MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
These “people-incorporating-genocidal-slavery” have upped the ante once
again. I was targeted by these nefarious boars simply for my political
views. On Oct 14, 2012, two ogres searched and seized my property
i.e. all my essays, my books, and all my Under Lock & Key
dated as far back as 1995. At the biased in-house tribunal two articles
from ULK were presented to me: 1) a 1991 Attikkka issue
explaining the situation before and after the rebellion of 1971. 2) The
July/Aug 2012
issue which calls for “all prisoners to show solidarity and
demonstrate a work stoppage from Sept 9-12, 2012.” Keep in mind I never
passed this publication about nor did I participate in a work stoppage.
I have no prison job. Also, the article mentioned above was for Sept
9-12, 2012. I was keep locked pending investigation on Oct 14, 2012.
That’s 35 days later.
Anyway, I was charged with a Tier III rule violation of 104.12
(demonstration) which reads: “an inmate shall not lead, organize,
participate in or urge other inmates to participate in a work stoppage,
sit-in, lock-in, or any other action which may be detrimental to the
order of the facility.”
At the farce hearing I presented the question: “where in the facility
was there an actual work stoppage?” The response was: “There was no work
stoppage.” My second question was: “when did I urge other prisoners to
demonstrate and when did the alleged work stoppage, sit-in, lock-in take
place?” The response was: “you never participated in nor was there ever
a work stoppage, sit-in, lock-in.” With no further questions I objected
to the entire circus of a hearing only to receive six months SHU time
anyway. This whole ordeal is due to me possessing ULK
publications, although they can’t actually state it at the hearing.
Furthermore, the hearing disposition reads: “although no actual act of
demonstration occurred I believed you attempted it.” Only after a cell
search 35 days later, and after an incident that never took place, do I
receive such a bogus charge. Go figure.
This isn’t the first political witch hunt in which I was erroneously
charged with demonstrations and it won’t be the last! These ruthless
gulags pride themselves on oppressing the free thinkers like me,
especially Attikkka! Keep sending me the Under Lock and Key.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We have heard from a number of comrades
that the article calling for a
Day
of Solidarity on September 9 led to heightened censorship and
punishment of prisoners. We know that there are restrictions on the
types of organizing permitted in many prisons and we are looking closely
at the language used in these types of articles to make possible the
widest distribution of ULK without sacrificing the content of
the publication.
A comrade from another trench spoke once on leadership and what it means
to h: “The answer is that like it or not, people who collect
information, analyze and then make decisions on what is true and not
true, are leaders. People who do not are not leaders.”(1)
Sensory deprivation in solitary confinement creates an inability to make
decisions because information flow is very nearly cut off. Another way
this bourgeois imperialist society stops leaders in their tracks is by
making one’s decisions, after analyzing information, seem off, to seem
crazy or “mentally ill.”
“Another problem relevant to revolutionaries is they have a more
intellectual tendency to describe reality independently of the socially
acceptable way of so doing. The individual is one who feels manipulated
and controlled by outside forces, and is aware of the limitations of his
individuality and room for maneuver… he gives himself importance, and
does not care what others think, or at least feels that to care about
that won’t help him to live. He tends to see himself as good and others
as wicked.”(2)
Prisoners, prison abolitionists and anti-imperialists of all stripes are
familiar with the above mindset. It is a mindset that’s a prerequisite
to successful prolonged struggle against entrenched anti-people systems.
Hegemonic propaganda that pigs use to uphold the superstructure
inculcates the majority of citizens to turn on non-mainstream
individuals. I’m positive some reading these words will be shocked to
hear the above quote is the bourgeois definition of schizophrenia.
Comrade Huey P. Newton, Minister of Defense of the
Black
Panther Party, was labeled mentally ill by prison administrators,
cops and non-revolutionary whites. His leadership ability of
disseminating truths gleaned from study posed such a threat to
capitalist hegemony that he had to be discredited by the label “crazy.”
In prison, pigs forced Newton to visit a psychiatrist. He had this to
say:
“From the minute I entered his office I made my position clear. I told
him that I had no faith or confidence in psychological tests because
they were not designed to relate to the culture of poor and oppressed
people. I was willing to talk to him, I said, but I would not submit to
any testing. As we talked, he started running games on me. For instance,
in the midst of our conversation he would try to speak in psychological
questions such as ‘do you feel people are persecuting you?’ Each time he
did this I told him I would not submit to any sort of testing, and if he
persisted I was going to leave the room. The psychiatrist insisted that
I had a bias against psychological testing. He was correct.”(3)
Mental illness is just a form of social control. Just the same as
“corrections” and “spreading democracy” are forms of social control. I
believe the prison system uses mental health jackets, and society in
general tags people as “just plain crazy,” to break revolutionary’s
self-esteem, leadership skills and family connections. When something as
large as koncentration kamps throws its weight into convincing people’s
mothers, fathers and sisters that said person is nuts, it’s a short walk
away from these individuals actually becoming insane with lack of
“free-world” support.
Their tactics are to divide and conquer by pasting “schizophrenic,”
“depressed” and “anti-social” tags on the foreheads of revolutionary
genius. They psychotropically castrate and lobotomize mind-washed
leaders into their people’s own genocide.
