E:\mn312

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 1

MIM Notes

January 2005, Nº 312

The Official Newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM)

Free

INSIDE: Carol Andreas obituary * Snicket review * Una Página en Español...

MIM
PO Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029
Return Service Requested

PRESORTED STANDARD

U.S. POSTAGE PAID

PERMIT #56365

BOSTON, MA

On the web: www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext

You are not on a mailing list. You will not receive this paper again unless you take action.

The government of the Netherlands

recently defended its decision to halt the

social benefits and freeze the bank

account of political refugee Professor

Jose Maria Sison. Prof. Sison is a Filipino

with long history of activism on behalf of

the exploited and oppressed and against

U.$. imperialism. Under pressure from

the United $tates and without due process

the Netherlands declared Prof. Sison to

be a "terrorist" in 2002. This ruling froze

Prof. Sison's bank account and removed

all state subsidies for food, housing, health

insurance and other basic necessities

which he had received for over a decade

as a recognized political refugee.

The U.$. State Department has listed

the Maoist Communist Party of the

Philippines and the New People's Army

(NPA) as "foreign terrorist

organizations" and encouraged other

governments "to take action to isolate

these terrorist organizations, to choke off

their sources of financial support, and to

prevent their movement across

international borders." On 12 August 2002

the U.$. Treasury Department listed Prof.

Sison as a "terrorist" whose assets must

be frozen. The Dutch government passed

the "Sanctions ruling on terrorism 2002

III" that criminalized Sison the next day.

The actions of the United $tates and

Pressed by U.$., Dutch gov pursues case against revolutionary Sison

the Netherlands

against Prof.

Sisons's survival

rights are a

microcosm of

the imperialists'

b r u t a l

repression of the

survival rights of

the peoples of

the Philippines and other Third World

nations. Forty percent of households in

the Philippines live below the poverty line

of $200 per persyn; about one-third of

pregnant wimmin do not have access to

prenatal care. The majority of the

population lives in the countryside under

conditions of feudal exploitation, with

tenants paying as much as 50% of their

yearly produce in land rent to large

landlords.

This poverty and the resultant suffering

are due to the exploitative policies of the

imperialists and their local cronies, who

rob the Philippines of its natural resources

and exploit its workers in labor intensive,

import- and export-dependent industries.

Over 100 years as an Amerikan colony

and neo-colony has devastated the

economy of the Philippines--and when

the oppressed of the Philippines rise up

to try and change that, the U.$.-funded

and trained Armed Forces of the

Philippines cracks down on them and

chases their leaders out of the country.

Here is a press release describing the

latest hearing on Prof. Sison's case. Prof.

Sison is not the only persyn affected by

these charges--they also restrict the

speech rights of residents of the United

$tates or its European allies. (Note the

Dutch government's position that those

who provide help or accommodation to

Prof. Sison are legally punishable.) Even

those who defend publication of Prof.

Sison writings or those of the CPP on the

grounds that this is necessary for fully

informed public debate may face

harassment or deportation under the

"USA Patriot Act." Standing up for Prof.

Sison is also standing up for our own ability

to speak and organize freely.

For more information about Prof.

Sison and the revolutionary movement

in the Philippines, see www.etext.org/

Politics/MIM/countries/phil/.

More starting on page 4:

-- Statement from Committee Defend-

Netherlands

--Who is Jose Marie Sison?
-- Dutch spies ran "Marxist-Leninst

Party"

By MC12

This is the headline you didn't see in

the Amerikan newspapers when the U.$.

military forced more than a quarter million

people from their homes in Fallujah, Iraq,

in a futile attempt to weaken the anti-

Amerikan uprising.

Fallujah had a population estimated at

250,000 to 300,000 at the time of the

Amerikan invasion (1). The population of

Iraq is about 24 million (2). That means

1.1% of the Iraqi population lived in

Fallujah before the invasion.

To find a metropolitan area in the U$A

of comparable relative size, look at Seattle,

Washington. The Seattle metro area,

which includes Tacoma and Bellevue, had

a population estimated at 3,122,000. That

is 1.1% of the total U.$. population of

288,369,000 (3).

So what happened to this population in

Fallujah? They were driven from the city

before and during the Amerikan invasion.

The clueless Amerikan media can't seem

to get the magnitude of this crime into

their heads. Consider this exchange

between NPR's Scott Simon and his

correspondent in Iraq from Weekend

Edition Saturday on December 18:

SCOTT SIMON (Host): Michael, can

you tell what it's like for people who

live in Fallujah to live day by day?

SHUSTER: No one is living in

Fallujah, Scott. Almost all the civilians

have left. It's impossible to live. There's

no water. There's no electricity. There's

no food. And many, many of the buildings

and houses have been flattened. All--

most of the residents of Fallujah went to

other cities to live with other Iraqis while

this happened and some went to refugee

camps not too far back. There's a lot of

talk about bringing them back, resettling

them. There have been various comments

from the Iraqi mayor of Fallujah and the

Iraqi government officials in Baghdad that

this process is going to start soon. But

the Marines tell you -- it's not clear how

that can happen, as long as there's

continued resistance and continued

attacks on Marine teams in Fallujah so I

Foreign army purges entire city

(the relative size) of Seattle

Continued on page 6...

DNC ARREST

CHARGES

AGAINST MIM

NOTES

REPORTER

DROPPED

BOSTON

District Court recently dismissed

trespassing and disorderly conduct

charges against a MIM Notes distributor/

reporter arrested at the Democratic

National Convention that nominated John

Kerry for president.

The Boston Phoenix also reported on

charges against four others arrested at

the Democratic National Convention--

all of Asian ethnicity. One of those

arrested complained of racial profiling.

MIM will report further on that in the

future as we learn the details of the

conclusions Boston reaches.

While the MIM Notes reporter was in

court, two Black men filed for restraining

orders against wimmin. A Black male

senior citizen with socks that did not match

and looking very frail was one of the

applicants. Although MIM finds it

disgraceful for the Black nation to have

to go through the u.$. court system,

Continued on page 6...

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 2

What is MIM?

The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is the collection of existing or emerging

Maoist internationalist parties in the English-speaking imperialist countries and their English-

speaking internal semi-colonies, as well as the existing or emerging Maoist Internationalist
parties in Belgium, France and Quebec and the existing or emerging Spanish-speaking
Maoist Internationalist parties of Aztlan, Puerto Rico and other territories of the U.$. Empire.

MIM Notes is the newspaper of MIM. Notas Rojas is the newspaper of the Spanish-speaking
parties or emerging parties of MIM. MIM upholds the revolutionary communist ideology
of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism and is an internationalist organization that works from the

vantage point of the Third World proletariat. MIM struggles to end the oppression of all
groups over other groups: classes, genders, nations. MIM knows this is only possibly by
building public opinion to seize power through armed struggle. Revolution is a reality for

North America as the military becomes over-extended in the government's attempts to
maintain world hegemony. MIM differs from other communist parties on three main
questions: (1) MIM holds that after the proletariat seizes power in socialist revolution, the

potential exists for capitalist restoration under the leadership of a new bourgeoisie within
the communist party itself. In the case of the USSR, the bourgeoisie seized power after the
death of Stalin in 1953; in China, it was after Mao's death and the overthrow of the "Gang

of Four" in 1976. (2) MIM upholds the Chinese Cultural Revolution as the farthest advance
of communism in humyn history. (3) As Marx, Engels and Lenin formulated and MIM has
reiterated through materialist analysis, imperialism extracts super-profits from the Third

World and in part uses this wealth to buy off whole populations of oppressor nation so-
called workers. These so-called workers bought off by imperialism form a new petty-
bourgeoisie called the labor aristocracy. These classes are not the principal vehicles to

advance Maoism within those countries because their standards of living depend on
imperialism. At this time, imperialist super-profits create this situation in the Canada, Quebec,
the United $tates, England, France, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Italy, Switzerland,

Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Israel, Sweden and Denmark. MIM accepts people as
members who agree on these basic principles and accept democratic centralism, the system
of majority rule, on other questions of party line.

"The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should

regard it not as dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of
learning terms and phrases, but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution."

- Mao Zedong, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 208.

MIM Notes Production by MC12

Letters

MIM Notes

The Official Newsletter of The Maoist Internationalist Movement

ISSN 1540-8817

MIM Notes is the bi-weekly newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement. MIM

Notes is the official Party voice; more complete statements are published in our journal,
MIM Theory. Material in MIM Notes is the Party's position unless noted. MIM Notes
accepts submissions and critiques from anyone. The editors reserve the right to edit
submissions unless permission is specifically denied by the author; submissions are
published anonymously unless authors insist on identification (prisoners are never
identified by name). MIM is an underground party that does not publish the names of its
comrades in order to avoid the state surveillance and repression that have historically
been directed at communist parties and anti-imperialist movements. MCs, MIM comrades,
are members of the Party. The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League (RAIL) is an anti-
imperialist mass organization led by MIM (RCs are RAIL Comrades). MIM's ten-point
program is available to anyone who sends in a SASE.

The paper is free to all prisoners, as long as they write to us every 90 days to confirm

their subsciptions. There are no individual subscriptions for people outside prison.

People who want to receive newspapers should become sponsors and distributors.

Sponsors pay for papers, distributors get them onto the streets, and officers do both
distribution and financial support. Annual cost is: 12 copies (Priority Mail), $120; 25
(Priority Mail), $150; 50 (Priority Mail), $280; 100, $380; 200, $750; 900 (Express
Mail), $3,840; 900 (8-10 days), $2,200. To become a sponor or distributor, send
anonymous money orders payable to "MIM." Send to MIM, attn: Camb. branch, PO Box
400559, Cambridge, MA 02140. Or write mim3@mim.org.

Most back issues of MIM Notes are available free on our web site. The web site con-

tains thousands of documents, with ordering information for many more.

MIM grants explicit permission to copy all or part of this newspaper for any reason, as

long as we are credited.

For general correspondence, contact:

MIM

P.O. Box 29670

Los Angeles, CA 90029-0670

eMail: <mim@mim.org>

WWW: <http//www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext>

Here we go again with Sean Hannity

and his so-called smooth right-wing radio

host snakes! To the perceptive man, their

lies are so lame! So who believes them?

Well, unfortunately there are numerous

uneducated Americans who are easily

duped by their lying propaganda! I feel

for them. They are comparing Nick Berg's

beheading with the U.S. soldiers who

abused those prisoners at the Abu Ghraib

prison.

The beheaders are being called

"monsters" while the prison guards are

nothing but "mischievous kids" who did

not know what they were doing! They

were just kids who were bored and

stepped out of line in a non-serious way.

They were untrained to be M.P.s, they

say! I beg to differ. Anybody with a

healthy conscience would know that what

they did to those Iraqis was plain wrong

and immoral. And aren t these Americans

supposed to be the no. 1 civilized people

of the world? What happened is very

simple to those people who still have

some shred of good common sense.

-- a Texas prisoner,

21 May 2004

MIM adds: It's no secret that the

Amerikan national conscience is impaired

by imperialist plunder. The people of this

country enjoy a wildly inflated standard

of living, at great expense to people in

the Third World. Self-interest keeps

Amerikans from considering how

persynally the Iraqis might take having

their homes and cities decimated and their

natural resources turned over to

Halliburton.

While we don't see any Maoist

leadership in the struggle against the u.$.

occupation, it is to the credit of the Iraqi

resistance that it is forcing some

Amerikans take the war a little bit

persynally too. The whole point of anti-

imperialist resistance is to make wars of

conquest and the profiteering that follows

too expensive for the aggressor country

to bear. It is unfortunate that the u.$.

people are so far gone outside the

international community that seeing such

resistance is their best chance of waking

up to the horrors of their own militarism

and cutting it out.

Revolutionaries need

background checks?

Greetings as always with a clenched

fist salute. Recently I was sitting in my

cage reading a book titled The FBI and

Martin Luther King Jr. by D.J. Garrow.

The gist of this book is the effects of

COINTELPRO [the FBI's Counter-

Intelligence Program, a campaign aimed

at spying on, infiltrating and destroying

progressive and revolutionary

organizations in the united snakes] on the

civil rights movement. While I fully

comprehend its dynamics, I'm hard

pressed to figure out how/why those of

the revolutionary left didn't take any

drastic countermeasures to unearth those

agent/infiltrationist elements. They seem

to be able to slide into the ranks relatively

easy, with little or no investigation of

background!

Reflecting on the assassinations of

Jonathan & George Jackson by pigs in

70 & 71, respectively, they were both

eliminated utilizing agents provocateurs

that had been serving law enforcement

for years! My point is you have very lax

security when unknown/untested

strangers can simply walk in off the

streets, claim allegiance to some ideology

and by virtue of a look be embraced into

the fold. George tried to warn the BPP

of Cleaver's background, i.e., his conduct

while in prison to no avail. His writing &

oratorical skills superceded his potential

for derailing the BPP. Now here we are

in 2004 still taking two steps forward &

three backwards. Where is the effective

front line? In the manifesto Blood in My

Eye, both George & Jonathan observed

a primary obstacle to collective progress

was the lack of a formal military cadre

strictly devoted to internal investigations

& neutralization of traitors! They felt then,

as I do now, that it isn't a lack of training

in ideology that stagnates a progressive

class struggle. Rather it's these boot-

licking sellouts amongst us, who are

working to kill us!

