holding scales in one hand and a
sword in the other. As the distance between IndoChina and France is so
great, so great that, on arrival there, the scales lose their balance
and the pans melt and turn into opium pipes and official bottles of
spirits, the poor lady has only the sword left with which to strike. She
even strikes innocent people, and innocent people especially.”(pg105)
Section 3 (Revolution and Liberation War) goes into tactics and
strategy, line, criticism and self-criticism, the counter offensive, the
United Front and the formation of the provisional government, various
committees and the such, from 1930-1954. This section also covers poems
from Uncle Ho’s prison diary. “Autumn Night,” which encapsulates the
prisoner’s longing for home; and “word play,” which discovers for the
reader the origin of George Jackson’s affectionate and personal title of
“The Dragon,” were of the author’s most interest. This section ends by
highlighting some of the statistical achievements of the revolution and
then goes into section 4 (Reconstruction and Errors) where a healthy
dose of criticism and self-criticism is spoke of to both the people and
the party of the time.
And the book concludes with Section 5 (At War Again, 1960-1966) which
goes into the “Vietnam War” most familiar to us already - the war of
U.$. “intervention.”
Overall the book is of an extensive value, Ho Chi Minh’s (Uncle Ho’s)
writings are so difficult to retrieve. Not only does it touch on a
number of socialist fundamentals throughout, but it provides a literary
timeline of the Vietnamese/Annamese struggles not so commonly familiar
to us, restricted to such our-story here in the belly of the beast. More
specifically though, speaking to those of the USW and any and all LOs
(especially) with a revolutionary intent, I recommend the following
readings with great earnest: Letter to Comrades in North Vietnam, Twelve
Recommendations, Instructions Given at the Conference Reviewing the
Second Le Hong Phong Military Campaign, and the Speech Opening the First
Theoretical Course of Nguyen Ai Quoc School.
MIM(Prisons) adds: The Vietnamese struggle was a heroic one that
is still at the forefront of the global anti-imperialist legacy. After
they defeated the imperialists, the most advanced political thinking of
the time did not take hold in Vietnam’s leadership, preventing socialism
from developing. But Ho Chi Minh was a leader of both a revolutionary
United Front and a communist party that successfully fought French and
Amerikan imperialists. The United Front led by the communists in Vietnam
provides an example for national liberation struggles today. We point
readers to a book review of
Ho Chi Minh: A Life for a more complete picture of the history of
the revolution in Vietnam, and the political line of the post-revolution
government.
We are the ones who verbally say the least Comrades who march from
the east Challenging what southerners accept as the norm We rain
on their parade, like an unsuspecting storm
Beyond colors, a nation of one Time is short, so much to be
done Blood and bullets worked in the past Knowledge and education
are meant to last
We are comrades who possess the plan to overthrow and change this
capitalist land The politicians are dangerous to our own Devious
acts we don’t condone
Bogus laws, misled justice If we don’t unite now, they’ll imprison
all of us We fondly believe it’s a tragic fate Unite now, before
it’s too late
Real criminals go free, while we rot in jail In capitalism, even
freedoms are for sale Pen and paper are the weapons to use If we
pull together, we definitely won’t lose
Remove crime and corruption from your sight Standing in solidarity,
it’s our right Each of us harbors a leader deep within Improve
ourselves, but they’ll never permit us to win
To comrades in the state of Tax-us, it’s a wake up plea Even locked
down, we can seek to be free This is national oppression induced by
the man Masking themselves as the Kool Kolored Klan
Grievances are one of the only administrative remedies we have against
unjust treatment and staff misconduct. In Oregon we also have
discrimination complaints, the right to attempt petition, a department
of corrections ombudsman and (any prisoner in any state or federal
facility can also do this next step) the ability to file with no fee a
Department of Justice (DOJ) civil rights complaint.
In Oregon, grievances come with two appeals. Then you have exhausted the
process and can go to further discrimination complaint with one appeal
and then that process is exhausted. Using either/or you can lay the
groundwork for a federal civil suit and meet the requirements of the
1997 Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) providing you exhaust all
administrative remedies available to you. So, you must either exhaust
all of your grievance appeals or discrimination complaint appeals to
file suit. You may not file a grievance and a discrimination complaint
on the same issue. I always advise that you exhaust every grievance and
discrimination complaint so you retain your ability to file suit.
You can file a DOJ civil rights complaint at any time with or without
exhausting either administrative remedy. However, showing you have tried
to address the issue with no satisfaction will help your DOJ complaint.
Always create a paperwork trail. Always!
If you are having ongoing issues of some type, but can A) document a new
incident of the same type has occurred and B) have new information about
the issue, you may file another grievance under OAR 291-019-0140 (6) or
another discrimination complaint under OAR 291-006-0015 (6). However,
expect the grievance coordinator will try and stop you claiming you have
already filed a grievance/discrimination complaint on the same issue
previously. This is one of their tactics to keep you from proving an
issue is persistent and is ongoing. This is currently happening to me at
Two Rivers Correctional Institution. Ms. Reynolds, the grievance
coordinator is stopping valid grievances and discrimination complaints
when I can clearly prove the Oregon administrative rules are being
properly followed.
Always know the rules and laws you are evoking. I suggest you read up on
them and copy them so you can cite them in your grievance/discrimination
complaint process.
If your process is blocked you can take it to the Oregon DOC ombudsman
or internal affairs - or both, to keep the issue alive. Make copies of
everything you do and make sure you have followed all processes to the
letter of rule before you go to this level. As a last resort per OAR
291-107, you can attempt a petition process as well.
You may face uphill battles but if you are going to use the
grievance/discrimination complaint process, so do it right the first
time and be persistent. You may not win but you can keep the struggle
alive.
MIM(Prisons) adds: Information like this is key to push forward
our battle
demanding
our grievances be addressed. We don’t yet have a petition for
Oregon, but for many other states we have petitions prisoners can
request to push this grievance battle on the political front while
filing administrative appeals and working your way into court. For those
states that don’t yet have a petition, request the generic version and
help us customize it to your state.
In the course of my imprisonment at this facility we’ve been on a
perpetual lockdown induced by the administration to conserve the limited
resources and money appropriated to operate the facility. We’re
currently in our cells 24/7 and are only afforded escorted showers every
few days. We have been denied yard, dayroom, phone calls, visits, law
library access, adequate and nutritious food, education, and work.
I recently came in contact with a camarada who referred me to your
organization and I would like to contribute any way I can to unify peace
in prisons. Over the last few months, I’ve organized a campaign to bring
change to our conditions and have been utilizing the administrative
process to seek relief, which has been otherwise unsuccessful and only
brought about the “privilege” of purchasing items from their canteen and
the order of items through package companies who extort our family
members by making them purchase luxury items at a 500%-1000% mark up, so
that their private industry of capitalist pigs can profit from our poor
families. I’m moving for a boycott on such items and to not put any more
money in their fat pockets.
I’ve also been educating those who wish to learn and build up their
minds. Since coming in contact with your
newsletter, I’ve
taken the liberty to expand your mailing list by assisting a few
comrades in contacting you and have shared ULK with comrades
who have been interested.