This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
Maoist Internationalist Movement

    I N T E R N E T ' S  M A O I S T  M O N T H L Y

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

     XX XX  XXX  XX XX   X   X  XXX  XXX  XXX  XXX
     X X X   X   X X X   XX  X  X X   X   X    X
     X V X   X   X V X   X X X  X X   X   XX   XXX
     X   X   X   X   X   X  XX  X X   X   X      X
     X   X  XXX  X   X   X   V  XXX   X   XXX  XXX

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

         THE MAOIST INTERNATIONALIST MOVEMENT

     MIM Notes 104                  September 1995


Get MIM Notes 104 from the Maoist Internationalist 
Movement (MIM), and get the latest in Maoist news 
and analysis - put a revolutionary weapon in your 
hands.

In MIM Notes 104, read about MIM's continuing 
effort to build public opinion on behalf of 
prisoners in Amerikkka's gulags. Letters from 
unknown revolutionary prisoners accompany MIM's 
article of unity and criticism of the mass movement 
to save the life of Mumia Abu-Jamal. MIM Notes 104 
contains a letter from Jose Maria Sison, founder of 
the Communist Party of the Philippines, sending his 
support to Mumia. Read about MIM's efforts to bring 
a revolutionary, Third World feminist perspective 
to the annual Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, as 
well as an expose on a police murder of a Latino 
youth in East Los Angeles.

MIM Notes speaks to and from the viewpoint of the 
world's oppressed majority, and against the 
imperialist-patriarchy. Pick it up and wield it in 
the service of the people. Support it, struggle 
with it and write for it.

MIM Notes is available to subscribers of New York 
Transfer (nyt@nyxfer.blythe.org). Or get a 
subscription from MIM via e-mail or in print for 
$12/year for 12 issues. Write: MIM Distributors, PO 
Box 3576, Ann Arbor MI 48106-3576. (Send, stamps, 
cash, check or m.o. made out to "MIM 
Distributors".) Send questions, letters or 
submissions to: mim@nyxfer.blythe.org.

For a free issue mailed to your Internet address (a 
large text file), send a message explaining your 
interest to: mim@nyxfer.blythe.org.

MIM Notes 104 includes:

IN THIS ISSUE:

 1. MASSES PROTEST MURDER IN LINCOLN HEIGHTS
 2. LETTERS TO MIM
 3. NDFP CONDEMNS RAMOS GOVERNMENT FOR UNILATERAL
    SUSPENSION OF PEACE TALKS
 4. RAMOS IS LAME DUCK PRESIDENT, NDFP CAN
    NEGOTIATE WITH NEXT PRESIDENT
 5. ZAPATISTAS ATTEMPT LIBERATION THROUGH FIRST
    WORLD REFERENDUM
 6. AT A CROSSROADS: MOVEMENT TO SAVE MUMIA WINS
    TEMPORARY VICTORY
 7. ANTI-PRISONS FORUM DRAWS DEDICATED CROWD, SOLID
    DEBATE ON THE NATIONAL QUESTION
 8. INFANT MORTALITY: NATIONAL OPPRESSION IS NOT IN
    OUR HEADS
 9. CAN THE SPARTS EXPLAIN WHO KILLED VINCENT CHIN?
10. QUE VIVA PUERTO RICO LIBRE!
11. PSEUDO-FEMINISTS STRENGTHEN PATRIARCHY
12. MIM PRESENTS REVOLUTIONARY FEMINISM AT MICHIGAN
    WOMYN'S MUSIC FESTIVAL
13. PEOPLE'S PICNIC RALLIES IN SUPPORT OF PRISONERS
14. NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES STRIKE FOR PIE
15. PARASITE MERGER: UNIONS MERGE TO NEGOTIATE
    CUSHIER DEALS
16. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS ABOLISH
    AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
17. UNDER LOCK AND KEY: LETTERS FROM PRISON


* * *



MASSES PROTEST MURDER IN LINCOLN HEIGHTS:
PIGS EXECUTE 14-YEAR-OLD

*** This article was written for Notas Rojas, MIM's 
Spanish-language newspaper. To subscribe, 
contribute to or distribute Notas Rojas write to 
MIM Distributors, PO Box 29670, Los Angeles, CA 
90029-0670. ***

Los Angeles, July 30 - Before the eyes of his 
mother, 14-year-old Antonio Gutierrez was shot four 
times by the police - the army of imperialist 
invasion. Gutierrez was just one victim of the 
police readiness and apparent authority to execute 
anyone, anywhere, especially Latinos, Blacks and 
members of First Nations. Gutierrez's mother and 
other witnesses to the execution say that Antonio 
was not armed, and that after he was shot and 
handcuffed, the police shot him again.

When the community of Lincoln Heights found out 
about the murder, people were soon confronting the 
pigs with rocks and fires. This type of rebellion 
demonstrates the oppressed nation masses' 
spontaneous anti-imperialism, and MIM supports the 
people in their righteous anger against the state. 
But we call on the masses to turn their anger into 
organizing energy: work with MIM to expose brutal 
murders like this one, build public opinion against 
the state and for the oppressed. Most importantly, 
use your anger to build a movement that can destroy 
this system definitively, rather than allowing 
arrests and injury in your community with no 
strategic benefits.

A "PROBLEM" OFFICER

The rebellion lasted for two days, at which point 
the bourgeois media - public relations servants of 
the pigs and the state - reported on it. They wait 
until there's an event they can try to blame on the 
oppressed and then they start writing. These 
vultures will never report on a murder like this 
one to expose the state, which is why MIM builds 
independent media so that we can publicize the 
truth about imperialism.

The media and the pigs say that the officer who 
murdered young Antonio, Michael Falvo, was a 
"problem" officer, since he had a violent record of 
abuses and brutality. To that MIM responds: the 
whole police is a filled with "problem" officers 
because the police exist in order to assault and 
take advantage of Latinos, of Blacks and Indigenous 
people. In cooperation with the FBI, the CIA, and 
the U.S. army abroad, the police defend and 
perpetuate imperialist aggression. Falvo is not an 
exception, he is just a concrete example of the 
police fulfilling their role.

THE WAR ON GANGS & DRUGS

For the Amerikan imperialists and their allies in 
the white nation, all Latinos and Blacks are 
suspected of being gangsters. The "war on gangs," 
"the war on drugs," "the war on (so-called) illegal 
immigration," "the war on crime" - these are all 
deceptive names for the war on the oppressed 
nations within U.S. borders.

The Amerikan pigs have absolutely no right to apply 
justice to anybody, because their presence in 
Aztlan and in all North America is the product of 
murder, robbery, genocide, betrayal and all types 
of injustices. The white man arrived in this 
hemisphere and stole the land of the First Nations 
and exterminated their people; they constructed 
their empire with the work of Black slaves; they 
expanded their empire by attacking everything that 
got in their way. The imperialists are the real 
criminals. Their abuses won't stop until they are 
defeated.

TRUE JUSTICE REQUIRES REVOLUTION 

The family of Antonio Gutierrez has filed a lawsuit 
against the police. Together with those who 
protested the murder, MIM demands justice for young 
Antonio, just as MIM demands justice for the more 
than one million prisoners trapped in the dungeons 
of the U.S. empire. MIM believes true justice will 
only be possible once Amerikan imperialism and its 
pigs have been defeated and political power is in 
the hands of the people. That's why we work for 
socialist revolution.

There are many groups that say that Latinos should 
unite with whites and fight for white demands. 
These groups fail to see that the interests of the 
oppressor white nation are fundamentally opposed to 
the interests of the oppressed nations. Other 
groups say that the best way of improving the 
situation of Latinos is voting. Voting for whom? 
The Democrats and the Republicans are all racists; 
they are the leaders of imperialism. Latino 
politicians who are Republicans or Democrats have 
the same intentions as their white comrades. Some 
people only want to advance their political careers 
on the backs of the oppressed. MIM says that Aztlan 
is a legitimate nation that must be freed from the 
claws of the United Snakes, and we warn the masses 
against those that say there are no internal 
colonies within U.S. borders.

The fight for reforms is also deceiving, for those 
reforms could disappear whenever the white nation 
wants. There are no guarantees. The only real long 
term improvement of the life of the oppressed can 
come from revolution. In Aztlan (the territory 
which Amerika stole from Mexico) we are talking 
about national liberation with the goal of self 
determination, and of socialism. The people of 
Aztlan should liberate Aztlan, to later rule 
Aztlan, in order to have a police that truly serves 
the people: a police that will protect the poor 
from the abuses of the rich. A police that is not 
corrupt or racist. To try to improve the 
relationship between the current police and the 
Latino community is a deceiving lie that can only 
perpetuate suffering.

Power must be seized from the oppressor. 
Revolutionaries in Aztlan will eventually need to 
take up arms against the invaders  -  not just 
spontaneously in response to individual police 
actions, but organized as a Maoist Party. It is 
only through national liberation and socialist 
revolution that we can get to a society in which 
guns and political power of groups over groups are 
relics of this dying system.

DOWN WITH INTEGRATION!

DOWN WITH TRAITORS!

DOWN WITH THE PIGS AND THE GOVERNMENT!

ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE! 

Note: We use "United Snakes" as a translation of 
"Estamos Hundidos," which is a pun on "Estados 
Unidos," or "United States." "Estamos Hunidos" 
literally means "we're doomed," and is often used 
in the context of, "Look what they've done to us: 
We're ruined."


* * *


SISON SAYS: SAVE THE LIFE OF MUMIA ABU-JAMAL!

by Prof. Jose Maria Sison, Founding Chairman, 
Communist Party of the Philippines

July 22, 1995

On my personal behalf and in representation of 
anti-imperialist and democratic forces in the 
Philippines I join the great number of people and 
organizations in the United States and throughout 
the world in the outcry to save the life of the 
African-American journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal and to 
set him free.

It is unjust and outrageous that, because of his 
fearless and tireless defense of his fellow victims 
of racial persecution and brutality, Mumia Abu-
Jamal has been framed up by the Philadelphia police 
in 1981, he has been imprisoned for 14 years under 
the most cruel conditions and he is being rushed to 
his death on August 17 by a warrant of execution 
calculated to pre-empt his appeal for a new trial.

Mumia Abu-Jamal is a dedicated revolutionary 
fighter in the service of the African-Americans and 
all other peoples. He has used his speaking and 
writing skills as his weapons so effectively that 
the coercive apparatuses of the U.S. monopoly 
capitalism and the brutality of the state have been 
applied on him by the worst elements in the most 
malicious and arbitrary ways in the attempt to 
silence and put him away.

Mumia Abu-Jamal became a member of the Black 
Panther Party in 1969-70. Undaunted by the brutal 
state repression of this party and other African-
American organizations, he has persevered in 
standing up and speaking for the African-American 
people. As a journalist and radio commentator, he 
has relentlessly exposed the racist nature of U.S. 
monopoly capitalism and the brutality of the state. 
In this connection he is an award-winning 
journalist.

Despite prohibitions and retaliations by the prison 
authorities, he has courageously continued to speak 
and write the truth against oppression. He has 
recently come out with his book Live from Death Row 
which exposes conditions on death row, reveals his 
thoughts on the state "correction" system and the 
death penalty and unfolds his views on social and 
racial oppression and the liberation movement.

The plight of Mumia Abu-Jamal exemplifies the lot 
of the great majority of African-Americans who 
suffer racial discrimination, exploitation, and 
oppression. The system that has subjected him to 
racial hatred and persecution, that has deprived 
him of his liberty for so long and is bent on 
taking away his life is a system of cruelty and 
injustice that deserves worldwide condemnation by 
the people.

