MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
I recently came across your newsletter and found it very interesting. I
am in Ironwood State Prison - Administrative Segregation (ISP Ad-Seg).
All should be advised that Hispanic prisoners are being targeted by
Institutional Gang Investigations (IGI) in ISP for validation. Many of
us were told to either inform or be validated. Myself and many others
are validated on informants alone, and some on cultural drawings alone.
It seems the state’s agents (Office of Correctional Safety) are
rubber-stamping anything submitted by ISP-IGI.
MIM(Prisons) responds: Gang validation is just one of many
tactics used by the prisons to divide prisoners and target activists.
The threat to inform or be validated is common, and then false
information is used to validate those political activists that the
prison wants to isolate. This is another example of why MIM(Prisons)
says that prison classifications do not define a prisoner’s
revolutionary potential. Many informants walk in GP freely without
anyone knowing what they did while solid activists are falsely validated
or retreat to SNY. We must judge our comrades by their actions, not
their prison-imposed classification.
I recently received
ULK24, thank you.
I share your newsletters with more than twenty people and an article
(Correction
on SNY debate) caused quite an uproar. I recognize the opinion of
what people perceive Special Needs Yards (SNY) is (deviants, rats, etc.)
but have major disagreement with the flawed perception.
The first of a few salient points is the strongest. In buying into the
SNY/GP separation a fatal flaw emerges in ideology. The idea that SNY
refugees who pursue personal safety are filth comes from a criminal
mindset of values and morals. This needs correction and as a solution I
offer education. SNY refugees are getting away from criminal mindset
organizations and street gang policies. 99 percent of conflict within
the walls isn’t political struggle. It’s not being able to pay for
drugs, tribalism, promoting racial hatred and warfare for earlier lost
battles, revenge for street gang violence, manipulation by imperialist
agencies, and good old “I can’t do my time so I’ll make everyone else
miserable.”
As a mainline and SHU veteran of fifteen years traipsing across New
Folsom, High Desert, Pelican Bay, Corcoran, Chino, San Quentin, and Old
Folsom, the idea that I should prepare for death because a corrupt
criminal organization declares it so is sheer idiocy. The idea that I
could crawl under a rock in a hole somewhere and meekly keep my head
down and not try to “make” my situation is sheer childlike fantasy.
Convict (criminal) justice isn’t blind, it is premeditated power
struggles, envy, greed and the law of the jungle coming to fruition. The
reality of prison politics is simple, dope is shotcaller. Greed,
self-aggrandizement, negative cultural and educational values run
rampant like a virus. Split by race, geography, imagined fifty year old
slights and insults, the semi-ignorant masses huddle on their claimed
patches of territory on the yard and build up walls of separation that
tower far above the actual prison walls that confine them. Imperialists
stand watching; laughing, and profiting. The convenient high noon-middle
of the street showdown of physical combat isn’t a noble ideal and it has
replaced rational thought as the tool of necessity in the concrete
culture.
It needs to be said that Republicans and Democrats don’t care if you’re
SNY or GP, creating a mental separation to divide and conquer is proven
COINTELPRO strategy. It makes moving the herd easier.
Bear this in mind please. Just because you are in a cell in prison you
are not a political prisoner. As an individual you must make peace with
why you’re in the cell in the first place. Responsibility for your life
is first. If you choose to pull yourself up by your bootstraps and do
that then wipe away the veil and quit dividing the world in to race,
geography, and location, quit dividing your world into SNY and GP,
become more than a convict.
SNY was a choice I made that I must live with. To believe that I have no
redeemable value is ludicrous. I didn’t testify against anyone, no one
went to the hole, I did not become an oppressor of my own people. I did
not leave my morals on the mainline. I do not live, associate, or do
business with deviants, rats, or oppressors. I am vigilant in knowing
who and what they’ve done in my life. I simply now walk stronger alone
in my stride.
If you are still on the path of separatism you’re stagnant and if your
doctrines espouse convict vs. convict violence, drug profits, or control
of the mass. You are not a revolutionary, you are an oppressor, as your
desire is simply to be king of the mountain. Please do not don the guise
of righteousness simply because of a designation the system created that
you choose to use.
It is every day actions that define you. if you’re still gangbanging,
slinging, separating, wake up you’re stuck in the matrix like Neo was.
Do something revolutionary, walk across the yard to that semi-familiar
face with the ink work of a different tribe on his sleeves. Embrace the
viking king, the African warrior, the Aztec warrior and realize that if
you can’t do it you are by choice dividing and separating, and you’re
the one who doesn’t get it.
My heart and mind are guiding my moral compass true and I cannot see
exploiting another for self-gain. Where do you stand really? It doesn’t
matter in the physical sense as it isn’t a physical question. What is in
your heart will show up in your everyday life. If I’m just talking,
blowing smoke, what I’ve written above makes me another windblown
hypocrite and false seer uttering borrowed phrases and aping the
intelligent conversations of my learned betters. But if it resides in
every beat of my heart and my stride matches my hearts intentions,
recognize, wherever I may be.