I could leave prison by consenting to swallow my own destruction. I
could leave solitary if “all I did” was snitch for them. Most of my
family’s gone because they believe I’m insane. Forty-six letters sit
unmailed because I lack postage. After filing two lawsuits, the Prison
Litigation Reform Act bleeds 60% of the $25 a month my dear poor
grandmother sends. She could have retired this year, but with all her
grandsons in chains.
FDR 25 is a kkkontrol unit policy which I have filed suit on. A policy
deputy director for administration Mike Haddon states:
“The policy you are requesting is FDR 25, Intensive Management Unit, it
states ‘mail, other than first class, privileged and/or religious shall
not be allowed for inmates on intensive management and includes
newspapers, books, magazines, pamphlets, brochures, etc.’ This policy’s
release could reasonably be expected to jeopardize the Utah Department
of Corrections hence it is protected. If this information were to be
released into the system, inmates could use that information to fight
policy. We do not let that chapter out to anyone who isn’t in law
enforcement. Your request for a copy of the 78 page policy is,
therefore, denied.”
A policy that prevents people from collecting information, receiving
information and analyzing said information, coupled with the
unconstitutional fact that the Utah DOC doesn’t provide a law library
per supreme court ruling Bivens, halts the ability for captives
to “describe reality independently” of that policy. Since only pigs can
know that policy, we can’t fight it.
Even if I could know it and struggle with it and beat it in court I’d
just be labelled “mentally ill,” more so than I am now. And this is the
purpose of sensory deprivation and mental illness: halting revolutionary
leadership and maintaining the status quo. Stopping information and
throwing dirty jackets on truth.
Who does bourgeois psychiatry serve by destroying oppressed peoples? The
oppressor nation. What types of people are being killed off in these
concentration camps? The oppressed nations. What population turns a
blind eye to this reality, or even worse, that the Third World is
parceled up and packaged for First World consumer consumption? The
oppressor nation. What nation must be organized to defeat the oppressor
nation? And if we wish to succeed shouldn’t we discern friend from foe?
“The job of psychiatrist [and those that subscribe to bourgeois
psychiatry] must be abolished [and reeducated after repenting oppressive
policy, genocidal injustice and terroristic ‘spreading of democracy’],
if only because it is corrupting to the truth to have a profession of
people [or nation] making money by constructing various vague illnesses
[vague reasons for war or psychotropics/institutionalization] that
people have. Instead, all oppressed people and progressive-minded people
must take up the science of controlling their own destinies.”(4)
MIM(Prisons) adds: Just as physical violence is used against the
oppressed as a means of control and installing fear, so is psychological
violence. So when we think about promoting safety in prisons, we cannot
do that without addressing psychological violence as well. Often that is
the predominate form of violence used against revolutionaries. Our
approach to this must be twofold in terms of helping comrades survive
the torture they currently face in U.$. gulags, and to put an end to
that torture altogether to really ensure people are safe. It is for this
reason that we reviewed and distribute portions of the
recently
revised Survivors Manual from the American Friends Service
Committee. Our Serve
the People Programs, such as our Free Political Literature for
Prisoners Program and University BARS study groups exist for all
prisoners, but are especially important for keeping those in isolation
engaged, active and sane. All comrades should support these programs
with money and labor, while comrades on the inside should keep the issue
of long-term isolation at the forefront of the general struggle for
prisoner rights.
I recently read about the “agreement to end hostilities” and seen this
as an essential step forward for prisoners but a step that will include
many more steps in the future if prisoners are to truly take back our
humynity not just in California but in prisons across the United $tates.
Although I support the original five demands and will continue to do so
along with any future demands for justice I felt the need to add to the
dialogue and perhaps bring some other ideas to the scene. What I noticed
from the five demands and many other proposals being kicked around is
the absence of the very core of our oppression - the SHU itself. What we
have learned since the initial strike was that many civil rights groups
and people around the world see the SHU itself as torture, all or most
of what is being asked for i.e. contact visits, phone calls, cellies
etc. can be granted were it not for SHU. Even things like validation and
debriefing etc. become easier to combat when the SHU is out of the
picture so it is the SHU itself that becomes the kernel of our
oppression in regards to the prison movement in general and the current
struggle we are facing in Pelican Bay. This is why any proposals should
have at the forefront the demand to close the SHUs! How can we talk of
justice or prisoner rights without calling for an end to housing
prisoners for any reason in these concentration camps? It’s like saying
“you can water board me but can we listen to a better radio station
while you do it?” No other country is doing what Amerika does with the
SHU on this scale but it is ultimately up to us whether we steer the
prison movement on a real path of transformation or limit any changes to
what amount to mild reforms.
Many struggles throughout history that dealt with prisoners gained far
more than what has currently been proposed in our situation. A couple of
situations that quickly come to mind are the Puerto Rican revolutionary
group Macheteros who were arrested in the 1960s for acts against Amerika
in their quest for independence. Well it came out via Freedom of
Information Act years later that the national security advisor was on
record saying the Macheteros should be released because of the protests
and support and how these protests do not look good for Amerika in the
eyes of the world. This is on record and the Macheteros were released.
They were released from prison and linked to bombings and other acts
against the U.$. Government
Another group of prisoners were the Red Army Faction of Germany who were
in prison for acts against the government; bombings, cop killings,
murders of politicians, etc. When this group was arrested they were
housed in a specially constructed area of the prison - kinda like the
short corridor - and were in solitary confinement and not allowed to
come in any contact with any other prisoners but through hunger strikes
and supporters out in society raising awareness about their treatment
they were finally granted yard time with each other and better treatment
after a year or two of constant struggle. My main thrust here is that if
those who were assassinating government officials, judges etc., in an
attempt to overthrow the government were able to overturn the isolation
and draconian treatment surely we can as well!