-- a Federal prisoner in Colorado

17 August, 2004

A RAIL Comrade and MIM reply:

Revolutionary organizations are always

at risk of being infiltrated. We can learn

not only from the example of FBI

infiltration into the Black Panther Party

and other U.$. groups, but from our

predecessors in other countries as well.

We look especially to the model of Lenin's

Russia. When asked about the presence

of a state agent on his Central Committee,

Lenin remarked that the agent must have

done a lot of revolutionary work to earn

the position. We take security seriously,

but no background check is going to weed

out every infiltrator.

At this time, the imperialist police

agencies in the U.$. have far greater

material resources than the revolutionary

camp and can easily concoct false

backgrounds for their agents. What they

cannot fake is activism that supports our

revolutionary goals. We expect the same

level of contribution of all comrades at a

given level of membership. In other

words, comrades and allies will prove

themselves through hard work rather than

through background checks. We may not

deflect every leech trying to suck the life

out of our movement from within, but we

will be sure to extract the greatest level

of work for the least amount of exposure

from every persyn we work with.

Iraqi insurgents vs. Abu Ghraib guards: Who are the monsters?

Sean

Hannity,

radio host

snake.

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 3

by International Minister

El Diario International has reported that

Carol Andreas of Colorado died at age

71 on December 7 of a cerebral

aneurism. She was a professor and

revolutionary. The people of Peru and

Amerika both have special reason to

mourn.

Although in the 1960s there were over

1 million self-described revolutionaries

among u.$. college students, by 1976, the

number of people still active in

revolutionary struggle in the united $tates

fell to about 0.1% of its previous level. El

Diario International led by Luis Arce

Borja mentioned her support for the

People's War in 1980 and after, but Carol

Andreas has international significance to

Maoism as well.

In 1976, when most of the world's

communists fell for Hua Guofeng and

Deng Xiaoping after the death of Mao,

Carol Andreas held firm. Her study group

immediately published a book upon the

death of Mao upholding the Cultural

Revolution and denouncing the capitalist

restoration. This should have been

unremarkable given the preparation Mao

and the "Gang of Four" gave the world

for capitalist restoration in China, but in

practice relative to others, Carol Andreas

proved to have great foresight and

firmness on this question while most of

the world's communists temporarily fell

off course. It was only in succeeding years

that Hua Guofeng and Deng Xiaoping

revisionism went into the minority in

parties outside China.

As El Diario International correctly

pointed out, Carol Andreas also held firm

in 1992-1993 when the "peace accords"

controversy in Peru arose. MIM will add

that Carol Andreas confided to MIM that

we should uphold Luis Arce Borja in exile

against others arising at the time to

diminish his stature outside Peru. In

knowing what's what in 1976 and 1992,

no one can do better than Carol Andreas

did.

MIM also conducted activity to support

the Cultural Revolution and Luis Arce

Borja, so the question arises about the

unity of Carol Andreas and MIM. One

would guess that the issue dividing us

would be the labor aristocracy, and we're

still not entirely convinced she accorded

this issue the proper weight, but Carol

Andreas claimed not so much to disagree

with MIM on this point. In fact, she

pointed out that even in Peru the labor

aristocracy was quite a problem. She

stressed repeatedly that she had read all

of Lenin's Collected Works and she knew

where MIM was getting all those

suspicions about the oppressor nation

workers. With regard to others agitating

for labor aristocracy demands she said,

"let them bang their heads against the

wall."

In print, a newsletter published by

Carol Andreas on Peru openly debated

MIM's contributions in passing. She

reported that she had spoken with those

who had found MIM to be a rejuvenation

of Maoism in Amerika and integration of

Maoism with U.$. conditions while others

say MIM made no contribution to the

struggle in Peru.

Our criticisms of Carol Andreas were

public before she died. What we have

not reported before is that she told MIM

she "did not have energy" for inner party

struggle and democratic centralism

anymore. Her attitude was something like

"been there, done that."

We do not doubt that Carol Andreas

told Luis Arce Borja there is no vanguard

party in Amerika, but we only criticize

Carol Andreas and some Third World

comrades for a liquidationist line. Carol

Andreas was an articulate activist

regarding the Cultural Revolution and

Peru and this translated into invitations

to speak to international communist

conferences. In this practice of

promoting individual personages at

conferences, MIM has found a

liquidationist attitude catering to the

imperialist country petty-bourgeoisie.

Some have gone so far as to invite Carol

Andreas as an individual to speak while

excluding parties.

Sartre spent his most correct years

criticizing intellectuals who refuse

vanguard parties. Intellectuals chafe

against discipline for their own persynal

mental needs at the expense of the

international proletariat.

The disease of petty-bourgeois

intellectuals obtains orthodox aid from

those who have quoted Stalin on

vanguard parties in the West against

MIM. Stalin made a list of conditions

organizations must meet to call

themselves vanguard parties. Yet we

challenge our critics to find in Stalin

anywhere that it is OK not to join a party

until it meets those conditions and if Stalin

did any such liquidationist thing, then he

was wrong. Our international comrades

do a disservice to the international

proletariat with cynical comments

denying the need to take sides and join

organizations. That does nothing to

encourage youth in countries where no

one claims to be Maoist either.

The relationship of Carol Andreas to

the vanguard party idea and Stalin's

theses on vanguard parties raise a basic

question of materialism. The problem in

the day of Lenin and Stalin was to choose

among parties or factions wishing to join

the Comintern especially from Germany,

but also typically from Italy. These

factions Lenin and Stalin could choose

among had five and six digit

memberships. That sort of luxury does

not apply today in the imperialist

countries. When we materialists are

choosing among factions and parties, we

can use conditions like those prepared by

Stalin for use in the Comintern.

The decision on how to recognize one

faction or party over another discussed

by Stalin is completely different than what

Carol Andreas and some of her

international admirers have done-- which

is to deny any choice at all. If we have a

choice between factions or parties, we can

compile a list of conditions. When we find

ourselves saying there is no vanguard

party at all when at least one claims to be

one, then we have fallen into

liquidationism.

There is always a most advanced line

in any society--a basic fact of

materialism. If Carol Andreas did not like

MIM or other organizations, she should

have declared herself vanguard in

Amerika and forced the issue. The

passive attitude that no one else has

People mourn the death of Amerikan

revolutionary Carol Andreas

already established nicely running

vanguard parties that we can join as cogs

in the machine must be banished as anti-

Leninist and fatal to this stage when so

many countries need to form vanguard

parties.

One thing we like about what Carol

Andreas did is that she took a liquidationist

line which she made up for to some extent

with internationalism. In her last decade

or so she could not see straight to leading

revolution in the united $tates, but she

gave her energy to the revolution in Peru.

Comrades who would like to remember

Carol Andreas should read her book Peru:

When Women Rebel. And if anyone

clings to any stereotypes about wimmin

not being able to hold firm lines, digest

Lenin or lead politically, we point to Carol

Andreas. No one in Amerika, male or

female did any better than Carol Andreas

did in 1976 and 1992.

If anyone in direct contact with the

Forever 21 struggle disagrees with this

press release or believes it to be false,

please contact mim3@mim.org.

A recent agreement reached by the

Garment Worker Center and Forever 21,

Inc., among others, stipulates that the

Garment Worker Center contact the

owners of websites deemed by Forever

21, Inc. to contain information pertaining

to the disputes resolved by the

aforementioned agreement, and to ask

those owners to post the statement that

follows on any page containing said

information.

We apologize if you believe you have

been contacted in error.

Sincerely,

Garment Worker Center

STATEMENT:

Forever 21, Inc., the Garment Worker

Center, Sweatshop Watch, and the Asian

Pacific American Legal Center, on behalf

Sweatshop agreement reached

of several Los Angeles garment workers

represented by it, have reached an

agreement to resolve all litigation between

them. In addition, the parties have agreed

to take steps to promote greater worker

protection in the local garment industry.

The parties are pleased to announce the

resolution of this matter as a positive and

symbolic step forward in demonstrating

respect and appreciation for garment

workers. Under the parties' agreement,

the national boycott of Forever 21 and

related protests at the Company's retail

stores, initiated by the Garment Worker

Center in 2001, have ended. The parties

share a belief that garment workers

should labor in lawful conditions and

should be treated fairly and with dignity.

Forever 21, the Garment Worker Center

and Sweatshop Watch all remain

committed to ensuring that the clothing

Forever 21 sells in its stores is made under

lawful conditions.

For more on the fight against sweatshops, visit:

http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/agitation/sweatshops/index.html

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 4

by Committee Defend-

Netherlands

Prof. Jose Maria Sison's appeals

against the Dutch Minister of Finance

and the COA (Central Organ for

Reception of Asylum Seekers) were

taken up at the court hearing at the

Utrecht Court on 29 October 2004 at the

Vrouwe Justitiaplein 1 in Utrecht. Also

taken up was the appeal of Ms. Julieta

de Lima against the Ministry of Finance.

Present at the hearing were Prof. Sison

and Ms. De Lima and their lawyers: Mr.

J.M. Langenberg and Mr. D. Gurses for

Prof. Sison and Mr. Gerard Scholten for

Ms. De Lima. The Minister of Finance

was represented by Mr. A.B. van Rijn

and the COA by Mr. R. van Duffelen.

Ms. De Lima's appeal was first taken

up. Mr. Scholten argued against the

continued freezing of the Euro 1.700

amount in the joint account of Ms. De

Lima and Prof. Sison. He strongly

asserted that this amount is for paying

medical, food and other necessary bills.

These havenothing to do with terrorism.

Ms. De Lima had been saving up money

to pay the bills, thus running into deficits

in her other accounts. Mr. Van Rijn, on

the other hand, reiterated the Finance

Minister's position that any direct or

indirect provision of financial and

economic means to Prof. Sison is

prohibited by the EU listing.

The presiding judge declared that the

court would issue a decision on Ms. De

Lima's appeal within four weeks.

Mr. Langenberg, speaking on behalf of

Prof. Sison, started with the statement

that the issue at hand was how, in a

modern democratic society, the minimal

fundamental rights of an individual must

be protected or cannot be protected. This

concerns the right to survival, he said.

Mr. Langenberg stated that since 9/11

the world appears, as in the Cold War of

the past century, to have been divided into

two camps: terrorists and fighters against

terrorism. The events in the US have led

to the hardening of society, especially

American society, and to a wide-ranging

internationalization of the fight against

terrorism. He cited reports on violations

of international law regarding torture of

prisoners in Guantanamo. There is now

the question of protecting fundamental

rights of individuals and protecting

democratic society against terrorist

attacks.

Langenberg added that it was an

executive order of US President Bush that

put Prof. Sison on the terror list. This was

followed by the Dutch government

through a Sanction Regulation that took

away his basic allowances for survival.

However, through an authorization of the

Minister of Finance, the Municipality of

Utrecht was allowed to grant the minimal

needs for food, accommodation and

insurance. Langenberg declared that he

assumes, from the humanitarian

standpoint, that one who cannot secure

his basic needs because he is not allowed

to work and may not be expelled, cannot

be made to starve or be put in danger of

losing his life through denial of his basic

allowances.

Mr. Langenberg strongly criticized the

Ministry of Finance's hard line position

that it is the policy of the Dutch Cabinet

not to provide any financial means to those

on the list of terrorists and the granting of

authorization would contravene the

cabinet policy.

And yet, Langenberg said, Justice

Minister Donner declared, when

questioned in parliament, that "in the end,

the government has to give a certain

welfare allowance because he (Prof.

Sison) may not be expelled. That is the

dilemma in which the law has put itself

into."

Langenberg stressed that, since Prof.

Sison is covered by the absolute protection

of Article 3 of the European Convention

on Human Rights (EVRM) and may

therefore not be expelled, he should be

granted a welfare allowance by the

COA. He referred to cases of many

Afghan refugees who continue to receive

allowances from the COA, despite their

being declared excluded from the

protection of the Refugee Convention.

Langenberg criticized the "head in the

sand" tactic of the defendant and its

"ostrich policy". He further asserted that

UN Security Council Resolution 1452 and

European Council Regulation 561/2003

should apply to Prof. Sison and the claim

of the Minister of Finance that these apply

only to Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda and

the Taliban violates the purpose of the

UNSC resolution. It would mean that

Prof. Sison and others put on the terror

lists since 9/11 have less "humanitarian"

rights than Osama bin Laden and

members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Mr. D. Gurses assailed COA's position

that Prof. Sison has no legitimate stay in

the Netherlands. He stressed that Prof.