Just because you read the little red book and you’re on a mainline
doesn’t make you a revolutionary. Educate yourself, enlighten others,
uplift all.
MIM(Prisons) adds: MIM(Prisons) does recognize all prisoners as
political prisoners because who goes to prison is determined by the
politics of those in power. But there is a difference between why you
are in prison, and what you are going to do with your life. So we agree
with this comrade that political consciousness must be learned through
study and work, and is not given to you the day they close you behind a
cell door.
This debate over whether there can be any revolutionaries on SNY has
been raging in the pages of Under Lock & Key for 2 years
now. MIM(Prisons) comes down on the side of all revolutionary prisoners.
We judge people by their work and not by their state-determined
classification. There are revolutionaries on SNY and there are rats on
GP. And we know the rats in all units like to pretend to be
revolutionaries. We can only look at people’s actions to determine where
they really fall.
U.$. citizens are said to comprise a nation which embraces freedom.
Freedom is said to be such a fundamental element of our nation that we
insist on forcing our concepts of it upon other countries. The
government coined a military mission “Operation Enduring Freedom.” The
colonists declared war on the British in the interests of freedom;
freedom was a major element in the fuel for the civil war; and the U.S.
invaded Iraq to “secure” Iraqi freedom. Freedom seems to be the fuel to
the fire of many struggles over the centuries in U.S. related matters.
Justice is also something that’s supposedly held dear in this nation.
This Justice Department, along with its affiliates, is among the biggest
governmental agencies in the nation. Our courts supposedly produce
justice. People are murdered by the government, via capital punishment,
in the name of justice. People are killed on the battlefield in the name
of justice. Unarmed men are shot down in the streets by police, in the
name of justice. Justice, as we know it here in the U.S., seems to be a
grim reaper with a thirst for blood.
Sometimes what one says about their character is not always in harmony
with their actions; the same is applicable to a nation. As the old
saying goes, “Actions speak louder than words,” and I believe that the
actions carried out by a nation’s government are the true indicator of
what that nation’s principles and values are. Governmental action here
in the U.S comes in the form of legislation, policy, enforcement, and
rulings.
So despite what we say as a nation regarding how important freedom is,
the question becomes: Are our actions in line with what we say? I think
not and here’s why. We say that we cherish freedom. In fact our
Declaration of Independence says that man’s freedom is an unalienable
right, yet we have a larger number of people incarcerated than any other
nation in the world. People will have many rationalizations as to why
this is so, but from a purely objective analysis none hold up. Being the
number one wielder of human captivity, while supposedly holding man’s
freedom in the highest regard, are two totally irreconcilable positions.
Additionally, even as the Declaration was written and for years
afterward, slavery was an accepted institution in this country. So while
freedom was being formally recognized as a man’s inalienable right,
certain men were being denied that very right. How can those two
positions be reconciled?
Freedom, as defined by the Black’s Law Dictionary is: Quality or state
of being free; liberty; independence
And Free is defined as: Not in bondage to another; enjoying liberty;
independent.
Prisoners, slavery, excessive laws, our government seems to be the
personification of the anti-freedom. Surprisingly many citizens seem
oblivious to this paradox.
And who defines justice, being that it’s such a fluid concept. I mean,
one person’s justice can be another’s injustice. In the interest of
having a formal gauge, I’ll refer to the “Webster’s” dictionary for
definition. Justice is defined: Uprightness; equitableness; fairness.
Now consider some of the actions committed by our government.
During the westward expansion of this nation, the government
continuously laid claim to lands that they had previously agreed to
leave to the First Nations. The First Nations were, for the most part,
patient as Buddhist monks when facing these recurring betrayals. But
even a priest can reach his boiling point, and when the First Nations
reached theirs, the government resorted to forcefully taking the land.
To take the property of another by means of force or fear is robbery.
Robbery is a crime punishable by imprisonment/fine. This is not very
much in line with justice is it?
Then think of the governmental approval of slavery in this nation. Not
in regard to the actual practice of slavery but the fact that our
government once deemed it acceptable and now denounces it. The key here
is that despite the reversal, the government has made no restitution for
this crime. No formal apology, no monetary compensation, or any “peace
offering” to the New Afrikan nation.
In contrast, the German government has formally apologized and committed
monetary compensation to the Jews for the Holocaust. And even in the
United Snakes of Amerika, the government has started providing
compensation to the First Nations. But I suppose that the decision
makers in the government feel that Amerika is above any measures to make
amends to mere “niggers.” (No offense to anyone in the New Afrikan
nation, to which I belong. I simply use the word that the imperialists
would in their reasoning). Yet they still boast Amerika as a justice
loving nation.