In beginning to grapple with our oppression and find the best method of
resistance we must first understand the origins of our oppression. One
cannot move forward with a correct game plan without knowing ones
opponent. When a boxer is about to fight a formidable opponent what does
he/she do? Well they watch the videos of the opponents fights in order
to understand the opponents strengths and weaknesses thus preparing
oneself for a proper offensive. We must also do our homework on this
current anti-SHU struggle, things like where the SHU came from, why is
it used so much by Amerika - more so than in other countries, who
controls such a system? We must identify our opponent if we want to more
forward.
We know the SHU and all prisons are a part of the “state” apparatus, but
who controls the state? The ruling class is not including the people
(the poor people) it is the rich who run things. These rich, or
capitalists, have developed into what Lenin defined as “imperialism”
which is simply capitalism on steroids, it is economic exploitation on a
global scale. So the state and thus prisons are run according to what is
in the interest of this ruling class. Prisoners in general are not
profitable to this ruling class as most prisoners derive from what Lenin
defined as the “lumpen proletariat” which is basically the underclass or
can better be defined in the United $tates as simply the “Lumpen” which
are prisoners, the unemployed, those caught up in crime, etc. Most
lumpen don’t work or pay taxes so to the ruling class the lumpen are
just taking up space and not helping the wheels turn in the economy. But
more importantly, the lumpen are a potential revolutionary force as this
is the natural order of repression inviting resistance. Whenever one is
being smothered the natural reaction is to struggle to breathe. Our acts
of resistance in the 2011 strikes clearly proved this to be true.
There are many phenomenon that occur that are long held communist
principles that may be practiced today by many prisoners without ever
knowing their origins. We must use these tools to gain victory in our
current situation, one such tool is historical materialism which is used
to transform things in the material world. It does this by understanding
historical events and processes which created a specific reality. In our
current struggle in order to change or transform our torture conditions
in SHU we would first have to understand the process of what brought the
SHU itself to be created. When we understand it was the state and
ultimately the ruling class which created the means to throw away vast
swaths of the population and smother any embers of resistance then we’ll
know we won’t change things simply by picketing around a prison or
filing a lawsuit because we are up against something more sinister than
simply “tough laws.” Marxism is a method not dogma and so it is fluid
and continues to find new responses in its interactions with the
material world, so it will continue to be applied to different
phenomenon. Although asking the state for changes is cool and must be
done, the more crucial change must come from within one’s own approach
to our oppression, we are deprived of so much but the most vital
opportunities are low hanging fruit, these being opportunities in the
theoretical realm. The truth is we can’t “change the system” and by
system I mean capitalist Amerika which runs prisons and SHUs, it is all
in the state apparatus so it is one and the same - in prison lingo it is
one “car.” We can’t change the system we must rip it out by its roots,
dismantle it in order for true change to occur. To really believe we can
change this system is to take a stance as the democrats who think change
comes out of the voting system via reforms.
The task we have ahead of all of us held in U.$. prisons is a real
uphill battle that is in sync - even if we don’t realize it - with many
other struggles aimed at the U.$. empire not just in the United $tates
but globally. While our effort is different in many ways, we should face
this effort like a guerrilla war. Rather than a passive state, guerrilla
warfare is a combination of defense and offense in our pursuit of
victory but our initial victory should be to unmask the brutal
dictatorship of the state and deny it the ability to operate cloaked in
secrecy. Let us strip it bare and display its most grotesque parts to
society. In doing this let every dungeon where conditions have peaked to
intolerable proportions raise the banner of resistance in regards to
material conditions, in this way we will expose the contradictions in
“American democracy” while obtaining small gains to our conditions. What
occurs in our living conditions is worse than what we even realize. Even
though most have grown accustomed to SHU, it is not norma. People are
social animals. Our entire existence as people is to interact with
others, our senses demand this, it is a dialectic which exists on
reacting to people and the environment and when all sensory input is
deprived it works against our very being, i.e. it destroys us,
dehumanizes us.
Lastly, although I would of course always like to hear editors of
publications ramble about what some have referred to as “commie
rhetoric” I would much rather hear a prisoner’s perspective on communist
principles or how they apply to the prison movement in general or the
anti-SHU struggle in particular. But one cannot discuss “prisoner
rights” without discussing prisoner oppression and thus what is behind
prisoner oppression (capitalism). Today’s society profit is put ahead of
the people as far as education, food, land, etc and thus crime rises
then our next natural step is finding an alternative society where
prisons and SHUs are not used as concentration camps. The only society
that would really truly change the system is a socialist system – to
deny this is to deny history.
We can’t afford for prisoners to sacrifice their lives because
self-appointed vanguards refuse to do a little philosophic/scientific
homework and make a few minor adjustments to our current path. We’re
pursuing what is essentially a tactical issue of reforming the
validation process as if it were a strategic resolution to abolishing
social-extermination of indefinite isolation. This is not a complex
issue to understand, and it requires a minimal amount of study at most
to understand that the validation process is secondary and is a policy
external to the existence of the isolation facilities. It’s not
difficult to comprehend that external influences create the conditions
for change but real qualitative change comes from within, and to render
the validation process, program failure, the new step down program, etc,
obsolete, and end indefinite isolation, requires an internal
transformation of the isolation facilities (SHU and Ad-Seg) themselves.