Sison is a recognized political refugee,

with status of 1A according to the

Refugee Convention and is covered by

the absolute protection of Article 3 of

EVRM. He therefore has a right to a title

to stay since he has been tolerated in this

state for more than seven years. It is

inhuman, stated Gurses, to tolerate a

refugee (he may not be expelled) but to

deny him the right to a humane existence

by taking away the necessary means of

existence. This has an impact on the

psyche, not only of Sison but also on his

wife and his children who live in the

Netherlands. He is, as it were, artificially

kept alive by gifts from friends so that he

will not starve to death. Gurses said that

this manner of tolerating someone violates

the principles of a socially just state and

also Art. 3 of EVRM.

Mr. Gurses pointed out that since it is

crystal clear that Prof. Sison may not be

expelled, there is indeed in a farreaching

manner a "detournement de pouvoir"

(abuse of power) by the Dutch authorities

who must be considered as negligent and

improper. The conclusion of the COA that

the appeal of Prof. Sison is to be rejected

is therefore unfair and unreasonable.

Mr. Van Rijn, speaking on behalf of the

Minister of Finance, reiterated the latter's

position that no benefits may be given to

Prof. Sison, especially since the decision

of the Council of the European Union is

stricter than the Sanction Regulation of

the Dutch government. The latter allowed

the Dutch Minister of Finance, in

consultation with the Minister of Foreign

Affairs, to grant an exception. But the

EU decision requires the consultation

with other Member States, the Council

and the European Commission.

Mr. Van Duffelen, speaking on behalf

of the COA, maintained that the order to

leave the Netherlands had been given to

Prof. Sison. He ignored the fact that Prof.

Sison's recognition as a political refugee

and his protection by Article 3 of EVRM

effectively countered the order to leave.

He reiterated that the decision of the COA

to declare Prof. Sison's appeal not

grounded should be confirmed by the

court.

In a brief question and answer period,

the presiding judge asked about refugees

whose procedure had ended but still

received welfare allowance. An assistant

lady judge said that a new law, issued in

September 2004, ordered the stopping of

such allowances. To a question whether

those who have helped Prof. Sison and

Ms. Julieta de Lima who has provided

accommodation to Prof. Sison are legally

punishable, Mr. Van Rijn said "yes".

The Court asked if Prof. Sison wanted

to speak. Prof. Sison stated that he has

been subjected to inhuman and degrading

treatment in violation of Article 3 of

EVRM and to violations of his democratic

right to due process. He has been unjustly

demonized and branded a terrorist. His

life has been put in danger. All this and

the view of the Minister of Finance's

representative that those who help him

are legally punishable are indications of a

Hitler-like fascism creeping into Dutch

society. He added that his lawyers had

already presented his position.

The presiding judge announced that the

Court would issue its decision within four

weeks.

--From Committee Defend-

Netherlands, October 31/04

[December 15 2004 comment by

MIM: We have no further news as of

this date.]

Report on 29 October 2004 Court Hearing in Utrecht on

Appeals of Prof. Jose Maria Sison and Ms. Julieta de Lima

Who is

Jose Maria Sison?

Prof. Sison helped found the Kabataan

Makabayan (Patriotic Youth) in 1964 and

led some of the first protests against

Amerikan intervention in Vietnam--of

particular relevance as the United $tates

used the Philippines as a staging area for

aggression in Southeast Asia.

He went on to found the Communist

Party of the Philippines on December 26,

1968, the New People's Army on March

29, 1969 and the National Democratic

Front of the Philippines on April 24, 1973.

The CPP, NPA and NDF continue to

wage revolutionary armed struggle for

national liberation from imperialism, for

socialism, and against feudalism,

imperialism, and crony capitalism. Under

the pen name Amado Guerrero he wrote

"Philippine Society and Revolution," a

concrete application of Maoist principles

to the reality of the Philippines that

remains a guiding document of the

Philippine revolutionary movement.

Prof. Sison was imprisoned by the

Marcos fascist regime from 1977 to l986.

Soon after his release the U.$.-puppet

Aquino regime exiled him. Dutch courts

previously upheld his refugee status and

granted his wife and son political asylum.

While in exile, Sison has served as a

political consultant to the revolutionary

National Democratic Front of the

Philippines in peace negotiations with the

Government of the Republic of the

Philippines. He also speaks and publishes

articles in support of the revolutionary

movement of the Philippines and against

U.$. imperialism; he is a strong critic of

the "war on terrorism" and the U.$.

invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

To give their campaign to silence Prof.

Sison the flimsiest of justifications,

Philippine and Amerikan spy services and

their media mouthpieces claim without

evidence that Sison still heads the CPP.

However, as the CPP puts it in a

statement reprinted on page six, "the

Party's collective leadership effectively

operates in the consolidated revolutionary

guerilla bases in the Philippines, safely out

of the immediate reach and mischief by

the US and local reactionary armed

forces."

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 5

by PIRAO chief

On December 10th, Dutch government

radio admitted that the Dutch government

infiltrated or set up three organizations--

the Marxist-Leninist Party and two

friendship societies, one for Kampuchea

and one for Albania. These organizations

also did succeed in recruiting genuine

members between 1969 and some date

in the 1980s. Among other goals of the

organizations set up by the Dutch spies

was to obtain support from China, which

the Dutch intelligence agencies claim they

succeeded in doing. In the West, the

governments deliver money to their

lackeys running for election or serving as

dictators around the world, even where it

is illegal. On the other hand, the majority-

exploiter governments make a big stink if

China or some other competitor spends

money on politics in their allegedly free

countries that supposedly allow a free

competition of ideas as a selling point for

the whole organization of their societies.

This incident shows that the Dutch

government in its zeal to catch the

Chinese government cheated its own

people of a chance to organize Dutch

communist organizations without

interference. This alone gives the lie to

the "free world" often discussed by the

Dutch and the rest of Western Europe

and the united $tates. Infiltration by the

state is especially damaging to communist

and anarchist organizations, because

people often join them because they

detest the idea of secret services, so any

talk of "fair play" in a "democracy" needs

to be taken with a grain of salt.

Far more damaging to the international

proletariat is the setting up of

organizations where armed struggle is

going on or about to happen. These

organizations set up by cops and spies

seek to divert the naive where struggle

has reached a certain level of intensity.

Peru and Nepal have a plethora of parties,

mostly because of the needs of the

exploiters. Equally damaging is those

instances of organizations that suddenly

have major support in the imperialist

countries arranged by the CIA. In Iraq, it

is public knowledge that the "Communist

Party USA" works with the U.$. puppet

regime, (a case of minor support) but

similar activities are also happening

covertly in many Third World countries.

On the other hand, an additional

complication is that sometimes the

exploiters do briefly ally with the exploited

when the exploiters are in a bad squeeze.

The case of Germany sending Lenin back

to Russia in a train car in World War I is

an example. When there is a war going

on or could be going on in a given region,

we cannot rule out that a faction of

exploiters would ally with the exploited

on fairly positive terms.

From the bourgeois point of view, the

infiltration of communist groups serves

dual purposes. One is to dampen or track

activity in those groups and the other is

to prevent activity in the first place. As

the people learn that communist

organizations are infiltrated, they may give

up trying to work with them. Even

planting false stories of infiltration aids in

this goal. In response, we Maoists have

dual duties--one is not to deny enemy

activity and the other is never to justify

cynicism or paralysis of the exploited and

oppressed.

Speaking of an eastern European

comrade, Comrade Stalin said "what does

he know?" in reference to the idea that

there are no enemies in his party. De-

classified documents also show that U.$.

police infiltrated the Black Panther Party

and went so far as to co-chair a Trotskyist

group.

Likewise, in Kanada an organization of

2500 found itself infiltrated by agent

provocateurs. In the imperialist countries

unprepared for armed struggle, the enemy

joins communist organizations and tries

to provoke them into unplanned armed

activity.

Meanwhile, the imperialists carry out

illegal act after illegal act through wars

only to be let off with impunity. While

these infiltrators waste taxpayer money

and risk others' lives in an effort to

provoke violence, they fail to arrest war

criminals such as Henry Kissinger,

Caspar Weinberger and Donald

Rumsfeld.

In any case, the capitalist class will

continue to look for communist

scapegoats in the majority-exploiter

countries, with the hope that the public

will blame the communists for terrorism,

war and everything else the imperialists

are carrying out or causing to happen. The

fact that the communists have no power

and only the blame and the fact that even

the Dutch intelligence agencies make it

more difficult to organize fair-weather

communist organizations is a plus of the

kind Mao referred to when he said it is

good that the enemy attacks. The quality

of movements under attack improves

while the quantity dissipates. In countries

like the Netherlands, the fair-weather

types who avoid communist organizations

would be from the petty-bourgeoisie

anyway, so there is no real loss of contact

with the "masses," because of the

intelligence agency activity.

As MIM pointed out in its 2004

Congress resolution, the enemy does set

up entire organizations and it also takes

small organizations and makes them

transit points for huge operations dwarfing

anything the communist organizations in

that country could dream of doing

themselves. Nonetheless, we would never

exchange our internal problems for those

of the bourgeoisie--their inter-imperialist

wars, imperialist rivalries and shady

business competition that undermines the

whole capitalist system without any

communist's lifting a finger.

The nub of our problem is that just

because the enemy sets up organizations

favoring Stalin and Mao we cannot afford

to abandon the principles of Stalin and

Mao. Since we cannot always know

precisely which organizations are fakes,

and to what degree, it is important to

approach this question in principle. We

must establish principles to follow that

take advantage of our strengths and

emphasize the enemies' weaknesses. If

we succeed in doing this, it won't matter

if we do not precisely know which

organizations or leaders are fakes and

which are not, because in the long run

our principles will guide us to getting that

right in practice more often than not. For

example, if we have a purge, and it throws

out 100 people, the question is not how to

be absolutely right about every single

purged individual but how to be sure that

overall the 100 thrown out damaged the

enemy more than us. If we wait till we

find payroll stubs for every enemy on CIA

payroll we will lose for sure, because our

ability to function in that realm is a relative

weakness. If however, we can come up

with a policy that disproportionately

affects the spies and cops, we will win,

and this is something that the party can

do.

Crucially, we must teach our own

movement the difference between

discussions of historical origins and line.

This is also related to why ad hominem

criticism is never right. It hardly matters

if David Duke or a CIA spy says 2+2=4.

2+2=4 is still true. Likewise, maybe the

first Maoist organization in the

Netherlands started with just spies.

Nonetheless, that is no excuse for the

Dutch to avoid Maoist principles. That is

an example of how we have to distinguish

between origins and line. This truth is also

evident when we work it in reverse.

People with good origins often end up

quitting or otherwise betraying the

movement. The enemy has to emphasize

the psychological and individual to split

up the strength of the globally exploited

and oppressed. The enemy hopes that by

targeting the leaders, there will be no one

left who can implement Marxism-

Leninism-Maoism. The enemy

miscalculates and in sports terms there

is no way that the proletariat and

oppressed can lose unless they defeat

themselves or if the bourgeoisie carries

out internal war that destroys the planet--

game over, called on account of

destruction of the atmosphere.

What to do about potential paralysis

Contrary to some dreamers, there are

always enemies in communist parties that

have been around the block. Only parties

just starting that no one has heard of yet

can hope not to have enemies inside yet.

MIM has a number of policies and

recommendations to deal with the enemy

problem at arm's length to take advantage

of the proletariat's strengths relative to

the enemy's. We guarantee that MIM and

the organizations it admires have

infiltrators perhaps going to the very

origins and leadership of the organizations

as does happen some times.

1. MIM members do NOT claim to be

MIM members and travel to the Third

World struggles except by prior

arrangement or at open conferences. In

practice with the current low level of

International Ministry support mandated

by our Party Congress, even this issue

should not come up. MIM has NO pre-

arranged plans for meeting in the Third

World at this moment. So, if anywhere in

the Third World you meet someone from

the imperialist countries seeming to spew

the MIM line, you may be talking to an

unaffiliated persyn or you may be talking

to an agent.

There is never any reason for People's

Wars to be trusting toward imperialist

country alleged comrades. Someone

carrying MIM Notes around could be

anybody. MIM Notes is free, so carrying

that around does not mean anything either,

so we warn everybody, especially the

Third World comrades, that no imperialist

country comrade is worth risking security

for. In the best of circumstances, the

comrades from the majority-exploiter

countries are not weeded out by

systematic armed struggle, so chances

are very high that the best one could hope

for is that any imperialist-country

"comrade" is really a Menshevik with

some sympathies for the international

proletariat. We suggest that Mao's

teaching that without a people's army the

people have nothing be taken seriously in

relationship to the majority-exploiter

countries.

2. Lenin's "better fewer, but better" is

the best security advice for proletarian

parties. Write off dead wood hanging

about the party. Newbies should be aware

of this problem. Newbies and others

starting their political commitment should

ask themselves, "if I were a leader of a

communist party, how would I be able to

tell a police agent from a newbie?" This

is another reason to emphasize the self-

reliance and self-activity of comrades and

it is also a reason not to be expecting

proletarian unity and action to come about

spontaneously and easily. It is part of our

underdog status that we must continuously

exercise our brains on this question and

improve through small increments and

sometimes by leaps and bounds.

