MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
There are two important tasks which imprisoned revolutionaries need to
carry out. The first is to build public opinion for revolution. The
second is to survive their imprisonment long enough so as to ensure a
lasting impact on the revolutionary movement long after their release.
For those not getting out, it’s important not to give up, as your
contributions to oppressed peoples’ movements are still very meaningful.
It is from these concrete classrooms that some of the most dedicated
revolutionaries emerge, returning to their communities after years in
prison. Therefore the need for political instructors to train these
students is dire. As such, survival pending revolution should be an
important part of any comrade’s focus while imprisoned.
Survival pending revolution can mean figuring out how to navigate
everyday prison politics in a manner acceptable to the prison masses. At
its most basic this can mean doing no harm in the masses’ eyes.
Ultimately, the prison movement is a mass movement. How can we lead a
mass movement if the prison masses cannot trust us because we are
actively working against their own righteous interests? How can we claim
to stand for liberation if we are responsible for oppressing others? In
our interactions with the prison masses we must be like fish swimming in
the sea, not only blending in with our environment, but becoming one
with our environment.
The anti-imperialist prison movement is a mass movement, but if we don’t
have the support of the masses then we don’t have anything. This is an
important point that real revolutionary organizations have understood
from very early on. The Chinese Communist Party understood this and so
they created an eight point program which helped to address the needs of
both cadre and masses within the wider scope of revolutionary practice.
Decades later the Black Panther Party would incorporate this same
program into its organization, re-working the points to the BPP’s
specific conditions:
Speak politely.
Pay fairly for what you buy.
Return everything you borrow.
Pay for anything you damage.
Do not hit or swear at people.
Do not damage property or crops of the poor, oppressed masses.
Do not take liberties with women.
If we ever have to take captives do not ill-treat them.
Because prison can be such a violent place and communists are supposed
to stand against oppression, comrades associated with the prison
movement should make it a point to be best known as peacemakers rather
than agitators, unless of course they are dealing with injustice at the
hand of the oppressors. As such, the likelihood of injury is
significantly higher amongst prisoners when compared to people on the
streets, with one report citing that more than a quarter of state and
federal prisoners report being injured since admission to prison.(1)
These figures however do not account for prisoners who do not report
injuries, so the real number is definitely higher.
Another common cause of injury in prison, which is often overlooked and
under-reported, is the violence associated with prison sexual assault.
According to Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) reporting, more than 1
million people have been sexually assaulted in prison over the past 20
years.(1) That’s an astonishing 50,000 people a year every year for the
last 20 years! Again this estimation by PREA is likely under-reported.
Prison rape is important to prevent, not only for the obvious reasons
but because with sexual assault in prison comes “an increase in other
types of violence, including murder, involving inmates and staff, and
long lasting trauma which makes it even more difficult for people to
succeed in the community after release.”(1, 2)
When it comes to substance abuse virtually all prisoners are addicted to
something. Statistics show that 80% of prisoners abuse drugs or alcohol
and that nearly 50% of jail and prison inmates are clinically
addicted.(3) “Four of every five children and teen arrestees in state
and juvenile prisons are under the influence of alcohol and drugs while
committing their crimes, test positive for drugs, are arrested for
committing an alcohol or drug offense, admit having substance abuse and
addiction problems or show some combination of these
characteristics.”(3) This last point is very relevant to the lumpen in
prison and lumpen youth because most prisoners started doing drugs and
alcohol at very early ages, generally around the same time they start
breaking bourgeois laws and getting into trouble. A hundred and fifty
years ago social scientists like Marx and Engels started theorizing that
breaking bourgeois laws was just another way for oppressed people to
rebel against their oppressive conditions. Needless to say that this
form of rebellion was not very effective, but it is as Frederick Engels
termed “revolution in embryo.”
It is interesting that much of adolescence is spent in almost continuous
rebellion, as this is generally the stage in humyn development when
people begin to become conscious of the world around them in ways not
experienced before. The fact that lumpen youth engage in criminal
behavior at such an early age says a lot about the ways certain groups
in society begin to exhibit early signs of what can only be described as
an early group, or class, consciousness. This is important to note
because it shows that the lumpen realize where their place in society
under capitalist rule is, and they actively begin to figure out how to
fit in it.