Otherwise, in practice, social extermination retains continuity under a
new external label. Appearance is reformed, hence the suffix “re”, while
the essential composition (contradictions) is unchanged. Do you fix a
bad motor on a car by altering its appearance with a new paint job? It
might look nice, but it’s still the same motor.
I don’t know if these “representatives” are just refusing to consider
anything else, if they are making a conscious decision to hear the sound
of their own voices only, or if they believe that to acknowledge a need
for course adjustments will discredit them. They hold power in here, but
it’s a power held through threat of force, and most youngsters aspire to
this, or those who don’t, understandably keep their mouths zipped.
Either way, because of this power, they’re not used to hearing the
truth, but praise form the brown-nosers who tell them what they think
they want to hear and tell them what will benefit them. This only
hinders the accuracy of their analysis. This refusal to be more
receptive and adjust course where necessary based on an application of
dialectical materialism is going to cost us lives pursuing an incorrect
course. Our victories are superficial and exist more in appearance than
anything. They are privileges, rights that we already had coming to us,
so what appears as a victory is really implementing our established
rights (abstractly anyhow), without actually making essential progress.
It’s a vehicle to distract us without actually conceding essential
transformations. And these are, and will be, reversible.
Although it is dangerous, and all it takes is for the current so-called
reps to openly denounce any true vanguard, all others will accept this
proclamation, and the true vanguard will be discredited and hit first
opportunity. So a true vanguard must tread very carefully to build large
scale support with their ideas and education. But what’s of greatest
importance, it must be done in the interest of all! As we, you and I,
know, a vanguard is not someone, a program, philosophic logic, etc, that
appoints itself, it is the most advanced line and it must be
complemented with a corresponding practice. As Lenin and Joe Steel said,
“there can be no theory there can be no movement” Just as a “movement is
necessary to develop theory upon.” Obviously, I’m paraphrasing but the
point is evident.
I’m convinced we need to circulate a few pamphlets that serve an
educational purpose, but more importantly, function as an outline. And
if necessary, appeal to convict mass to launch our own hunger strike,
one or two at a time. Write up our own list of demands - tables in each
pod, phones, bars, cellies, dayroom time for social intercourse, demands
that can all be achieved by a victorious struggle for “association”
based on U.S. constitutional rights and UN Geneva conventions (for
publicity). To implement “association” (social intercourse) would
necessitate the peripheral demands above and thus qualitatively change
the isolation units from within as we currently know them.
MIM(Prisons) responds: Control Units are isolation cells within
prisons where people are confined to small cells for long periods of
time. Control units are a common tool of repression throughout the
Amerikan prison system, frequently used to target prisoners who are
actively fighting for their rights. They target Black, Latino and
indigenous people who are a disproportionate part of control unit
populations.
As a part of our ongoing
campaign to
shut down the control units, we fight for reforms to give our
comrades in indefinite isolation some improved conditions, especially
when these reforms are focused on better enabling their political study
and organizing. We recognize that some reforms may mean the difference
between physical or mental health or serious illness. But we agree with
this author that we need to fight the attempts by proponents of the
criminal injustice system to paint a happy face on long-term isolation
and call that “reform.” It is only by ending long term isolation
completely will we actually win this battle.
On 9 September 2012 at Everglades Correctional Institution, FLDOC,
individual members of The Blood Nation honored the soldiers of Attica by
doing one or more of the following: fasting, boycotting the
canteen/commissary, accepting chow hall trays and dumping them, and
explaining why. Also participating individually were one or more members
of the following (in alphabetical order): Black Gangsta Disciples; Crip
Nation; Insane Gangsta Disciples; Almighty Latin King Queen Nation;
Nation of Islam; Spanish Cobras; Shi’a Muslim Community; Sufi Community.
My apologies to anyone I missed. It was a small step at a spot with no
history of unity, but even a single drop of water in a dry glass makes
it wet. Respect to those who made the sacrifice, those who joined us
midday, those who expressed interest the day after. I’m as human as
anyone, but let’s TRY to remember who the enemy is!
For the past three days now. these weak and wicked scum dogs have been
attempting to get us Black prisoners Black to viciously attack a brother
by telling us he’s a “child molester/sex offender.” All this after the
prisoner filed a few complaints against these wart hogs. Go figure. This
of course caused these brain dead compromising prisoners, especially the
porters, to exclude themselves from the brother. The pig gave direct
orders to the white feed up porter to “don’t feed him shit.”
After two days of this torture, the prisoner attempted to sign in to
Protective Custody in hopes that he could get away from the pigs and
make it home in one piece, as he has less than 30 days left. The people
incorporating genocidal slavery (P.I.G.S.) weren’t satisfied and decided
to up the ante. They told the brother he was moving to another cell
block and to pack up his property. Once on the front of the C-Block
33/34 companies the prisoner placed his bags down and was cracked over
his head by a white prisoner holding a 4 inch broom handle, in the
presence of six pigs, 2 in the bubble, 2 on the staircase and 2 on the
companies.