3. Party leaders should not substitute

talk for a standard of action. The fact

that someone discusses a cool political

line with a party leader does not mean

anything. Effective work in public and

effective marshalling of resources is what

counts in security questions. It does not

mean there should be no place just to talk.

4. Lenin's advice on making police

agents work hard is applicable. He had a

police agent on his central committee, but

there could have been a lot more if the

standard of work for the central

committee were low. The police agent

that managed to get in did much work for

the revolution.

5. Do not answer pig questions. People

Security: This time a lesson from the Netherlands

Continued on page 7...

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 6

think that that process is -- that process

of resettling is still unclear when it will

start.

SIMON: Mm-hmm. Michael, have

Marine commanders imparted to you or

are you otherwise able to make some kind

of judgment now about what the strategy

on the ground seems to be for US forces?

Simon knows he's supposed to

"personalize" the story, so he asks about

daily life. But when the reporter's answer

reveals the horrific crime committed by

Amerika, Simon has no response except

"Mm-hmm," and he doesn't follow up.

Instead, he changes the subject to the

future Amerikan strategy.

Perspective affects perception. While

the gingoist Amerikan always thinks of

Army purges entire city (the relative size) of Seattle

because we continue to back the original

Black Panther Party demand for Black

national courts, we would like to comment

on the gender aspect of the restraining

orders. Again, because of the

imprisonment rate of Black men and the

poor health care given to Black men,

there is a vast shortage of eligible Black

men for heterosexual Black wimmin. The

discontent of Black heterosexual wimmin

and the stereotyped gender roles and

images of domestic violence should not

add up to an attack on Black men any

more than Black wimmin should put up

with domestic violence by Black men.

What we saw in court is only a concrete

confirmation of what we know from

statistics on domestic violence generally.

Police thuggery

The arrest of the MIM Notes distributor

started as a matter with the Roxbury

Community College administrator who

has in the past specifically prevented

distribution of MIM Notes while

permitting other publications distributed

in the Reggie Lewis Center, where the

DNC held a forum for Howard Dean and

Dennis Kucinich. However, Boston police

involved themselves and even upped the

ante by physically taking away the MIM

Notes reporter's digital recorder on which

there were numerous interviews with

Democratic Party convention delegates

and other official attendees.

We can now report that those

interviews will never see the light of day,

because Boston Police maliciously

destroyed the recorder by breaking it in

half before returning it by order of the

judge. We apologize to the various

delegates and members of the Utah

Progressive Democrats Caucus we

interviewed that day.

CHARGES

AGAINST MIM

NOTES

REPORTER

DROPPED

Continued from page 1...

Scott Simon: Hm-mmm.

Continued from page 1...

Good news, bad news on MIM's central task

Amerikan well-being first, the scientific

perspective allows us to compare apples

and apples. We can see that the

Amerikans emptied out a city the relative

size of the Seattle metropolitan area, and

compare that with other atrocities or

crimes -- revealing the scale of

imperialism's crimes. Our revolutionary

determination then drives us to right these

wrongs by working to eliminate the

system that systematically produces

them.

Notes:

1. Boston Globe 11/15/04, p. A1.

2. http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/

2003/iraq/maps/

3. Statistical Abstract of the United

States, at http://www.census.gov.

December, 2004

Central Task Report

by PIRAO Chief

December 9, 2004

MIM's central task: "to create public

opinion and the independent

institutions of the oppressed to seize

power."

Overall

This month we continue to fail in our

primary goal of advancing the number of

users. Also, as arranged at our 2004

Congress, we cut back the November and

December MIM Notes. Meanwhile, our

art users only recovered to their 2002

levels.

On the prisons front we have bad news

and good news. The bad news is that

there was no money to distribute papers

into prison. Some comrades have stepped

forward to keep MIM Notes afloat, but

funding for prison distribution is just

coming on line now. In the past, I have

taken the blame for prison distribution, but

in this case I will not. One could say I

should do more of X work instead of Y

work or allocate resources differently, but

then I would be here making a false self-

criticism for a shortage somewhere else,

such as in MIM Notes printing. It would

also encourage people to have overly

inflated ideas about MIM's resources.

The good news in prisons is that we

continue to right a historic wrong in

relations between the lumpen and the

middle classes. By this I mean that MIM

was always strong in prisons, but the

people outside prison walls were not

paying much attention. Articles taken in

just the prison subsection of our agitation

page increased at a 136% annual rate this

November.

On an even brighter note, this month

had solid growth in our second-most

important goal, pages taken. With 76%

annual growth in files taken per day, we

are almost on target with our Five Year

Plan for that goal. Concretely, it means

that right now, we average over 250

articles taken per every hour of each day.

MIM Notes distribution

We have a report of independent MIM

Notes distribution in Toronto which we

do not include in the statistics. As we have

pointed out before, the .pdf files are

available on our web page. Anyone can

print them and distribute them. To learn

how to do that and do it once is the major

hurdle for any comrade learning

distribution. After that, comrades can

work on increasing their frequency of

distribution per year. Learn to do big

distribution of MIM Notes by doing it.

Realistically, it takes on the order of

$1000 to be able to print a substantial

quantity of newspapers. For many people,

that $1000 is another hurdle. Yet, knowing

what the problem is is also helpful. The

money problem is just another reason we

of the proletarian line are the underdog.

If we cannot arrange $1000, we should

work on earning a living more efficiently

and examine our consumer choices--

apartments that are too expensive often

being a culprit. Some people would be

dramatically better off buying a house and

paying a mortgage instead of a rent. Only

the children, senior citizens, disabled and

prisoners really have a good reason in the

majority-exploiter countries for not being

able to raise printing money. The rest of

us need to think about it. This is our

attitude toward any resource question.

It's not enough to enjoy reading MIM.

Whenever we say "can't do it" to

ourselves, we have to realize we just

learned something. We are not Buddhist

or Hindu practitioners aiming at thought

devoid of material influences. On the

contrary, our problem is to obtain all kinds

of resources, not to say "we don't have

it," and then purify our minds. Working

with a vanguard party in the majority-

exploiter countries is much like being a

business entrepreneur who works from

the bottom up. We get people who apply

all kinds of wrong logic to working with

MIM. It's not like asking for a government

job, fitting like a cog in a big corporation

or picking a church or fashion outlet at

the mall. Out of all these experiences

people are familiar with in the non-

unionized sectors of majority-exploiter

countries, the entrepreneur is really the

most applicable model. Most union

experiences are also not applicable,

because most unions are tied in with large

corporations. The large corporations offer

a model of how to organize, but they also

buy people off so fundamentally, that they

are not the best example--though

churches, unions and single-issue

organizations provide a foundation of

experiences very helpful to MIM.

Some people will decide they cannot

arrange $1000 or more for their own

distribution work in which case they

should find other ways to build public

opinion against imperialism and for

communism and the independent

institutions of the oppressed. On the other

hand, most non-prisoners in the majority-

exploiter countries have a basis for

gradually improving their distribution

work.

Getting to the point of doing printing

once is a major achievement. Before

MIM did it, we worked with xerox copies

and that is another way to go in the short

run-- to pick articles or posters and do

xerox copies. However, comrades should

put out of their minds doing distribution

of a newspaper every two weeks in small

quantities. Let this be an official retraction

or end to a past campaign to increase

distribution. If comrades in each locality

do a large distribution once a year or even

two years, this will contribute hugely and

also serve as a basis for improvement. In

addition to a large sum of money, the

activity also requires some free time to

distribute the paper. Comrades may wish

to consider planning to spread out the

distribution over periods of days and

maybe weeks or months.

The proletarian class obviously must

improve greatly to rule, so improvement

is more important than actual level of

political work accomplished. We could

become demoralized thinking how the

bourgeois papers publish their garbage

daily or even by how the MIM publishes

twice a month. That would be the totally

wrong way of looking at the question. The

right way is to take a step toward

improvement and focus on the one's own

progress in contributing to the communist

movement. One should take this MIM-

recommended road, because imperialism

is going to do itself in and because the

Third World proletariat is going to assert

its interests eventually. The more than five

billion people on the bottom will take

power from the other billion or fewer

people. In the meantime while this huge

historical trend is asserting itself, we

Continued on next page...

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 7

asking your name, address, occupation,

age, race, education level, hair color

etc.--any of these--could be innocent

or nice but stupid people or they could be

cops. There is no reason to take a

chance. Nice people should learn not to

ask pig questions--ever. Whether people

are too inept not to carry this out or

whether they are cops hardly matters to

the party: such people need to be written

off.

6. Politically cut down the psychologists,

individualists, geographic opportunists and

Liberal pragmatists. a) Psychologists are

interested in your persynal motivations.

So are cops. Alleged Marxists who

cannot distinguish between questions of

motivation and line are never going to

amount to anything anyway, so dispensing

with them in order to dispense with cops

is no loss in the majority-exploiter

countries.

Let people interested in persynal

motivations read some autobiographies.

W.E.B. Du Bois and Bobby Seale have

them published already. So we should

make use of what is already available and

not re-invent the wheel.

On the whole, the question of persynal

motivation is unimportant. Marxism is a

science for solving certain problems of

food, clothing, shelter and peace.

Marxism-Leninism-Maoism presumes

that people are interested in these subjects

and that presumption has proved as

historically correct as the presumption

that people are interested in medical

doctors because they fight epidemics. We

spend no time worrying about a lack of

humyn interest and hence we do not

worry about persynal motivations. Those

motivations could be right or wrong, and

given the low level of scientific effort by

psychologists and psychiatrists, those

motivations could be misunderstood, but

ultimately the question is unimportant.

There are going to be people interested

in the Marxist agenda until those social

problems are gone.

In this psychologist category we can

include the ad hominem attack crowd and

all identity politics and most of post-

modernism. They emphasize subjective

experience and motivations while we

Maoists emphasize picking the right

basketball team to play for and then

putting the ball in the hole--sports-talk

for implementation. Even if no basketball

team will draft you, you still have to put

the ball in the hole. To translate--if it is

difficult to work with an organization,

there still has to be a way to raise the

level of the proletariat's game. For the

exploited and oppressed to win, it will not

be necessary for every persyn to work

directly with a party-affiliated

organization, though it is certainly

desirable.

b) Individualists of all kinds make police

infiltration easier. Typically the

individualist raises one persynal pet peeve

to a level of principle without realizing it.

For whatever reason, individualists hang

about communist movements in a manner

indistinguishable from cops looking to

obtain information without having to work

for it. Someone uninterested in broad

historical questions should not be given

credibility as a "comrade." Someone who

would raise this or that ad hoc point above

unity and struggle around broad historical

questions should be written off. If they're

talking about something millions and

billions of people cannot reference, it

cannot be a basis of unity and struggle.

c) Geographic opportunists only fight

for lines that provide leaders in their

localities. If that happens to be the CIA

with its superior resources, geographic

opportunists are satisfied. The geographic

opportunists do not think about the logic

of what it is going to take to unite billions

of people across boundaries. (These kinds

of people who passively await something

to do in their locality Lenin also referred

to as "provincialists.") Likewise

pragmatist Liberals.

d) Pragmatist Liberals Pragmatist

Liberals are combining problems from

above. In some organizations cops/spies

outnumber members. In others it is vice-

versa, but in no case are we justified in

basing membership struggle around

anything other than broad historical

questions that could be grounds for a

cardinal principle. In other words, we

cannot allow spy successes to scare us

into taking up origins, size or locality

questions as a replacement for cardinal

questions. That would be a total victory

for the enemy, much akin to how the

"terrorists" have already won the battle

against "freedom" with the passage of

the "Patriot Act."

In the Netherlands, the spies put in a

lot of effort with a lot of spies, so anyone

who joined based on size would have

picked the spy organization instead of

setting up their own. Likewise, the U.$.

intelligence services have a 10 digit

budget, not to mention the cops, so for

them to carry out large operations is no

big deal. Depending on what they are

fishing for, these spies may even put the

ball in the hole for the proletariat. This

does not give us the luxury of saying

anyone who accomplishes something is

a spy.

In retrospect we can say we wish there

were some other organization the Dutch

proletarians formed, but we cannot say

that it was wrong to join a spy-arranged

organization instead of none at all. This

idea would be as wrong as Hoxha's

metaphysics against Mao that since there

is a bourgeoisie in the party, Mao must

be a Liberal. The people who joined the

spy-arranged organization did so on

principle and on the whole that principle

is going to work out more often than not

for the proletariat and its working is going

to doom the imperialist system a tad faster

than by its own suicidal tendencies.

Maybe in many Dutch localities, Dutch

secret services were the first to espouse

Maoist principles. Because of this we do

not obtain the luxury of saying Maoist

principles are wrong! First we have to

pick our cardinal principles. Then we

have to think about how to make life

harder for spies and cops.

