This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
Maoist Internationalist Movement

Why do you say some nationalism is still progressive?

*See also, 300 million exploited whites: where are they?
*See also, "Pan-Africanism, Pan-Arabism, Pan-Slavism and Turanian nationalism: Progressive or reactionary?"
*See also, "Against hyphen-nation"
*See also, "The national question in general"

"In wars of national liberation patriotism is applied internationalism."

Quotations of Chairman Mao, chapter 18 or "The Role of the Chinese Communist Party in the National War," October 1938, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 196.

There are three reasons that nationalism still plays a progressive role in the world in oppressed nations:

1) super-exploitation
2) semi-feudalism
3) uniting migrants with the super-exploited

When a country is super-exploited by another through a puppet comprador-lackey regime, the workers toil more exploited than ever before, because fascist regimes coerce the workers to work for the imperialist country masters for a pittance compared with the legal wages in the imperialist countries.

That is in Lenin already.

It is also in Lenin, Stalin (and even Trotsky counter to today's popular myths) and others in the 1920s that nationalism may play a positive role in uniting capitalist classes and workers against semi-feudalism. Often it is the imperialists propping up semi-feudalism and it is the nationalist masses who want to build their countries at least in a capitalist way.

See a quote from Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky on Turkey along these lines.

Finally, nationalism plays a progressive role when it causes people located inside the imperialist countries to unite with the people of their native lands that are still super-exploited.

These three reasons are also the economic content of principal contradiction in the world today --the struggle of the oppressed nations against imperialism.

When nationalism has no role to play in uniting people against backward forms of exploitation, nationalism is reactionary. That includes all imperialist country cases of nationalism. The imperialists already have the most advanced economic system and their nationalism does not drive their system forward to socialism. Quite the opposite, imperialist country nationalism supports the backwardness of the Third World and brings about endless war.

Nationalism is also reactionary when the target is other oppressed nations. The only revolutionary nationalism targets imperialism as the enemy and no oppressed nations. Stalin said: "This does not mean, of course, that the proletariat must support every national movement, everywhere and always, in every individual concrete case. It means that support must be given to such national movements as tend to weaken, to overthrow imperialism, and not to strengthen and preserve it. Cases occur when the national movements in certain oppressed countries come into conflict with the interests of the development of the proletarian movement. In such cases support is, of course, entirely out of the question."

"Foundations of Leninism," by Joseph Stalin, Works, Vol. 6, (Foreign Language Publishing House, Moscow, 1953), pp. 145-7.


 [About]  [Contact]  [Home]  [News]  [RAIL]