Making sense of the white man’s fakery to jump him, the brother began
backing up towards the rear of the company, dodging several swings with
his arms as the attacking prisoner aimed at his face. Keep in mind the
pigs are laughing and allowing the white prisoner to assault the brother
with a weapon. Both companies are watching it all play out through the
side of the cell doors and mirrors. One brother said “you might as well
fight them, they (pigs) are gonna jump on you anyway.” But he kept
saying “nah, I ain’t stupid, I’m trying to go home to my son!” Finally,
the pigs told the white prisoner to “put the handle down and go kick his
ass, he’s scared.” Feeling comfortable with his “support team” the white
prisoner started towards the rear to fight the brother. But the white
prisoner got his ass beat. Of course, this was such a disturbing scene
for the pigs, just seeing a white man in their back pocket taking blows
from a Black fist caused them to quickly pull the pin alarm and call 30
more pigs to C-Block as they yelled “get the fuck off him now!”
The brother got up and locked himself inside his cell while the white
prisoner, all pink and red in the face, was dazed and confused was asked
by the pigs, “are you alright?” before politely telling him to “go to
your cell.” All the while the brother was put in handcuffs, roughed up,
and rushed out the block into the hallway where the pigs beat us up out
of view, but we can all hear it. Later on the pigs came back on the
company to the white prisoner’s cell giving him one of the brother’s
dreds that they ripped out of his head. Somewhat of a token of
remembrance, just like they did to Nat Turner in 1831. Make no mistake
about it, this is Amerikkka in 2012 for the Black man. This is exactly
what George Jackson was describing in Soledad Brother. Tomorrow
is the 41st anniversary that he was slain in action, and the 181st
anniversary of Nat Turner’s slave rebellion. Nothing much has changed.
In hindsight and conclusion, when the pig was trying to get us to feed
the lie that the brother was a “Rapo,” he made a profound statement. The
target of harassment said “these pigs been raping our women for hundreds
of years and you gonna believe him and his words on face value!?” Enough
said!
MIM(Prisons) adds: This comrade is right to point out that the
oppressors will do everything they can to divide the oppressed. We can’t
trust them for information, but instead must judge our comrades through
their actions. Those who work in the interests of the oppressed are our
friends and those who work against the oppressed are our enemies,
regardless of the reason for their confinement or what other people say
about them. This is a good example of why someone might ask to be moved
to an SNY/PC yard for good reason. The
debate
over protective custody prisoners has been ongoing in ULK
for many months and MIM(Prisons) maintains that we can not let the
prisoncrats divide revolutionaries with false labels and categories.
There are genuine revolutionaries throughout the prison system and there
are snitches and compradors found on every yard as well. Actions are
much more important than prison-imposed labels.
Manuel Angel Diaz
Pig brutality is once again on display for the world to see after
outraged protests erupted following the murder of 25-year-old Manuel
Diaz in the city of Anaheim, CA by police this weekend.
Pigs claim that the murder of Diaz was justified and only prompted by
Diaz after he supposedly ran away from them and reached for his
waistband. The neighbors and family members of Diaz who witnessed the
execution tell a different story however. They say that while Diaz did
indeed run away from police, at no time whatsoever did he reach for his
waistband as police claim. No gun was even recovered from the scene,
according to the pigs themselves.
This is the sixth officer-involved shooting for the Anaheim Police
Department this year. That’s including that second life to be claimed by
Anaheim police not more than 24 hrs after the death of Diaz in which
pigs stated that they indeed retrieved a gun near the body of the second
victim of police violence, as if to say, “See? We only shoot when we
have to.”
The neighborhood was justifiably outraged as they demanded answers and
vented their anger on killer cops, but the pigs were having none of it.
Feeling “threatened” as they always do, the pigs responded the only way
they know how – with violence!
When the protesters refused to disperse, non-lethal weapons were fired
on wimmin and children, and an attack dog was set loose on an occupied
baby stroller . The pigs then had the audacity to claim that their dog
“got loose” from the patrol car. The entire scene was caught on a camera
phone if anyone cares to see.
Immediately thereafter, coconut lackey and self-proclaimed community
activist Dr. Jose Moreno publicly regretted to the local media that the
community resorted to violence while simultaneously calling for
transparency from the police.
The entire attack was caught on tape. How much more transparency do you
need? We know that no amount of transparency in the world will ever keep
sadistic pigs or their attack dogs on the leash, because that’s exactly
what they’re there for, to be set loose on the oppressed like the rabid
dogs that they are!
How quick were the pigs to shoot rubber bullets at wimmin and children
of brown skin color in Anaheim this weekend? Yet how many rubber bullets
were shot at all the
Occupy
movements combined this year? What was the proportion of violence
and how much restraint was practiced with respect to the former and the
latter? I’m sure that if the numbers are calculated we will see a gross
discrepancy of violence.
The “diversity” of the Olympics highlights the unity of imperialist
nations, while hiding their predatory role in other nations.
The 2012 London Olympics are almost upon us and the world waits, holds
their breath even, in anticipation of this most glorious of events which
will surely decide what country can lay claim to the best athletes bar
none.
But take a closer look and you’ll see that the Olympics are in all
actuality nothing more than bourgeois propaganda; a multifaceted
cultural and ideological weapon of the international bourgeoisie in
which they pretend that the world isn’t divided into oppressor and
oppressed nations. Through the institution of the Olympics the
international bourgeoisie seeks to make us believe that the entire humyn
species is all living in harmony as equal members of one big happy
family, and that the nations of the world co-exist peacefully as if all
are members of one big “global village” with the exception of some
“rogue states.” Nothing however could be further form the truth! Part of
that truth being that the Olympics are really just another synonym for
this “global village” construct, a construct used to white-wash reality.