Lastly, the above speaks of a process

of purges and demarcation regarding

membership and affiliation practices. Yet

it also worth stressing that no purge, no

diss and no cop/spy activity ever justifies

giving up work against imperialism and

imperialist militarism. People who

intended to be genuine or who were just

thinking through something may find

themselves wrongly "written off" or

purged. Such people will continue political

work and not use the accidents of struggle

as an excuse to discontinue work. There

are widely varying levels of working with

or inside communist parties.

Examples of successful action

In the Dutch case, money for the cause

from genuine comrades ended up going

right to the Dutch secret services, thus

serving to discourage anyone attempting

to organize a communist party in the

future despite Dutch pretensions to

"freedom." Likewise, it is now public that

the "Communist Party USA" treasurer

was FBI; although the FBI allowed both

deposits and withdrawals for political

purposes.

So in some cases, the enemy is taking

the efforts of hundreds or thousands of

people and wasting it. In other cases, the

enemy is just watching activity while

fishing for bigger fish.

When we emphasize putting the ball in

the hole, instead of psychological talk and

investigation of "origins," we are going

to foil the attempts of the enemy to waste

our activity. For example, PIRAO

recently reported that Toronto and vicinity

has had some distribution of MIM Notes.

This particular distribution would foil any

possible attempt at sabotage, because the

persyn in charge took the MIM Notes

from the web site and printed and

distributed it him/herself. In other words,

this comrade(s) took the assist from the

web page, but basically put the ball in the

hole him/herself. So this persyn who

carried out action knows him or herself

that what the enemy could do to interfere

was very limited. It's not a case where

the comrade sent in $1000 and it went to

the secret services.

Now let's apply this lesson to newbies

and MIM. In every newbie's political life,

the hurdle of commitment involving money

is very important. People who get in the

habit in their teens or twenties of giving

money get on the right track. Others often

never commit to political activism despite

years of discussion. On the other hand,

newbies are going to read stories like this

true story about the Dutch. In addition,

there will be geographic opportunists and

pragmatists telling newbies not to "trust"

certain people based on various ad hoc

reasons that add up to unprincipled

individualist schlock. Separating from that

will also involve being able to distinguish

between petty-bourgeois vehemence for

narrow-minded pet peeves and proletarian

militance. The bourgeois Liberals dressed

in ultra-left or militant clothing can cause

paralysis by spreading the most corrosive

Liberalism. To break the impasse of

"trust," newbies may just have to put the

ball in the hole themselves. They can

advance cardinal principles themselves

and make a tremendous advance while

exercising the brain to work in better unity

in the future.

Now we would also say this: for those

who cannot put the ball in the hole

themselves like Toronto did, we have to

say, yes, there is the chance the enemy

will sabotage your contribution, but there

is also a chance your contribution will do

good. In the end, the proletariat wins,

because it can afford to take more

chances than the bourgeoisie. The

imperialist system is doomed.

Note: http://www2.rnw.nl/rnw/en/

currentaffairs/region/netherlands/

041210canl

Security: This time a lesson from the Netherlands

Continued from page 5...

Task report

From previous page...

should not get lost in its scale and instead

we should focus on improving our own

activities.

Corresponding attitude

toward the party

Something we have stressed is that

MIM is not Burger King. We don't have

"have it your way." We don't have a

professional staff and the number of jobs

needed for the revolutionary movement

are infinite in variety and intensity, at least

metaphorically speaking. So we hope

everyone looks at the party the right way.

Even if we had a professional staff, MIM

would not encourage a consumer ethos

in picking one's politics.

It's not a question of "shopping" for a

party or dumping jobs on the party and

seeing how it does. These are the sorts

of passive activities that imperialist

consumer society encourages both at

home and at work. How often we have

heard "the party does not do _________

(fill in the blank)." It would be like "I don't

buy that gadget, because I need 60 watts

instead of 40." That is wrong and the

correct way to choose a party out-of-

power and without control of base areas

as is the situation generally in the

imperialist countries today is by how it

hastens the scientific struggle--and by

hastening I do not mean a random fill-in-

the-blank "practice." The correct way is

by choice of cardinal principles and

nothing else. Everything else is part of

our predicament of being the underdog

class and not doing something because

of that underdog status is the equivalent

of original sin. There are good and bad

reasons for rejecting MIM. The worst

reason is thinking one has a proletarian

line and then making the absolutely

circular discovery that MIM is the

underdog. A good reason for rejecting

Continued on page 9...

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 8

Review: Lemony Snicket's A Series

of Unfortunate Events

Directed by Brad Silberling

Paramount Pictures, 2004

Reviewed by a contributor

"Lemony Snicket's A Series of

Unfortunate Events" is based on the first

few books of Lemony Snicket a.k.a.

Daniel Handler's ongoing fiction "Series

of Unfortunate Events," which deals with

the adventures of the three Baudelaire

orphans. "A Series of Unfortunate

Events" has been compared to J. K.

Rowling's "Harry Potter" series in terms

of popularity with children, but has

received much less press. A large number

of movie viewers may become new

Lemony Snicket fans after seeing the

movie, which has a bearing on the movie's

impact.

Although this review is not particularly

interested in how "Unfortunate Events"

compares with the books artistically, the

movie is supposedly similar to the books.

Someone mysteriously burned down the

Baudelaires' lavish mansion and killed

their wealthy parents. The orphans'

distant relative Count Olaf doggedly

pursues the children, trying to take their

inheritance. It seems that he was

somehow involved in the arson. Each of

the children is "gifted," or "talented."

Violet is good at inventing gadgets; she's

like MacGyver. Klaus is good at absorbing

information from books. Sunny excels at

biting things, and in the movie, she can

speak "baby" fluently, or think complex

thoughts. (The movie captions Sunny's

(Kara Hoffman and Shelby Hoffman)

baby talk with witty subtitles, which is

supposed to be funny.)

"Lemony Snicket's A Series of

Unfortunate Events" is definitely not the

first comical or satirical movie in which a

child character resists a dislikable adult

who is ignorant, irrational or given to

ridiculous antics. For example, looking

way back, there is Jean Vigo's " Zéro de

conduite " (1933). Of course, there is the

whole "Home Alone" series (1990, 1992,

1997, 2002). Other recent movies of this

kind include "Max Keeble's Big Move"

(2001). However, few movies are as

thorough as "Unfortunate Events" in

portraying adults as being dim-witted

compared with children.

Even Lemony Snicket's (Jude Law)

antics are ridiculous compared with Klaus

(Liam Aiken) and Violet's (Emily

Browning) seriousness and sober-

mindedness. He pretends to be writing

down a true story, but he is way too

excited. The movie pauses its bringing-

to-life of Lemony Snicket's story to show

Lemony Snicket himself; while doing this,

it distracts from the seriousness of the

deadly, distressing situations in which

Klaus, Sunny and Violet find themselves

as a result of Lemony Snicket's typing.

For that matter, the character Lemony

Snicket's imagination is almost sadistic in

the way that it incessantly torments the

Baudelaire orphans with situations that

they do not find funny despite the movie

audience's laughter. Funny things are

going on around them, but Klaus and

Violet look antagonized and tired of it all.

Gruff, pudgy banker Mr. Poe (Timothy

Spall) is too quick to leave the orphans in

dangerous situations; if he were a social

worker, he would be considered

incompetent. High-strung Aunt Josephine

(Meryl Streep), who is afraid of realtors,

irritates Klaus and Violet with all her

warnings about unlikely accidents (for

example, her large kitchen refrigerator

falling over and squashing a persyn).

Count Olaf (Jim Carrey) and his acting

troupe are flamboyant, foolish and goofy,

but stereotypically greedy and uncaring.

Not all adults seem to bother the

Baudelaire orphans. In particular and

unsurprisingly, Klaus and Violet have fond

memories of their dead parents. But we

aren't shown or told much about them,

and all Klaus and Violet have to

remember their parents by is a metallic

silhouette of their parents' side profiles.

"Unfortunate Events" is the latest in a

long line of movies (including "E.T. The

Extra-Terrestrial," 1982; "Flight of the

Navigator," 1986; "The NeverEnding

Story II: The Next Chapter," 1990; "Peter

Pan," 2003; and "Catch that Kid," 2004,

more recently) portraying mentally or

physically strong children, but ultimately

having them return to the home or the

family as a safe haven. And like the whole

"Spy Kids" series (2001, 2002, 2003),

"Unfortunate Events" is big on family

"sticking together." However, the movie

alludes to some interesting points.

The orphans stick together as a family,

but partly because they are legally forced

to. Also, we see older children taking care

of younger children, or children taking

care of other children--true, because they

have to take care of each other, but Klaus

and Violet are successful in taking care

of Sunny. This reflects a reality that many

persyns in the united $tates are familiar

with: the decay of some forms of

childcare under patriarchy, without the

emergence of advanced forms of

childcare that are further away from

patriarchy, and signs that there are

alternatives to biological parents'

parenting their own children only.

The Baudelaires are English, but in the

real world, after imperialism is

overthrown, oppressed nationalities

especially may experience a restoration

of patriarchal forms of childcare while

patriarchy is still being destroyed. For

example, imperialism causes some

children in the internal semi-colonies of

the united $tates to become orphans.

Without imperialism, there may be fewer

orphans, but temporarily more children in

patriarchal childcare in nuclear families.

Certain patriarchal forms may resurge

after imperialism is destroyed, but

patriarchy will still need to be destroyed.

This includes the practice of placing

orphaned children with relatives even

though they may be abusive.

"Unfortunate Events" deserves praise for

trying to illustrate (painfully--Olaf slaps

Klaus across the face at one point) that

there will be no end to child abuse while

the institution of childhood, and patriarchy

more generally, still exist.

Count Olaf is after the Baudelaires'

inheritance, and the movie does not

question class and patriarchal practices

of inheritance, but it is not so much that

the children want to keep the inheritance

for themselves. Legally, the children have

to die before Count Olaf can get the

money. They may just be trying to survive.

Olaf relies on different kinds of force,

intimidation and threats to control Klaus,

Sunny, and Violet, and other persyns'

actions and hate for children effectively

protect Olaf, but the Baudelaires

repeatedly outsmart Olaf, even Sunny.

The point here is not that infants are

capable of defeating adults, but rather,

that infants, too, are oppressed under

patriarchy since gender oppressors obtain

benefits from infants through a system

that subjects children to violence and

enervation. "Unfortunate Events"

illustrates this in a limited way. Olaf is

able to take advantage of Sunny's small

size. It may be given that Olaf will go for

the most vulnerable child, but he

repeatedly calls Sunny a "monkey" to

demean her. Later, he puts her in a cage.

What Olaf thinks about children is a

condition of his actions toward them.

Like so many other movies that feature

child characters, "Unfortunate Events"

represents or misrepresents a particular

aspect of children's oppression under

patriarchy without even trying to portray

what children have in common socially.

For example, just looking at the movie, it

is hard to imagine that Klaus (a boy,

nearly a teenager), Sunny (baby) and

Violet (a young teenage girl) have

anything in common as children. No other

child characters appear in the movie.

"Unfortunate Events" does go a little bit

further than other movies by suggesting

that the Baudelaire orphans all have

something in common, and maybe even

that they are children "against the world"

of stupid grown-ups, but the children are

supposed to be talented and unique, that

is, different from other children. So, Klaus,

Sunny, Violet are exceptional. However,

"Unfortunate Events" does do a little bit

to show how children in general can

survive despite, and because of , adults'

"mental illness."

In the presence of his troupe, Olaf

scolds Klaus and Violet for not making

roast beef for dinner, as if he could afford

roast beef, but he plainly lives in a

dilapidated, unkempt mansion. Also, Olaf

seems to be oblivious to the fact that he's

a bad actor, and he presumptuously casts

himself in leading roles. Some kind of

mental disturbance may be a cause of

Olaf's brandishing a knife to threaten the

children. Olaf is intimidating, but at

relatively likable Uncle Monty's place, he

is extremely careless with his disguise and

is too quick to run after being exposed as

an impostor. Olaf's lack of self-control

poses a risk to the Baudelaires, but is also

a weakness that they take advantage of.

In the real world, the mental abilities

of some parasites living in imperialist

citadels are decaying for different

reasons. (This doesn't necessarily appear

as "mental illness.") To the extent that

this deterioration of mental abilities, and

this descent to lower modes of thinking

like sentimentalism or what-feels-good

subjectivism, worsens as metropolitan

imperialist-country parasites get older, the

possibility is raised that some oppressor-

nation children will dictate to oppressor-

nation adults--and particularly that

oppressed-nation children will dictate to

oppressor-nation adults. This is on top of

the fact that children are gender-

oppressed and have an objective basis to

support the revolution in different ways,

while the vast majority of oppressor-nation

men and wimmin, who are exploiters and

gender oppressors, do not. Although

"Unfortunate Events" does not deal with

revolution, it is interesting to see the

Baudelaire orphans take matters into their

own hands because they think they know

better than the crazies, fools and idiots

surrounding them. It is not so much that

stupidity (whatever this means) is peculiar

to gender oppressors like adults in

oppressor nations. On the contrary, adults

may have a sort of monopoly on cognitive

development because of the social

exclusion of children in so many different

ways--but children ought to be

encouraged to recognize their differences

with other persyns and take important

Quick-witted children live among mentally

disturbed adults in an imperialist country

Go to next page...