The real take away here, however, is that many people who currently find
themselves in prison first learned to survive and fit into their
oppressive social environment by both developing and adapting many
negative behaviors as a way of seeking positive reinforcement within
negative situations. Unfortunately for the oppressed this positive
reinforcement came at the expense of reinforcing negative behaviors
which has of course landed them in prison. Learning to combat such
negative behaviors means having to unlearn many of the traits that were
previously thought socially acceptable and necessary. In essence, this
means learning to undo and working against the lumpen lifestyle. A
lifestyle that is not only characterized by violence, alcohol and drug
abuse, but by anti-people activity in general. As dialectical
materialists however we are confident that the oppressed nation lumpen
can learn to combat such negative character traits using the methods of
unity-struggle-transformation.(4) The hope of the oppressed internal
nations depends on it.
This movie is a must-see for any left-leaning persyn looking to kick
start a revolution or join a movement for the purpose of societal
change. The East is about a subversive underground movement
which can best be described as a loose collection of anarchist cells
focused on giving the heads of corporations that are responsible for
ecological destruction a taste of their own medicine. One reference in
the movie describes them as radical cells that started with Earth First!
They attack big business, who they see as responsible for much of
today’s problems in the United $tates. Indeed, they see the principal
contradiction in the United $tates as between greedy corporations that
will stop at nothing to make a quick buck and the life on planet Earth
that they threaten. The ideas portrayed in their propaganda videos are
hard-hitting in a way that is true to the First World radical ecology
movement in real life.
The potential for the radical ecology movement to be a real force for
change in the First World is one reason this movie is powerful. The
movie is also aesthetically pleasing on many levels (which means it’s
fun to watch!) and filled with political content. It has a couple big
Hollywood names; none more notable than Ellen Page of Juno
fame. This movie speaks mainly to the worries of today’s white
petty-bourgeois youth growing up in the shadows of climate change, oil
spills and other mass pollution, toxic food and medicine and a
consumerist society that doesn’t seem to care. The characters touch on
struggles with their wealth, but ultimately use their privilege to
attack their enemies. They criticize Amerikans for their complacency,
but see the imperialists as the ones deserving severe criticism. Similar
to many radical environmental movements in the real world, there is no
explicit class analysis in the movie, but The East seems
potentially friendly to both a Third Worldist and a First Worldist
perspective. The real positive lessons of this movie however come from
its emphasis on security and organization, or lack thereof, within
supposed revolutionary groups.
The East focuses on an ex-FBI agent named Jane who goes
undercover for Hiller-Brood, a fictional “intelligence firm” that
specializes in protecting the interests of imperialist corporations thru
espionage. Jane’s mission is to attempt to infiltrate The East, a
so-called eco-terrorist organization that has been a thorn in the side
of McCabe-Grey, a fictional corporation that specializes in producing
cutting edge pharmaceuticals. Jane’s assignment is to go undercover
using the name Sarah, to meet and gain the trust of potential East
members that Hiller-Brood has been tailing.
[SPOILER ALERT!]
After a night of partying and getting to know some counter-culture types
who Sarah thinks might know The East, she decides they are relatively
harmless and then sneaks away in the early morning hours to pursue other
potential targets, but not before snapping all their pictures and
sending them back to Hiller-Brood for file building. From here on out
Sarah sets out to meet some other potential targets who are older, more
mysterious and hence more promising. After meeting the possible East
members and train hopping with their friends, Sarah gets her first taste
of pig oppression when they are forced off the train by railroad
security and subsequently beaten. It is in the midst of the commotion
that Sarah sees the persyn she’s been following flash a badge at
security - the persyn she’s been following is a fed! After being left
cuffed to a train Sarah makes a narrow escape from police and is rescued
by one of the train-hoppers whose van she jumps into. Once inside of the
van Sarah recognizes one of the symbols of The East. Convinced she is
now on the right track, Sarah slices her wrist in the hopes that this
guy whose van she’s in will take her to The East. Her plan works, but
not before he runs a quick make on her by dialing the number on her
phone marked “mom.”