The term and concept of what the petty-bourgeoisie ideologues have
deemed “global village” and what the big bourgeoisie have in turn
labeled more correctly as “globalization” can be more appropriately
elaborated and defined as “…a supra class, supranational and
universalist process of irresistible all around homogenization of the
world under the auspices of monopoly capitalism, through the
multilateral agencies (United Nations (UN), International Monetary Fund
(IMF), World Bank (WB/IBRD) and World Trade Organization (WTO)) and the
multinational or transnational firms and banks.”(1)
But this ain’t no nit-wit critique of the process of globalization per
the mythical “99%,” who aren’t 99% of anything but more like part of the
top 13% of the richest people in the world!(2) No, this is a critique of
the “global village” construct which has its origin rooted in
petty-bourgeois ideology just like the “99%,” and which is but a
rephrasing of that same process of “globalization” from the
international bourgeoisie, as if both the exploiters and exploited are
all in the global struggle for humynity together! But we communists know
this construct and its material reality by its original name:
imperialism!
As previously stated, the Olympics don’t just serve to gloss over
national and class contradictions on a global scale. They also serve as
an extension and propagation of bourgeois ideology a la “human nature,”
i.e. that always inherent drive to compete.
Indeed, the Olympics serve to keep both the masses of the world and the
more progressive wing of the enemy population distracted from the harsh
reality of imperialist society (as do professional sports in general).
The reality is that the imperialists are on a global rampage in which
they’re voraciously and ruthlessly raping and plundering the oppressed
people of the world and their national territories, i.e. Latin America,
Africa and Asia (the Third World). The lie that is the concept of the
“global village” exaggerates “…the coherence of the world capitalist
system to the point of glossing over the distinction of national modes
of production”(1) and its main proponents are in the oppressor states:
the industrialized and ethnologically developed countries, the First
World, principally the United $tates.
Furthermore, “globalization”/imperialism pretends that the dismantling
of national barriers to the operation of capital markets and finance
capital brings progress to the Third World or “developing economies”
whilst the idealistic and naive petty-bourgeoisie of both the
imperialist countries and the Third World believe it. But the truth of
the matter is that the “…counterproductive character of neocolonialism
is the result of imperialist financing for the overproduction of raw
materials and some manufactures for the consumption of the capitalist
countries and the upper classes in the underdeveloped countries since
the 70s.”(1)
On top of this, the popularization of the global village concept isn’t
just done by the bourgeoisie. This fake global concept is even
propagated by so-called “communists” principally in the First World thru
the guise of revisionist trickery!
On the one hand we have the barefaced bourgeoisie who uses these
concepts to deny Lenin’s formulation of imperialism and proletarian
revolution, saying that it belongs to the past and that the current
neocolonial system is a “post-imperialist phenomenon,” as if imperialism
and all its tools of oppression and exploitation have all but withered
away!
On the other hand we have the so-called and sometimes self-proclaimed
“Maoists” in the First World who are really nothing but
crypto-Trotskyists that spread the false notion, correctly criticized by
MIM, that “…the world proletarian revolution can only be the result of a
simplified struggle between a globally united monopoly bourgeoisie and
the world proletariat and that the total collapse of the unified
imperialism is impending despite the current state of the subjective
forces of the revolution in the world.”(1)
We must take the time to study and analyze the world around us and its
history thru the historical materialist perspective and from the point
of view of the oppressed and exploited Third World masses. We need to
look at the two great socialist projects of the 20th century. The first
was born from the First World War and strong proletarian leadership, and
the second was born of the Second World War and strong peasant backing
which gave further credence and elaboration to the importance of
national liberation and the correct theory that socialism can only be
accomplished one country at a time, of which the establishment of the
USSR should have proved to the muddle-headed. This study makes clear
that the global village/globalization concept that the bourgeoisie uses
to deceive the masses and the world is the same theory the revisionists
use to accomplish the aims of their bourgeois brethren.
So when you’re watching the Olympics this summer remember two things: 1)
The world isn’t one big happy family. It is divided into oppressor and
oppressed nations. This is the principal contradiction on a world scale,
while the fundamental contradiction on a world scale is the bourgeoisie
vs. the proletariat. The Olympics are nothing but the vain attempts of
the international bourgeoisie, and imperialist states to whom they are
bound, to cover up national and class contradictions and to white-wash
reality so that we will confuse the true prize of national liberation,
self-determination and complete emancipation from the imperialists for
gold medals. 2) Just as the global village construct of the
petty-bourgeoisie that dominates that class is a myth and a lie, so is
the global village thesis of the crypto-Trotskyists (simultaneous world
revolution) which they’ve specifically tailored to their purposes. It is
an ideological weapon of the revisionists used to fool the oppressed
nations within U.$. borders into believing that we need not seek
national liberation and self-determination for ourselves because
according to them all nationalism is bourgeois in essence and “the whole
world comes first!”
Lenin, Stalin and Mao all took clear positions on the national question
which was liberty at its core; so why can’t the First World
“communists”? Ask yourself this, go into deep thought, study the
question and you will be enlightened ten-fold.