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 9

Militarism is war-mongering or the

advocacy of war or actual carrying out

of war or its preparations.

While true pacifists condemn all

violence as equally repugnant, we

Maoists do not consider self-defense

or the violence of oppressed nations

against imperialism to be militarism.

Militarism is mostly caused by

imperialism at this time. Imperialism

is the highest stage of capitalism--

seen in countries like the United

$tates, England and France.

Under capitalism, capitalists often

profit from war or its preparations.

Yet, it is the proletariat that does the

dying in the wars. The proletariat

wants a system in which people do not

have self-interest on the side of war-

profiteering or war for imperialism.

Militarism is one of the most

important reasons to overthrow

capitalism. It even infects oppressed

nations and causes them to fight each

other.

It is important not to let capitalists risk

our lives in their ideas about war and

peace or the environment. They have

already had two world wars admitted

by themselves in the last 100 years and

they are conducting a third right now

against the Third World.

Even a one percent annual chance of

nuclear war destruction caused by

capitalist aggressiveness or "greed" as

the people call it should not be tolerated

by the proletariat. After playing

Russian Roulette (in which the bullet

chamber is different each time and not

related at all to the one that came up in

previous spins) with 100 chambers and

one bullet, the chance of survival is

only 60.5% after 50 turns. In other

words, a seemingly small one percent

annual chance of world war means

eventual doom. After 100 years or turns

of Russian Roulette, the chances of

survival are only 36.6%. After 200

years, survival has only a 13.4%

chance.

What is militarism?

work with MIM is realizing that one likes

bourgeois ideology and does not want to

waste MIM's time. There are all sorts of

alternatives to MIM ranging from

Republican to Trotskyist organizations.

MIM is not asking for votes or for trust.

Because what we have to accomplish is

different than what Burger King or John

Kerry attempt to accomplish and because

we do not have the bourgeois resources

sufficient to simply replace the

government, we must focus on continuous

improvement by taking up self-reliance.

The exploited and oppressed camp

must have a different outlook than Burger

King and other businesses serving

consumers. "Ask not what the party can

do for you but what you can do to create

public opinion and the independent

institutions of the oppressed" should be

our motto.

Part of adopting the right approach is

puncturing any myths about the party. For

example, PIRAO is defunct. I'm still here,

but I and other comrades are busy with

such a wide range of things that for all

practical purposes concerning the outsider,

PIRAO is defunct. Now, some people

will react by becoming discouraged.

Others will see this as a lesson about our

underdog status. Part of my job is to

report on this accountably, so people will

know our strengths and weaknesses.

Though we are in a weak position, other

organizations and activists do not issue

reports as regularly and accountably as

we do. So my point is not to say we are

inactive, only that for practical purposes

PIRAO is defunct.

Originally, we had hoped PIRAO would

serve as an organization for people under

the tightest discipline. As one might think,

Task report

From page 7...

that is not our strong suit in the majority-

exploiter countries. Yet, as it stands we

do not have the leadership to implement

even partially some aspects of the

PIRAO concept for people willing to do

disciplined work or for people who need

disciplined structure. That is up to you,

our reader to become PIRAO leaders.

PIRAO has become more of a

mediating influence--talking about how

to approach going from lofty principles

and understandings to action. Reading

theory magazines and MIM Notes, one

could end up a reading consumer only, so

PIRAO has attempted to communicate

through these reports more about what

it's like to do work that we call

"infrastructural" as opposed to direct

public opinion or theory writing.

MIM holds no base areas or

government power. That's a key point in

understanding what kind of accountability

to apply to MIM. Again, if one thinks there

is some kind of huge stash of centrally-

located resources that need to be

employed, that is not the case, at least

not right now.

Although we have more readers than

any other organization in the English-

speaking world calling itself "communist,"

we also reach our limits and that is also

an example of puncturing myths. For

example, why we are stuck at around

40,000 readers, I do not know. That could

just be our limits as individuals here, so

it's encouraging to see a deeper

readership. Perhaps the deepening of

readership will lead to people's making

contributions to the struggles that will get

MIM out of this rut, if not now, then by

steady improvement, soon enough.

In fact, the readership this month was

noticeably dramatically better. This month

there were so many articles including

many rather obscure ones with over 100

readers that it makes me tired thinking

about it. Hopefully we will all get used to

the idea that no matter how much we put

in work on articles for the website, there

will be more demand.

As the number of files taken on the

website indicates, there is a connection

between the work we manage to get up

on the web page and our readership. The

number of files taken increased 61% in

one year and that is a major

accomplishment by comrades submitting

their articles and other web files. Of

course, MIM does all that by going

through a political weeding-out process.

We have proved that it is possible to

oppose all opportunism and come up with

big numbers.

There is not a single "job" that the party

center does that it always did. MIM

comrades printed first and then became

journalists, editors and graphics workers.

MIM also did not have the money,

transportation and other resources and

skills that it has now.

The good thing about the way the MIM

web page is set up is that people can

arrange their own printings and

distribution and not "trust" the party. The

party has more than earned "trust," but

in the most important senses, "trust" is

not an important question. We encourage

everyone to keep their eyes on "impact."

Decide for yourself if you like what MIM

Notes says and whether you "trust" the

party or not, do something to distribute

MIM Notes if you like it. That's what we

mean by keeping the eye on "impact."

matters into their own hands if the

supervising adults refuse to change their

mistaken ideas.

It is possible to tease out these themes

further, but overall, "Unfortunate Events"

deserves a neutral rating for doing little

to change the status quo. Some of this

has to do with the fact that there is so

much bullshit in this fantasy movie to wade

through to get to anything meaningful.

Also, the movie undermines its own best

elements. For example, Aunt Josephine's

various fears seem irrational especially

when her house's foundation is built onto

the face of a cliff above Lake

Lachrymose, but her seemingly irrational

fears about unlikely home accidents turn

out to be premonitions; the idea is that

Aunt Josephine wasn't that crazy after

all. The Baudelaires aren't enthusiastic

about accompanying eccentric Uncle

Monty on his trip to Peru and seem to

feel that people are pushing them around,

which alludes to a certain reality under

patriarchy by which children are

pressurized into a restricted group of

households, usually relatives', but Lemony

Snicket suggests that sticking with Uncle

Monty would have been ideal for the

Baudelaires. The movie depicts the

Baudelaires as being intelligent compared

with all of the adults, which counters the

notion that biological children are all

unintelligent and senseless compared with

adults, but despite all his knowledge, Klaus

almost superstitiously believes that there

is always a way out of a bad situation.

And while "Unfortunate Events" happens

to be right in showing how vast book

knowledge doesn't necessarily mean

having correct ideas, there is a difference

between perseverance and superstitious

persistence that the movie itself blurs.

The whole movie is very dream-like.

In the movie, everything does happen for

a reason, like in roleplaying games. There

is always a way out of a bad situation,

which is the premise of Violet and

MacGyver's feats. In addition, there is a

lot of deliberate anachronism in the movie;

the movie looks like a dream. For

example, Olaf drives an antique car with

power door locks and lock knobs that can

disappear (as if by magic, but this isn't

clear). Olaf's dark, dingy mansion is

across the street from a contemporary,

quaint house, while the Baudelaire

mansion is located in what looks like a

suburb in industrial England. In the "Harry

Potter" movies (2001, 2002, 2004), there

is at least a sense of how the witches

and wizards' fantastical inventions came

to exist (by magic), and there is a more

or less clear separation between the

Muggle world, which looks like the real

world, and the wizard world. In

"Unfortunate Events," it is difficult to

discern any history behind the

simultaneous existence of Olaf's power

door locks and Mr. Poe's "car stereo": a

bulky audio tape reel player. In

"Unfortunate Events," no attempt is

made to explain the fantastical inventions

and fantastical situations; they're simply

there. While "Harry Potter" and

Snicket

From previous page...

"Unfortunate Events" may both be

products of idealism, "Unfortunate

Events" makes no effort to ground its

fantasticism in any reality, not even a

fictional one. As a result, it encourages

idealistic ways of thinking and discourages

looking for patterns in objective reality that

are based on history. Sequels to

"Unfortunate Events" may explain some

of the stranger elements of the movie,

but as it stands, the movie's redeeming

elements have the context of a fantasy

world.

"Unfortunate Events" is very dream-

like, but real childhood is a nightmare in

which children are coerced, silenced,

terrorized, and made to be fearful. The

victimization of children is not a

consequence of just incompetent or

malicious caretakers, but will happen as

long as children as a group are oppressed

under patriarchy. It is doubtful that the

adults and even the children who laugh

at Klaus, Sunny and Violet's expense will

understand this after leaving the theater.

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 10

MIM on

Prisons & Prisoners

MIM seeks to build public opinion

against Amerika's criminal injustice sys-
tem, and to eventually replace the bour-
geois injustice system with proletarian jus-
tice. The bourgeois injustice system im-
prisons and executes a disproportionately
large and growing number of oppressed
people while letting the biggest mass mur-
derers -- the imperialists and their lack-
eys -- roam free. Imperialism is not op-
posed to murder or theft, it only insists that
these crimes be committed in the interests
of the bourgeoisie.

"All U.S. citizens are criminals--

accomplices and accessories to the crimes
of U.$. oppression globally until the day
U.$. imperialism is overcome. All U.S.
citizens should start from the point of view
that they are reforming criminals."

MIM does not advocate that all

prisoners go free today; we have a
more effective program for fighting
crime as was demonstrated in China
prior to the restoration of capitalism
there in 1976. We say that all prisoners
are political prisoners because under
the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, all
imprisonment is substantively
political. It is our responsibility to
exert revolutionary leadership and
conduct political agitation and
organization among prisoners --
whose material conditions make them
an overwhelmingly revolutionary
group. Some prisoners should and will
work on self-criticism under a future
dictatorship of the proletariat in those
cases in which prisoners really did do
something wrong by proletarian
standards.

Under Lock & Key

News from Prisons & Prisoners

Oregon Organizing

Needs Next Step

Unfortunately, I am once again enchained

in the belly of Oregon's imperialistic DSU

machine. This time, for nothing at all! They
transferred me to Snake River Correctional
Institute only to place me on `Involuntary

Ad- Seg' status which means they can lock
me down for any amount of time for nothing
other than being me! I say this because of the

political tattoo on my face, which reads,
`FUCK COPS!' in huge letters! But the
administrative imperialists say it's because I

am a threat to staff. Since an anti- imperialist
prisoner just stabbed one captain and one
CO at OSP, they locked me down as well.

We revolutionaries in Oregon have been

very busy this year, with simultaneous hunger
strikes on three of Oregon's roughest prison

yards, and telephone strikes and boycotts.
The imperialistic administrative capitalist
machine agendas that run Oregon's prison

telephone systems are profiting a million
dollars a year off Oregon's prisoners. Our
telephone strikes in September were very

successful. We are now granted three yard
times a day. Also, they have lowered many
items' prices in the canteen.

Yet, the biggest accomplishment of all was

and remains the racial unity that brought
about the prisoner unity that dominated the

system across Oregon. It is time for unity to
rise up and overthrow. Many people have
thrown their theories and ideology around

and have gained good ground in the struggles
of our movement. Reality, however, is always
right around the corner, and fact is louder

than fiction. With that in mind, I submit these
few words of realism untainted by fantasy.

In Oregon there are 106 county jails, 12 state

prisons and 1 Federal prison. Oregon is
succeeding in its effort to transform human
warehousing into a centerpiece of the

imperialist, capitalist, corrupted economy. Yet
I see people everywhere shocked by what
they saw in the Abu Ghraib situation in Iraq,

but no one is protesting the many men and
women on Death Row in California and
Oregon, the prison beatings, the cases of

outright torture, or prisoners murdered for
their acts of political resistance. Why is that?
It seems that parading around in Portland and

Eugene under a 1,000 different ideologies will
accomplish nothing other than riling a bunch
of street kids to throw a few rocks.

Some say this approach to a common

ground in resistance movements is really
counter-productive, and in the end only put

our supporters with the most heart and
courage in the prison system. In turn, this
clash of ideology is only sacrificing our people

to the system's imperialistic machines, and
then forcing them to stand alone in a structure
long built on racial separation and oppressive

segregation. This is why the ARM and I are
combining our efforts in learning and teaching
towards working in a united front with MIM,

Rail, USW, Under Lock and Key and MIM
Notes, and becoming part of the proletarian-
led united front against imperialism.

In the struggle, Your comrade Lucky,

October 2004

Unite, Stop the

Violence in Oregon

Greetings, brothers and sisters, from my

concrete cage. Recently some violence
occurred at the Snake River Correctional

Institution. Due to differences between some
inmates, it created a situation that could have
been avoided. It is for this reason I would like

to address the great need for unity, and what

unity through the ages has done for small
groups of people.