And moving right along into more modern times, a focal point relevant to
this subject is Amerika’s criminal justice system, which is contrary to
the meaning of justice. For starters, studies have shown that Black
nations and Latino nations receive harsher sentences and more severe
charges in comparison with their caucasian counterparts. This is in
regards to the very same or similar criminal acts.
A good example of this is the sentencing disparities between crack
cocaine (mostly found in inner city, oppressed nations, neighborhoods)
offenses and powder cocaine (generally associated with suburban,
caucasian, neighborhoods). Despite the fact that the powder form of the
drug has more of it than crack, five grams of crack will get one the
same amount of time as about one hundred grams of powder cocaine. How
absurd is that? There’s nothing just about a system that harbors racial
disparity.
In the interests of promoting a safe and healthy society, the government
has instituted the position of prosecutor. In their prosecutorial
duties, the prosecutor is supposed to be bound by moral, ethical, and
legal restraints. One of the main legal restraints supposedly binding
the actions of a prosecutor is the constitutional “guarantees” that
every defendant is supposed to have. In theory, a prosecutor must
respect a defendant’s constitutional rights.
In reality, Amerika’s Supreme Court has deemed a prosecutor’s violation
of certain constitutional “guarantees” acceptable. Therefore prosecutors
don’t feel very obligated to respect a defendant’s constitutional
rights. Add to this the fact that prosecutors have been granted immunity
from civil liability in relation to their on the job misconduct. This
basically give them license to disregard the law, having nothing
upright, fair, or equitable about it.
There are plenty of instances which can illustrate precisely how unjust
the so-called justice system is. Biased/racist judges and prosecutors,
intentionally ineffective defense attorneys, discriminatory laws, all of
these things help shatter the facade of legitimacy and justness of what
is called the justice system. And ironically New Afrikans, the same
people who were subjected to the inhumanity of slavery, are
disproportionately targeted by the criminal “justice” system. It appears
that the main facet of justice in Amerika is overt oppression. Amerika
is the enemy of both freedom and justice.
MIM(Prisons) adds: A recent
book
review further highlights the true injustice of the prison system
in Amerika. And overall this comrade makes a very important point about
the hypocrisy of the U.$. claim to support freedom and justice. We will,
however, point out that in order to achieve a society that truly affords
everyone freedom and justice, we must first dismantle capitalism. And
that will not happen overnight. For this reason, we support an
explicitly repressive society called the Dictatorship of the
Proletariat, which is a transition period between capitalism and
communism where the government is run by the people and actively
represses the freedom of the former bourgeoisie. We can not be idealists
and think that it is possible to just magically conjure up a society
where all are equal when those in power will fight to retain their
power, and our culture teaches people to work first for individualist
selfish goals. We will need years of retraining and re-education for
people to truly work in cooperation for the common good.
I recently completed an assignment as a prospective USW leader. The
topic of dissertation was of revolutionary
Fearlessness,
Scientific Strategy, and Security. The study offers a primary
discourse on issues such as applying the scientific method in strategy,
rather than being passionately or emotionally driven. The “fear factor”
is addressed, and how it can be effective or reckless in issues like
security.
I got a lot from the study personally. I understand as materialists we
aren’t supposed to be influenced by ideas of “the divine,” metaphysical,
or spiritual intervention in human affairs, or in any context for that
matter. Maybe it’s the strong indigenous traditions passed on for
generations in my family and culture that lead to such first impressions
and perceptions. Whatever the cause may be, within the time frame of me
receiving and responding to the above referenced assignment, things were
happening on the ground level directly associated with the lessons in
our assignment. Maybe a Christian or Muslim would believe it was God
allowing their faith to be tried and tested by satan or his legions. Or
a pagan may have believed it was a fusion of Mexican and Roman war gods,
Vaitzilopochtli and Mars somehow interfering with material conditions on
Earth in order to sharpen and refine his skills, strategy, tactics, and
security in struggle. But such convictions, regardless of how firmly
believed, have no scientific basis and cannot be interpreted as truth.
Yet the life lesson and the message has been conveyed.
Back in the 80s in the Texas prison colonies known as “ranchos” there
was a spontaneous combustion within the social relations of Chicano
prisoners. It spread like wildfire, like a virus. A true example of
dialectic materialism in a controlled environment. Like Phoenix rising
out of the flames, ashes, and blood, rose a democratic prison society
claiming to stand together against negative activities in prison. By the
late 90s, entering the new millennium there was a loose confederation of
Latino tribes, regional and autonomous in nature, in virtually every one
of the over 100 Texas ranchos. These regional autonomous tribes are now
a dominate factor in almost every correctional institution in Texas. No
longer are they confined to the Ranchos either, but have spread into the
hoods and barrios, infecting our youth. There is ample evidence that the
state has played an effective instigating role in a long and bloody war
of attrition that has been going on for over two decades uninterrupted,
in a now hidden, now open fight, a fight kept from the public eye. A war
between the tribes and organized Texas families. This evidence could be
used to substantiate a claim that the government has encouraged, even
created the conditions for this anarchistic tribal take over of the
social structure amongst Texas prisoners. Similar to how the U.S. has
continuously done in the Third World, funding and provoking civil wars
in the Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East in order to divide,
conquer, and maintain hegemonic control of economic interests and
security.
