Tracking Prison Censorship in the United States

DAI Deputy Director
Department of Corrections
2729 Plaza Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109

23 July 2013

RE: Censorship of Under Lock & Key Issue 32

Dear Mr. Dormire,

I received your letter from July 2 regarding issue 31 of Under Lock & Key. Thank you for looking into that matter. We will be following up with the subscribers to let them know that they should have received issue 31.

I'm now writing you regarding issue 32. We received a notice that it was censored by the department for ?promoting violence throughout the publication.? There were no further details provided. This was the first notice we received regarding this issue, it was dated July 11.

After making a cursory review of the issue, I could not find any thing that promoted violence anywhere in issue 32. So I am once again requesting a review of the censorship of issue 32.

In addition, I am requesting that whatever needs to be done to avoid frivolous censorship in the future be done. It is not fair to delay our mail for months every time when the mail does not pose any threat to safety.

Sincerely,

Thank you for keeping me infomred as to the status of the appeal against the censorship of Under Lock & Key here in the Missouri Department of Corrections. This letter is to inform you that at this time, I have still not received my copies of Under Lock & Key, nor have I recieved any notification from the Mailroom here at Farmington Correctional Center that my subscription was even being censored. In direct contravention of Institutional Services Policies 13-1.1 Offender Mail Procendures and 13-1.2 Censorship Procedure, I have not once recieved a Censorship Notification with attached Covenant Not to Sue Form. I thank you for your diligence in pursuing this matter in the interests of incarcerated offenders everywhere.