Everyone knows, or should know, that the

whole justice system isn't properly presented
to the public on television or in most books.
The justice system in this country nowadays

bases its decisions largely on community
opinion. If a decision to be made by a court
might be right and just but contrary to popular

ideology, more often than not, the court will
rule in light of what commercial society would
think.

The reason the prison population isn't

noticed as a force of intelligence is because a
portion of this population is more concerned

with looking good to their friends, getting
caught up in the rumor mill, and extorting from
the weak. Most of those involved in this are

more intelligent than that, but let peer pressure
take over their common sense and their depth
of humanity.

Those who are oppressed by other inmates

are usually highly intellectual people with the
knowledge and resources to assist the inmate

oppressors in areas important to their (and
our) cause. The extorted don't fear the ability
to help others, rather they crave it, but instead

fear the extorters' actions after a completed
task. Without unity the officials of the
prisons, cities, states, and the country will

forever oppress the little man.

Throughout world history, smaller bands

of people have united together to form one

mighty force to impress upon the tyrants of
the era their human need to be heard and
treated as a people equal to that of any other

in the world. . . Brothers and sisters, it is time
to put away childish ways of thinking and
see who the real battle is against. It is time to

become a new kind of society. Each one of
our prisons has within it a community of its
own. The Amerikan government wants prison

reform? Let's give it to them. It doesn't take
violence, not in our lifetime.

Prisoners can use their minds to achieve a

goal, as long as they know what that goal is.
We have a goal, people. How long are you
going to sit on your hind ends and let others

decide what time you go to bed, wake up, and
shower. Contrary to what many may be
thinking, it doesn't have to be done with

violence against each other.

Many people feel angry about some of the

immoral crimes some have done to the point

of hate for those people. You might ask
yourself how you are to deal with that in these
times. Hate is an emotion/feeling that takes a

lot of mental energy. These energies can be
put to better use in other areas. The point is
that hate for other inmates could be what is

keeping a lot of our warriors in chains. At first
it is hard to put into practice, but, like other
abilities, it gets easier and easier.

Violence against fellow captives is what the

autocrats want. They depend on this to show
the unknowing public how `dangerous' their

`jobs' are. When, in truth, they are nothing
more than glorified George Jetsons who push
buttons to keep our daily lives controlled. It

doesn't have to be this way. Oppression is
right in the faces of every locked-up person
banned from society.

For those at SRCI, one inmate who became

upset because those in charge of scheduling
television viewing kept forgetting to schedule
his favorite program, wrote to the Oregonian

newspaper when the institution was going to
show `The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'. Now
SRCI can only host PG-rated movies. Our

anger towards each other is pointless while
being held within. There will be other times
for violence. While in prison it only defeats

our purposes for the rights we seek. There
will be a time for the actions that one may feel
violent and just. But, for our goals, it is not

now. This is your call to arms where the
weapons are pens and intelligence. That is,
unless you like being thought of a stupid

misfit shunned by an uncaring capitalist
society.

--An Oregon Prisoner, October 2004

Prison abuse in Iraq

and U.$.

I greet you in strength. I received MIM

Notes; it was absolutely refreshing to read a

historical dialectical materialist analysis of the
current epoch, i.e., imperialist aggression.

The newly exposed torture and abuse of

Iraqi prisoners at the hands of agents of the
bourgeoisie, in which some were revealed to
be correctional officers in the U.$., has created

a new opportunity. I think as a movement we
have an opportunity to galvanize and create
genuine consciousness as to the culture of

oppression that has been taking place in this
country for decades. I think a tactic that can
be applied is to show the bourgeois domestic

policy of prisoner oppression and continued
sanctioning of this policy by government
officials and the judicial system and how they

extended this policy to the rest of humanity.
History will not forgive revolutionaries for
not making use of the concrete material

conditions in relation to the continuous
ignominious misanthropy of the bourgeoisie.

It will take a constant vigorous explanation

and revealing of the hundreds of thousands
of episodes of torture and abuse sanctioned
by the state against prisoners in the country.

There has to be a real pressure on the
bourgeois media machine in such a way that
they don't gloss over or pusillanimously

report on this condition. It may be idealist to
focus on the bourgeois media machine, but I
think they have a use. The key is to make it

impossible for the media machine to ignore
the humongous nature of the bourgeois
foreign and domestic policy in the treatment

of prisoners.

- A Virginia prisoner May 2004
MIM responds: The bourgeois media can

freely ignore prison abuse in this country,
until the public knows about it from other
sources. It would be idealist to base our

strategy on the goal of getting the bourgeois
media to carry the proletariat's message.
Instead, we build MIM Notes, our website

and other publications as independent
institutions of the oppressed. True, media
exposure may be a result of our victories, but

it is not their cause. To expose the prison
abuse and torture that you refer to, we
continuously publish reports on conditions

in Amerikan prisons -- and their connection
to the torture in Iraq and around the world.

For example, we publish this report from
prison in a Virgina control unit. It's our job to
get this information into the hands of other

prisoners and concerned readers on the
outside, to build public opinion against
imperialism.

Texas prison system

oppression and waste

Greetings to all my brothers and sisters in

the struggle for justice and peace. I'm writing

to you from one of Amerikkka's Texas Gulags,
straight from the pit of hell, where Satan's
demons run this system -- the Nazi

Greyshirts; where innocent men and women
are put to death on the Texas Concentration
Camp death row; where men are murdered,

beaten, and worked like dogs in their
sweatshops, without pay.

We work years to stay out of trouble to

earn what is called "good time and live class,"
and then one major disciplinary case can take
all that away. A lot of times the cases are

bogus. These officers can lie about anything

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 11

Facts on U$ imprisonment

The facts about imprisonment in the United $tates are that the United $tates has been the world's leading prison-state per capita for the last

25 years, with a brief exception during Boris Yeltsin's declaration of a state of emergency.(1)

That means that while Reagan was talking about a Soviet "evil empire" he was the head of a state that imprisoned more people per capita.

In supposedly "hard-line" Bulgaria of the Soviet bloc of the 1980s, the imprisonment rate was less than half that of the United $tates.(2,3)

To find a comparison with U.$. imprisonment of Black people, there is no statistic in any country that compares including apartheid South

Africa of the era before Mandela was president. The last situation remotely comparable to the situation today was under Stalin during war
time. The majority of prisoners are non-violent offenders(4) and the U.S. Government now holds about a half million more prisoners than
China; even though China is four times our population.(5)

The rednecks tell MIM that we live in a "free country." They live in an Orwellian 1984 situation where freedom is imprisonment.

Notes: 1. Marc Mauer, "Americans Behind Bars: The International Use of Incarceration 1993," The Prison Sentencing Project, 918 F. St. NW, Suite

501, Washington, DC 20004 (202) 628-0871 Reference: SRI: R8965-2, 1994
2. Ibid., 1992 report.

3. United Nations Development Programme, "Human Development Report 1994,:" Oxford University Press, p. 186.

4. Figure of 51.2 percent for state prisoners there for non-violent offenses. Abstract of the United States 1993, p. 211.
5. Atlantic Monthly December, 1998.

and their word is always taken as right, but
no matter what we say we're found guilty,

and we never win on the grievance process.

I'm doing time for giving one of these Nazi

Greyshirts a black eye eight years ago. But

they can murder, and do everything else
illegal, and never see one day in jail. Texas is
not the only corrupt system; this whole

government is sick and corrupted. Our very
own president can bomb countries for oil and
kill hundreds of thousands, but it's not murder

what he does? I do time for a black eye while
all my loved ones stand by waiting for me to
come home. I came down when I was 22 years

old and I'll soon be 33. All these years of my
life gone.

All I can say is I'm with all of you in spirit

and heart in this great struggle. One day I'll
be able to be on the streets and help if I can,
but until then I can only write and say,

"March on brothers and sisters and stay
strong. The ones who keep up the fight will
prevail in the end."

--A Texas Prisoner, May 2004
MIM responds: Thank you for your letter.

When they impose a definition of crime under

which you are in prison while the president is
in his hot tub in Crawford, they not only do
an injustice to you and your family and

community, they also waste the vast human
resources of millions of people who should
be doing meaningful work for the people. And

beyond that, they actively block those
prisoners who are attempting to improve their
lives from getting the education they need.

See the letter below.

No library or

education allowed in

Texas

I have always had mixed feelings about the

way America treats other countries. The
politicians think they can just invade any
country, go in, take over, and tell them what

to do, while they sit in Washington collecting
kickbacks.

I have talked with a couple other people so

far and they want to learn more of your views.
I would like some history books and political
books about Lenin and Stalin for starters if

they are available. I read most of the time but
all I can get here are sci-fi and fantasy, mostly
from other prisoners. They closed down the

library after the librarian retired and only let
people in school go to it. I have to work in the
kitchen 8 hours a day and have too much

education for them to put me in school
[presumably a high school degree -ed.].

I am in prison for the second time for

burglary. I need stability in my life and
something to believe in so when I get out
again I can stay away from drugs. I can write

some articles for MIM Notes, about the prison
here. I look forward to receiving my first copy
of MIM Notes.

--A Texas prisoner, June 2004
MIM responds: MIM has always said that

some people in prison have committed crimes
against the people and need rehabilitation
(and/or treatment, in the case of drug

addiction). It's just that (1) imperialists impose
a definition of crime that serves their interests,
not the interests of the people (see letter

above), and (2) their prison system does
nothing to encourage people to improve
themselves and their contribution to the

people.

It is criminal that MIM and other small

organizations are left trying to supply

educational material to millions of prisoners,
while the state not only denies them
education, but denies them access to libraries

when they seek to educate themselves even
after working all day. Let's purge this system
with its insane and oppressive practices, and

build a new justice system, as part of a new
just society that prevents crime against all
people while using the vast resources of the

oppressed for the public good rather then
the enrichment of the imperialists and their
lackeys.

Organizing against control units in Indiana
Revolutionary Greetings! I haven't

communicated in a while because I've been

busy with my court preparation and we are
currently in a prison lock- down. I hope the
included signatures help out with the struggle.

If you have any extra copies of the Anti

SHU petition can you send them to me? I
have some comrades that would like to send

them to the outside and get them on the
streets.

--An Indiana prisoner, August 2004

California Prison

Guards: the real

danger

I've come to a place that's not dangerous

because of the inmates, it's dangerous

because of the guards. Don't get me wrong,
ya do have some wacked people in here. But
the people that are supposed to be overseeing

ya safety are the ones putting your life in
danger. If they don't like me they can put a
knife in my cell. If they don't like me I can fall

out and have a seizure in this cell. They'll
provoke you in a way that they actually want
you to put hands on them. These are the folks

who are supposed to be overseeing me. It's
just like the police on the street. Ain't nothing
different.

- A California prisoner, November 2004

California:

Punishment for

sagging pants

Folsom prison has its own rules and has

been under investigation for corruption. There

was one situation where a young Black
brother was sagging his pants. Now the

procedural way to deal with such a minor
offense is to issue a verbal warning and if
that fails the progressive discipline begins.

However, for this brotha that didn't happen,
instead his cell was searched and all
appliances were removed. That night they sat

in darkness! I hooked up a citizens complaint
for him and left the rest up to him. People are
afraid of reprisals.

- a California prisoner, November 2004

Lifers: get involved in

the fight

As a lifer in the state of New York, I feel

there is not much being done in the fight for
good time for lifers. By saying this, I don't
mean to offend the few organizations that are

fighting on our behalf, I'm speaking more on
a prisoners behalf. As lifers, I feel we need to
become more involved in the fight for good

time and get our families involved as well.

Little do we know that our families hold

some kind of power. Just imagine if all of our

families were to come together and speak out
against this fucked up justice system. They'd
leave the government no choice but to listen.

If we're going to see change in the years to

come, we're going to have to make that change
happen. The only way we're going to be able

to make that happen is by coming together
and fighting against this fucked up justice
system. Fighting against each other only

proves that we're still in the same frame of
mind that we were in when we first entered
this system, when we were purposely kept

ignorant and taught what to think instead of
how to think. The war on Iraq should open
our eyes to what's in store for us. This

government will kill kids and women to
accomplish their goals. Their goals are to
accomplish what Hitler failed to do: take over

the world. (It's called the New World Order.)

So instead of getting on these gates beefing

about what rapper wasn't good and what ball

player made 20 points, we need to start
becoming politically aware and get in tune
with what's going on in this fucked up world

because it effects all of us. Next time, we get
on these gates, we need to be talking about
how Che and Fidel Castro were able to

overthrow a whole system with just 80
comrades and how we can't overthrow a
system with over 2 million prisoners. We need

to become familiar with the speeches of
comrades like Marx, Lenin and Mao. We need
to understand their cause and their fight. Like

the comrade George Jackson said, "Men who
read Lenin, Fanon and Che don't riot, `they
mass,' `they rage,' they dig graves."