Within the tribes there is no constitution, rank, or central command
structure. They’re divided into regional districts, and are purely
democratic and autonomous in nature. What’s so important and phenomenal
here is the material dialectics in action. How the tribes are a natural
development, the structure, principle, and form naturally developed over
time under conditions of extreme oppression by more than one force.
Notice how at the beginning it was a Chicano based movement, but has
since embraced the Latino concept.
It should be very well noted that by no means is the tribal structure
revolutionary, nor is it structured as a family. It’s distinct in
nature, a security measure so to say. But it’s phenomenal to me. Almost
any criminal, political, religious, or economic ideas can be retained by
the individual, yet they cannot be instituted as a form from top down.
This is anarchistic and ineffective at times, and leads to much
conflicting interest, but these are the material conditions.
I happen to be a progressive individual. I believe in developing my
mind, body and soul. I’m constantly studying, reading, working out,
collecting my thoughts and energies, and focusing them in a productive
and creative form. This is what I do, it’s how I’ve learned to adapt to
my environment and pull through these wasteful conditions. Yet I’m
surrounded by negativity and destructive individuals. Other tribesmen
are stuck in a state of mental and physical decadence and decay. They’re
manipulative, oppressive and dictatorial, straight criminal by nature. I
understand these too are only character manifestations of these wasteful
conditions. And something I strive against. These two separate and
distinct classifications are both allowed within the context of the
tribe. Of course they oppose each other and conflict at times.
Recently conflict arose between the tribes and ALKQN. What resulted from
the conflict wasn’t good for any of us, nothing positive or progressive
was attained. In fact what resulted was the loss of solid braves,
continuous lockdowns, strategic hits, and “mediation” by the rancheros
to keep the steers in line. As a deterrence, the administration began
rounding up tribesmen. The tribes have the larger numbers and are often
perceived as the aggressors regardless of the circumstances. Anywhere
from 16 to 20 tribesmen were rounded up at different times during the
conflict, seed as collateral, systematically subjected to punishing
intimidation, subjugation, and humiliation, all in order to
psychologically inhibit the young braves, and break their will and
resistance. Of course it was effective on the youngsters who average out
to about 20 years old. Left for weeks without anything, in a bare cell
with only enough soap to wash our ass. No writing, legal, or
correspondence materials. No books or literatures with which to
stimulate our minds. After 3 weeks they gave us our bibles, which we all
know to be pacifist literature telling us to turn the other cheek and
obey our masters. We were systematically served disciplinary cases for
nonsense. Sadly it wasn’t my first, and won’t be the last time I go
through such conditioning. I was a part of the final round up, all my
property was confiscated before I was herded into the holding pen
“corral.” 16 volumes of legal transcripts, including legal notes and
work product was seized and inspected for weeks. The round up lasted
from Dec 6 2011 through January 12, 2012.
The very next day after being released onto the pasture, not any time
during the “investigative” lockdown, but after my release, the Rancheros
called a coup of tribal representatives, to show them a letter that was
found in my property. This letter was correspondence to one of my kin on
the Rancho. A written analysis of our social relations and conditional
circumstances as Chicanos under this neocolonial order. It included
strategy and tactics regarding pending and future litigation addressing
family and communal lands stolen from our direct ancestors after the
Texas revolution. The royalty and mineral rights to raw crude being
pumped and refined on a particular island off the Southern coast of
Texas. The letter was detailed and passionate. It was revealing and
exposing. Nothing that should have fallen into agency files. Truthfully,
I don’t even know the full context of the letter.
Somehow the Rancheros convinced or influenced these two representatives
that I had intentions of waging and leading a guerilla assault against
other tribal bands. This has no logical or reasonable basis. The context
and substance of the letter was written in a language of resistance.
These leaders are steeped in the criminal programming and traditions,
which is only a natural response, I understand. I evolved from these
perceptions myself. Somehow they agreed with the Rancheros that the
content of the letter was a threat to the structure and security of the
tribal alliance. Council was held, both sides brought their points to
the fire. The determining factor was how these so-called gangsters and
criminals were allowing themselves to be used by the rancheros, and
using the word and influence of the Rancheros to substantiate a claim
against a tribesman. Many other subjective and objective factors played
a role in the democratic process. But the objective truth is that I’m
still here. I’m almost 100% sure that had this issue been brought up on
a weak-minded, unrefined, undisciplined and fearful mind, the situation
would have played out differently, and that individual may not be here
to share the experience like this.