It is the duty of the broad masses of the people 
and everyone with a sense of justice to demand that 
the life of Mumia Abu-Jamal be saved and that he be 
set free. Should the capitalist and racist 
authorities be unheeding, the African-American 
people and the rest of the people in the United 
States and throughout the world can go into a storm 
of rage against the unjust capitalist system.

MIM RESPONDS with some trepidation that as MIM 
Notes goes to press, there is an indefinite stay of 
execution in place in Mumia's case. As Mumia 
pointed out in response to this stay, however, 
while he is no longer under and active death 
warrant, he lives under an active death sentence. 
We must remain ever-vigilant in Mumia's case until 
this death sentence is overturned.


AZANIAN REVOLUTIONARY SPEAKS OUT ON MUMIA

Revolutionary greetings. Thanks so much for 
responding to my mail in such a short space of 
time. The background you gave about Mumia was quite 
informative and soul-searching. I was particularly 
touched (though not completely surprised), by the 
fact that Black churches are not strongly coming 
out in support of the brother. It is generally the 
case. Even here in Azania, no church leader has 
raised a finger in condemnation of Mumia's pending 
execution.

The activities [supporting Mumia] I told you about 
are mainly by our Black Consciousness Movement, 
i.e. the Azanian People's Organization and its 
formations, viz Azasm (Azanian Student Movement, a 
high school student wing), Azasco (Azanian Student 
Convention, a tertiary student wing), Azanian Youth 
Organization, etc. Yesterday (Thursday), the 
chairperson of Wits region of Azapo, Cde Lybon 
Mabaso, led a march to the United State consulate 
in Pretoria. The same day, Azasco branch at Wits 
University organized a meeting which was addressed 
by Mathatha Tsedu, a Sowetan journalist and a 
leader of Media Workers Association of South Africa 
(MWASA). Last week MWASA went on record after 
declaring Mumia its honorary member. 

Another tale of surprise here is the silence on the 
part of the ANC [African National Congress]. The 
irony is that not so long ago, the ANC-led "gnu" 
has abolished death penalty. One would then have 
expected ANC to add its voice in condemning Mumia's 
imminent execution. They have adopted a wait and 
see attitude.

Anyway...I'll keep in touch and inform you of new 
developments, I'll appreciate it if you do the 
same.

I'll hear from you. Keep Strong.

 - Azanian Revolutionary July 28, 1995

*** MIM has seen a letter from the ANC regarding 
Mumia's case in the Worker's Vanguard 7/28/95. ***


SECTARIAN ANARCHISTS REFUSE EXCHANGE
WITH STUPID MIM

MIM wrote the group I'm in, called Neither East Nor 
West, asking for an information exchange. We are an 
anti-authoritarian group that opposes both 
capitalism and "Soviet-type" systems which includes 
Mao's China. We see all of those systems as 
exploitative and against freedom. We propose a true 
cooperative/self-management economics. Seeing the 
world in only two ways - as MIM-type Stalinist 
groups do - as either "bad capitalist" or "good 
communist" is not historical nor too intelligent. 
Humans are adept enough at coming up with third and 
more paths to a good society.

If you're interested in us, please send $1.00 and a 
SASE to Neither East Nor West, 339 Lafayette St., 
Rm. 202, New York, NY 10012.

 - Agent for NENW-NYC

MIM RESPONDS: This letter is a perfect example of 
why activists should exchange publications, ideas 
and struggle. The NENW-NYC agent doesn't even 
recognize the similarities in ideology between 
Maoism and anarchism and is ready to scrap 
discussion of the best path toward achieving our 
mutual goals. MIM shares your goals and your 
support for "true cooperative"s and "self-
management." But you offer no way of getting from 
here to there, Maoists do. You will find the 
furthest progress of collectivization anywhere in 
the history of China. It wasn't perfect like your 
idea, it was superior because it existed. If you 
compare an idea to a practice, the idea will always 
look better because it never has to face the 
challenge of implementation. If you compare a 
practice to a practice, Maoism will win. What has 
anarchism ever done to improve the lot of the 
oppressed?

MIM has no use for the dichotomized "bad 
capitalist" and "good communist." Unlike 
Trotskyists, we maintain that bourgeois democratic 
national liberation is progress over neo-
colonialism. Revolution to create an independent 
capitalist economy in an oppressed nation would be 
something that MIM would support. We still don't 
think the battle should end there - if national 
self-determination is to last, it must move on to 
socialism. But our line on national self-
determination is an example of some anarchists' 
misconception of Maoism. We support national self-
determination because history and the real-life 
application of theory and ideology to practice has 
taught us that we must. Good things (bourgeois 
democratic revolution) are good - we want the best 
(communism). We are interested in seeing NENW-NYC's 
explanation of how Maoists with this line are 
dichotomizing and idealizing the world, while 
anarchists who have yet to make a successful 
revolution anyplace are innocent of this sin.

MIM is ready for dialogue with anarchists or other 
groups and encourages them to write. Ask for a 
subscription exchange with MIM Notes. If you want a 
challenge, send us five bucks and read our latest 
theory journal: "The Anarchist Ideal & Communist 
Revolution."


ALL PRISONERS?

I was wondering if you could explain something to 
me. 

Do you support all prisoners in the world no matter 
what their crime, say, murder (you know like 
shooting some guy on the street for no other reason 
then shooting him, something of that nature). I ask 
this, for I was reading some of the back issues of 
MIM Notes and I saw a lot of support for prisoners 
and a lot of prisoners writing you, asking for 
literature. Now, we totally agree with you (MIM) 
that prisoners of a political nature should be 
supported no matter what (usual political 
prisoners, except China, are supporters of 
socialist revolution in Imperialist countries, or 
just people against some sort of oppression). Of 
course there are other types, but we do have a 
problem with supporting cold blooded murderers and 
rapists who have absolutely nothing to do with the 
fight for political/social/economic revolution in 
their particular niche in the world. We truly don't 
feel that a rapist gives any sort of help or 
furtherment of any Anti-Imperialist cause.

  -  a reader who wants to start local RAIL, July
     1995


MIM RESPONDS: It is excellent that you are getting 
involved and doing anti-imperialist work through 
starting RAIL. We look forward to working together 
and building the anti-imperialist movement. Working 
in RAIL means being led by MIM line, and we hope 
that through dialogue we can bring you closer to 
our understanding of prisons as an instrument of 
national oppression.

In the USA, we say all prisoners are political 
prisoners. But we don't use the slogan "free all 
prisoners!" Is this a contradiction? No. We say 
this to point out that crime itself is a political 
thing. Who decides what is a crime? The rulers of 
the society. "Murder" is supposed to be illegal, 
but cops kill people all the time, migrant workers 
die from pesticides, children die lacking 
medication, and the USA kills hundreds of thousands 
of Iraqis with no talk of "murder." "Rape" is 
supposed to be illegal, but proletarian women who 
work as prostitutes are raped all the time. All sex 
in this society is governed by patriarchy, which 
makes it all rape. Yet the state (which imprisons a 
grossly disproportionate number of Black men for 
rape) doesn't do anything to criminalize gender 
hierarchies.

Who is imprisoned for what crimes is a function of 
who has power in a society. That is why we say all 
prisoners are political prisoners. There are some 
people in prison who have done truly bad things 
(although most people in prison have not). The 
random killing you mention, while very rare, is a 
good example. That's one reason we don't say "free 
all prisoners!" We recognize that if we had 
socialism today, the masses would not want to just 
let everyone go. Some people might have new trials 
and end up doing reform labor or something. But, we 
say unequivocally that no Black, Latino, or First 
Nation person should ever be tried in a white 
court. No matter what that person has done, this is 
an act of national oppression. Their nations are 
occupied by white Amerika, and that trial is part 
of the illegitimate exercise of national 
domination. Even many white people in prison 
deserve to have their cases heard by a fair court.

You also mention China and other places. We would 
say that all prisoners everywhere are political, as 
described above. In China today, the government is 
state-capitalist or even fascist. We don't support 
its prison practice at all. Prisoners everywhere do 
hard, forced labor, whether in China or in [your 
state]. To read about the way China handled crime 
and prisons when it was socialist (1949-1976), 
write to us for a copy of Prisoners of Liberation, 
an account by two Amerikans who were imprisoned in 
China from 1950-54 and began to publicize their own 
stories as soon as they returned home.


* * *


CORRECTION

The article "U.S.-Ramos regime betrays peace in the 
Philippines" in the August 1995 issue of MIM Notes 
claimed that the National Democratic Front of the 
Philippines (NDFP) broke off negotiations with the 
Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) 
after the GRP violated existing agreements with the 
NDFP. While it is true that the GRP violated 
existing agreements by arresting the NDFP's 
political consultant, Sotero Llamas, it is not true 
that the NDFP broke off the talks. It was the GRP 
which unilaterally suspended talks on June 27 1995, 
the day after talks opened. At that time, the NDFP 
was willing to continue the formal peace talks as 
soon as the GRP released Sotero Llamas from prison 
and allowed him safe passage to Brussels, where the 
peace negotiations were taking place. 

This only underlines the fact that it is the NDFP 
which is willing to carry on peace negotiations in 
the framework of national sovereignty, social 
justice and democracy, while the GRP uses these 
negotiations to get the revolutionary forces to 
capitulate by cloaking itself in the rhetoric of 
peace without actually taking the steps necessary 
to ensure a just and lasting peace.

MIM apologizes to its readers and the NDFP for the 
error in our earlier article. The following two 
articles are press releases from the NDFP which we 
received several days after the last issue of MIM 
Notes went to press.


* * *


NDFP CONDEMNS RAMOS GOVERNMENT FOR UNILATERAL 
SUSPENSION OF PEACE TALKS

The National Democratic Front of the Philippines 
(NDFP) hereby condemns the unilateral and 
indefinite suspension of the GRP-NDFP peace 
negotiations by the Ramos government. We hold the 
GRP solely responsible for a series of deliberate 
acts done in bad faith and calculated to scuttle 
the Hague Joint Declaration and the Joint Agreement 
on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG). 

For more than a month, Mr. Ramos has failed to 
abide by the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity 
Guarantees (JASIG) and has willfully violated it by 
refusing to respect the safety and immunity 
guarantees of Comrade Sotero Llamas and allow him 
to perform his role as political consultant of the 
NDFP in the peace talks with the GRP.

Going from bad to worse, Mr. Ramos himself has 
proceeded to unilaterally declare the indefinite 
suspension of the peace negotiations, as if he were 
not satisfied with trampling down on the rights of 
Comrade Llamas and violating the JASIG. 

In sharp contrast, the NDFP Negotiating Panel has 
demonstrated its good faith by going to the opening 
session of the peace negotiations and expressing 
its eagerness to continue post-opening talks upon 
the arrival of Comrade Llamas in Brussels despite 
already apparent moves of the GRP to prevent his 
release and travel. 

It is an open fact that some military officers 
represented by Gen. Renato de Villa have exerted 
all-out efforts to keep Comrade Llamas under 
detention and thereby sabotage the GRP-NDFP peace 
negotiations.

At the same time, there are clear manifestations of 
a scheme among highly-placed agents of imperialism 
and reactionary institutions to undermine and 
discard the five agreements already signed by the 
GRP and the NDFP and replace the framework of peace 
negotiations established in The Hague Joint 
Declaration since 1992. 

The GRP Negotiating Panel, headed by Howard Q. Dee, 
is increasingly obsessed with the tactics of 
maneuvering the NDFP into a position of 
capitulation and with the line of liquidating the 
revolutionary armed struggle of the people through 
sheer deception. 

The GRP proposal for a ceasefire ahead of the 
comprehensive agreements on human rights and 
international humanitarian law, social and economic 
reforms and political and constitutional reforms is 
calculated to put off the people's basic demands of 
national liberation, democracy, and social justice 
and to simply undermine  the people's resistance to 
their increasing exploitation and oppression.

