This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
*----------------------------------------------------------*
| |
| x x x x x x x xx xxx xxx xxx |
| xx xx x xx xx xx x x x x x x Issue #18 |
| x x x x x x x x xx x x x xx xxx |
| x x x x x x x x x x x x 12/21/85 |
| x x x x x x x xx x xxx xxx |
| |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Newspaper of the Maoist Internationalist Movement |
*----------------------------------------------------------*
APARTHEID DOOMED
IMMIGRATION TIDE TURNING AGAINST APARTHEID
Since the riots in South Africa in Soweto in 1976, the
number of jittery white South Africans who left the country
equalled the number attracted by opportunities to exploit.
Today, according to the Wall Street Journal, the tide has
turned. ("Pulling Out: White South Africans Flee Country,
Fearing A Grim Future There, 12/13/85, p. 1)
10% of South Africa's white population says it will get
out by 1990. Many more are making efforts to find the means
of selling houses and collecting up money to leave.
Apparently, many would like to leave, but the position of the
South African currency (rand) is so poor that whites do not
have the means of selling their property and going anywhere
else where they would have the hope of regaining their former
lifestyle. (Ibid.)
At the same time, South African businesses are failing at
a record rate, twice that of four years ago. ("Bankruptcies
Rise in South Africa As Strife Undercuts Economy," Wall
Street J., 12/20/85, p. 19) This is a good lesson in
dialectics: even when the capitalists think they have it so
good, their success in exploitation unexpectedly blows up in
their face.
The pressure of the Black revolt supported broadly in
world public opinion is too much for the white population of
South Africa, which owes its middle class status to the sweat
of Black laborers. The emigration of the whites leaves the
white settler government in that much more of a desperate
position. Already white men serve a three year mandatory
service in the armed forces, which have duties in sabotaging
Black African nations all over the southern half of the
continent. In the latest action, South African troops moved
further into Angola in pursuit of Namibian guerrillas trying
to wrest control of their country from South African
colonialism. (Wall Street Journal, 12/20/85)
There will be a growing shortage of people to hold down
the Black people. Apartheid is wearing thin.
NEW RIGHT ORGANIZES WHILE REAGAN STALLS ON SOUTH AFRICA
Joining the efforts of Jerry Falwell and Rev. Moon to
rally public opinion to prop up South Africa is Accuracy in
Media. Accuracy in Media is a New Right watchdog of the press
that sees a liberal bias in most news-reporting.
The extreme isolation of apartheid in public opinion has
driven the New Right into desperate exhortations. Reed
Irvine, who is chairman of Accuracy in Media published an
editorial in USA Today that supports the ban of foreign mass
media from South Africa and restrictions on all journalists
covering riots. At the moment two British TV cameramen are
being charged by a Johannesburg court for inciting riot.
(Wall Street Journal, 12/20/85, p.1)
In characteristic New Right fashion, the editorial nowhere
makes the obligatory criticisms of apartheid that even Reagan
makes to cover up his lack of effective action to end U.S.
support for the white settler regime in South Africa
(Azania). Reed Irvine comes right out for repression of
coverage of oppression with the excuse that the Soviets do
it, so why can't we?
By contrast, even the South African ambassador, also
published in the wonderful pages of USA Today--who next, the
KKK?--felt it necessary to put up window-dressing. "Since
1980, South Africa has taken concrete steps to demonstrate
what it has repeatedly declared--that the era of white
domination has ended and political participation must be
extended to blacks."
Meanwhile, at the Wall Street Journal, disguised fascism
won more air time. Accuracy in Academia, a spin off of
Accuracy in Media, which has connections to the John Birch
Society received top billing in a piece by David Brock on the
Journal's opinion page. (A few days later the lead story for
the Wall Street Journal was the new-found credibility of the
Rev. Moon's newspaper--the Washington Times.)
David Brock credits Marxism in several ways by his
criticism. "About 250 ethnic-studies programs now exist on
campuses, and women's history, written mostly by neo-Marxist
feminists, is an accepted fixture at many schools." (Wall
Street Journal, 12/12/85) Furthermore, Marxism's relevance or
"present-mindedness is a sharp break with traditional
intellectual standards." (Ibid.)