What’s amazing to me is that this whole experience happened to coincide
with an assignment on “Fearlessness, Scientific Strategy, and Security,”
that I received from MIM(prisons) while these very events were
unfolding. The experience was very humbling. I learned a very valuable
lesson: “gots ta be mo’ careful.”
To all you would be progressive individuals with a revolutionary vision,
who happen to be involved with LOs who do not follow a well formulated
line, or uphold the principles they claim to represent, be careful.
Limit yourself and your activities, don’t be so careless in expressing
your views and concerns around ignorant unlearned individuals. People
fear what they don’t know. Above all, if your views and beliefs can be
based on science and conditional/material facts, if you feel these
scientific views to be pure and true, be loyal and stay true to them to
da fullest. Stay committed and stare down adversity with a fearless
spirit. Understand your material and social conditions. Please don’t let
no law enforcement elements interfere with your relations and influence
your views to the point they become reactionary against your own. Their
intentions may be all in good faith to maintain peace and security on
the unit level. But their interests and security does not comport with
yours in the objective long term. Proceed with caution.
Why are we so blind to seeing things we need to see Why do we let
those who hate us tell us who we’re supposed to be Why do they tell
us that our big lips & noses seem to be awkward Then they turn
around, get breast implants, silicone, lip shots & ass jobs Why
are we coerced into armed forces to do the government’s dirt They
turn us into killing machines, mental patients, or inmates And lie
to our loved about how we are hurt I pledge allegiance to the united
snakes that I’ll expose you to the fullest even if it seals my
fate I’ll expose your horns & bloodshot eyes & tell the world
you are a liar, a cheat, a thief & a fake Long ago you planted
seeds of hate And stripped our culture If you’re watching but
still can’t see I recommend that you look closer Cause there’s much
more to see Stand strong in liberation for nations to be
In order to file a §1983 prisoner complaint, one must exhaust the
facility grievance procedure on any issues beforehand. The pigs here
claim procedural defect, frustrating the exhaustion requirement of the
PLRA. Now that the institution has been made aware of my pending §1983
suite, they block the third and final grievance process. I am submitting
a revised complaint with denial of access to the court added, and I will
keep you informed.
I passed two
grievance
petitions on down the line. Colorado chain gang is just as messed up
as you might think, but I do help those who at least show some heart. I
pass all of my info on to other people, to maybe spark some fight.
MIM(Prisons) adds: The grievance campaign is spreading from its
start in California to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, North Carolina,
Oklahoma, and Texas. Write to us for copies of the grievance petition
for your state. If you are in a state not currently covered by the
grievance campaign you can use the current petitions as a format, but
will need to look up citations and policies specific to your state for
reference in the petition. If you do this research and send us what
needs to be rewritten for your particular state, we will gladly send an
edited, accurate copy to other USW and Legal Clinic folks in your state.
Just recently on the John B. Connally unit drastic changes are being
made. The administration has been coming down real hard on the already
oppressed masses. Not only do they house all the STG (security threat
groups) on Building 4, but have divided the whole unit. The dorms which
comprise Buildings 18 and 19 house all non-STG and those prisoners who
work around the unit. Building 3 houses non-STG prisoners and those in
the religious program. Building 7 houses all those not yet qualified to
move up on the unit to A-side. Building 7 also houses those prisoners
who are less than 10 years into their life sentence and that have over
50-year sentences. Building B houses a mixture as well but they stay on
that building with the less fortunate who are kept housed all day in
their cells. They eat in the building now that a chow hall was built to
accommodate.
This division with the unit capacity of 2,800 prisoners has not only
stagnated the progress or process to organize effectively, but has
caused those who got it better on A-side to not give much attention to
the sufferings of those who experience it much more on B-side. They are
ready to cause wars and riots with each other rather than direct that
misguided energy towards establishing a union to grieve concerns and
make administration hear and act on our behalf.
In expressing such observations, I also know that it is not an easy
task, but it can be done even if we are divided. As a whole we are only
segregated until we can find better ways to network and communicate and
this is why I am encouraged and empowered by your articles and
newsletter. There is hope! And it is right here right now!
There are two specific challenges we face with our comrades who get out
of prison and want to stay politically active. First, the difficulties
of balancing work, school, politics and general home life. Second, the
overlap between friendship and politics. It is important that we address
these challenges to help our comrades follow through on their pledges to
serve the people after gaining their freedom.
So far we have been less than successful in this regard, and many
comrades fall out of touch with us, only to re-emerge when they are
locked back up months or years later. In a country with such a
relatively low number of active, committed anti-imperialists, losing
these comrades to the streets is a significant blow to our work. As we
expand our Re-Lease on Life Program, we are working to address specific
challenges with life on the streets in the belly of the beast.