How can the GRP ever comply with the more complex 
requirements of a ceasefire agreement when it 
cannot comply even with the simpler ones now in the 
JASIG? Compliance with JASIG, in the case of Sotero 
Llamas, is now a test of how much further the GRP 
can go in peace negotiations with the NDFP.

As always, the NDFP is committed to the pursuit of 
a just and lasting peace through the solution of 
the problems that have caused the civil war. There 
can never be a just and lasting peace without first 
addressing the roots of the civil war.

 - Luis G. Jaladoni, Chairperson, NDFP negotiating 
panel, 27 June 1995


* * * 


RAMOS IS LAME DUCK PRESIDENT, NDFP CAN NEGOTIATE 
WITH NEXT PRESIDENT

The unilateral declaration of indefinite suspension 
of negotiations by the GRP and its continuing 
willful violation of the Joint Agreement on Safety 
and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) are clear 
manifestations the Ramos regime is hellbent on 
terminating the peace negotiations. 

Related to these manifestations is the attempt of 
the regime to change the framework of peace 
negotiations with a framework of capitulation at 
the expense of the NDFP. 

The Ramos regime is cynical, callous and wanton in 
trying to throw away the five documents that have 
been mutually agreed upon by the GRP and the NDFP 
negotiating panels and approved by their principals 
since 1992, starting with The Hague Joint 
Declaration. 

As it tries to disregard these documents, the Ramos 
regime is in effect wasting the effort and expense 
that have gone into the making of these documents.

If the regime wants to terminate the peace 
negotiations because it cannot change the 
framework, the NDFP has no choice but to look 
forward to the next president of the GRP for the 
possibility of resuming peace negotiations in 
accordance with the aforesaid documents.

Mr. Ramos is a lame duck president, limping on the 
second and last leg of his six-year tenure. He has 
his own peculiar scheme of priorities which now 
rate peace negotiations as extremely low.

Mr. Ramos is more than ever preoccupied with 
reaping the personal rewards of his political 
power. He and his cronies are busy accumulating 
private assets as a result of contracts arising 
from foreign and local overborrowing, foreign 
speculative capital, sale of state assets and the 
so-called military modernization program. 

The rampant official and unofficial criminality 
under the Ramos regime is exacerbating the socio-
economic and political crisis of the ruling system. 
The ever rising level of oppression and 
exploitation is inciting the people and the 
revolutionary forces to intensify the armed 
revolution.

 - Jose Maria Sison, Chief Political Consultant of
   the NDFP Negotiating, Panel 13 July 1995


* * * 


ZAPATISTAS ATTEMPT LIBERATION THROUGH FIRST WORLD 
REFERENDUM

July 26, Northampton, MA - El Comit¼ Pro Democracia 
en M¼xico organized a small video presentation and 
informational meeting about the Zapatista National 
Liberation Army (EZLN). The EZLN and the 
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) Mexican 
government have been engaged in negotiations since 
April; little besides a ceasefire has come out of 
the negotiations. The Zapatistas' demands include 
land, housing, jobs, food, health, education, 
culture, information, independence, democracy, 
liberty, justice and peace.

The EZLN is fighting the single-party rule of the 
PRI which is pro-imperialist, fascist, and 
unconcerned with the plight of indigenous Mexicans. 
The Zapatistas have invited people across Mexico as 
well as abroad to vote in a five-question 
international plebiscite about the future of the 
EZLN as a political force. The questionnaire 
reflects the Zapatistas' approach of using 
spontaneous mass insurrections and sporadic 
violence as a prod for negotiations. The Communist 
Party of the Philippines criticizes this strategy 
of subordinating military struggle to elections and 
negotiations extensively.

First World activists may be flattered at being 
asked to decide internal Mexican issues, but this 
is a Mexican matter, to be decided by Mexican 
activists and not by people in the First World who 
lack the knowledge to make informed 
recommendations. The international referendum 
approach is less successful than a protracted, 
self-reliant people's war which creates a 
committed, mass base for revolution. The Zapatistas 
should stop polling First Worlders for their 
opinions, and apply the strategy of people's war as 
it was successfully implemented by the Communist 
parties of China and Vietnam and as it is being 
used today in the Philippines and Peru.

Note: Rebolusyon 1/1/93.

 - a member of the Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist
   League (RAIL)


* * * 


AT A CROSSROADS: MOVEMENT TO SAVE MUMIA WINS 
TEMPORARY VICTORY

by MC12

August 18 - With the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal 
postponed "indefinitely," the movement to save him 
is at a crossroads. The stay of execution granted 
by Judge Albert Sabo allows time for appeals to be 
considered, and it is likely the process will drag 
on for months or maybe years, although that is not 
certain. Thousands of activists all over the world 
have united under the narrow banner of stopping 
this execution. Where do they go from here?

Mumia was framed for the righteous killing of a 
police officer. His show trial exemplified the sham 
of the Amerikkkan injustice system. Saving him 
requires public pressure and legal maneuverings. 
But revolutionaries have to understand that Mumia's 
case is not isolated, that the entire injustice 
system daily oppresses millions of members of the 
oppressed nations in North America.

Mumia himself said, "There are hundreds of 
thousands of Mumia Abu-Jamal's on death row and 
doing life bits in this country. These people are 
not well known."(1) Many of them are well known to 
MIM and readers of MIM's Under Lock & Key section, 
which appears in every issue of MIM Notes (pages 10 
and 11 in this issue).

The question for those who have struggled to save 
Mumia's life is: What about all the others? What 
about the system that perpetuates their oppression?

A BROAD MOVEMENT

The movement of people to save Mumia has been very 
broad. It includes most self-described socialist or 
communist groups in the U.S. Empire, including MIM; 
broad sections of progressive masses in Europe, 
Africa and elsewhere; celebrities and academics; 
student groups; mainstream Black politicians and 
some church groups. Outside of saving Mumia's life, 
these groups have very disparate agendas.

Hundreds of prisoners in Amerikan gulags have 
rallied to stop the execution, including some 200 
in Lewisburg Maximum Security prison in 
Pennsylvania. In Europe and the U.S. Empire, many 
prisoners engaged in public hunger strikes.

Jose Maria Sison, the founding chairperson of the 
Communist Party of the Philippines, declared: "It 
is the duty of the broad masses of the people and 
everyone with a sense of justice to demand that the 
life of Mumia Abu-Jamal be saved and that he be set 
free." Academics for Mumia Abu-Jamal rounded up 
more than 200 members. Calls went out to Asian-
descended communities from the David Wong and Yu 
Kikumura support committees.

Under consistent pressure, the National Association 
of Black Journalists finally filed a brief in 
support of Mumia's right to free speech in jail. 
The United Church of Christ's Commission for Racial 
Justice issued a statement opposing the 
execution.(2) The National Association for the 
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the 
Nation of Islam spoke out for Mumia as well.

Rallies or protests were held in more than 50 
cities of the U.S. Empire. In Washington D.C., 
successive protests turned out increasing numbers 
of people. They culminated in a rally and march of 
several hundred people on August 7th. Marchers, 
organized by the anarchist-led D.C. Coalition to 
Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, walked through poor areas of 
the city passing out flyers and educating community 
members, some of whom emerged from their tenements 
to raise clenched-fist salutes.

At a big rally in Philadelphia on August 12, 
thousands of supporters listened to many speakers 
and raised hell outside the Philly City Hall. 
Uniformed cops kept back, but one organizer 
reported rather obvious police infiltrators: "One 
sister even had some braid/dredlocks thing and a 
clip-on nose ring, but I saw 'Phila. Police Dept.' 
on her camera." Former prisoner Dhoruba Bin-Wahad 
addressed the crowd, pointing out that Congress had 
long hearings on the Waco massacre, and never had 
hearings into the bombing of MOVE members and their 
neighborhood in Philly in 1985. A week later, the 
(In)Justice Department gave $3.1 million to white 
supremacist Randy Weaver as payment for the lives 
of his wife and child, killed by the FBI.(3) MOVE 
members - and the rest of the Black nation - are 
still waiting for their reparations.

Organizers were glad to see the stay of execution. 
But they know that the state hopes to diffuse the 
movement by stalling, lessening the political cost 
of killing Mumia. Not that it's all costs. The pro-
death-penalty white majority wants to see more 
people just like Mumia executed, not less. On the 
Internet, one white supremacist lamented: "I was 
hoping mass riots would break out, so we would be 
forced to unload our stockpiles. Sniff Sniff."

As the movement to save Mumia tried to do some 
mainstream fundraising, it came up against 
roadblocks set by the Fraternal Order of Pigs 
(FOP). A benefit concert featuring progressive 
Black bands was refused the use of Club Vegas. A 
bookstore canceled a public reading from Mumia's 
book after getting calls from the FOP. And a rage 
against the machine benefit concert had to move 
from Philly to Washington D.C. after, according to 
a band spokesperson, "For some reason or another, 
nobody wanted to touch the show."(4) All these are 
examples of why MIM always stresses the need to 
develop independent media that doesn't have to 
kowtow to imperialist whim.

SO WHERE DOES THE MOVEMENT GO NOW?

In an interview, Mumia's defense attorney Leonard 
Weinglass said that the defense hopes to "get a 
court that will look at this case, and loot at it 
with an open mind, and objective mind, that's all 
we ask." As the defense attorney, it's his job to 
do this through legal appeals. But revolutionaries 
cannot get too hung up on the difference between 
one judge and another or between one trial and 
another.

There is no justice for the oppressed in the 
Amerikan injustice system, and fostering illusions 
about a better trial or better judge is a 
politically dangerous game. A new trial is a tactic 
to get Mumia out; it's not about getting justice 
from a system that exists to deny justice to the 
oppressed by any means necessary.

An Azanian friend of MIM, following the case from 
afar, had this perceptive comment: "I've been 
thinking about it, asking myself whether judge 
Sabo's decision should be celebrated as victory for 
us. I couldn't get myself to celebrate it. ... When 
I thought about the fact that Mumia has been in 
jail for 13 years, I told myself that our radical 
demand should be that the Comrade must be set free. 
... In my view, anything less is just a lip service 
which, as a matter of fact, does not remove a 
shadow of death over Mumia's head. ... I don't see 
the possibility of a fair trial."

FIND STRENGTH IN THE MASSES

There is a crucial distinction between appealing to 
the masses and appealing to the state. Tactically, 
the legal appeals must continue. But politically it 
is more important to influence the masses than the 
state, which is a lost cause. For example, the D.C. 
rally that went through neighborhoods of the 
oppressed was more progressive than a rally in 
Burlington, Vermont, where protesters foolishly 
charged a hotel where governors were meeting and 
got arrested, to little effect.

Anyone who wants to end the injustices of Amerika 
needs to see clearly the political nature of crime 
itself. It is vital to understand, as Mumia and MIM 
say, that there are hundreds of thousands of people 
unjustly incarcerated. According to a recent Bureau 
of Justice Statistics report, there are now 1.5 
million people in Amerikan prisons. In MIM's daily 
prison work - organizing prisoners, distributing 
literature to them and building public opinion for 
them on the outside - we don't mess around with 
categories of prisoner. The system is illegitimate; 
it exists to protect the power of the power-
holders. Even people who commit crimes against the 
people deserve a trial by the people and 
punishments with a chance to rectify their crimes.

In the coming months, the thousands of people who 
have participated in the struggle to save Mumia 
Abu-Jamal should remain vigilant and active. The 
state remains poised to take Mumia's life on short 
notice. But the organizers and the masses must also 
take up the cause of ending the oppressive 
injustice system, and the imperialist power 
structure that runs it. Anything less strikes only 
glancing blows against the legitimacy of the 
system. To do justice for Mumia, for the oppressed 
in the U.S. Empire and around the world we must 
continue the fight to build both public opinion 
against this brutal system, and the power to 
destroy it.