In addition to attacking minorities generally, Brock makes
the disgusting comparison of university professors to people
in the government. Brock comments that the Marxist professors
condone the heckling of Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Caspar
Weinberger. Brock sees the Marxist professors as a major
danger or source of repression in society.
As usual for New Right mythology, free speech is for
people in the United States Government and not for people who
criticize the government, never mind the Salvadorans and
South African Blacks, who Weinberger & Co. murder regularly.
Recently at a campaign puff speech, Bush retorted hecklers
by saying "try that in Lenin [he means Red] Square"--in other
words, be thankful for free speech and shut up! To George
Bush and the rest of the Reagan Administration, MIM NOTES
makes the following offer. "Go to South Africa!"
JERRY FALWELL SUPPORTS MARCOS TOO
Lest anyone think fundamentalist leader Jerry Falwell does
not consistently support semi-fascist regimes like South
Africa, Jerry Falwell announced that Americans should support
the dictator of the Philippines--Ferdinand Marcos. The United
States already plans a $900 million military aid package in
return for continuing use of two military bases in the
Philippines. (Detroit Free Press, 11/12/85, p. 4a)
Question: With the divine backing of Falwell and Moon, why
does Marcos make "his most important decisions on days that
either have the number Ô7Õ in them or are divisible by 7?"
(Chicago Tribune, 11/10/85, p. 7)
INDEPENDENCE YET TO BE WON IN COUNTRIES BORDERING SOUTH
AFRICA
Lesotho receives over 50% of its national income from
miners who "migrate" to South Africa. Mozambique has 60,000
workers in S. Africa in addition to important port and
hydroelectricity agreements. As a result, Mozambique and
Zimbabwe support economic sanctions, but can not afford to
alienate S. Africa in practice. South Africa keeps all of its
neighbors in line partly by threatening to expell foreign
workers. (Detroit Free Press, 11/12/85, p. 1)
THE BEAT GOES ON
Cubans are fighting the U.S.-backed contras in Nicaragua
according to Secretary of State Schultz. There are 2,500
Cuban military advisers in Nicaragua according to Schultz.
(Detroit Free Press, 12/7/85, p. 1)
Meanwhile, private American citizens are getting paid
$1,000 a month to fight with the contras; Spanish neo-Nazis
are also recruited as mercenaries and somewhere somehow the
contras bought the capability to shoot down Soviet-made
helicopters.
Although Sandinista leader Ortega offered the USA to send
home the Cubans if the U.S. ends aid to the contras, the
superpower contention in Nicaragua is heading up a notch.
Schultz hinted that more military aid will be next for the
contras if the Cubans continue their role in Nicaragua.
AMERICAN MEDIA DISCOVERS SOVIET MEDIA
During the past year, Soviet television has shown seens of
combat in Afghanistan. The coverage depicts the dangers and
the pursuit of Afghanis by Soviet troops, who occupy
Afghanistan.
Like the American media, the Soviet media portrays the
Soviet Union favorably. Soldiers in Afghanistan are seen as
doing patriotic duty to the Soviet motherland. Grenada or
Afghanistan, you be the judge: "The primary purpose of such
reports has been to invest a little-known and little-
understood conflict with some glory and patriotism."
("Suddenly, Soviet Media Discover Afghanistan," Detroit Free
Press, 11/12/85, p. 7a)
YEAR PASSES ON BHOPAL DISASTER--DECEMBER 3RD, 1984
The Union Carbide chemical gas disaster in Bhopal, India
that left over 1,750 people dead is still in court. Now Union
Carbide, threatened with take-over bids by companies that
promise to run exploitation without being caught, is taking
the classic blame the victim approach.
"The Indians were to blame. 'When we put [the plant]
there, we were outside the city,' Mr. Anderson says, but he
adds that the Indians allowed the people to settle around it.
'That's what they do in the Third World.'"
(Wall Street Journal, 12/26/85, p. 22)
Union Carbide's anti-Third World consciousness is
revealing. "It could never happen here," said Chairman
Anderson to the Congress. However, on August 11th, another
leak developed, this time in W. Virginia, where 135 people
were injured. (Ibid.)
In the American case, chairman Anderson suggested that the
135 are hypochondriacs. "'I think that if we had a release of
Aperge [at a plant], 135 would go to the hospital.'" (Ibid.)
Now Union Carbide claims that the Bhopal disaster was
sabotage by Sikh militants. (Ibid.)