After speaking to another Hiller-Brood agent posing as Sarah’s mom, he
destroys her phone, blindfolds her and takes her to a secret location in
the woods; a dilapidated house in the middle of nowhere. As they arrive,
Sarah is introduced to “Doc” the group’s resident doctor, much to the
chagrin of Thumbs the group’s only New Afrikan. As she is being treated
Sarah discovers that Doc was once a med student. She is then drugged and
put to sleep. After waking, Sarah meets Izzy, Ellen Page’s character,
who views Sarah with a skeptical eye. Izzy gives Sarah a straight-jacket
and tells her to wear it if she wants to come down for dinner. Feeling
she is now a hostage, and partly out of curiosity, Sarah reluctantly
agrees to put on the jacket. Once they enter the dining room, Sarah is
surprised to find the rest of the group already assembled at the table
and all wearing straight jackets. At the head of the table is Benji, a
bearded and eccentric looking man who reveals to Sarah that they know
everything about her, her last job as a bank-teller, where she grew up,
everything. All aspects of her cover identity unfortunately.
Benji then tells Sarah that she can begin eating whenever she’s ready.
Not knowing how to eat if she’s in a straight jacket Sarah tells Benji
that she’s a guest and would not feel right if she started before them.
To which Benji responds; “You can do what you please, but we prefer to
eat after you begin.” Confused and uneasy Sarah attempts to eat by
slurping the soup directly from the bowl. Everyone stares at Sarah with
a look of condemnation. What happens next is a “zen” moment in which
everyone takes to eating by having the persyn next to them pick up the
spoon with their mouth and feed them. Feeling played, Sarah storms out
of the house and into the woods where Benji and company follow her and
ask her to come back. Sarah responds, “For what? So you can continue to
make fun of me to your followers?” Benji then explains that he doesn’t
have any followers. He tells her that if she’d only relied on the group,
instead of selfishly trying to feed herself then she wouldn’t be feeling
stupid. Sarah then retorts “Why is it that self-righteousness and
resistance movements always go hand in hand?” Yet it is the bourgeois
and the Christians who are the most self-righteous of all, imposing
their ways on others, forcing the majority to suffer for their own
benefit. They criticize the masses with a false sense of superiority,
while it is the job of revolutionaries to criticize the oppressor with
the basic facts of their oppression. Throughout the movie, it is
stressed that everything members of The East do is their own choice, and
when they do do things it is organized in collective ways that challenge
bourgeois individualism, such as the eating example.
Later that night Sarah is caught spying by Eve, an East member. Sarah is
then forced to reveal herself to Eve, but she tells her that she is an
active FBI agent, and that The East house is currently under
surveillance, and that if she exposes her she’ll go to jail. Eve agrees
to stay quiet but flees the next day without telling anyone what she
knows. The next day The East discovers that Eve has left. This throws
the group’s next mission into limbo. Sarah explains that she can easily
fill Eve’s shoes. The group takes a vote and decides to let Sarah in on
the “jam” so long as her knowledge of the mission is relegated to her
role. Sarah agrees.
The group’s mission is to infiltrate a business party hosted by
McCabe-Grey. Once inside the party their plan is to slip a supposed
anti-malarial drug “Denoxin” into the drinks of some of Amerika’s elites
who have gathered to celebrate a contract between McCabe-Grey and the
U.$. military which will make Denoxin available to Amerikan soldiers
serving abroad. Denoxin’s side-effects have been linked to various
mental and nervous disorders as demonstrated by Doc, who took the drug
after his prescription killed his sister. During the celebration the
vice president of McCabe-Grey gives a speech in which she touts Denoxin
as a miracle drug that will protect men and wimmin in uniform in the
mission to protect Third World people from evil dictators and oppressive
governments; thereby allowing them to bring “freedom and democracy” to
the oppressed masses.
Sarah finds out what The East is up to and attempts to stop it, but it
is too late. The East completes their mission and returns to their
hideout in the woods. Back at the safe-house Sarah takes to snooping and
discovers the real identities of The East members. However, her spying
is cut short when they see breaking news that McCabe-Grey’s vice
president has begun to succumb to Denoxin’s side-effects, her life in
possible danger. The East panics and decides to disperse and flee back
into the relative safety of the city. They all agree that should members
decide to continue with the movement they should all return to the safe
house in a couple weeks.
Now, back in society, undercover agent Sarah seems uncomfortable in the
real world, she is no longer used to the amenities of living in a First
World country. She has become accustomed to living in the woods with The
East and their communal social values; she is conflicted. Though she
feels troubled she returns to Hiller-Brood for debriefing. She gives up
the identities of The East and expresses her concerns that another
attack will occur. She pleads to have The East house raided before they
disappear, but they refuse and send Sarah back for more intelligence
gathering.
Sarah re-connects with The East as they are planning the next action.