NOTES:

Uncited accounts are from individual Internet 
reports or MIM eye-witness accounts
1. NYT 8/13/95, p. A14.
2. Washington News Observer 8/5/95.
3. Washington Post 8/16/95.
4. Philadelphia Daily News 8/7/95.


* * * 


MIM NEWS

ANTI-PRISONS FORUM DRAWS DEDICATED CROWD, SOLID 
DEBATE ON THE NATIONAL QUESTION

Boston, August 19 - RAIL and MIM held a forum on 
political prisoners and repression with speakers 
from the National Committee to free Puerto Rican 
POWs and Political Prisoners, the Revolutionary 
Anti-Imperialist League, Freedom Now Coalition, 
Prison Legal News, the North American Indian Center 
and Latinos for Social Change. A Puerto Rican 
comrade performed revolutionary music (to a loud 
and lasting ovation), and letters were read from 
comrades behind bars who could not be with us to 
participate in the forum in person.

A dedicated crowd of about 30 or 40 people took 
part in this forum that lasted 3 hours and included 
some heavy political debate over the questions of 
national liberation, electoralism, and the role of 
the working class. A local radio station taped the 
program for use in several upcoming news programs 
and we collected more than $120 in donations for 
MIM's Books for Prisoners Program.

VARIED LINES DEBATE THE NATIONAL QUESTION

RAIL's speech opened the forum by broadening the 
question of political prisoners beyond individuals 
like Mumia Abu-Jamal and pointing out that we need 
to struggle for and end to the entire Amerikan 
injustice system. The comrade from the National 
Committee to free Puerto Rican POWs and Political 
Prisoners took this point further, arguing that the 
Amerikan courts should have no jurisdiction over 
people from Amerika's internal colonies. He focused 
on the need for national liberation struggles and 
talked about the failure of many "left" 
organizations to rally behind political prisoners 
from oppressed nations.

The comrade from the North American Indian Center 
discussed the long history of repression Indigenous 
people have faced in this country. He talked about 
the difficulty of publicizing Indigenous political 
prisoner issues when everyone believes that the 
First Nations were all killed off. Amerikan 
schoolchildren are fed lies about the history of 
First Nation history that leave out the national 
struggles against imperialism that have lasted 
hundreds of years and do not realize that the 
struggle continues.

The comrade from Prison Legal News read a speech 
from PLN's editor, Paul Wright, who is currently 
serving a prison sentence and could not attend. He 
spoke about the oppressive system of that the puts 
more than just a few individuals behind bars as 
political prisoners. This was followed by a letter 
from a comrade in a New York prison. This comrade 
pointed out the torture, beating and constant 
repression faced by prisoners and called on 
comrades outside the bars to fight the whole prison 
system and take part in work on the outside both 
against prisons and for national liberation 
struggles.

A representative of the Freedom Now coalition spoke 
about her history in the Black Panther Party and 
the repression that she and her comrades faced both 
on the streets under constant surveillance and in 
prison being tortured and beaten by the prison 
pigs. She called on people to get involved in 
electoral struggles although she added that she did 
not think we could win true liberation and equality 
until we undertook a revolutionary struggle. She 
also focused on the need for working class unity, a 
unity that included the white working class even 
though the oppressed and exploited people that she 
talked about were mostly the oppressed nations. She 
asserted that many working people in this country 
have been pacified by the concessions they have 
been given by the imperialists but still considered 
these people potential revolutionaries. 

MIM responded to this position on the working class 
by pointing out that these workers have been 
pacified such that it is now in their material 
interests to support imperialism. The pay-offs they 
have been given have created a large labor 
aristocracy. While in practice we have unity with 
the work that this comrade does because she 
correctly focuses on the oppressed in this country, 
it is important that comrades understand who, as a 
group, has the potential to be an ally of the 
revolution and who will not be an ally based on 
their class interests.

Finally, the comrade from Latinos for Social Change 
took the opportunity of speaking last to disagree 
with the strategy of electoralism even in the 
interim while we are also fighting for revolution 
and to disagree with those on the panel who were 
arguing for national liberation struggles, instead 
arguing that class is the principal contradiction 
in the world and in Amerika. While all comrades on 
the panel had the strategic unity of working to 
free political prisoners and end the criminal 
injustice system, the disagreement over national 
liberation struggles turned into a lively debate 
which involved many members of the audience. 

While MIM does not see the question of the 
principal contradiction as a dividing line question 
for communists today, we do think it is important 
that comrades have a firm grasp of the principal 
contradiction in order to engage in the most 
effective organizing.

WHAT'S WRONG WITH AMERIKANS? STUDY THE LABOR 
ARISTOCRACY!

The discussion with the audience turned to the 
question of how to organize students around 
revolutionary issues when one person raised the 
question of why he has been unable to organize the 
various cultural centers on his campus for 
progressive activities. The comrade from RAIL 
responded that there is a material basis for these 
cultural centers to feel an allegiance with the 
school administration since that is where they get 
their funding even though many of them were founded 
by progressive struggles of the students. 

This turned the discussion to a question of how to 
organize people around prison issues and why groups 
like Progressive Labor Party, Workers World, CPUSA 
and others will not do more than give token lip 
service to this important issue. A number of people 
on the panel praised MIM as one of the few 
organizations doing serious work around prisons 
issues and one of the few dedicated enough to put 
on and take part in forums such as this one.

MIM encouraged people to study the history of the 
labor movements in this country and the history of 
the pseudo-left organizations to understand why 
they will not support political prisoners and why 
they are not fighting for real revolutionary 
change. An understanding of the large labor 
aristocracy in this country is crucial to the 
effective fight for revolutionary change. 
Repeatedly revolutionary organizations and labor 
organizations have fallen into reformism and social 
democracy because they sought to organize the 
Amerikan workers in their own interests only to end 
up organizing in the interests of imperialism. (To 
learn more about this read J. Sakai's book 
Settlers: the Mythology of the White Proletariat, 
available from MIM for $10). It is also important 
to study the real revolutionary organizations like 
the Black Panther Party, the American Indian 
Movement, the Young Lords Party and others to 
understand why the most progress for revolutionary 
change has been led by organizations fighting 
revolutionary national liberation struggles. 

HELP US DO THIS AGAIN; CONTRIBUTE TO MIM'S PRISONS 
WORK

Participants on the panel expressed interest in 
holding this event again in October when more 
students are in town as we try to get our message 
out to an ever wider audience. Stay tuned for 
information about this upcoming event if you missed 
it the first time.

To contribute to MIM's Books for Prisoners Programs 
which provides revolutionary educational material 
free to prisoners, send check or money order made 
out to MIM Distributors, P.O. Box 29670, Los 
Angeles, CA, 90029-0670.


* * *


INFANT MORTALITY:
NATIONAL OPPRESSION IS NOT IN OUR HEADS

In July, an article on Infant Mortality Rates (IMR) 
in the American Journal of Public Health 
demonstrated that the rate has been declining 
faster for whites than for Blacks, and that the 
disparity between whites and Blacks has increased 
since 1950. Puerto Rican, Hawaiian, Indian and 
Black infants all had mortality rates much higher 
than whites. Blacks in Amerika are oppressed as a 
nation, and that the division between the Black and 
white nations is growing. The study used National 
Vital Statistics data and other national surveys. 
As countries become more developed and their health 
care advances, infant mortality rates fall, 
especially in categories of death that are 
preventable such as prematurity and low birth-
weight. Overall the infant mortality rate for 
Blacks fits this pattern and is falling. But Black 
infants are dying more from prematurity and low 
birth-weight: almost 9% more in 1991 than in 1981. 
So even while in general IMR is declining across 
nations within U.S. borders, Black infants are 
dying more from preventable complications.

Prematurity and low birth-weight were the leading 
causes of death among Black infants in 1991; 
prevention of these problems depends on good 
pregnancy health care and good health of the 
mother. Black infants die at a rate of 269.9 per 
100,000 live births from short gestation and 
unspecified low birth weight; white infants die of 
the same causes at a rate of 66.1 per 100,000 live 
births. This ratio of 4:1 can only be explained by 
national oppression. There is nothing "racial" 
about this issue of survival, it is not a 
"characteristic" Black people have to die as 
infants. The high IMR among Blacks indicates a 
systematic lack of health care which can only be 
understood as a national problem. It would not be 
possible to enforce such thorough institutional 
inequality through anything other than a division 
between nations: white and Black. For whites the 
leading cause of IMR in 1991 was congenital 
anomalies, which are not easily preventable.

More proof that the Black IMR is a product of 
national oppression is the fact that while higher 
education for mothers lead to lower infant 
mortality, this association is stronger for whites 
than for Blacks. "The Black-white disparity was 
greater at higher levels of education and ... the 
racial disparity had generally increased across all 
educational levels during 1964 through 1987." So 
even among Blacks of wealthier classes (as measured 
by mother's education and household income), 
national oppression ensures higher infant 
mortality. Even Blacks who join the petit 
bourgeoisie do not match their Amerikan 
counterparts.

The systematic lack of health care in the Black 
nation is fueled by multinational corporations' 
greed in pushing smoking, drinking and other 
dangerous opiates through a market in genocide: 
these are habits that contribute to the problems of 
infant mortality that Blacks face. MIM's response 
to high Black infant mortality is to build public 
opinion in favor of the liberation of the Black 
nation and all of Amerika's internal and external 
colonies. A self-sufficient Black nation will have 
the authority to provide universal health care to 
all its people. MIM works for revolutionary 
nationalism and socialism. Following their 
liberation from imperialism, oppressed nations all 
over the world will arrange their own state 
economics to prioritize the people's health and 
well-being, and smash the profit-driven militarism 
that defines imperialism and sacrifices the health 
of entire nations.

Note: "Infant Mortality in the United States: 
Trends, Differentials, and Projections, 1950 
through 2010." Gopal K. Singh, and Stella M. Yu. 
American Journal of Public Health, July 1995, Vol 
85, No. 7, p. 957-964.


* * *


CAN THE SPARTS EXPLAIN WHO KILLED VINCENT CHIN?

In Los Angeles, MIM hosted a showing of Who Killed 
Vincent Chin?, a video which exposes the deadly 
alliance between the settler labor aristocracy and 
the imperialists. The video details the murder of 
Vincent Chin by white working class auto workers 
who were out to avenge the loss of auto jobs to the 
Japanese (Chin was Chinese, but to these racists 
there was no difference). The labor aristocracy 
strongly supported the murderers, while a pan-Asian 
movement campaigned for justice, exposing the 
national contradictions between the privileged 
white working class and the oppressed nationalities 
inside Amerika's borders.

Supporters of the Spartacist League showed up at 
the film and helped to underscore the importance of 
MIM's clear line opposing the labor aristocracy. 
The Trotskyist presence at the film showing also 
reminds MIM of the importance polemicizing about 
our line on the labor aristocracy. The Spartacist 
League promised to write to MIM years ago in 
response to our critique of labor aristocracy 
politics. Advancing the debate in writing is the 
best way for both parties to be accountable to the 
masses for our politics.

The Sparts tabled outside before the film started, 
but then packed up the literature and came to watch 
the movie. When the video ended, a MIM supporter 
read excerpts from an unpublished MIM essay on Who 
Killed Vincent Chin? This essay connects the Chin 
case to MIM line on the white working class. The 
excerpt read by the MIM activist ends: "Those 
Marxists such as in the Spartacist League who have 
told us that the U.S. working class is the most 
advanced or tied for most advanced working class in 
the world - they should explain that to Vincent 
Chin's mother."

As the event was drawing to a close, the Sparts 
initiated a struggle with the MIM activists. Only 
MIM and Spartacist League supporters remained at 
this point. The two groups held a freewheeling 
discussion for about an hour, in which MIM made it 
clear that if the Spartacist League really wants to 
struggle with MIM, it should do so in print as it 
once did briefly, as a party's organ is a forum in 
which both parties are held accountable to the 
masses for their respective lines. 