Meeting Your Basic Needs
There are few resources for released prisoners, and without family or
friends to provide support it’s very difficult to find housing, get a
job and provide for basic necessities. There are few studies of
homelessness among released prisoners, but those that we’ve found
suggest that at least 10% of parolees end up on the streets without
housing after release.(1) The numbers are probably higher; sleeping on a
friend’s couch is not a long term solution but it won’t get you counted
as homeless in these studies.
Unfortunately MIM(Prisons) doesn’t currently have the resources to
provide much help in the area of basic needs for released prisoners. We
do have some resource guides for some states, and we can help you think
through the best plan for your circumstances. But our ability to help in
this area is limited. The rest of this article focuses on people who are
released and are able to meet their basic needs. If you have a release
date coming up, let us know so we can help you make a plan for the
streets.
Time Management on the Streets
Behind bars life is very regimented, with little room for any decisions
about how to organize your day, except when you are locked in your cell.
And even there, your options for how to spend your time are very
limited. You don’t have to keep a schedule because the prison keeps it
for you. So one of the problems prisoners face when they hit the street
is the vastness of opportunities and choices, and the lack of structure.
Many comrades will want to pursue some education, while also finding a
job, and attempting to reconnect with family and friends. This means a
lot of choices and opportunities, and structured days are necessary to
make them fit together. The demands of family and friends can be
especially difficult during the initial months post-release after so
long with social interactions closely monitored and limited.
Friends, family, school and work are all institutions that are deeply
ingrained in and supported by our culture. There is no support for doing
revolutionary organizing. That is why Re-Lease on Life is so important.
People have a hard enough time doing the normal things they need to do
to get by as former prisoners, especially as felons. If you just go with
the flow, you’ll find your time just flies by and you don’t put in any
political work.
To participate in the Re-Lease on Life program you need to make a
commitment to political work upon release. But most people will need to
keep this commitment minimal at first, so that you can focus on getting
established with a plan for meeting your long-term needs as an
individual, while keeping a connection to the movement.
It’s important to think about the future. If you get government
assistance, or have a part-time hustle when you get out, how long can
that last you? If you don’t have job skills or a college degree you
should consider school and look into scholarships. On the other hand, it
may be worthwhile to focus initially on just making some money before
you consider starting school.
Think about where you want to be in a year or two. If your political
work is limited by time now, how can you free up more time in the
future? One way is by getting into a career path where your income will
grow with your experience. Another consideration when looking for jobs
is, how can it support my bigger goals? If you work in food service, you
save money by bringing home leftovers. If you work at a copy shop, you
get discounts on fliers and literature. Getting a manual labor job might
help you meet your physical fitness goals. If you work at a security job
you get paid to do your political study, leaving your free time to do
outreach work.
Whatever your plan is, you need to start thinking about your time as a
budget. You have only so much each week, each day. Determine how much
you really need for the necessities in life and then schedule that time.
A week has 168 hours in it. If you sleep 8 hours a night that leaves
112. If you need 2 hours a day to cook, eat and take care of persynal
hygiene, you are down to 98 hours. Take at least 5 hours a week to deal
with other persynal stuff like finances, cleaning, and organizing. You
want to work out at least 4 hours per week, maybe more like 8. Now we
have 85 left. If you work full time you’ve got 45, plus transit time, so
make that 40. If you’re going to school too, you could probably use up
most of that 40. If you have regular appointments with your parole
officer, doctor or counselor, that will take a few hours. In your best
case scenario you might have 40 hours to spend on socializing, relaxing
and doing political work. Realistically, finding 15 to 20 hours a week
to do political work with a normal bourgeois life is an ambitious goal
that requires discipline and good planning.
Keep in mind that even if you only have 5 hours a week free for
political work, that is 5 hours of work getting done in the interests of
the oppressed. Any time you can set aside for this work is good. And
when you first hit the streets this will be easiest if you can set aside
that time on your schedule so that it is always the same day/time. For
instance, you could say that Tuesday and Thursday nights you will do
political work from 5-8 p.m. Block it off on your calendar and tell your
friends you have appointments or classes at those times (see below).
Working this into your schedule as a regular thing will make it much
easier to maintain your activism. If you give up and stop doing
political work, chances are good that you will never take it up again.
The revolution can’t afford to lose good activists like you, so don’t
let that happen!
