Whether "human nature" is good, bad or a completely bogus concept,
it does not follow that profit-run institutions will bring out the
best that our species can offer.
Most of humyn history of more than one million years has
been "primitive communist" or close to it.
Today there are still tribes found with
no experience of war or property, and there were even more such
First Nations at the time when Columbus first arrived in North America.
The Indians of North America didn't have a concept of private property,
and that's why there were conflicts with the Pilgrims. (For
sources that agree with this point, including the
U.S. Government propaganda agency that had the
usual job of countering communism, see:
http://www.salsem.ac.at/csacl/progs/AS_Modules/native.htm
http://www.wvlc.wvnet.edu/im/history/indland.html )
Hence, it is the capitalist system making people "greedy," not
a permanent biological "human nature."
Here is a story about the !Kung who still live the
same way today.
"In his 1961 book, The Heart of the Hunter,
Laurens van der Post, a South African
explorer and writer, "tells of coming across a
small !Kung tribe of about a dozen
adults and children as they crossed a
particularly hot and barren part of the desert.
"Van der post and his fellow explorers started
hunting some game so the Bushmen
could have extra food to carry on their journey
'toward the lightning on the horizon'
where the seasonal rains were beginning. The
explorers spent an entire day hunting
with their Land Rovers and provisioned the
Bushmen well for their trip.
"As the little tribe was leaving, van der Post
and his group stood to wave good-bye,
but the Bushmen simply walked off with many smiles.
No thank-you's were ever given. One of van der
Post's assistants, a hunter who'd never encountered
the Bushmen before, commented that they seemed
ungrateful and uncaring. Ben, one of
the other men in the group who understood Bushmen
culture, responded that to give another human food
and water is only good manners and is routine behavior
among the Bushmen. If the white men had been starving
on a long trek and the Bushmen
had found them, they would immediately share their
food and water, even if it
endangered their own survival. And they wouldn't
expect thanks in response. In fact,
in San Bushmen culture, to eat in front of another
person who is with out food is an immoral act,
every bit as horrific as in our culture if a person
were to walk out onto a busy city side-walk, pull
down their pants, and defecate. Everybody would be
shocked and horrified.
"For those of us who grew up in modern civilization,
it's difficult to imagine a life and culture where
such fundamental things are simply taken for granted .
When we stop behind a car at a red light, we
don't open the door and run up to the car in
front of us to thank them for following for being
so considerate as to follow the basic rules of the
road and stop for the red light—it's simply a given
that everybody does that. No thanks required. Thanking
people for doing something implies that they had
a choice to do otherwise, and did it out of a desire
to be nice. But imagine a world where feeding another
person is as much an automatic response as stopping
for a red light; a world where a person who fails to
feed or care for another is ostracized or punished,
the way we give people tickets if they run red lights;
where the care of others is more important then even
the care of yourself; where the teaching, 'All
things that you would want to do to you, do ye even
so to them,' is actually practiced—not out of effort
but as part of the daily routine, as the normal way
things are, as a basic assumption of society.
That is...the way of an Older Culture."
http://www.openmindopenheart.org/UnityArden/Earth2
|