MIM encourages the Sparts and other Trotskyists to 
write to us, as this will help demonstrate the 
failures of Trotskyism to the masses. The 
Trotskyists' dogmatic idealism makes them incapable 
of considering the reality of labor aristocrat 
fascism, even when faced with the blatant 
demonstration given by the auto workers who 
murdered Vincent Chin and then justified the 
killing in openly fascist terms.

Note: For more on the ideological and theoretical 
failures of Trotskyism, see Kostas Mavrakis, On 
Trotskyism, available from MIM for $10. See 
especially Chapter 3, "Trotsky's Incapacity for 
Concrete Analysis."


* * *


QUE VIVA PUERTO RICO LIBRE!

July 30 - An annual Puerto Rican parade was held in 
Boston on this beautiful Sunday and a People's 
Contingent, composed of several progressive Puerto 
Rican organizations, joined in the march. Carrying 
banners that said "Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, Free All 
Political Prisoners," and other messages about 
political prisoners, this contingent brought up the 
issue of Puerto Rican POWs and political prisoners 
while pointing out that this is not just a Puerto 
Rican problem. 

In a leaflet distributed by members of the People's 
Contingent, the marchers explained "This year this 
contingent is composed of several groups that fight 
for social justice. Each group will be carrying 
their own banner. We dedicate this parade to Mumia 
Abu-Jamal an Afro-American political prisoner and 
former Black Panther. The governor of Pennsylvania 
has scheduled August 17, 1995 as his execution 
date. We condemn that they want to execute him."

The contingent ended up behind an Amerikan army 
contingent, a positioning that was symbolic of the 
contradictions between the politics present at the 
parade. The parade was a mixture of revolutionary 
and bourgeois nationalism, with a small contingent 
of reactionary comprador nationalists represented 
in the army cars.

In response to the banners carried by the People's 
Contingent, many people watching the parade raised 
their fists and shouted solidarity slogans such as 
"Que Viva Puerto Rico Libre," which translates as 
"Long Live a Free Puerto Rico." This is different 
from shouting "Long Live Puerto Rico," and it 
represents the difference between nationalist 
consciousness and revolutionary nationalist 
consciousness. Puerto Rico is not currently free as 
it is a colony of the United States. The people of 
Puerto Rico have many reasons to be proud of their 
national heritage and its long history of 
revolutionary resistance. But Puerto Rico in its 
current colonial status deserves only a very short 
life: until the revolutionary struggle for national 
liberation is successful.

Alongside the revolutionary consciousness of the 
People's Contingent, this parade featured many 
symbols of bourgeois nationalism including proud 
youth showing off their fancy cars with the names 
of their home cities in Puerto Rico written on the 
windows. Some featured other slogans such as 
"Respeta mi Bandera," ("respect my flag,") showing 
the national political consciousness that is a 
potential ally of the revolutionary national 
liberation struggle under the leadership of the 
proletariat.

This comrade marched with the National Committee to 
Free Puerto Rican Prisoners of War and Political 
Prisoners banner. Although the People's Contingent 
was small relative to the size of the parade and 
the number of people who joined in to show off 
their fancy cars, the response of the crowd was 
encouraging. Actions such as this one are important 
to show the youth of our many oppressed nations 
that true pride does not come from owning a pretty 
car, it comes from fighting with the struggle to 
liberate the oppressed of the world.


* * *


PSEUDO-FEMINISTS STRENGTHEN PATRIARCHY

by a member of the Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist 
League (RAIL)

Pseudo-feminist groups like Refugee Women and 
Development, Amnesty International, and assorted 
legal groups, recently convinced the U.S. 
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to 
recognize gender-specific forms of persecution in 
political asylum cases. "The new 
guidelines...formally recognize rape, domestic 
violence, domestic abuse, genital mutilation, 
slavery, forced marriage, and other forms of 
violence against women as potential grounds for 
protection."(1) Previously, the INS saw violations 
such as rape as private acts or street crime, not 
as forms of political torture or persecution.

REFORM STRENGTHENS PATRIARCHY

Supporters of this new gender reform are lending 
mountains of credibility to the U.S. government as 
a champion of women's rights. They attempt to hide 
the fact that the way to overturn the patriarchy is 
to organize women to defend themselves against 
violence and to organize oppressed women and men to 
overturn the comprador and imperialist regimes that 
sanction violence against the people.

Approximately 3% (about 5,000 out of 144,000 last 
year) of all applicants are granted political 
asylum, and the majority of political refugees are 
men. The pseudo-feminists touting the gender reform 
in political asylum standards ignore the obvious 
inefficacy of trying to ease the burden of 
patriarchy through the INS. They are not trying to 
address systemic violence against women, they only 
want a a superficial internationalist flavor for 
their movement.

The reform will be useless for women trying to 
escape Amerika's allies, as protection will not 
likely be extended to women who oppose politics 
Amerika upholds. The political manipulation of this 
policy is clearly evident in the case of a Haitian 
woman raped in retaliation for her support of 
Aristide who was recently granted political asylum. 
Amerika needs to rebuild its credibility regarding 
Haiti because it allowed the anti-Aristide military 
so much freedom there. This woman was a convenient 
piece of public relations propaganda for Amerika, 
yet it is clear that the INS did not seek out other 
Haitian women in the same position.

Patriarchy, left intact, continues to define 
violence against women. Women seeking asylum must 
be able to prove that "...their personal political 
beliefs made them a specific target of state 
persecution"(1). So if a woman refuses to tolerate 
culturally acceptable violence, the INS may find 
her political beliefs out of order and reject her 
application. Forced marriage is necessarily defined 
by both partners' willingness to marry. How does a 
woman prove that she's opposed to a specific 
marriage or marriage in general and therefore was 
forced to marry?

THERE IS NO SOLUTION SHORT OF OPEN BORDERS

Rightist opponents of the gender reform claim that 
it will "open the floodgates" for refugees. Yet an 
INS commissioner admits that the new guidelines are 
only a way to "...sensitize immigration service 
officers..." Third World women don't need sensitive 
INS pigs reviewing their applications for asylum, 
the Third World proletariat demands open borders 
and an end to Amerikan domination of its economic 
and political life.

NOTE: Sojourner 7/95, p. 20.


* * *


MIM PRESENTS REVOLUTIONARY FEMINISM AT MICHIGAN 
WOMYN'S MUSIC FESTIVAL

The Michigan Womyn's Music Festival is a week-long 
gathering of several thousand women, mostly 
lesbians, for music, socializing and (identity) 
politics. Workshop topics range from "recovering" 
from racism 12-step style to the Lesbian Avengers. 
This year MIM held two workshops of its own to 
advance revolutionary politics in the struggle for 
women's liberation; MIM stressed that patriarchy 
cannot be abolished without the destruction of 
capitalism through the fight against imperialism. 
Women at the festival supported MIM's analysis of 
gender short of the actual practice of national 
liberation for internal colonies and support for 
Third World Revolutions.

The first workshop focused on a Maoist 
Revolutionary Feminist Perspective. MIM opened the 
discussion by explaining that when we talk about 
gender, we are talking about power, not genitalia. 
The speaker said that throughout the talk, she 
would use the un-sisterly words of "right" and 
"wrong," unabashedly declaring that those who favor 
the continued oppression of women are not "valid," 
and this set the tone for a lively debate. 

MIM pointed out that gender oppression is relative. 
Biological women can wield oppressive gender power 
based on their nation and class. MIM emphasized the 
importance of looking at the appropriation of 
sexuality - instead of just reproductive labor - 
for an analysis of how lesbians fit into the 
analysis. The women at the discussion seemed to 
agree that lesbians are not outside the patriarchal 
paradigm as they recognized that lesbian battering, 
sado-masochism, and pornography are obvious 
manifestations of the eroticization of power among 
women.

UPHOLDING PSYCHOLOGY WITH THE MYTH OF THE BLACK 
RAPIST

To illustrate some of the power that First World 
women have, MIM pointed out that white women have 
the power to put Black men in prisons by crying 
"rape." A member of the audience asked the MIM 
speaker what she would do if she was raped by a 
Black man. To the questioner's great annoyance, the 
speaker prefaced her response with a qualifier as 
to how preposterously unlikely that was. MIM 
pointed out that Black men are not all lurking 
behind bushes looking for a woman to rape - and 
that this is an insidious myth used to justify 
repression against the internal colonies by 
Amerika.

The audience member insisted on knowing what the 
individual MIM member would do in that case however 
hypothetical it was. MIM members work to abolish 
the disgusting society that makes rape routine - 
not to get individuals locked up in a prison system 
that does nothing to change acts that are harmful. 
MIM pointed to the book Prisoners of Liberation and 
the way that China dealt with criminals prior to 
1976 as good examples of a correct practice. 
Thought Reform coupled with criticism and self-
criticism is a way for people to see what they have 
done and why it is wrong.

The discussion focused primarily on psychology. One 
woman said that MIM had a contradictory line 
because MIM does not advocate sending men to jail 
for rape while at the same time we say abolish 
psychology. She said that psychology is the only 
way to ensure that the Black man does not rape 
again.

MIM disagrees. People commit crimes under 
capitalism for material reasons and these reasons 
must be addressed in order to find the solution. 
Reformists who advocate therapy for Black rapists 
of white women want only one-sided change - they 
want continued privilege for white women while 
Black men endure oppression in a more "civilized" 
manner. And if they advocate therapy for the white 
women as well, it is just a way to feel better 
about nation, gender, and class privilege while not 
changing the constant rape inherent in patriarchy.

The audience asked whether 12-step programs were 
also in the objectionable realm of psychology. MIM 
talked about our own experiences in addressing 
problems among Maoists in our circles such as 
substance abuse and depression. MIM maintains that 
it is superior to deal with such problems in the 
context of independent power. MIM directed the 
audience to the upcoming issue of MIM Theory, which 
will focus on psychology. Another woman pointed out 
that you really have to look at who brings the 
drugs into the ghetto - the CIA - and punish those 
people instead of those addicted.

The discussion turned to reproductive rights and 
MIM upheld its support of abortion on demand 
without apology. One audience member was not 
satisfied with this because she thought that she 
should have control over women who have "too many" 
children. Another audience member correctly pointed 
out that the flaw in the logic was that a rich 
woman could have 10 kids but that the woman is 
putting down a poor woman having 10 kids. She 
pointed out that you have to look at and understand 
the reason why poor women have many children. The 
problem is not "too many" children per se, but 
unequal distribution of wealth and gender, class 
and national oppression. Overall this first 
workshop got a very positive response from the 
women in attendance.

FESTIVAL AUDIENCE REJECTS REVOLUTIONARY FEMINIST 
PRACTICE

The second workshop that MIM facilitated, focusing 
on revolutionary feminism as applied in Peru, was 
less welcomed by the women at the festival. MIM 
started out explaining how it is important to work 
from the vantage point of the International 
Proletariat. In this, women's liberation is not 
true liberation if it is gotten off the backs of 
women from the Third World. A good example is how 
birth control First World women use to control 
their own reproductive lives is tested on women in 
the Third World and Peru specifically who do not 
control their own reproduction.

One woman MIM would label a pseudo-feminist said 
that there was no reason for her to look at 
struggles outside Amerika. MIM agrees with this 
woman's assessment of her own objective interests 
and explained that First World women, who as a 
group are part of the gender aristocracy, can 
achieve relative gender privilege by fighting 
within the system. But true liberation for women of 
the world is not going to come through First World 
women climbing the capitalist ladder and continuing 
to support oppression of Third World women. If 
women want real equality instead of imperialist 
patriarchy then we need to fight a subjective 
battle as well. First World feminists must struggle 
to understand that overthrowing imperialism is a 
correct and necessary feminist goal, and they must 
be convinced to commit gender suicide and renounce 
their gender privileges to help achieve this goal. 
Patriarchy cannot be abolished without overthrowing 
capitalism through the fight against imperialism. 
Peruvian women are currently engaged in that 
battle.