Money is Time
Just as challenging for many former prisoners as managing time is
managing money, and the movement needs both. Don’t fall into Amerikan
consumerism. Imperialism has kept itself going by building a consumerist
culture at home to keep capital circulating. What that means is that a
typical Amerikan lifestyle involves far more consumption than is
necessary (or even healthy). Having your own apartment, your own car, a
cell phone plan, and others preparing your food for you are just some
obvious examples of things considered to be “necessary” expenses
justifying the so-called “high cost of living” in this country. Seek out
others who you can share expenses and cost-saving tips with. Extravagant
spending is often a social behavior. Many recreational things like cable
television, alcohol and cigarettes become habitual expenses. Rest and
recreation are important, but try things that are more healthy and cost
less, and if you do want to splurge, make it a special reward, not a
daily expense.
One of our strengths in this country is that Amerikans get paid
extremely high wages. By keeping expenses low, you’ll find that you can
get by on a part-time job, leaving you with more time to do what is most
important to you. Remember, even if you’re making minimum wage you are
in the top 13% income bracket in the world. Don’t use poverty as an
excuse, when your wealth and privilege are really what’s holding you
back from doing political work.
The Persynal vs. The Political
Related to the challenges you will face with managing your time on the
streets is the social demands of family and friends. The overlap between
friendship and politics is something that most people don’t consider. In
fact, in this country we are encouraged to think about politics as
something we must share with family and friends. But MIM(Prisons) does
not agree with that view.
We live in a country where most people have a very strong material
interest in the status quo, and so they will oppose anti-imperialist
politics. The chances of winning them over to the side of the revolution
are very minimal, and there is generally no need to destroy
relationships with family and friends in the name of this struggle when
there are so many other people out there we can try to recruit. Also,
because of security concerns in this country, exposing your politics to
family and friends can put you at a real risk, especially if you are on
parole. If there’s one thing you should have learned being locked up,
it’s that snitches are everywhere.
There is nothing wrong with having friends who don’t share your
political convictions, you just need to avoid talking about politics
with them or only talk about smaller points of politics, without raising
suspicion. This doesn’t mean you can’t share your political views with
friends and family who show that they are likely to be interested and
agree, but be careful because once they know your views and the work you
do, you can’t take it back.
Basics About Security on the Streets
When you are locked up in prison the government has a lot of information
about you and knows your every move. So behind bars you can only control
your security to the extent that you keep your mouth shut on the yard
and don’t share information about the political work you are doing with
people who might use it against you.
On the streets things are a little different. Although you might have to
report in to a parole officer or allow the state to track you in some
other way as a term of your release, you have a lot more freedom about
what information you do and don’t share with people and with the
government. You are under no obligation to tell anyone about the
political work you do, and in fact you should do your best to keep this
private from people you know unless you have a reason to believe that
they would be supportive. And of course you want to keep it a mystery
from the state. This is NOT because we are doing anything illegal, but
rather because the state does not like anti-imperialists and will use
this as a reason to find or create an excuse to lock you back up. So
don’t make this easy for them.
[The following is in response to a United Front (UF) statement from
a group calling itself
“Revolutionary
Gangstas.” Unfortunately, due to almost extremely widespread in
South Carolina, we have not been able to get a response from them. On
our website we continue to print solidarity statements with the UF, one
of which is from the
United
Gangsta Nation, who was also sent some of these criticisms, but has
not responded. We are printing this belatedly to voice the concerns
brought up, and further all of our efforts at building a United Front.
As with most letters we receive, the author’s words below have been
edited for brevity and clarity.]
Confusion most often is the agent provocateur’s most precious tool to
plow furrows in the soil of a lumpen formation, so to plant the bacillus
seeds of annihilation.
This process is done by three means: (1) Those agent provocateurs who
willingly work with the oppressors. (2) Those unconscious agent
provocateurs whose behavior is so reckless and contrary to their
formation or movement that they kick up enough dust and problems for the
oppressor to use their actions to either plant and kill or as
justification for more oppression and suppression. (3) The third type,
while not agent provocateurs, can cause just as much damage. This third
is “uneducated members” of a movement or formation who misrepresent that
movement by stating or doing things inconsistent with the official
position.
The brothers in ULK 21 from South Carolina state they are
founding members of a formation they call
“Revolutionary
Gangstas.” However, on the 21st line they also say they are “members
of the Gangster Disciples,” which is GD’s former nomenclature.
I have a serious aversion with the misinformation, confusion and
incorrectness that’s being presented. First, if these brothers are
“learned men” in that former nomenclature, they would not step into this
LO revolutionary vita theater using defunct nomenclature that’s
inconsistent and contrary to the leader of that defunct LO’s official
position.
Secondly, they would know that LO is now officially and publicly moving
within, and a vanguard in, the same principles of the United Front for
Peace in the Vision of the Growth and Development Movement. Therefore,
no “new” interior formation is required to be part of the UF for Peace.
If these brothers wish to be part of the peace front, do so as believers
of the Vision of Growth and Development, not as Revolutionary Gangstas.