As we convene our third congress, we approach our five year anniversary
as an organization. While members of MIM(Prisons) – and even more so USW
– have been in the prison movement for longer, we find this an opportune
milestone to reflect back on where the prison movement is at and how it
has developed.
In 2011 a series of hunger strikes in California made a great impact
countrywide. Many activists, from crypto-trots to anarchists to
reformists, rallied around this movement and continue to focus on prison
work as a result. While our predecessors in MIM saw the importance of
the prison movement decades ago, their foresight is proving more true
today as we begin to reach a critical mass of activity. It is now a hot
issue within the left wing of white nationalism, which is significant
because whites are not affected by the system extensively enough to call
it a true material interest.
This gradual development has been the result of two things: agitation
around the facts of the U.$. injustice system on the outside, and
prisoner organizing on the inside, both of which MIM and USW have been
diligently working on for decades. In the last year and a half, prisoner
organizing came to a head with the Georgia strike and the
California
hunger strikes, which were both coordinated on a statewide level.
While getting some mainstream and international attention, these events
rang particularly loud among the imprisoned, with a series of similar
actions still developing across the country (recently in Virginia,
Ohio,
Texas,
Illinois,
the federal supermax ADX, Limon in Colorado and a follow-up hunger
strike in Georgia).
Meanwhile, the agitational side of things came to a bit of a head with
the release of the book
The
New Jim Crow last year. This book has continued to get lots of play
from many different sectors of the political spectrum. And while in most
cases those promoting the book are amenable to the lackluster
conclusions, the organization of these facts into a book stand for
themselves. It requires a very biased viewpoint to read this book and
then turn around and deny the national oppression faced by the internal
semi-colonies through the U.$. injustice system. Therefore we think the
overall effect of this book will be both progressive and significant,
despite its limitations.
It is for these reasons that we see this as a moment to seize. When we
started five years ago we had the great fortune of building on the
legacy and existing prisoner support programs of MIM. The ideological
foundation that MIM gave us allowed us to focus our energies on more
practical questions of launching a new prison publication, building
support programs for comrades that are released, developing
correspondence political study programs, and launching a new website
that features the most comprehensive information on censorship, mail
rules, and abuses in prisons across this country.
With our infrastructure built and steadily running, we need to look at
ways to take advantage of the relative consciousness of prisoners right
now and the relative attention the U.$. population has on the prison
system. We have always said that without prisoners organized there is no
prison movement, so we see that as the principal prong of attack. Thus,
we are taking steps to improve the structure of United Struggle from
Within (USW), the mass organization for prisoners that was founded by
MIM and is now led by MIM(Prisons). Building on suggestions from some
leaders in USW, we have enacted a plan to form councils in states where
there are multiple active USW cells. Below we further explain an
organizational structure for our movement, so comrades know where they
fit in and how they should be relating to others.
As we saw during the California strikes, censorship increases, as do
other repressive measures, when organization expands. So as we step up
our efforts, we can expect the state to step up theirs. We will need
more support than ever from volunteers on the outside to do legal and
agitational work to keep the state faithful to their own laws and
regulations.
As big as those challenges are, the internal challenges will be even
greater hurdles for us to jump in the coming years. The recent large
mobilizations have begun to reveal what these challenges will be. And
there is much work to be done to identify, analyze and work to resolve
the contradictions within the prisoner population that allows for the
current conditions where the state dictates how these vast populations
of oppressed people interact with each other and live out their lives.
The prison movement that arose before the great prison boom that began
in the 1980s was a product of the national liberation struggles
occurring at the time. Today, the prison population is ten times as big,
while the political leadership on the outside is scarce. The prison
masses must guard against the great number of misleaders out there
opportunistically grabbing on to the issue of the day to promote
political goals that do not serve the oppressed people of the world.
Prisoners may need to step up to play the leading role this time around,
which will require looking inward. We must not only learn from the past,
but also build independent education programs to develop the skills of
comrades today to conduct their own analysis of the conditions that they
face. On top of that we must promote and develop an internationalist
worldview, to find answers and alliances in the oppressed nations around
the world, and remove the blinders that keep us only focused on Amerika.
There is no liberation to be found in Amerikanism. That Amerikans have
created a prison system that dwarfs all others in humyn history is just
one example of why.
So it is with cautious optimism that we approved the resolution below at
our recent congress. We think this plan addresses proposals submitted by
some USW leaders, and hope you all will work with us to make this an
effective structure.
Congress Resolution on USW Structure
MIM(Prisons) is initiating the creation of statewide councils within
United Struggle from Within (USW), the anti-imperialist mass
organization for prisoners. A council will be sanctioned when two or
more cells exist within a state that are recognized as active and
abiding by the standards of USW. MIM(Prisons) will facilitate these
councils, where the focus is on practical organizing around the needs of
the imprisoned lumpen in that state. As the U.$. prison system is
primarily organized by state, the councils will serve to develop and
address the specific needs and conditions within each state.
In the case where cells have identities other than “USW” we do not
require them to use that name. For example, the
Black
Order Revolutionary Organization, which self-identifies as a “New
Afrikan revolutionary movement,” may be invited to participate in a USW
statewide council. While USW itself does not favor the struggles of any
oppressed nation over another, as a movement we recognize the usefulness
and importance of nation-specific organizing. In the prison environment
there may be lines that cannot be crossed in current conditions which
limit the membership of a group. As long as these cells exhibit true
internationalism and anti-imperialism they may possess dual membership
in USW by joining a statewide council.