MIM explained the history women's importance and 
power in Peru to illustrate the necessity of 
overthrowing imperialist powers. Gender 
stratification and military repression in Peru are 
products of imperialism. The Spanish, English and 
the Amerikans have all forcefully changed the 
indigenous culture and power structure. (MIM 
recommends and distributes Carol Andreas's book 
When Women Rebel for more on this.)

Women were very sympathetic to MIM's assessment of 
the travesties of imperialism and Amerikan economic 
domination. But when it came to what to do, women 
asked if MIM's idea was to kill other people. They 
showed a complete inability to grasp materialism as 
a measuring stick of gains for Third World women. 
They could see no difference between women starving 
with no autonomy and women being in command of the 
local people's committee and able to feed their 
children. The essence of the matter seemed to be 
that if PCP Chairperson Gonzalo himself did not 
change into a biological woman or was not replaced 
by one, the PCP could not really be feminist.

The women in the audience made the same mistake 
that women in Peru made in their earlier stages of 
struggle: they drew the lines based on biological 
sex as opposed to material interests. It is 
important to understand the significant role that 
imperialism has played in exacerbating the 
contradictions between indigenous men and women and 
also to understand that relative to both men and 
women in oppressor nations, indigenous men are 
gendered female. The fight for liberation must not 
set gender aside and reduce all struggles to class 
or nation, but this does not make gender the 
principal contradiction. This faulty analysis 
obstructs discovery of the real principal 
contradiction and serves a reactionary purpose. 

One woman said that she has never seen Maoists that 
did not oppress women within the organization. She 
scoffed at the fact that the PCP leads the 
revolution in Peru with many women leaders and 
ignored the biological gender of the MIM 
facilitator. MIM encourages women hold this line to 
stop complaining about the lack of power that women 
have in revolutionary parties, engage in struggle 
and seize leadership in organizations and parties 
that work to abolish patriarchy.

MIM tried to elicit from these women some kind of 
response as to whether revolutionary violence was 
ever justified, or if, in fact, they believed that 
it was "just as bad" as reactionary violence waged 
against Third World women and men every day under 
imperialism. The women at the workshop professed 
that they wanted something "new," but didn't 
propose anything specific. MIM upholds the PCP as 
the best thing going in Peru. Advocating a non-
existent idealist alternative to revolutionary 
violence amounts to siding with reactionary 
violence. 

MIM hopes that the many women who took copies of 
MIM Notes and took notes at our workshops will 
continue to study the ideas that we discussed and 
join the struggle for women's liberation on a 
global scale.


* * *


PEOPLE'S PICNIC RALLIES IN SUPPORT OF PRISONERS

by member of the Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist 
League (RAIL)

July 4, St. Louis, Mo. - As U.S. imperialism 
celebrated its birthday this year, more than 130 
people gathered at Tower Grove Park in support of 
political prisoners and prisoners of war being held 
hostage by the U.S. government. The Second Annual 
People's Picnic was organized by the Coalition 
Against U.S. Imperialism (CAUSI), a coalition based 
on the agreement that Amerika is an illegitimate 
nation built on the stolen land, labor and 
resources of captive nations.

Revolutionary politics dominated a festive 
atmosphere of food, games and music. A 
representative of the Revolutionary Anti-
Imperialist League (RAIL) hosted the rally: 
"Welcome to the only patriotic picnic in town today 
on behalf of those who work and fight for freedom. 
Those who are now imprisoned because they oppose 
the U.S capitalist-imperialist state which invaded 
this land, killed and enslaved its indigenous 
people, kidnapped and enslaved Africans to build 
its economic base, invaded and annexed northern 
Mexico and Puerto Rico and dictates to other 
nations what types of government they will or won't 
have. While Amerika celebrates its treacherous acts 
today and dares call it freedom, we say "no." 
Instead, we celebrate the fact that freedom loving 
people have always resisted Amerika. Today there 
are hundreds of political prisoners in the U.S. 
because they dared to oppose imperialism and 
support self-determination and socialism. They are 
Puerto Rican freedom fighters, native amerikan 
Indians fighting for self-determination, members of 
the Black Panther Party for self-defense and 
proponents of the Republic of New Africa."

One of the featured speakers, a representative from 
Citizens United for the Rehabilitation of Errants 
(CURE), pointed out that not just political 
prisoners, but all prisoners deserve our support 
and consideration. Prisons, the courts and the pigs 
are politicizing many prisoners by exposing them to 
the class struggle. The speaker noted that "there 
are prisoners being denied their basic human rights 
in these concentration camps. My husband is 
imprisoned at the Potosi correctional facility, a 
control unit prison which is nothing but a legal 
torture institution. This government is not 
fighting crime but committing the crime of 
repression and genocide against poor and working 
people."

This RAIL representative, following MIM leadership, 
organizes around the line that all prisoners are 
political prisoners. People in Amerika's 
penitentiaries have been judged by an outlaw state 
that has no authority to determine "criminality." 
Just as the RAIL speaker listed Amerika's 
treacherous acts against all people who lived on 
this land before Europeans came here, RAIL demands 
Amerika correct its own injustices before it sets 
out to place people in its department of 
corrections.

A sister from the Eastern Missouri Coalition to End 
the Death Penalty spoke about Missouri's last two 
executions. In May, the state executed a man by 
lethal injection at the Potosi control unit prison. 
It took over 35 minutes for him to die. To most 
civilized people, this is torture or "cruel and 
unusual punishment;" but to the state of Missouri 
it is a common way of intimidating and controlling 
Africans, people of color and the poor. "The u.s. 
is the only industrialized country to use the death 
penalty...it has proven to be a weapon by an elite 
ruling class against people of color and the poor. 
It must be abolished." On June 20, the state 
executed William Griffin, accused of murder for a 
drive-by shooting in 1980. The defense had 4 
witnesses testify that Griffin did not do the 
shooting, and was not in the car. The prosecution 
had one witness who was given a deal to testify. 
The prosecution witness admitted in private that he 
perjured himself, but he feared the wrath of the 
court. Governor Carnahan, a Democrat chose not to 
pardon Griffin because he feared political reprisal 
from voters.

Speaking for the All-African People's Revolutionary 
Party, an enthusiastic sister brought revolutionary 
greetings explaining that the fourth of July is 
"...a lie! All of Amerika's actions run against 
freedom and liberty." Referring to Pennsylvania 
Governor Ridge's signing Mumia Abu-Jamal's death 
warrant she charged "They use sacred dates from the 
people's movement to carry out their diabolical 
actions. They used Martin Luther King's birthday to 
start bombing Iraq. Now they are using the birthday 
of Marcus Garvey, August 17, to murder Mumia Abu-
Jamal. But listen, struggle is a two-way street. A 
people's tribunal was recently held where people 
from all over the world condemned the u.s.a. for 
its repeated use of genocide against the world's 
people. The u.s. government was sentenced to death 
at a date which WE will choose! Death to 
imperialism! Death to capitalism!"

CAUSI provided all participants at the picnic with 
postcards to send to Governor Ridge demanding an 
end to all executions and a new and fair trial for 
Mumia Abu-Jamal. More than 100 were collected and 
mailed the next day. A meeting was planned to build 
a huge local demonstration on behalf of Mumia 
calling for a stay of execution and his release 
from prison.

Revolutionary greetings and statements of support 
were sent from the Crossroad Support Network in 
Chicago, a group which works with New African 
political prisoners and prisoners of war; and the 
Maoist Internationalist Movement, the revolutionary 
communist party whose line and leadership RAIL 
follows. Additional speakers presented statements 
of support including: the Midwest Anti-Fascist 
Network, the Gateway Greens, Anarchist Youth 
Federation, Industrial workers of the world, the 
Organizer and the Organization for Black struggle. 
All the statements and greetings were greeted with 
enthusiastic applause and cheers.

Despite a bout with rain, people stayed to hear 
local hip hop group "Eleven-fifty-five" and to eat, 
talk and have a good time. When the rain stopped, 
the sun came out and someone mentioned that the 
rain is considered cleansing in Indigenous 
cultures. Like the rain, a truly revolutionary 
movement led by the proletariat will cleanse the 
world of imperialism and establish communal unity 
of the peoples of the world.


MIM ADDS: This sounds like an excellent event and 
we appreciate the opportunity to publish a report 
on it in our newspaper. There are a couple of 
discrepancies between this article and MIM line; as 
MIM Notes goes to press, we have not had time to 
get a response from the author as to her/his 
agreement with these points:

MIM does not call Indians "native Amerikans" 
because this is a misrepresentation of who they 
are. They are not native Amerikans because the 
Amerika with a k is used to connote the piggish, 
imperialist state we currently live under and there 
is nothing about Indians that is native to that. It 
is more accurate to say that Indigenous people got 
to this continent first, which is why MIM calls 
them First Nations rather than natives. We made a 
mistake about this in the review of Pocahontas in 
MIM Notes 103, so we're sorry if that contributed 
to confusion on this point.

MIM does not call Black people Africans when 
talking about the Black nation here. People whose 
ancestors were brought to this country and torn 
from their language, culture, land and nations 400 
years ago are no longer Africans. To call them that 
is to deny the history that created the Black 
nation and made it impossible for members of the 
Black nation to return to their ancestral homes as 
Africans. 

MIM also does not refer to "people of color" 
because color is not the issue. The people referred 
to in this article are oppressed nationals, members 
of internal colonies. As groups, these people are 
defined by their national differences from, and 
their national oppression by Amerika.


* * *


NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES STRIKE FOR PIE

Two thousand five hundred employees of the Detroit 
News Agency (DNA) have been on strike since July 
13th. At least one Trotskyist front group, the 
National Women's Rights Organizing Committee 
(NWROC), is organizing to help the strikers. MIM 
takes the Maoist line and upholds the perspective 
of the international proletariat: the Labor 
Aristocrat strikers are in a bloody alliance with 
the big corporate capitalists. The DNA employees 
want better benefits in exchange for their service, 
even though these benefits can only be proffered at 
the exnspee of the Third World proletariat.

After the contracts for these printers, press 
operators, mailers, photoengravers, and newsroom 
and maintenance workers expired April 30th of this 
year. The unions and DNA have been firing 
accusations of bargaining in bad faith back and 
forth ever since; with disputes over pay raises, 
company supplements to pensions and job security 
blocking a settlement.(1) In June, the labor board 
ruled against the Newspaper Guild Union 22 for 
failing to bargain in good faith on an overtime 
proposal by management. Now the National Labor 
Relations Board is considering union complaints 
that the newspapers bargained in bad faith.(4)

There is nothing heroic about workers who already 
have benefits and pensions arguing over more 
benefits and pensions while other workers don't get 
enough to eat. The strikers have solicited funds 
from the AFL-CIO to support their strike,(5) and 
were promised up to $1 million.(6) This is the same 
AFL-CIO that got its money by opposing the 
struggles of Japanese and Mexican farm workers in 
California(8) and supported the UAW's fight against 
Black nationalists and oppressed nationals in 
Detroit.(9)

The NWROC has tried to build support for the 
strikers by asking subscribers to drop their 
subscriptions to the DNA papers and protested 
stores that carry them, like Border's Bookstores.

