I can’t believe I am going to defend Curtis Reeves but if there is
something I hate more than police it is capitalistic patriarchy, or mad
masculinity, or what I call toxic testosterone. This is how capitalism
rewards aggression.
We see it all the time in society. If a man is over 6 feet tall, he
is almost guaranteed a management position in any workplace while more
qualified workers are passed by. Or how it can be dangerous to attend a
football game because of aggressive fans who can easily become violent.
It is that the rewards of a capitalist culture go to those who are
willing to fight the hardest.
The fact that an elderly man can not even attend a movie without
being bullied by some mad man is evidence that capitalism does not work
for human relations. Curtis Reeves asked Chad Oulson to be respectful
and Chad Oulson became aggressive and violent because that is all he
knows.
Chad Oulson probably thought he could get away with being a bully
because he was bigger and much younger than Curtis Reeves. Chad Oulson
thought it was OK to be violent and hit an old man because who is going
to challenge a big man full of mad machismo? But this time karma finally
caught up with Mr. Oulson and his pretty wife. Kurtis Reeves had the
great equalizer, a gun. Curtis Reeves did what the rest of us could not
get away with. Because Reeves was a police captain he could kill Chad
Oulson with impunity, and in my mind, the jury was correct to acquit
Reeves because the rest of us hate bullies too.
Another thing I think is relevant is an incident that occurred in
early February. Two boys were fighting in the mall, 1 black and 1 white.
The mall police intervened. They tackled the black boy to the ground
violently and handcuffed him while the white boy only sat on a bench.
Everyone on the news displayed this as a example of police racism but
that is not what I seen. What I seen is 2 police officers, 1 man and 1
woman intervene in the fight. The man police officer tackled the black
boy violently while the white woman police officer tackled the white boy
to the bench and then backed off at the first sign of compliance. It
should be noted that both boys were compliant after the police
intervened in the fight. I do not know if the male officer who tackled
the black boy is a racist or not, but what I do know is that the male
officer had way too much toxic testosterone flowing in his veins. Where
it is obvious the woman officer only used as much force as was necessary
to stop the fight, the male officer clearly wanted to hurt someone. What
I seen is patriarchy culture. Male police officer full of mad machismo
on a mission to hurt as many people as he can, full of violence and
aggression with a license to do whatever he wants with impunity.
Honestly, if racism is the tool that is used to take that pig down then
I will support that approach by whatever means necessary.
I see the capitalist patriarchy here in prison everyday. CDCR policy
is if I am outside and 6 feet away from anyone a face mask is not
required. However, that policy does not stop mad officers from telling
me to put my mask on. These crazy pigs full of mad machismo mask check
me all the time, not because it is policy or safety, in fact, it is
contrary to CDCR policy. The crazy pigs mask check me only because they
want to display dominance and control over another human being. The
little bit of dominant feeling the pigs get from making me bow to their
will makes them feel like a bigger man than they are.
The male officers that mask check me, only so they can feel a little
bit of dominance, learned that sick behavior from American culture that
rewards it; a disgusting capitalist culture that teaches patriarchy and
rewards toxic testosterone allows these sick officers to challenge me
while they have the upper hand. I am a defenseless prisoner, while they
are a gang with weapons. The mask check is contrary to CDCR policy that
clearly states if I am outside a mask is not required. The mask check is
nothing more than a testosterone challenge. Mad masculinity or what the
South Americans call machismo.
Who is the bigger man? The defenseless prisoner or the gang of
officers carrying weapons? This sick culture that rewards the aggression
devastates so many.
Wiawimawo of MIM(Prisons) responds: I recently heard
a well-known fascist arguing for more violence to defend honor, that our
society has become too soft without it. This same fascist is infamous
for abusing his ex-wife. We agree with the author above that machismo,
especially over one’s right to text during a movie, is a toxic result of
the patriarchy. It is not clear from the information available that
Reeves’ quickness to pull the trigger didn’t stem from the same
machismo. Either way, we can agree that the patriarchy led to Oulson’s
death.
However, patriarchy kills more people through violence between
romantic partners and former partners. A recent gruesome story hit the
news of an ex-boyfriend who broke in and tortured and killed his
ex-girlfriend’s now husband.
While the percentage of homicides in the United $tates from
gang-related violence is around 10%(1), the percent from intimate
partners is about 20%.(2) The percent of wimmin victims of murder by
intimate partners is about 40%. Yet there is a war on gangs, but no war
on patriarchy being led by those in power. The war on gangs, like the
war on drugs, is motivated by a project to control the internal
semi-colonies of the United $tates.
As many of our imprisoned readers will recognize, it is much easier
to get people to lash out in violence against those with no real power
over petty things than to stand up against power over real grievances.
It is not just white Amerikan movie-goers, it is the oppressed as well
who fall prey to the machismo, the petty individualism, and the violence
of Amerikan culture. We are not pacifists, we advocate the use of all
tools that can be effective at ending needless violence and murder.
After imperialism, patriarchy is the next power structure that must fall
to reach our goal. In the exploiter countries, we see the violence of
the patriarchy more strongly, where the violence of imperialism is less.
Join us in standing up for fights that really matter.
Note:
1. MYTH: Gangs are
responsible for most U.S. homicides, GVPedia (Gun Violence
Research)
2. Cooper & Smith,
2011, United States Department of Justice.