|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, see our web page on crypto-Trotskyism, the RąP=u$A and the RIM which stole our name
After two months of MIM's exposure of their work for the State Department, the RąP=u$A brought forward their tie to an organization that is working with the Iranian Muhahedin as a stooge of u.$. imperialism.
This latest article uses some political rhetoric to conceal services to imperialism. For that reason, MIM goes through it separately, line-by-line below with our own comments interspersed in red.
U.$. imperialism is the world's number-one enemy, the principal enemy of the world's people. It is not the principal enemy of the world's people, except if we are talking about wimmin, except if nuclear energy is involved or except when u.$. imperialism is attacking mullahs. All the "exceptions" are a long-standing position of Bob Amerikan on the world's principal contradiction, as meaning nothing, especially now when the world's genuine Maoists agree that the principal contradiction is between imperialism and oppressed nations with the u.$. imperialists as the principal enemy within that. It's hard for the State Department to maneuver around the formulation that the united $tates is the principal enemy of the world's people. When we see people doing that and calling themselves "Maoist," we better look out.
There is nothing in materialism by itself that guarantees a non-eclectic line. Feed enough granola and California sunshine to someone and that someone may interpret dialectics as meaning "the web of life." While it is true that dialectics is about interconnections, Mao's version of dialectics is not about an ultra-democratic, egalitarian and thereby scattered view of dialectics. Stalin and Mao both used the term "principal contradiction" and Mao enshrined it as his philosophy. The whole idea of a principal contradiction is dead-set against eclecticism and it is what prevents flim-flam artists masquerading as Maoists.
Already in 1921, the Soviet Union's Commissariat on the nationalities question published that without fail the imperialists will try to win over the wimmin and intelligentsia by talking about Islam's faults on the veil. Sadly, nothing has changed. Today we see the imperialists and RąP=u$A doing the same thing on the Islam question that Lenin's party already warned against. They fail to offer a way out of exploitation in general and they only offer the fight against the veil as a means of subservience to u.$. imperialism.