MIM supports the struggle of Third World workers 
for survival wages and working conditions. We work 
to build public opinion in favor of national 
liberation struggles, independent institutions of 
the oppressed and anti-imperialism and anti-
militarism. If the striking workers in this country 
would strike in favor of these goals, MIM would 
support them in that. But history tells us not to 
tail after struggles that ignore the interests of 
the Third World proletariat. We will continue to 
struggle scientifically against those who would 
subjugate the just struggles of the oppressed to 
bogus First World chauvinist goals.


NOTES:

1. The Michigan Daily 7/19/95, p. 3.
2. The Detroit News 8/6/95, p. 6A.
3. The Detroit News and Free Press 8/10/95, p. A1,
   A11.
4. The Detroit New and Free Press 8/9/95, p. A1,
   9A.
5. The Detroit News 8/2/95 p. 4A.
6. The Detroit Free Press 8/3/95, C1.
8. See Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins
   of White Supremacy in California by Toma's
   Almaguer.
9. See Detroit: I Do Mind Dying, A Study in Urban
   Revolution by Dan Georgakas and Marvin Surkin.


* * *


PARASITE MERGER:
UNIONS MERGE TO NEGOTIATE CUSHIER DEALS

Amerika's three largest labor aristocracy unions - 
the United Auto Workers, United Steelworkers of 
America and the International Association of 
Machinists and Aerospace Workers - are merging to 
increase their collective bargaining power. On July 
27 the unions signed an unofficial document 
announcing their plan to merge, but it will be five 
years before the merger is complete.

Imperialism is defined by ever more decadent 
demonstrations of its own stagnation. The unions 
are merging because their membership has declined 
so much in the past 20 years that they no longer 
have as much bargaining clout as they would like. 
The unions blame a hostile political climate for 
the lag in participation, but MIM understands that 
the need for labor aristocracy organization has 
disappeared. Labor aristocrats are not afraid to 
organize, they are too bloated to feel the need. 
But the superprofits that bloat them have to come 
from somewhere. As the class contradictions within 
the white nation become harder to see, the 
contradictions between U.S. imperialism and the 
oppressed nations get bigger.

As manufacturing companies move to the Third World 
superexploit Third World proletarians, the U.S. 
labor aristocracy finds it can do less organizing 
and more consuming. Labor aristocrats are 
compensated for more than the value of their labor 
in wages and benefits. They are also doing less 
production and more paper-shuffling.(see MT 1 or 
Settlers: the Mythology of the White Proletariat 
for an analysis of the political economy of the 
White Working Class)


* * *


UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS ABOLISH 
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

On July 20, the University of California regents 
voted to
wipe out gender- and nationality ("race")-based 
preferences in student admissions, hiring and 
contracting. KKKalifornia Governor Pete Wilson, 
himself a regent, understands that nothing brings 
home settler votes better than attacks on the 
oppressed nations. The governor recently proved it 
by immigrant-bashing his way to re-election.

Affirmative action has made no more than token 
reparations to Amerika's internal colonies, and MIM 
is outraged that even this tiny bit of progress was 
too much for the settlers and their political 
representatives to allow. We see the emerging 
student struggle in defense of affirmative action 
as progressive, but severely limited.

Affirmative action has been part of Amerika's neo-
colonial way of minimizing the threat of national 
liberation struggles in Amerikkka's internal 
colonies. It allows small numbers of oppressed 
nationality individuals to "integrate" more easily 
with their national oppressors, while the majority 
in the oppressed nations retain more traditional 
colonial status.

Real affirmative action requires reparations from 
the oppressor nations to the internal and external 
colonies and neo-colonies. And that requires that 
the imperialist U.S. bourgeois dictatorship be 
overthrown through armed revolution and replaced by 
a dictatorship of the international proletariat. 

The fact that 30 years of reform were wiped away in 
one blow demonstrates once again the futility of 
the reformist approach to making progressive 
change. The bright side of this latest attack on 
the oppressed nations is that it will bring new 
allies to the side of the international 
proletariat. We hope to see - and will gladly 
assist - students organizing in such a way as to 
raise the cost of the regents' reactionary 
decision.


* * *


UNDER LOCK & KEY


JOIN THE STRUGGLE

Dear MIM,

I received the June issue of MIM Notes without 
problem, thank you. However, the May issue was 
confiscated for review because of articles dealing 
with the abuse of prisoners by prison staff. The 
Publications Review Board felt that it was 
disruptive to the safety & security of the prison, 
and sent it to Springfield for their final review.

I still want to continue to receiving MIM Notes - I 
have no intention of letting the prison stop me 
from reading what I choose to read. They cannot 
stop me from reading what I choose to read. They 
cannot censor my reading materials simply because 
they do not agree with the articles, they have no 
basis for denying them.

Please help me with a problem. There are three of 
us on the same tier who want to start a study 
group, and we think it'd be really beneficial 
because we all have different political 
philosophies that we can draw upon to help each 
other grow. Our only problem seems to be getting 
any support from the brothers around us. We can 
only do so much as a three-man group. How can we 
get the brothers interested in joining our 
struggle? It seems that they're more afraid of 
having the guards come down on them than they are 
concerned about enlightening themselves.

Thanks once again for MIM Notes, and I look 
forward to hearing from you.

 - an Illinois prisoner, 6/30/95

RMG1 RESPONDS: A study group with only three 
people is a great start. Lead by example and maybe 
others will follow you. To quote an Indiana 
prisoner, "Keep on reaching out to these brothers, 
because they are too important to give up on."


ILLINOIS PRISONER PUTS CENSORS AND
BOBBY SEALE IN THEIR PLACE

Dear Comrades,

I received the newsletter and was delighted to 
hear from you. Let me assure you that I have tried 
to get in touch with you. However, since winning a 
grievance against the warden and a mailroom 
employee for the state who classified such 
material as gang literature, I had not received 
anything until what you recently sent.

I believe because I proved to imperialist 
representatives sent here from the state capital 
that the material in question was neither gang-
related nor racially antagonistic the staff here 
are destroying whatever I attempt to send out that 
is strongly political and whatever is sent to me.

It is a good thing that you wrote about the film 
"Panther" as I knew you would, because Bobby Seale 
trashed the film along with the memory of Huey P. 
Newton in a television interview with Tom Snyder. 
While in typical capitalist fashion he promoted 
himself and the upcoming film version of his book 
(Seize the Time). [MIM agrees with this prisoner's 
assessment of Bobby Seale's current politics, but 
the party does like and distributes this book 
because it is a good history of the BPP.]

Seale made charges of Newton attempting to break 
into the underworld rackets as the basis for him 
(Seale) leaving the Black Panther Party in 1974.

When Snyder pointed out the book's coverage of the 
Party's history was incomplete, Mr. Barbecue Sauce 
replied, "That's why we're working on a sequel."

 - an Illinois prisoner, 6/19/96


MASSACHUSETTS PRISONER FIGHTS CENSORSHIP

To: Paul Murphy, Superintendent, Old Colony 
Correctional Center
Superintendent:

On May 26, 1995, I received Form 403-8, Contraband 
Notification. Apparently the mail officer at OCCC 
[Old Colony Correctional. Center] contrabanded an 
incoming publication from MIM Distributors, 
claiming there was "gang-related" material in this 
publication, and failed to follow the regulations 
as enumerated in 103 CMR 481.

More specifically, the regulations violated were:

# 103 CMR 481.16(2)(b) which states I will be
  given notice that a written appeal can be
  submitted

# 103 CMR 481.15(2)(c) which states that it is the
  deputy superintendent's decision to exclude a
  particular magazine or publication

# 103 CMR 481.15 (1)(a)-(g) states what material
  may be excluded and there is no reference to
  "gang-related" material. Furthermore, no
  definition of "gang-related" material is given
  to any prisoner and as 103 CMR 481.15(2)(a)
  explicitly states:

No publication can be rejected "solely because its 
content is religious, philosophical, political, 
social or sexual, or because its content is 
unpopular or repugnant."

The absence of the right to appeal notification is 
a clear-cut violation. The fact that the deputy 
superintendent did not make the decision to 
exclude/or contraband the publication is beyond 
doubt. [A mail officer rejected it.  - MIM]

These regulations are ones that obligate prison 
officials and therefore because an obligation has 
been violated it is clear that your subordinates 
are in need of correction and thus your 
intervention is required.

In addition to excluding the publication in 
violation of 103 CMR 481, there is no indication 
that 103 CMR 481.16(2) was followed in respect to 
the publisher. The deputy superintendent must 
notify the publisher in accordance with policy. 
[MIM was not notified by OCCC  - MIM]

Superintendent, without more, the rejection and 
contrabanding of the publication is invalid. A 
broad-based rejection by the mail officer as to 
"gang-related" material is not a "reason."

Additionally, 103 CMR 481.16(4) states that I must 
be given the opportunity to "inspect in the 
presence of correctional personnel, any 
disapproved material for purposes of filing an 
appeal." Pursuant to this section I hereby request 
to inspect the alleged offending material for the 
purpose of filing an appeal.

Where I do not receive any response by June 10, 
1995, I will consider the absence of a response a 
refusal to answer and proceed with an appeal to 
the commissioner's office.

I await your reply and your corrective action.

 - a Massachusetts prisoner, 5/27/95


FLORIDA CENSORS MIM NOTES

Request for admissible reading material is denied 
at Okaloosa Correctional Institution. Any single 
issue of any publication shall be rejected if it 
otherwise presents a clear and substantial threat 
to the security, order or rehabilitative 
objectives of the correctional system or the 
safety of any person. 

Title: MIM Notes April 1995 99 The official 
newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist movement

 - Mailroom, Okaloosa Correctional Institution,
   3189 Little Silver Rd, Crestview, FL 32536,
   4/25/95 

MIM ADDS: Readers are encouraged to send letters 
of protest to the above address.


KENTUCKY REJECTS MIM NOTES

Notice of rejected mail

After inspection ... this mail has been considered 
as unacceptable because of the following 
reason(s):

Newspaper rejected that poses a potential threat 
to the nature of the security of this correctional 
facility.

 - Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky State
   Penitentiary

MIM ADDS: Both May and June 95 issues of MIM Notes 
have been withheld from at least two prisoners at 
Kentucky State Penitentiary. Letters of protest 
can be sent to: Dot Bacon or H. Mayfield, Mailroom 
staff, Kentucky State Penitentiary, PO Box 128, 
Eddyville, KY 42038-0128 


ALABAMA CENSORS MIM

The William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility 
censored the June 1995 issue of MIM Notes. In 
response, MIM sent a form letter to the prisoner 
whose paper was censored stating that the facility 
had censored MIM Notes and listing several 
possible actions the prisoner could take such as 
writing articles, describing prison conditions, 
and suggesting possible solutions. In response to 
MIM's letter, MIM received this letter from the 
prisoncrats at the William E. Donaldson

Correctional (sic) Facility.

Dear Sir/Madam,

As the attached letter is not conducive to good 
prison order, correspondence from your company 
will not be allowed into the facility.

Sincerely,

Ray Hightower, Acting Warden/Institutional 
Coordinator, 7/14/95

Letters of protest can be sent to: Mr. Hightower, 
Acting Warden/Institutional Coordinator, William 
E. Donaldson Correctional Facility, 100 Warrior 
Lane, Bessemer AL 35023-7299, phone (205) 436-
3681, Fax (205) 436-3399


FEDS THREATEN TO KILL FOR THOUGHT-CRIME

The prisoner who was scheduled to be executed at 
the main prison here had gotten a "stay of 
execution" for at least sixty days. He was 
scheduled to be executed on March 30, 1995. This 
would have been the first federal execution since 
the 1960s.

It turns our that he received the death penalty 
for a conspiracy offense! He was convicted for 
conspiracy to take out a "contract" on a federal 
witness. It's a capital offense. It really bothers 
several of us here that any conspiracy would be a 
capital offense, (or that the death penalty exists 
at all).

Well, thanks for sending MIM Notes! It's always 
thought-provoking.