As a secondary note, almost anyone can and has come to be “gangsta;”
however being “gangster” as in Gangster Disciple (when it was in
operation) was a privilege and entitlement that one had to learn and
earn. It was not no fad or cartooning. Too many died for it to be
cheaply commercialized into the hip hop distorted concept of gangsta.
Cease and desist.
If someone was educated in the Vision of Growth and Development, they
would know that that whole gangster concept was put into the box of
self-defense and selective reactionary response because our visionary
teacher and his trusted companions recognized prudently how inferior
that gangster could be in respect to our vision for real and true
Revolutionary Growth and Development.
As men and intelligent thinkers and doers, we know that being gangster
has its limitations that go against our vision. Therefore being gangster
became a contradiction in practice and principle and needed to be put in
its proper context, i.e. self-defense and selective reactionary
revolutionary response only.
Our uniqueness is sublimated because we have been there, done that, and
perfected that. Anyone who still holds such attachments are still
asleep. Our visionary teacher has made it clear and has supplied us with
the blueprint and tools to become that reclaiming power and force we
need to be to matriculate within the formations of the struggles of USW
and UF for Peace.
Way before the UF for Peace came into play, our vision has been
instructing us through the Universal Laws of Existence that the “Love”
of “Life” and the correct “loyalty” to it by applied “dedication”,
“determination” and “discipline” will produce in us a “knowledge”,
“wisdom,” and “understanding” that will bring an inner peace and will be
able to have unity and from there some “growth” and independence. And by
implication, internationalism comes naturally because our vision is
universal.
So if these brothers are serious, then do so by being properly educated
and live, act and be all you can be as one within the vision.
I leave, as I come. One in the Vision of Growth and Development and a
vanguard in the USW and UF for Peace. A student’s teacher.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We are printing this discussion to work on
two of the principles of the United Front for Peace. The first is
unity, which requires communication and true facts. In
addition, the principle of growth requires that we all strive
to educate ourselves and each other. While we are still in the beginning
stages of building united front, we are not the first to walk this path.
Those with experience to share should submit their analysis of that
experience to ULK so that others can learn from it.
From day one MIM(Prisons) has been aware of the many problems we would
face printing statements from individuals or small groups that claimed
affiliation to larger organizations. We are wary of the problem of
prisoners using ULK’s prestige to launch new pet projects with
no real leadership, while recognizing that we are in a stage where
small, isolated groups of anti-imperialists are stepping out to join
forces and dialogue with each other. At our last congress we made a
self-criticism for promoting anarchism around ideas of the cell
structure and united front. We corrected this deviation with the
resolution
Building
New Groups vs. Working with USW and MIM(Prisons). This resolution
should also be considered in relation to lumpen organizations (LOs) by
their members. The lumpen class has contradictions within it, and we
should not dismiss the successes that LOs independent of the state have
had in overcoming these contradictions and uniting large numbers of
people over extended periods of time.
In the statement from the Revolutionary Gangstas in ULK 21 they
make a criticism that could be extrapolated to a whole, large
organization. While “Revolutionary Gangstas” is providing an
alternative, it is not one with a practice MIM(Prisons) can vouch for.
To the extent that printing their statement suggested that they were a
better alternative to Growth and Development, MIM(Prisons) was
misleading the masses.
We
addressed
a similar issue in ULK 17 when a former Latin King wrote us to
criticize those affiliated with the group in his area. There we wrote,
“For the lumpen to be internally critical is a necessary step for the
development of a proletarian consciousness among the oppressed inside
U.$. borders. However, to print public criticisms without providing real
alternatives and leadership does more harm than good.”
As our comrade expands on in subsequent writings, we do need better
leadership and we do need to develop our analysis. But we should not
criticize existing leadership until we have a viable alternative and
existing leadership has rejected it. Our class analysis tells us that
the oppressed nation lumpen organizations are our friends, and we should
approach them from the standpoint of unity-criticism-unity.
As we recognize Growth and Development for their leadership and
experience in this arena, we would not use the word “vanguard” to refer
to them as Ras Uhuru does, as we reserve this term for those
organizations that uphold the most correct proletarian line. Part of
developing correct political leadership means taking up true
internationalism. Ras Uhuru refers to internationalism being inherent in
a vision that is universal. But organizations of various class interests
too easily claim “internationalism” via identity politics or just vague
phrases as in the example above. As stated in the
5
principles of the United Front for Peace in Prisons,
internationalism means that “We cannot liberate ourselves when
participating in the oppression of other nations.” As citizens and
residents of the most powerful country in the world we have a long way
to go to prove our own internationalism.
In the spirit of unity-criticism-unity we appreciate the feedback we
continue to get from our allies in various LOs who are working to make
the United Front a reality.
The downloadable grievance petition for Arizona has been updated to
include some more relevant addressees that were submitted by a comrade.
Please download it
here.
Click the link below for more information on this campaign.