With this proposal we are expanding the structure of our movement. We
recognize two main pillars to the ideological leadership of our movement
at this time. One being the MIM(Prisons) cell, and the other being the
Under Lock & Key writers group, which is made up of USW
members and led by and facilitated by MIM(Prisons). The statewide
councils should look to these two groups for ideological guidance in
their organizing work, mainly through the pages of Under Lock &
Key. In contrast, the councils’ main function will be in practical
work directly serving the interests of the imprisoned lumpen. They will
serve to coordinate the organizing work of scattered USW cells in a more
unified way across the state.
MIM(Prisons) will be initiating the California Council immediately, with
others to follow as conditions allow.
Recently I received notice of change to regulations number 12-03,
publication date 25 May 2012, effective date 10 May 2012, that is said
to affect sections 3000, 3375 and 3375.6. It states the California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) seeks to establish
requirements for an automated needs assessment tool to be used to place
prisoners in programs that would aid their re-entry to society and
reduce their chances of reoffending by identifying the criminogenic
needs of offenders.
The presentation appears to be harmless, but it is not harmless for
those ignorant enough to boast about their gang involvement, family
criminality, and other sensitive factors that will become readily
available and quickly cross-referenced and correlated with information
contained in intelligence files. In addition, the information gained
from the compass core assessment official record can be used as an
“administrative determinate” under 15 CCR 3375.2(b)(11) in addition to
3375.3 (9)(4)(A) & (B) which is the foundation not only for
validation but for intelligence analysts.
Issuing a list of demands to prisoncrats telling them what their
validation process should be is ludicrous, as is the idea of telling
your body when it should have the urge to excrete. Cats are quick to
want to make demands without any leverage, though prisoners no matter
where they are confined, have economic leverage that they are not
willing to exercise because cookies are of more immediate import.
Since the 1880s the concept of boycotting, or organizing to engage in a
concerted refusal to have dealings with prison/jail stores or
commissaries, has been a very powerful tool. In California it deprives
the CDCR of a source of revenue. It also affects the bottom line of
prison profiteers, whose profits are guaranteed by what amounts to cash
transactions for hundreds of millions in profits and revenues, courtesy
of prisoners who lack the will to sacrifice luxuries for a while in
order to exercise necessary economic leverage, to compel some
administrative change.
Prisoners in California should remember that canteen goods originally
were purchased at wholesale prices and then marked up 10% and the
proceeds over the costs and expenses went into the prisoner welfare fund
to finance many programs and activities that benefited prisoners. This
changed with the rise of Pete Wilson, the governor who used prisoner
welfare funds to help finance a re-election bid which opened the flood
gates for all sorts of misuse of the foundational purpose of the
prisoner welfare fund.
The validation process is a means of control and manipulation that I
have noted that some general population prisoners and sensitive needs
yard (SNY/PC) prisoners embrace as a sort of badge of honor, only to
belatedly find out the effects. In ULK 26an
Oregon prisoner points to the most significant problems with the
divisive nature in the development of LOs who are in competition with
each other.
It’s common for me to hear cats hollering that they are Blood this,
Blood that. Crip this or Crip that, Norteño, Southsider, Bulldog, skin
head, nazi, etc., trying to tout some bogus gangsta facade that
ordinarily would land them on Corcoran SHU 4B and validated. These
boastful cats are easily co-opted and manipulated. Their delusions of
grandeur provide Institutional Gang Investigations (IGI) with a wealth
of intelligence via their eyes and ears on the tier.
A perfect example is the
Corcoran
prisoner’s statement about cats in ASU I (Administrative
Segregation) laying down in fear of IGI retaliation for exercising their
right to file an appeal! Typically conversations over the tier are
recorded when IGI doesn’t have a reliable agent to make note of what he
sees and/or hears. As to the idea of
not
taking a cellie as a form of protest, the typical response is
privileges taken for 90-180 days and 60-90 days of early release credits
are taken. Cats who are addicted to sports programs or television or
canteen will cave in every time because they lack the will to sacrifice
luxuries for the cause.
Prisoncrats treat gang membership or association as a tool of extortion
used in their agenda of touting the violent nature of street or prison
gangs.
The CDCR is rife with crooked officials and staff and the secretary,
governor and legislature are unable and unwilling to purge itself of
those who regularly falsify reports. Supervisory staff/officials fail to
address the problems so as to encourage the misconduct and repression.
At the same time they are quick to feed a naive public a laundry list of
bogus incidents to justify the administration’s unwillingness to reform
itself.
I try to examine all aspects of the criminal injustice system to see
what tactics we can utilize in our struggle effectively, even if I have
to employ them alone. I sacrifice luxuries already so I know it’s
possible and a little something for all to consider.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade raises a good topic of
discussion: it’s important we evaluate the tactics that will be
effective in fighting prison repression. There are a limited number of
protest options available to prisoners, and some will be more effective
than others. Whichever tactics are best may vary by prison or state, but
the fundamental task of building unity for the struggle remains the same
across the entire criminal injustice system. Comrades in California
continue to strategize on the best ways to build on the recent prisoner
rights activism there. Join United Struggle from Within and work with
other anti-imperialist prisoners so that we aren’t stuck employing
tactics on our own, but rather in a united front across facilities,
organizations and nationalities.