 - a federal prisoner in Indiana, 4/2/95


OREGON CONTINUES TO CENSOR MIM NOTES

In April, Under Lock and Key reported that the 
Oregon State Corr. Facility has been rejecting MIM 
Notes since December 1994, because it contains 
material that, according to the prisoncrats, 
threatens or is detrimental to the security, good 
order, or discipline of the facility or 
facilitates criminal activity. Specifically 
targeted was the statement "through armed 
struggle" in the "What is MIM?" box on page two of 
every MIM Notes which the prisoncrats summed up as 
a promotion of armed revolution. On the request of 
a prisoner who wanted to receive MIM Notes, MIM 
even blacked out sections of the "What is MIM?" 
box, but to no avail. Each issue has been rejected 
with the same notice.

MIM Notes readers can send letters of protest to: 
Mailroom, Oregon State Corr. Institution, 3405 
Deer Park Dr., Salem, OR 97310-9385.


POLITICAL PRISONERS AND ORGANIZATIONS UNITE TO 
SAVE THE LIFE OF ZIYON YISRAYAH NOW

In Indianapolis, Indiana, the Indianapolis police 
department made a pre-dawn raid on the home of 
Ajamu Nassor and Ziyon Yisrayah on December 11, 
1980. The men and women in the house were asleep 
when the police kicked in the door and 
indiscriminately started firing and throwing tear 
gas inside of the home, leaving Ziyon Yisrayah 
wounded and Sgt. Jack Ohrberg of the Indianapolis 
Police Department dead.

What concerns us about this case is that it was 
determined at the time that Sgt. Ohrberg had been 
shot in the back and that the bullet that killed 
him did not come from either of the guns within 
the house. Most importantly, when this officer was 
shot, he had been facing Ajamu and Ziyon. The 
evidence is clear that this officer was killed by 
someone behind him and only police officers were 
in that position. Ajamu Nassor and Ziyon Yisrayah 
both received the death sentence for the December 
1980 slaying of Police Sgt. Jack Ohrberg. 

The prosecutors and Governor Evan Bayh both have 
publicly acknowledged and admitted in all the 
major newspapers in this state that Officer 
Ohrberg was in fact shot in the back and that 
neither of the guns found in the house was the 
murder weapon.

On December 8, 1994, at 12:13 a.m., the Indiana 
Department of Corrections (sic) executed Ajamu 
Nassor and pronounced him dead. Ziyon Yisrayah is 
now sitting on Death Row fighting for his life and 
needs your support. Now is the time that we must 
unite and act to save his life! We are asking all 
organizations who are campaigning against the 
death penalty, the New African Independence 
Movement and other movements and organizations 
fighting for justice, to act now to save the life 
of Ziyon Yisrayah. Mail all letters and petitions 
asking for executive clemency to the people and 
organizations below.

Ziyon Yisrayah is on Death Row for a crime that 
evidence proves he did not commit, and the 
prosecutor admits he did not commit. Such 
injustice is frightening and massive action is 
necessary. This cycle of violence diminishes all 
of us, especially our children. Violence is evil 
and is unacceptable as a solution to problems. It 
goes against the truth of our humanity.

Mail all letters and petitions for executive 
clemency to:

President Bill Clinton, The White House, 1600 
Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, DC 20500 Phone: 
202-456-1111 Fax: 202-456-2461

Governor Evan Bayh, Office of the Governor, The 
State House, Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317-
232-4567 Fax: 317-232-3443

For More Information contact: 

Human Rights Coalition of Indiana, 508 E. Corby 
Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601
Brew City Anti-Authoritarian Collective, P.O. Box 
93312, Milwaukee, WI 53203

ACT NOW IN SOLIDARITY
FREE MUMIA ABU-JAMAL
ABOLISH THE RACIST DEATH PENALTY

 - an Indiana prisoner


HUMAN TORTURE CHAMBER

This place is a human torture chamber. They came 
to my cell to get me on Monday the 13th, gave me a 
minute to pack my personal stuff, and took me to A 
& P to dress me. As I was walking to the Sally 
Port to the van, after having been cuffed and 
shackled, they allowed the dog to bite me on my 
arm. he didn't break skin but it made me very 
angry. 

In the Sally Port were a bunch of black-gloved, 
Nazi-looking Klansmen. They opened the door of the 
van, saying real loud, "Inmate, turn your fucking 
head. Don't look at me." I immediately took 
offense and rebelled. I told him, "Fuck you." He 
put his nasty hands over my mouth and reached in 
and undid the seat belt. They grabbed me and 
snatched me to the ground. They took my gloves 
(which I've not seen again). Then one really 
nasty-looking Klansman took his knuckles and 
applied pressure to the pressure point under my 
ear, causing me excruciating pain. 

They took me into a room and put me face down on 
this dirty, cold concrete floor, told me to stay 
there and don't get up, yelling loud all the time. 
I immediately got up because I am not used to 
being treated like a dog. They told me to lay down 
on the floor, I was still handcuffed and shackled, 
when I did not comply, they maced me. Then the 
"CERT" team rushed me with a shield, banging my 
head against the wall, slamming me to the floor. 
One was standing on my head, grinding my face into 
the concrete. 

One had crisscrossed my legs and was trying to 
break them. One or two were twisting my wrist. I 
thought for sure they would break them. They did 
not beat me, but they hurt me in every way they 
could within legal limitations. I may as well have 
been beat up. I could not see for the whole time. 
They took the chains and stuff off me and put more 
on me. Putting them on as tight as they could and 
I was in constant pain. 

They cut the clothes off me and dressed me in 
more. They took me to a cell with nothing in it 
but a metal bunk. They chained me to the bunk, 
face up with my jumpsuit at my ankles. I was left 
like that all day. I had to go to the bathroom on 
myself and they did not feed me. Today is my third 
day here and I've eaten only two meals because I 
don't eat meat and they keep serving meat. This 
morning they would not feed me because they said 
that I wasn't at the door.

They first night they told me that I have to keep 
one of the lights on because the nightlight is not 
working. I was unable to sleep with the light 
shining in my face so I turned it out. They came 
by every 15 minutes all night long kicking on the 
door yelling "Inmate, turn on your light." I asked 
them, why don't they get flashlights. They told me 
to speak to the captain about it. 

Everything is barked at you, in a degrading boot 
kamp way, like you can't hear. They announce on 
the loud speaker, "Inmates, if you are going to 
eat, stand at your door now!" Then when the food 
cart comes by, they bark, "Back up from the door. 
Sit on your bed." If you are not sitting on your 
bed, they don't feed you. It's sickening. They 
feed you very little, so you are always hungry and 
cold. You are constantly aware of being cold and 
hungry. I am sitting here shivering.

 - a Massachusetts prisoner, 5/16/95


TEXAS PRISON LABOR UNION FORMS

All prisoners inside the Texas Kamps should be 
informed of the founding of the Texas Prison Labor 
Union. The union is in its ground level state of 
organizing. The official charter is presently 
being drafted and filed.

 - two Texas prisoners, 6/15/95


PRISONERS REBEL AGAINST ANTI-PRISONER LEGISLATION

Dear Comrades,

I write to you about a riot that happened here 
early last night. I don't know all the details 
about it but I thought it might be of interest to 
the readers of MIM Notes.

Eight or nine people tied doors shut and broke 
broom handles and literally destroyed the pod. For 
people who are unaware as to how the units are 
arranged, there are three pods to a unit, each 
with three tiers in a U shape. All pods separate 
to keep people from going from pod to pod.

Prisoners here at Clallam Bay Corrections Center 
are on edge by the new Republican party. The 
Republicans are set out to keep us from working 
our bodies up, taking vitamins and keeping 
ourselves in shape. They also want to charge us 
for medical visits. The legislature passed a bill 
entitled the Hargrove bill, which lets them take 
anywhere from 10 to 30 percent of any money made 
or sent in from our families. For many, this is a 
great amount of money extracted from their pay. 
These are some of the many reasons why this riot 
may have happened. Like I said I don't know all 
the facts since the police here won't give up much 
info, and the news will get what the state wants 
them to know.

 - a Washington state prisoner, 4/17/95


WESTVILLE WARDEN DEMOTED;
PRISONERS SAY "GOOD RIDDANCE!"

Greetings,

For four years the Uncle Tom Warden Charles E. 
Wright asserted his dictatorship at the Maximum 
Control Complex (MCC) in Westville. He bragged 
about his control and got off on the physical and 
psychological torture of the prisoners an this 
genocidal tomb. He called prisoners young punks, 
and stole mail. He ordered prisoners to be chained 
to their beds, and dehumanized them with masks. 
This sick coward was truly a psychopath, he ranted 
and raved like a dog in heat, but never thought 
about being beat. He even had the nerve to tell a 
prisoner he didn't believe fat meat was greasy, 
but he believes it now. That's why Charley is no 
longer the warden at MCC. His expiration date was 
on 4/21/95. Instead of being demoted to assistant 
administrator at the Westville work release, 
Wright should have been demoted to "hell" for his 
horrendous crimes against humanity!

Please do continue sending me MIM Notes and keep 
me on your mailing list.

 - an Indiana prisoner, 4/25/95


DISCUSS, ORGANIZE AND AGITATE

This is being directed at brothers, to let them 
know that we continue to resist at MCC (Maximum 
Control Complex), no matter how oppressive our 
conditions. We continue to discuss, organize and 
agitate against the U.S. government. As of 
February 2, 1995, brothers have been placed on 
punitive quarantine status without probable cause 
other than pick and choose. This started about a 
TB (tuberculosis) shot which the majority refuse 
because of religious reasons. Others refuse the 
shot because guards say the shot is mandatory, 
which it's not. We continue to resist even though 
we know they may obtain a court order forcing us 
to receive the TB shot. We have discussed this 
point too and stand ready to resist.
Standing strong,

 - A Indiana prisoner, 4/495


PRISON BRIEFS

Double-celling is proceeding apace. Some of us 
political prisoners are forced to work in Unicor 
[a company which contracts with the prisons to use 
prisoner labor  - ed.]. A comrade was framed 
recently.

 - a Kansas prisoner, 5/1/95

I was in Vietnam, captured as a POW and received 
better treatment than that which is now being 
afforded to me here.

 - a Colorado Prisoner, 7/17/95

The blowers are being turned on in our cells, 
causing the temperature to drop to around 40 
degrees. This started about a month ago. For the 
first week the blowers remained on 24 hours 
straight. Since then they are turned on at 7 a.m. 
and shut off at 4 p.m. The reason: an alleged high 
level of carbon monoxide.

 - a Maryland prisoner, 4/3/95

The beatings still go on. Isolation cells are 
still being used, although I hear that both the 
"pink-room" and the "cadre area" isolation cells 
are no longer to be used due to a government 
investigation, but if so, it hasn't started yet. 
The physical and psychological torture is applied 
constantly and the blowers I mentioned are still 
in effect.

 - a Maryland prisoner 5/7/95

Texas no longer feeds its captives beef. Yeah 
they've got a new flavor, "VitaPro" (soybean). 
They are actually feeding us animal food. That and 
pork (forced vegetarianism). Despite the fact that 
the system raises and slaughters thousands of cows 
and pigs a week. Obviously being sold for private 
profit.

 - a Texas prisoner, 6/2/95

MIM Notes is not copyrighted. Please credit MIM 
when redistributing or referring to this material. 
Subscriptions are $12/year (12 issues), U.S. mail 
or e-mail. Send cash, stamps or check made out to 
"MIM Distributors."

Write: MIM Distributors, PO Box 3576, Ann Arbor MI 
48106-3576. E-mail: mim@nyxfer.blythe.org.

 [About]  [Contact]  [Home]  [Art]  [Movies]  [Black Panthers]  [News]  [RAIL]