This time around, the mission is to get Hawkstone Energy executives (yet
another fictional imperialist corporation) to admit their illegal
pollution practices on camera; illegal practices that have contaminated
a small town’s drinking water. Benji’s plan is to rationalize with the
bourgeois leaders of Hawkstone into giving up their dangerous
exploitation of the earth (kidnapping them and forcing them to listen),
but Thumbs disagrees. Thumbs doesn’t want to talk with the enemy, he
wants action now. He says that these rich types don’t ever respond to
“intellectual bullshit, they respond to firepower!” After some heated
discussion they agree to Benji’s original plan where Izzy ends up dead,
shot by Hawkstone security.
We cannot afford to make the focoist error of taking up armed struggle
when the conditions aren’t right, as the character of Thumbs attempts to
do. Focoism has a long history of failure, getting good revolutionaries
killed or locked up in jail. To think that armed actions will always
inspire the masses towards revolutionary activity is an ultra-left and
deadly, idealist mistake that has left many anti-imperialists either
dead or in prison. In this sense The East has a better strategy in that
they are primarily trying to stop the most powerful people from doing
the damage their corporations are doing, rather than engaging in focoist
actions aimed at convincing Amerikans that the corporations need to be
stopped. The East may actually end up stopping some corporations, and
the individuals leading them, from some of their more destructive
practices. But in the end this strategy, like focoism, lacks the big
picture perspective that will enable us to put an end to the
environmental destruction that is inherent to capitalism. What their
strategy lacks is the building of independent institutions of the
oppressed that have the power to implement environmentally-friendly
production methods while meeting the people’s needs. While the movie
shows The East building alternative culture within their collective, we
must figure out how to go bigger than that to really counter the
powerful corporations that are now calling the shots.
When Izzy dies, The East becomes spooked and are thrown into disarray.
One member talks of abandoning the movement and Benji tries to get him
to stay. Benji tells him that “a revolution is never easy, but that
doesn’t make it any less important,” to which the deserter states, “I
would betray the revolution for Izzy, that’s the difference between you
and me.” This is an inherent weakness in petty bourgeois radical
movements. When those they care about are threatened they see the
comforts of petty bourgeois life as preferable to struggle. This is why
the deserter is able to succumb to such individualist ways of thinking.
For the proletariat, oppression is a daily reality, and death of a
comrade will tend to justify further what they are doing rather than
discourage. What we must fully understand however is that the success or
failure of any movement does not hinge on the importance of one
individual, one man, one womyn or one child; but on the stated aims of
that movement and the completion of that goal, and if we stray from
those principles then we are just as guilty of betraying the revolution
as the deserter in the movie did.
At this point, this cell of The East splits up yet again. Back at
Hiller-Brood Sarah discloses the day’s events, she reports Izzy’s death
and claims that The East is in shambles, a perfect time to move in and
arrest them all. Her advice is again ignored. She is ordered to go back.
She meets with Benji, but this time pleads with him to give up the
movement; partly out of her wish to prevent another attack or death, and
partly because she has developed romantic feelings for him. Benji
refuses and instead convinces her to take part in one last mission. She
agrees because she has feelings for him and because she has now been won
over to The East’s cause.
On the way to the next mission Benji exposes his hand and tells Sarah
that he knows she’s a spy. He tells her that if she was ever down with
the movement or truly had feelings for him, then she’d complete the
mission and run away with him. She agrees to help. The mission is to
retrieve a flash drive from the offices of Hiller-Brood that contains
the names of fifty agents embedded in underground movements all across
the world. Benji convinces Sarah that he only wants the list to spy on
the spies; but what he really wants is to expose the agents to their
organizations. She carries out the mission but when she finds out
Benji’s true intention she denies having stolen the flash drive. She
tries to convince Benji that if they were to obtain the list it’d be
better to talk the agents into giving up their careers as spies for the
greater good. She argues if they only knew what they were really doing,
they’d all turn just as she had. Benji refuses and they part ways. He,
back to the underground, and she onto a one womyn awareness campaign.
The movie ends with clips of her talking to what appear to be other
Hiller-Brood agents outside of oil refineries and power plants. The take
away? Don’t work outside the system in order to change it, work
alongside it in order to change minds one persyn at a time.
