To whom it may concern,
Pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 5, no
one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhumane, or degrading
treatment or punishment.
Pursuant to the United States Constitutional Amendments, Amendment
VIII, excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Pursuant to South Carolina Department of Corrections Police ADN -
16.05 Food Service Operations, sections 2.4.2, ensuring that master
menus conform to the Recommended Dietary Allowances, & 7.1.1, menus
posted in all living areas, & 7.1.6, food will be prepared
progressively and served at proper temperature, 7.6.3, food service
specialists ensuring food quality, quality are in compliance.
The South Caroline Dept. of Corrections current Mission Statement
quoted as follows:
“Protect the Public, Protect the Employees, Protect the Inmates…”
Current SCDC policies, procedures, and practices serve to create an
environment in direct conflict and opposition with their “Mission
Statement”. Furthermore, SCDC’s “Mission Statement” should be expanded
to include educational and rehabilitative goals. The entire system needs
to be restructured to meet all the needs and goals effectively and
efficiently. “Protection” is just one of the many needs.
The food served at the Broad River Secured Facility and throughout
SCDC has always been a topic with wide spread opinions depending on
which side of the fence you are on. SCDC brags that they have the lowest
cost per inmate in the country. Eat one of the meals and you’ll see why.
SCDC inmates housed at BRSF are suppose to receive fruit every lunch
meal like general population but we don’t.
A large portion of the meals are cheap starches. Milk, when it is
available, can only be obtained at breakfast, and on the numerous
occasions it is either not av liable or it runs out before all inmates
ain RHU (Restricted Housing Unit) have been fed. White rice or pasta
served every lunch and dinner. The portions, which are supposed to be
regulated, are left to the discretion of the inmates working on the
serving line and “told” to give RHU inmates half a portions. On the
weekends RHU inmates along with general population are fed only two
meals every Saturday and Sunday.
One of mans most basic instincts is self-preservation. A large
portion of the problems that arise at BRSF are due to search for edible
food (edible being defined not only as able to be eaten as far as taste,
but also as far as safety, and, most importantly, quantity). While there
are laws, as well as policies which prohibit certain forms of
punishment, the denial of food for being in the “Restricted Housing
Unit” (segregation) have become common.
Inadequate Food Served in BRSF
Pursuant to SCDC policy ADM-16.05, Food Service Operations &
2.4.2 and & 7.6.3, “Ensuring Inmate Master Menus conform to
the”recommended dietary allowance… Food Service Specialists ensuring
food quality, quality are in compliance…”
On April 10, 2023, I myself as well as eighteen other prisoners
declared a “Hunger Strike” challenging our poor conditions of
confinement at Broad River Secured Facility, and inadequate food
portions was one of our reasons. We are being fed like children in a
elementary school. Every meal we are not receiving the recommended
portions that was recommend by the “National Academy of Sciences and
National Research Council.”
Beginning of January 2023, SCDC changed its food menu and started
serving inmates “fruit on lunch meals, chicken patties, fish, and chop
chicken.” However, we in BRSF-RHU are not receiving these item with the
exception of fish.
Our meals have one scoop of grits during breakfast and when we have
rice or pasta we only receive one scoop. At one point of time we were
receiving “paper trays” that couldn’t hold food so this shorten our
meals. These paper trays always had our food mushed together and fallen
out the bottom. On the weekends we are fed two meals a day and neither
meal we don’t receive adequate portions.
Pursuant to Knop v. Johnson, 667 F. Supp. 467 (W.D. Mich. 1987),
“food is one of the basic necessities of life protected by the Eighth
Amendment…”
Also see Ramos v Lamm, 659 F. 2nd 559, 570 (10th Ci. 1980_. Robles v
Coughlin (?), 725, F.2d 12 (2d cir, 1983).
My hope is that you have received this report with an open and
inquisitive mind. While I hope this information helpful, the higher hope
is you will investigate this matter for yourself. It is fair to say that
no matter who is asked, politician, citizen, or inmate, the answer is
still the same: The Broad River Secured Facility needs a complete
overhaul along with SCDC!