Forever onwards to victory! Freedom or

death!

-- A New York Lifer, June 2004

Join the fight against

the injustice system

While we fight to end the criminal

injustice system MIM engages in

reformist battles to improve the lives

of prisoners. Below are some of the

campaigns we are currently waging,

and ways people behind the bars and

on the outside can get involved. More

info can be found on our prison web

site: http://www.etext.org/Politics/

MIM/agitation/prisons

Stop Censorship in Prison: Prisons

frequently censor books, newspapers

and magazines coming from MIM's

books for prisoners program. We need

help from lawyers, paralegals and

jailhouse lawyers to fight this

censorship.

Books for Prisoners: This program

focuses on political education of

prisoners. Send donations of books and

money for our Books for Prisoners

program.

End the Three Strikes laws: This

campaign is actively fighting the

repressive California laws, but similar

laws exist in other states. Write to us

to request a petition to collect

signatures. Send articles and

information on three strike laws.

Shut Down the Control Units: Across

the country there are a growing number

of prison control units. These are

permanently designated prisons or cells

in prisons that lock prisoners up in

solitary or small group confinement for

22 or more hours a day with no

congregate dining, exercise or other

services, and virtually no programs for

prisoners. Prisoners are placed in

control units for extended periods of

time. These units cause both mental and

physical problems for prisoners.

Write to us to request a petition to

collect signatures. Get your

organization to sign the statement

demanding control units be shut down.

Send us information about where there

are control units in your state. Include

the names of the prisons as well as the

number of control unit beds/cells in

each prison if that is known. Send us

anti-control unit artwork.

MIM's Re-Lease on Life Program:

This program provides support for our

comrades who have been recently

released from the prison system, to help

them meet their basic needs and also

continue with their revolutionary

organizing on the outside. We need

funds, housing, and job resources. We

also need prisoner's input on the

following survey questions:

1. What are the biggest challenges

you face being released from prison?

2. How can these problems be

addressed?

3. What are the important elements

of a successful release program?

MIM Notes 312 · January 2005 · Page 12

Notas Rojas

enero 2005, Nº 312 Fragmento del Periodico Oficial del Movimiento Internacionalista Maoista Gratis

Escrito por mim3@mim.org y

mousnonya

Traducido por Células de Estudio para la

Liberación de Aztlán y América Latina

El 24 de mayo, Bush salió en la tele con fin

de preparar al público para las semanas y los
meses que tocan en Irak. "Nuestros
comandantes han estimado que menos de
115,000 tropas resultarían suficientes en este
momento del conflicto"- dijo Bush. "Dado el
reciente crecimiento de la violencia,
mantendremos el actual nivel de tropas-
138,000- por el tiempo que sea necesario".

"Si los comandantes necesitan más

tropas"- dijo Bush,- "las mandaré". (1) El
mismo día el senador demócrata Joe
Lieberman se puso del lado del presidente
diciendo en el CNN que la guerra en Irak era
"una prueba generacional". En vez de señalar
que esta guerra ha fomentado el odio hacia el
imperialismo estadounidense, Lieberman
declaró que habría más ataques en el suelo
estadounidense si las tropas no se quedan
en Irak.

Mientras tanto, los senadores Hillary

Clinton (D-NY) y Lindsey Grahan (R-SC)
hicieron un llamado abogando por unas
"fuerzas militares más amplias". Hillary
Clinton expresó dudas en cuanto al
financiamiento de las mismas pero dijo que
no había otra opción. (2) Es posible que
Grahan vea la guerra como una oportunidad
de trabajo para los blancos jóvenes rurales
de su estado, ya que Carolina del Sur ha
perdido muchos puestos de trabajo, pero se
niega a implementar cambios.

Los múltiples escándalos alrededor del

tema de torturas de los prisioneros en Irak y
Afganistán significan que otros imperialistas
como la ONU están en una mejor posición
para negociar. En este momento los
gobernantes estadounidenses están tratando
de aparentar flexibles ante el público.
Nosotros pensamos que esta apariencia se
dirige más que nada hacia la opinión pública
estadounidense, y no tanto hacia otros líderes
estatales.

La diplomática de Hillary Clinton, Madeleine

Albright, dijo que apreciaba el reconocimiento
del valor de la ONU por parte de Bush el 24 de
mayo. El hecho de que Bush está dispuesto a
fomentar las ilusiones de la población
electoral demócrata indica que existe una
unidad bipartidista.

El MIM anticipa la introducción de un

servicio militar obligatorio después de las
elecciones a menos que los iraquíes u otros
luchadores del Medio Oriente obtengan una
enorme victoria militar o a menos que haya
una desesperada lucha radical en contra del
servicio militar obligatorio durante los meses
que vienen. Por el momento paree que la
posibilidad de sacar a EE. UU. de Irak es mejor
que nunca: 1) Bush está "recibiendo palizas"
a nivel internacional y hasta cierto punto
dentro de EE.UU.; 2) Bush y Blair aparecieron
ante la ONU buscando una bendición para la
ocupación. Hay que enfatizar que si bien es

cierto que EE. UU. están recibiendo palizas
militares y latigazos verbales por parte de la
opinión pública internacional, y que pronto
Bush se enfrentará a las elecciones, es posible
que dicha búsqueda del apoyo de la ONU
tenga como su meta una consolidación de la
opinión pública estadounidense con respecto
al tema del servicio militar obligatorio. A los
imperialistas les gusta decir que ellos
"hicieron un intento" con la ONU y fallaron,
de modo que necesitan implementar un
servicio militar obligatorio. (Desde nuestro
punto de vista, no importa si el Tío Sam decide
arruinar el país mediante gastos de déficit para
expandir las fuerzas militares o implementar el
servicio militar obligatorio. De cualquier
manera el imperialismo estadounidense está
condenado a ser parte del basurero de la
historia. Cuanto más luchan los iraquíes y los
afganos, menos eficaces serán los
mercenarios que llevan a cabo
reclutamientos.)

Los imperialistas jugarán las cartas de la

ONU. Otra carta podría ser la Liga Árabe, una
asociación de lacayos gubernamentales
árabes. El 23 de mayo, los lacayos árabes
sugirieron la idea de mandar tropas a Irak como
parte de la fuerza internacional respaldada por
la ONU. (3) Un milagro diplomático llevaría
tropas árabes a Irak, y Bush podría lanzar un
grito de victoria para las elecciones de
noviembre.

Nosotros pensamos que es muy probable

que todos estos esquemas se implementen
con el fin de demostrar al público
estadounidense que Bush "hizo el intento",
y de darles a los senadores Clinton y
Lieberman las excusas que necesitan para
respaldar diseños más agresivos. Es posible
que Inglaterra sea uno de los pocos países
que se nieguen a contribuir muchas tropas a
los imperialistas estadounidenses. Un 66%
del público electoral inglés se opone a que se
manden ni siquiera 3000 tropas más a Irak. (4)
Los imperialistas estadounidenses carecen de
personal militar hasta tal grado que no son
capaces de continuar sus operaciones
ofensivas contra Irán, Siria o Corea del Norte.
Cuatro hechos sobre los movimientos de
tropas enemigas y la "estructura de sus
fuerzas" demuestran porqué la capacidad
militar de los imperialistas ha llegado al
extremo, dada la ausencia de un reclutamiento
militar obligatorio.

En primer lugar, las tres divisiones

(alrededor de 50,000 soldados) recientemente
retirados de Irak están clasificadas como "no
preparadas para luchar". (5) Hasta que no se
reemplace o se repare su armamento, en lo
cual se tardarán unos cuantos meses, estas
tropas no estarán disponibles para su uso en
el extranjero. Estas divisiones han sido
reemplazadas por reservistas y guardias
nacionales. Con menos entrenamiento y un
armamento inferior estos soldados serán
menos eficaces.

En segundo lugar, el enemigo ha tomado la

decisión de retirar sus tropas del Corea del
Sur para mandarlas a Irak, y no es para que
los soldados del frente coreano obtengan una
"auténtica" experiencia de combate. (6) La
desesperación del enemigo es suficiente para
que éste arriesgue un frente (Corea) por otro
(Irak).

En tercer lugar, EE. UU. han empezado a

buscar miembros de la Reserva Individual, en
otras palabras, soldados que durante los
últimos ocho años han estado en servicio
activo o pasivo. Están sujetos a la posibilidad
de una movilización a base de aviso, aunque
no estén pasando por un entrenamiento junto
con la guardia activa o unidades de la reserva
pasiva. (7) Si bien los funcionarios
frecuentemente se han negado a dar de baja a
personal militar en servicio activo de acuerdo
con el programa "paremos las pérdidas", una
activación de la Reserva Individual es el último
paso que el gobierno puede dar para
incrementar el número de tropas, si se evita la
introducción del servicio militar obligatorio.
En cuarto lugar, EE. UU. también están
planeando mandar a Irak sus unidades de
entrenamiento de la fuerza de oposición
("OpFor"). (8) OpFor son los mejores
soldados de las fuerzas militares. Su trabajo
consiste en entrenar nuevas unidades de
acuerdo con los estándares más altos. La
presencia de estas unidades en Irak significa
que los reclutas recién entrenados no tendrán
ni idea sobre cómo pelear, de modo que logros
a largo plazo (algunos de los mejores soldados
de las fuerzas armadas en Irak) resultan en
pérdidas a largo plazo (reclutas no entrenados
serán aplastados como moscas el año que
viene, y sus compañeros fastidiados o
indispuestos a luchar terminarán matando a
oficiales).

Estos cuatro hechos indican que EE. UU.

no tienen el personal adecuado para llevar a
cabo sus planes, lo cual implica la
introducción de un servicio militar obligatorio
después de las elecciones,
independientemente de que facción
imperialista obtenga el poder estatal. El
servicio militar obligatorio no es más que otra
forma de opresión de los jóvenes, aún en
países imperialistas. Los imperialistas
estadounidenses se han dado cuenta de que
no obtendrán apoyo material de los
imperialistas alemanes y franceses, y ni
siquiera de la ONU. Los socios de un crimen
con derechos iguales se respetan a sí mismos.
Así que EE. UU. implementarán un
reclutamiento obligatorio: los problemas
presupuestarios apuntan a la misma
posibilidad.

El capitalismo promociona una actitud de

"vivir en el momento". Este hecho envenena
el razonamiento capitalista en cuanto a la
guerra. Esta es una de las múltiples razones
por la cual el MIM tiene confianza estratégica
en el proletariado mundial. Los imperialistas
siguen cometiendo errores en esta guerra (9)
debido a una sobreestimación de su poder y

no pueden admitir la verdad- el hecho de que
su imperio está construido sobre el sudor y la
sangre de la mano de obra tercermundista
robada por los imperialistas.

Sin considerar el insano tratamiento de los

prisioneros y los abusos de los civiles
documentados en previos artículos de MIM
Notes, está claro que nuestros enemigos están
extendidos más allá de su capacidad y están
cometiendo errores. Si se suman sus cálculos
erróneos de fuerzas militares y sus
atrocidades contra el pueblo de Irak, se
obtendrá un resultado claro: los imperialistas
perderán la guerra en Irak. Cuanto antes sea
la derrota, mejor para todos nosotros.

Estos hechos confirman la predicción del

MIM de que los países imperialistas
desesperadamente necesitados de recursos
tercermundistas, terminarán expandiéndose
más allá de su capacidad e involucrándose
en difíciles guerras por recursos
tercermundistas. El enemigo está cometiendo
graves errores diarios. Pero nuestra victoria
no será rápida: desafortunadamente, los
imperialistas matarán a muchos proletarios
antes de que sus errores estratégicos se
manifiesten en sus propios países. Tenemos
que minimizar nuestras pérdidas hasta el
máximo grado posible mediante la
organización de una resistencia a la guerra.
No tarden en oponerse al imperialismo: la vida
que Uds. salven puede ser la suya.

Fuentes consultadas:
1. http://www.cnn.com/2004/

ALLPOLITICS/05/24/bush.iraq/index.html

2. http://www.cnn.com/2004/

ALLPOLITICS/05/23/senate.military/
index.html

3. http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/world/

story/0,4386,252691,00.html

4. http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/

0,12956,1224003,00.html 45%

5. 15 de mayo, 2004, por Esther Schrader

http://www.latimes.com/news/

nationworld/iraq/compl ete/la-

naready15may15,0,7845126.story?coll=lairaq-

complete
6. 19 de mayo, 2004 por JOSEPH

L.GALLOWAY Detroit Free Press http://

w w w . f r e e p . c o m / n e w s / n w /

troops19_20040519.htm

7. http://www.sltrib.com/2004/May/

05132004/utah/166102.asp

8. 24 de mayo, 2004 http://

www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/
Artic les/000/000/004/

100ctzvm.asp
9. Por Jim Lobe, Asia Times, 21 de mayo,

2004 http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/

FE21Ak02.html

Bush reitera lo mismo: es posible

un aumento de tropas en Irak