On the upbeat side, the Wall Street Journal published
cheery reports that freedom of exploitation is as great as
ever in Mexico, India, South Korea and elsewhere. "'The
disaster didn't result in a generalized attack on
multinationals,' says Edward Stumpf, the commercial counselor
at the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi." (Ibid.)
In case anyone was having second thoughts, the race for
profit is still on. He who hesistates will lose a take-over
bid.
ANY CAPITALIST CAN BE SENATOR
The 33 senators elected in 1984 spent an average of almost
$3 million in their campaigns. House members averaged
$288,636. (Detroit Free Press, 12/8/85)
MILITARY BUILD-UP PROFITABLE
The Navy released a study that shows that capitalists make
more profits on "defense" contracts than in non-"defense"
work. Some of the Pentagon's 22 major contractors make as
much as 20% more profit on their war supplies than on other
commodities. Overall, in 1984 the profit rate for defense
work was 9.2% compared to a rate of 7.7 to 8.0% for non-
military sales.
As measured by return on assets, General Dynamics made 49%
on its military aerospace work while military shipbuilding
yielded a 44% return. At Boeing, 90% of all profits comes
from the Pentagon. (Wall Street Journal, "Defense Contracts
Yield Higher Profits Than Private Work, Navy Study Says.")
The report shows that the higher profits went along with the
recent acceleration in military spending.
MERGER MANIA CONTINUED
In the cut-throat competition to outproduce and undercut
competitors, companies find it most convenient to buy
competitors and spread into new areas. An ever smaller number
of capitalists runs ever larger pieces of the economy.
Texaco has lost two legal battles in its takeover of Getty
Oil. Penzoil has charged Texaco with dirty dealing. Forced to
choose between two members of the capitalist class, who
should the government award? In this case, Texaco was
apparently lax in pulling government strings. ("Courting
Disaster: How Texaco Turned Big Takeover Victory Into Bigger
Legal Loss," Wall Street Journal, 12/20/85, p.1) Penzoil has
won a $11.1 billion judgement against Texaco in court.
General Electric acquired RCA for $6.28 billion. (Wall
Street Journal, 12/12/85, p. 3) GAF offered $4.13 billion for
an additional number of shares to takeover control of Union
Carbide. (Wall Street Journal, 12/13/85, p. 5)
READERS CRITICIZE AND PRAISE MIM NOTES
MIM NOTES MAKES SELF-CRITICISM
In using MIM NOTES as an unofficial tool of collective
organizing, MIM has sought reactions to MIM NOTES from all
who read them. Carrying out the mass line, MIM has collected
up your opinions and is now going to present them back as a
comprehensive critique of MIM NOTES.
Most controversially, MIM NOTES started to append typeset
editorials of a radical/liberal nature that had to do with a
number of topics. Praise for the editorials is universal in
that they clearly serve the masses in a very broad,
informative and comprehensible fashion. The editorials are
also in service of mass organizations and liberation
struggles that Maoists would want to serve.
However, as one person said, "this stuff is worthwhile,
but it is not revolutionary." With this simple criticism, it
is clear that MIM should continue to serve the masses, but
not confuse that service work with MIM NOTES as a collective
organizer for the creation of a party. Generally, MIM NOTES
has been attacked for not doing enough theoretical work and
for not connecting the news to a grasp of Marxism-Leninism
Mao Zedong Thought. In response to these criticisms, MIM
NOTES will continue to distribute obscure editorials that are
in the service of the peoples in Eritrea, East Timor or those
that the government comes down on in Central America
solidarity organizations. On the other hand, radical/liberal
editorials are not to be attached to MIM NOTES and MIM asks
that the typeset editorials not be distributed as part of MIM
NOTES. In this way, a political error can be chocked up as
good experience.
As for other criticisms of MIM NOTES, the editors make
self-criticism for laxness. The pace of publication is not
fast enough; MIM THEORY, the essays for working out
programmatic positions and theories has been neglected.
The only way that the problems with MIM's publications can
be overcome is through reliance on broad numbers of people.
Once again, we at MIM call on you the reader to support the
publication with articles and news sources and through
distribution and contributions.
Distribution is the key link because only through
distribution can the power of Mao's mass line be realized.
Only then will enough political resources come together to
make MIM NOTES what it should be.