Now let us examine this film from a Maoist perspective: “In the world
today, all culture, all literature and all art belong to definite
classes and are geared to definite political lines. There is in fact no
such thing as art for art’s sake, art that stands above classes, art
that is detached or independent of politics.” (MIM Theory 13)
This should be our attitude and guiding line when viewing or reviewing
art i.e, film, literature, music, etc. Only with this attitude will we
be able to see thru the bourgeoisie obfuscation of art. Furthermore;
“works of literature and art, as ideological forms are products of the
life of a given society.” Which means that what we as a society deem to
be art can only be pulled from the consciousness of society itself. Art
expresses not only individual, but society’s wishes, its desires, its
anxieties and its perceived problems.
Now we began this review by stating that this movie was aesthetically
pleasing and filled with political content. Comrade Mao taught us that
the most reactionary art in class society is both high in artistic value
and filled with political content. And who’s political views was this
movie putting forward? The bourgeoisie’s of course. But even though it
is a bourgeoisie product with bourgeois aims we can still learn
something from it that we can apply to our own movement. Hence, we
should not totally discard it.
Overall, The East is painted in a very positive light in this film,
highlighting the liberatory and egalitarian aspects of the anarchist
sub-culture. What we are to take away from this is Sarah benefitted and
learned from that experience, but goes on to have her real impact by
working among the agents of the imperialists to convince them what they
are doing is wrong. The whole premise assumes that people just don’t
know the destruction that these corporations are doing. While the
details are certainly masked from Amerikans, the information is still
readily available, and a historical analysis of this country will reveal
much deeper roots to reactionary politics of the Amerikan consumer
nation. A more damaging storyline that would be justified by this movie,
which we see time and time again in real life, is the activist who
participates in radical organizing to learn and build cred and then goes
on to work within the system as Sarah does when they “grow up.” This
movie will play well with the radical-curious, who find their life’s
work in NGOs, non-profits and even government agencies. The good side of
this film is that it could lead people to be sympathetic to the cause of
radical ecology, despite its praise of reformism. There are also some
good practical lessons in this movie.
The first lesson to take away from this film is that any movement that
is truly working against the interests of the imperialists will simply
not be tolerated. The agents of repression are always looking to smash
movements of dissent and are constantly working vigorously to infiltrate
and spy on us.
Secondly, we must be cautious of who we decide to work with and who we
reveal ourselves to. Simply because we meet people who seem to share our
political views does not mean they are comrades and thereby privy to our
organization’s actions or methods of work. Within sub-cultures, having
the right look and lifestyle can lead to people putting their guards
down for superficial reasons. Sarah demonstrates this, and there are
many real-world Sarahs whose stories have been exposed. This essentially
breaks down to “better, fewer, but better.” And even good comrades can
be turned, which we should keep in mind as well. The bourgeoisie and
their spies are highly organized and we should be too. A good way of
keeping security tight within our organizations is by keeping politics
in command. No one who isn’t putting in work should know anything about
our organizations other than what is published in the pages of Under
Lock & Key and the MIM(Prisons) website. Our work should always
be geared along the lines of what will be the most effective and will
get us the furthest fastest. As such, security within our movement
shouldn’t be something we study in addition to theory, but should stem
directly from it.
Thirdly, we shouldn’t necessarily have to like our comrades on a
persynal level. Just because we like certain people or have relative
unity with them on certain issues doesn’t mean we recruit based on
popularity. We recruit based on the correctness of one’s political line
and the type of work done over a period of time. When they were around,
the original Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika was the vanguard of
the communist movement in the North American continent exactly because
they were composed of the communist elite. They didn’t get to those
positions overnight due to social networking, but because they put in
the correct type of work over a sustained period. This is something else
we should remember when building and re-building our movements. Thus, if
we are serious about taking the socialist road then we must study and
work assiduously to learn Marxist philosophy, scientific socialism and
Marxist political economy so that we may integrate it into our work and
apply the most correct political lines.
In conclusion, we must take art seriously and not cede the cultural wars
to the bourgeoisie but must engage them on that level as well. For the
bourgeoisie this movie was a hit due to its successful combination of
aesthetics and politics. Therefore we must also seek to fuse the
political with the artistic. Under Lock & Key already does
this to a certain degree as the ULK writers struggle to make it the
trenchant arm of the revolution. Right now however, what ULK lacks in
artistic value it makes up in political worth, though there is much room
for improvement.
Don’t work alongside imperialism to change it one persyn at a time.
Rather, work directly against it in order to smash it and revolutionize
the world.