This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
"Run"
Mosfilm 1970
Directors: A. Alov, V. Naumov
185 minutes
Ordinarily we would not expect anything good to
come out of the Brezhnev era (1970) Soviet Union
in the matter of political films. However, this
artistic rendition of the sufferings of the
Russian counterrevolutionaries (referred to as
"whites") of 1917 is now in fact progressive. We
attribute this to the fact that 1917 was distant
enough and the preoccupation with art itself time-
consuming enough that the many ideological foibles
of the Brezhnev era popular consciousness did not
overly contaminate the film.
The premise of the movie is the end of the Russian
Civil War started by the events of 1917. The
counterrevolutionaries go through a long process
of change in the movie, changes forced upon them.
At the beginning of the movie, we find generals
executing people in a desperate and hopeless
rearguard action to defend Russian capitalism and
the church. Finally, enough white officers realize
that it is most valiant to protect their men by
disbanding. The movie's scenes of the desperate
repressions aimed at something the whites cannot
contain or fix are actually a metaphor for the
whole world today, with Bush's desperate running
about the globe trying to control the inevitable
proliferation of weapons guaranteed by his own
beloved capitalist system. As we see in this film,
the history it depicts and history in general,
there is no avoiding that some repressive violence
ends up being pointless. It is this fact that will
haunt the most hardened counterrevolutionaries the
rest of their lives and it is also the fact that
makes being right about violence absolutely
essential, thus providing a need for a science
studying violence.
After the civil war's violence, we see people ship
out to Turkey where their lives undergo a dramatic
change. Most memorable are the scenes of generals
selling toy soldiers and running cockroach races
to make a living.
Also memorable are the moments when doubts enter
the minds of even the most hardened counter-
revolutionaries. In squabbles amongst themselves,
one ex-white general says he wishes he were a
Bolshevik for a day just so he would have the
reason and authority to shoot his acquaintance he
viewed as overly corrupted by bourgeois values.
In fact, the movie ends with a return to the
Soviet Union--the homeland--and a symbolic
greeting of the future. The reviewer would also
mention that V. Dvorzhetsky had a most memorable
character to play as a white general. At the
moment, the reviewer cannot remember any greater
acting in any film s/he has seen. The character
and acting are so well-defined, we are to fear
that the truly backward will admire the white
general for all the wrong fascist reasons. The
directors went through a painstaking and clear
process to show how the white generals faced a
tragic end, but without survey data regarding
viewer reactions to the film, we cannot guarantee
that the directors' efforts were not in vain. The
acting may have outdone the script's logic, so we
cannot say for sure that the emotional and
backward did not pick up the wrong message. With
that proviso, and lacking any final evidence, we
recommend this film for now.
When MIM achieves state power, we will finance
movies like "Run," and we will include money for
survey research on the extent to which the public
comprehends the film. Merely making money or
winning acting prizes will not be the goal.