by Web Minister, August 1, 2002
Our July readership dropped off precipitously as in past summers. We were not able to coordinate and launch campaigns on schedule to boost MIM webpage readership. Instead, we still find ourselves in the midst of major overhauls of how we do our work. Readership in arts and movies continued to be strong and individual readership of MIM Notes back issues was also strong, but foreign language readership fell off, thus proving that it is not only Amerikkkans slacking off in the summer. We're very unhappy with what we have done, and we only hope that we will get to our campaigns in time to show up in the August figures. These figures are probably 10% worse than they should be, because our web page was not serving files for a few days for technical reasons beyond our control.
Statistic | July, 2001 | July, 2002 | % change |
Avg. MIM pages served per day | 1168 | 1551 | +32.8% |
Number of different computers MIM served | 7798 | 13,727 | +76.0% |
Number of different MIM files actively chosen from | 5736 | 3869 | -32.5% |
MIM data transferred average per day | 119.082 megabytes | 119.93 megabytes | +0.7% |
Unique visitors sent to Amazon bookstore | 32 | 146 | +356% |
Standard disclaimers:
1. The numbers in these reports are conservative estimates for a number of reasons.
a. The number of computer users refers to number of computers. The number of users could be
higher or lower, because some computers serve pages to more than
one individual, because individuals share computers and because conversely individuals
use computers in more than one place.
b. The number of pages served should be thought of as a minimum, because statistics do not count re-readings or re-servings from local computer memory. Nor do they count sharing of pages once downloaded.
c. Most but not all graphics served are excluded from the figures to cut back on increasing "page" averages just by calling up various graphics.
2. Tracking where computers are from is bound to have some error as many wise users intentionally surf the web and leave a false trail. On the other hand, we doubt that such error means that non-U.$. readership is lower than reported, given that we do not count .com, .net and .edu readership.